From: Dan Carpenter
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 13:10:03 +0300
> I have come to view you as a very clever troll.
+1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
I have come to view you as a very clever troll. You will say
infuriating things like "That is an interesting background information
but the function implementation update suggestion is correct" and
pretend to not see the bug for nine emails. Then you'll say something
"Ha ha, I audited all the
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> The ipcomp_free_tfms() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then
> >> returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.
> >
> > It doesn't though...
>
> You are right that this function implementation does a bit more
>> The ipcomp_free_tfms() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then
>> returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.
>
> It doesn't though...
You are right that this function implementation does a bit more before
returning because of a detected null pointer.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 09:45:41PM +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring
> Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 21:41:26 +0100
>
> The ipcomp_free_tfms() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then
> returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.
>
It doesn't
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 09:45:41PM +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
From: Markus Elfring elfr...@users.sourceforge.net
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 21:41:26 +0100
The ipcomp_free_tfms() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then
returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not
The ipcomp_free_tfms() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then
returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.
It doesn't though...
You are right that this function implementation does a bit more before
returning because of a detected null pointer.
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
The ipcomp_free_tfms() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then
returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.
It doesn't though...
You are right that this function implementation does a bit more before
I have come to view you as a very clever troll. You will say
infuriating things like That is an interesting background information
but the function implementation update suggestion is correct and
pretend to not see the bug for nine emails. Then you'll say something
Ha ha, I audited all the call
From: Dan Carpenter dan.carpen...@oracle.com
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 13:10:03 +0300
I have come to view you as a very clever troll.
+1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
From: Markus Elfring
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 21:41:26 +0100
The ipcomp_free_tfms() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then
returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring
---
From: Markus Elfring elfr...@users.sourceforge.net
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 21:41:26 +0100
The ipcomp_free_tfms() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then
returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
12 matches
Mail list logo