Re: new generic content schemes popping up everywhere...

2001-03-13 Thread Jonathan Morton
>Indeed. The whole concept is fatally flawed; probably the biggest >challenge facing a cracker attacking this system is choosing which of the >many avenues to start with :-) > >1. The drivers. I really like displaying audio and video via my hard >drive, so I use drivers which do that... Or you

Re: new generic content schemes popping up everywhere...

2001-03-13 Thread James A. Sutherland
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Thomas Dodd wrote: > Andre Hedrick wrote: > > >From siliconvalley.com's GMSV column today: > >self-destruct if it's tampered with. The utility is enabled > >with 11 layers of security defenses, all of which must be > >successfully navigated to disable the

Re: new generic content schemes popping up everywhere...

2001-03-13 Thread Thomas Dodd
Andre Hedrick wrote: > >From siliconvalley.com's GMSV column today: >self-destruct if it's tampered with. The utility is enabled >with 11 layers of security defenses, all of which must be >successfully navigated to disable the system. These layers >range from a series of forced

new generic content schemes popping up everywhere...

2001-03-13 Thread Andre Hedrick
>From siliconvalley.com's GMSV column today: No one expects the Spanish Inquisition, "the white screen of death"" A small Texas venture with roots in the intelligence community has developed a digital copy protection scheme that it says is nearly unbeatable. Infraworks' InTether

new generic content schemes popping up everywhere...

2001-03-13 Thread Andre Hedrick
From siliconvalley.com's GMSV column today: No one expects the Spanish Inquisition, "the white screen of death"" A small Texas venture with roots in the intelligence community has developed a digital copy protection scheme that it says is nearly unbeatable. Infraworks' InTether

Re: new generic content schemes popping up everywhere...

2001-03-13 Thread Thomas Dodd
Andre Hedrick wrote: From siliconvalley.com's GMSV column today: self-destruct if it's tampered with. The utility is enabled with 11 layers of security defenses, all of which must be successfully navigated to disable the system. These layers range from a series of forced

Re: new generic content schemes popping up everywhere...

2001-03-13 Thread James A. Sutherland
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Thomas Dodd wrote: Andre Hedrick wrote: From siliconvalley.com's GMSV column today: self-destruct if it's tampered with. The utility is enabled with 11 layers of security defenses, all of which must be successfully navigated to disable the system. These

Re: new generic content schemes popping up everywhere...

2001-03-13 Thread Jonathan Morton
Indeed. The whole concept is fatally flawed; probably the biggest challenge facing a cracker attacking this system is choosing which of the many avenues to start with :-) 1. The drivers. I really like displaying audio and video via my hard drive, so I use drivers which do that... Or you could