Re: noexec=on doesn't work

2006-12-14 Thread Bill Davidsen
John Richard Moser wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm running on an Athlon 64 in 32-bit mode, running 32-bit Ubuntu with kernel 2.6.19 (Ubuntu version 2.6.19-7-generic for the curious; compiled for 586). Apparently, 'noexec=on' on the kernel command line does nothing; the

Re: noexec=on doesn't work

2006-12-14 Thread Bill Davidsen
John Richard Moser wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm running on an Athlon 64 in 32-bit mode, running 32-bit Ubuntu with kernel 2.6.19 (Ubuntu version 2.6.19-7-generic for the curious; compiled for 586). Apparently, 'noexec=on' on the kernel command line does nothing; the

Re: noexec=on doesn't work

2006-12-11 Thread John Richard Moser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Eric Piel wrote: > 12/09/2006 09:03 PM, Kyle McMartin wrote/a écrit: >> On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 02:34:47PM -0500, John Richard Moser wrote: >>> I have filed this as a distro bug with Ubuntu; it may be their issue, I >>> haven't dug deep enough to

Re: noexec=on doesn't work

2006-12-11 Thread Eric Piel
12/09/2006 09:03 PM, Kyle McMartin wrote/a écrit: On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 02:34:47PM -0500, John Richard Moser wrote: I have filed this as a distro bug with Ubuntu; it may be their issue, I haven't dug deep enough to find out. I am posting this here to disperse the information breadth-first

Re: noexec=on doesn't work

2006-12-11 Thread Eric Piel
12/09/2006 09:03 PM, Kyle McMartin wrote/a écrit: On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 02:34:47PM -0500, John Richard Moser wrote: I have filed this as a distro bug with Ubuntu; it may be their issue, I haven't dug deep enough to find out. I am posting this here to disperse the information breadth-first

Re: noexec=on doesn't work

2006-12-11 Thread John Richard Moser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Eric Piel wrote: 12/09/2006 09:03 PM, Kyle McMartin wrote/a écrit: On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 02:34:47PM -0500, John Richard Moser wrote: I have filed this as a distro bug with Ubuntu; it may be their issue, I haven't dug deep enough to find out.

Re: noexec=on doesn't work

2006-12-09 Thread John Richard Moser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kyle McMartin wrote: > On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 02:34:47PM -0500, John Richard Moser wrote: >> I have filed this as a distro bug with Ubuntu; it may be their issue, I >> haven't dug deep enough to find out. I am posting this here to disperse >> the

Re: noexec=on doesn't work

2006-12-09 Thread Kyle McMartin
On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 02:34:47PM -0500, John Richard Moser wrote: > I have filed this as a distro bug with Ubuntu; it may be their issue, I > haven't dug deep enough to find out. I am posting this here to disperse > the information breadth-first instead of depth-first, which will shorten > the

noexec=on doesn't work

2006-12-09 Thread John Richard Moser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm running on an Athlon 64 in 32-bit mode, running 32-bit Ubuntu with kernel 2.6.19 (Ubuntu version 2.6.19-7-generic for the curious; compiled for 586). Apparently, 'noexec=on' on the kernel command line does nothing; the NX bit seems to not work.

noexec=on doesn't work

2006-12-09 Thread John Richard Moser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm running on an Athlon 64 in 32-bit mode, running 32-bit Ubuntu with kernel 2.6.19 (Ubuntu version 2.6.19-7-generic for the curious; compiled for 586). Apparently, 'noexec=on' on the kernel command line does nothing; the NX bit seems to not work.

Re: noexec=on doesn't work

2006-12-09 Thread Kyle McMartin
On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 02:34:47PM -0500, John Richard Moser wrote: I have filed this as a distro bug with Ubuntu; it may be their issue, I haven't dug deep enough to find out. I am posting this here to disperse the information breadth-first instead of depth-first, which will shorten the

Re: noexec=on doesn't work

2006-12-09 Thread John Richard Moser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kyle McMartin wrote: On Sat, Dec 09, 2006 at 02:34:47PM -0500, John Richard Moser wrote: I have filed this as a distro bug with Ubuntu; it may be their issue, I haven't dug deep enough to find out. I am posting this here to disperse the