On Thu, 22 Mar 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 03:42:27PM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
> A year ago, I may have agreed with you. However, Linus not only veto'd
> it but
> stamped on it repeatadly at VM Summit. He couldn't have made it clearer
> if
> he wore a t-shirt a hat
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 03:42:27PM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
A year ago, I may have agreed with you. However, Linus not only veto'd
it but
stamped on it repeatadly at VM Summit. He couldn't have made it clearer
if
he wore a t-shirt a hat and
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 03:42:27PM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
> A year ago, I may have agreed with you. However, Linus not only veto'd it but
> stamped on it repeatadly at VM Summit. He couldn't have made it clearer if
> he wore a t-shirt a hat and held up a neon sign. The assertion at the time
>
On (22/03/07 10:38), Christoph Hellwig didst pronounce:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 02:43:48PM -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
> > The main reason I am advocating a set of pagetable_operations is to
> > enable the development of a new hugetlb interface. During the hugetlb
> > BOFS at OLS last year, we
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 02:43:48PM -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
> The main reason I am advocating a set of pagetable_operations is to
> enable the development of a new hugetlb interface. During the hugetlb
> BOFS at OLS last year, we talked about a character device that would
> behave like /dev/zero.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 02:43:48PM -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
The main reason I am advocating a set of pagetable_operations is to
enable the development of a new hugetlb interface. During the hugetlb
BOFS at OLS last year, we talked about a character device that would
behave like /dev/zero.
On (22/03/07 10:38), Christoph Hellwig didst pronounce:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 02:43:48PM -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
The main reason I am advocating a set of pagetable_operations is to
enable the development of a new hugetlb interface. During the hugetlb
BOFS at OLS last year, we talked
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 03:42:27PM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
A year ago, I may have agreed with you. However, Linus not only veto'd it but
stamped on it repeatadly at VM Summit. He couldn't have made it clearer if
he wore a t-shirt a hat and held up a neon sign. The assertion at the time
was
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 04:35:28PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 03:26:59PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> >> My exit strategy was to make hugetlbfs an alias for ramfs when ramfs
> >> acquired the necessary functionality until expand-on-mmap() was merged.
>
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 03:26:59PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> My exit strategy was to make hugetlbfs an alias for ramfs when ramfs
>> acquired the necessary functionality until expand-on-mmap() was merged.
>> That would've allowed rm -rf fs/hugetlbfs/ outright. A compatibility
>>
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 03:26:59PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:43:48 CDT, Adam Litke said:
> >> The main reason I am advocating a set of pagetable_operations is to
> >> enable the development of a new hugetlb interface.
>
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 03:51:31PM
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:43:48 CDT, Adam Litke said:
>> The main reason I am advocating a set of pagetable_operations is to
>> enable the development of a new hugetlb interface.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 03:51:31PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Do you have an exit strategy for the *old*
On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 15:51 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:43:48 CDT, Adam Litke said:
> > The main reason I am advocating a set of pagetable_operations is to
> > enable the development of a new hugetlb interface.
>
> Do you have an exit strategy for the *old* interface?
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:43:48 CDT, Adam Litke said:
> The main reason I am advocating a set of pagetable_operations is to
> enable the development of a new hugetlb interface.
Do you have an exit strategy for the *old* interface?
pgpY6RsCOPJvi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
The main reason I am advocating a set of pagetable_operations is to
enable the development of a new hugetlb interface. During the hugetlb
BOFS at OLS last year, we talked about a character device that would
behave like /dev/zero. Many of the people were talking about how they
just wanted to
The main reason I am advocating a set of pagetable_operations is to
enable the development of a new hugetlb interface. During the hugetlb
BOFS at OLS last year, we talked about a character device that would
behave like /dev/zero. Many of the people were talking about how they
just wanted to
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:43:48 CDT, Adam Litke said:
The main reason I am advocating a set of pagetable_operations is to
enable the development of a new hugetlb interface.
Do you have an exit strategy for the *old* interface?
pgpY6RsCOPJvi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 15:51 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:43:48 CDT, Adam Litke said:
The main reason I am advocating a set of pagetable_operations is to
enable the development of a new hugetlb interface.
Do you have an exit strategy for the *old* interface?
Not
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:43:48 CDT, Adam Litke said:
The main reason I am advocating a set of pagetable_operations is to
enable the development of a new hugetlb interface.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 03:51:31PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you have an exit strategy for the *old* interface?
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 03:26:59PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:43:48 CDT, Adam Litke said:
The main reason I am advocating a set of pagetable_operations is to
enable the development of a new hugetlb interface.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 03:51:31PM -0400, [EMAIL
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 03:26:59PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
My exit strategy was to make hugetlbfs an alias for ramfs when ramfs
acquired the necessary functionality until expand-on-mmap() was merged.
That would've allowed rm -rf fs/hugetlbfs/ outright. A compatibility
wrapper for
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 04:35:28PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 03:26:59PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
My exit strategy was to make hugetlbfs an alias for ramfs when ramfs
acquired the necessary functionality until expand-on-mmap() was merged.
That
22 matches
Mail list logo
