On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 08:53:51AM +0200, Jean Pihet wrote:
> Hi Jiri,
>
>
> On 5 October 2014 20:24, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 07:48:01PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> >> Top-posting on purpose:
> >>
> >> Btw, jolsa, if you get your LCE proposal for the perf splitting
> >>
Em Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 04:02:29PM +0200, Borislav Petkov escreveu:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 10:55:31AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > So you say that if we change a method, say, perf_evlist__open() to
> > accept a new argument, or change the type of one of its arguments,
> > with a go
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 10:55:31AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> So you say that if we change a method, say, perf_evlist__open() to
> accept a new argument, or change the type of one of its arguments,
> with a good reason, it is acceptable and with just a change in the
> README explainin
Em Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 03:49:12PM +0200, Borislav Petkov escreveu:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 10:40:21AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Right, we now should always think that the great advantage of having
> > this code and its users in the same repo tree is going away, i.e. we
> > will
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 10:40:21AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Right, we now should always think that the great advantage of having
> this code and its users in the same repo tree is going away, i.e. we
> will not be able to improve the code by fixing mistakes that require
> changing i
Em Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 01:23:42PM +0200, Borislav Petkov escreveu:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 06:22:43PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > My preference would be for single object files, but the pressure to have
> > a written in stone library seems to just build up...
> Yeah, I think if
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 06:22:43PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> My preference would be for single object files, but the pressure to have
> a written in stone library seems to just build up...
Yeah, I think if we have an alternative way to easily integrate that
functionality into extern
Em Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 09:53:49PM +0200, Borislav Petkov escreveu:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 04:12:27PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Right, and it is being a great exercise, thanks for the patience so far
> > ;-)
>
> I know, this is your secret agenda to keep me at bay working on th
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 04:12:27PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Right, and it is being a great exercise, thanks for the patience so far
> ;-)
I know, this is your secret agenda to keep me at bay working on this! :-P
> Looking at those ifdefs we see things that are specific to tools/pe
Em Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 05:16:06PM +0200, Borislav Petkov escreveu:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 12:07:41PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > So, why have you commented out the perf_missing_features fallbacks? Are
> > they getting in the way somehow, what can we do upstream, i.e. in
> > tools
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 12:07:41PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> So, why have you commented out the perf_missing_features fallbacks? Are
> they getting in the way somehow, what can we do upstream, i.e. in
> tools/perf/util/ so that it gets closer to what you want to have?
>
> Ditto for
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 12:08:38PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 05:01:47PM +0200, Borislav Petkov escreveu:
> > On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 11:58:56AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Agreed, we can use rasd as a reference, I'm now looking for the git rep
Em Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 05:01:47PM +0200, Borislav Petkov escreveu:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 11:58:56AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Agreed, we can use rasd as a reference, I'm now looking for the git repo
> > url to see what it is using to prototype how I think this should be
> > do
Em Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:06:21AM +0200, Jean Pihet escreveu:
> The RAS Deamon (rasd) as available at [1] and the development version
> at [2], allows to enable kernel tracepoints and outputs the
> tracepoints fields according to the kernel format.
>
> [1] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/utils/ras/ra
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 11:58:56AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Agreed, we can use rasd as a reference, I'm now looking for the git repo
> url to see what it is using to prototype how I think this should be
> done.
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/utils/ras/rasd.git
--
Regards/Gruss,
Hi Arnaldo,
On 6 October 2014 16:58, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 11:07:26AM +0200, Robert Richter escreveu:
>> On 30.09.14 10:24:16, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> > Em Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:06:21AM +0200, Jean Pihet escreveu:
>> > > The plan is to move the sma
Em Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 11:07:26AM +0200, Robert Richter escreveu:
> On 30.09.14 10:24:16, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:06:21AM +0200, Jean Pihet escreveu:
> > > The plan is to move the small and generic functions first: util,
> > > xyarray, cpumap, thread_map etc;
Hi,
On 6 October 2014 11:07, Robert Richter wrote:
> On 30.09.14 10:24:16, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> Em Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:06:21AM +0200, Jean Pihet escreveu:
>> > The plan is to move the small and generic functions first: util,
>> > xyarray, cpumap, thread_map etc; then evlist, evs
On 30.09.14 10:24:16, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:06:21AM +0200, Jean Pihet escreveu:
> > The plan is to move the small and generic functions first: util,
> > xyarray, cpumap, thread_map etc; then evlist, evsel, trace-event,
> > trace-event-parse; and finally integr
Hi Jiri,
On 5 October 2014 20:24, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 07:48:01PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> Top-posting on purpose:
>>
>> Btw, jolsa, if you get your LCE proposal for the perf splitting
>> approved, please post the time here so people can come.
>
> yep, it got accept
On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 02:24:01PM -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Oct 2014 20:24:42 +0200
> Jiri Olsa wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 07:48:01PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > Top-posting on purpose:
> > >
> > > Btw, jolsa, if you get your LCE proposal for the perf splitting
>
On Sun, 5 Oct 2014 20:24:42 +0200
Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 07:48:01PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > Top-posting on purpose:
> >
> > Btw, jolsa, if you get your LCE proposal for the perf splitting
> > approved, please post the time here so people can come.
>
> yep, it got a
On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 08:24:42PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 07:48:01PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > Top-posting on purpose:
> >
> > Btw, jolsa, if you get your LCE proposal for the perf splitting
> > approved, please post the time here so people can come.
>
> yep, it
On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 07:48:01PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Top-posting on purpose:
>
> Btw, jolsa, if you get your LCE proposal for the perf splitting
> approved, please post the time here so people can come.
yep, it got accepted, ther schedule is:
Friday, October 17, 2014 from 9:00am –
Top-posting on purpose:
Btw, jolsa, if you get your LCE proposal for the perf splitting
approved, please post the time here so people can come.
Thanks.
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:24:16AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:06:21AM +0200, Jean Pihet escreveu:
> > T
Em Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:06:21AM +0200, Jean Pihet escreveu:
> The RAS Deamon (rasd) as available at [1] and the development version
> at [2], allows to enable kernel tracepoints and outputs the
> tracepoints fields according to the kernel format.
>
> [1] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/utils/ras/ra
The RAS Deamon (rasd) as available at [1] and the development version
at [2], allows to enable kernel tracepoints and outputs the
tracepoints fields according to the kernel format.
[1] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/utils/ras/rasd.git/
[2] https://git.linaro.org/people/jean.pihet/rasd.git
rasd curre
27 matches
Mail list logo
