OK.
On 2017/8/14 18:58, Thomas-Mich Richter wrote:
On 08/14/2017 12:30 PM, Wangnan (F) wrote:
Hi Thomas,
Your patch looks good to me. I've tested in my environment and it works.
Please resend it to lkml and let Arnaldo to collect it.
Thank you.
Will do, I take this as an Acked-by and
OK.
On 2017/8/14 18:58, Thomas-Mich Richter wrote:
On 08/14/2017 12:30 PM, Wangnan (F) wrote:
Hi Thomas,
Your patch looks good to me. I've tested in my environment and it works.
Please resend it to lkml and let Arnaldo to collect it.
Thank you.
Will do, I take this as an Acked-by and
On 08/14/2017 12:30 PM, Wangnan (F) wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Your patch looks good to me. I've tested in my environment and it works.
> Please resend it to lkml and let Arnaldo to collect it.
>
> Thank you.
>
Will do, I take this as an Acked-by and Tested-by, ok?
Thanks
--
Thomas Richter,
On 08/14/2017 12:30 PM, Wangnan (F) wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Your patch looks good to me. I've tested in my environment and it works.
> Please resend it to lkml and let Arnaldo to collect it.
>
> Thank you.
>
Will do, I take this as an Acked-by and Tested-by, ok?
Thanks
--
Thomas Richter,
Hi Thomas,
Your patch looks good to me. I've tested in my environment and it works.
Please resend it to lkml and let Arnaldo to collect it.
Thank you.
On 2017/8/14 17:47, Thomas Richter wrote:
Perf BPF prologue generator unconditionally fetches 8 bytes for function
parameters, which causes
Hi Thomas,
Your patch looks good to me. I've tested in my environment and it works.
Please resend it to lkml and let Arnaldo to collect it.
Thank you.
On 2017/8/14 17:47, Thomas Richter wrote:
Perf BPF prologue generator unconditionally fetches 8 bytes for function
parameters, which causes
6 matches
Mail list logo