Em Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 02:55:53PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 01:45:21PM -0800, Matthias Kaehlcke escreveu:
> > El Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 01:57:56PM -0600 Josh Poimboeuf ha dit:
> > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 04:34:25PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>
Em Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 02:55:53PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 01:45:21PM -0800, Matthias Kaehlcke escreveu:
> > El Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 01:57:56PM -0600 Josh Poimboeuf ha dit:
> > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 04:34:25PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>
Em Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 01:45:21PM -0800, Matthias Kaehlcke escreveu:
> El Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 01:57:56PM -0600 Josh Poimboeuf ha dit:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 04:34:25PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:11:56AM -0800, Yonghong Song escreveu:
> > > >
Em Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 01:45:21PM -0800, Matthias Kaehlcke escreveu:
> El Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 01:57:56PM -0600 Josh Poimboeuf ha dit:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 04:34:25PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:11:56AM -0800, Yonghong Song escreveu:
> > > >
On 11/27/17 1:45 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
El Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 01:57:56PM -0600 Josh Poimboeuf ha dit:
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 04:34:25PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:11:56AM -0800, Yonghong Song escreveu:
On 11/27/17 9:04 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de
On 11/27/17 1:45 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
El Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 01:57:56PM -0600 Josh Poimboeuf ha dit:
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 04:34:25PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:11:56AM -0800, Yonghong Song escreveu:
On 11/27/17 9:04 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de
El Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 01:57:56PM -0600 Josh Poimboeuf ha dit:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 04:34:25PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:11:56AM -0800, Yonghong Song escreveu:
> > > On 11/27/17 9:04 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > > Em Fri, Nov 24, 2017
El Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 01:57:56PM -0600 Josh Poimboeuf ha dit:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 04:34:25PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:11:56AM -0800, Yonghong Song escreveu:
> > > On 11/27/17 9:04 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > > Em Fri, Nov 24, 2017
Em Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 04:34:25PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> So, I noticed that any maps are failing, I'll go dig, but may be some
> new security tightening, even running as root, this was working
> recently, was even part of our discussion on the bpf_probe_read_str()
> trouble
Em Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 04:34:25PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> So, I noticed that any maps are failing, I'll go dig, but may be some
> new security tightening, even running as root, this was working
> recently, was even part of our discussion on the bpf_probe_read_str()
> trouble
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 04:34:25PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:11:56AM -0800, Yonghong Song escreveu:
> > On 11/27/17 9:04 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 04:16:52PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann escreveu:
> > > > [ +Yonghong ]
> >
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 04:34:25PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:11:56AM -0800, Yonghong Song escreveu:
> > On 11/27/17 9:04 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 04:16:52PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann escreveu:
> > > > [ +Yonghong ]
> >
Em Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:11:56AM -0800, Yonghong Song escreveu:
> On 11/27/17 9:04 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 04:16:52PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann escreveu:
> > > [ +Yonghong ]
> >
> > + Josh
> > > On 11/24/2017 03:47 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > >
Em Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 11:11:56AM -0800, Yonghong Song escreveu:
> On 11/27/17 9:04 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 04:16:52PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann escreveu:
> > > [ +Yonghong ]
> >
> > + Josh
> > > On 11/24/2017 03:47 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > >
On 11/27/17 9:04 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 04:16:52PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann escreveu:
[ +Yonghong ]
+ Josh
On 11/24/2017 03:47 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
FYI, just noticed, recently updated clang to version 6, from its
upstream git repo.
Do
On 11/27/17 9:04 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 04:16:52PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann escreveu:
[ +Yonghong ]
+ Josh
On 11/24/2017 03:47 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
FYI, just noticed, recently updated clang to version 6, from its
upstream git repo.
Do
Em Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 04:16:52PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann escreveu:
> [ +Yonghong ]
+ Josh
> On 11/24/2017 03:47 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > FYI, just noticed, recently updated clang to version 6, from its
> > upstream git repo.
>
> Do you recall what was your LLVM version prior to
Em Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 04:16:52PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann escreveu:
> [ +Yonghong ]
+ Josh
> On 11/24/2017 03:47 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > FYI, just noticed, recently updated clang to version 6, from its
> > upstream git repo.
>
> Do you recall what was your LLVM version prior to
On 11/24/17 11:09 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 04:16:52PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann escreveu:
[ +Yonghong ]
On 11/24/2017 03:47 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
FYI, just noticed, recently updated clang to version 6, from its
upstream git repo.
Do you recall
On 11/24/17 11:09 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 04:16:52PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann escreveu:
[ +Yonghong ]
On 11/24/2017 03:47 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
FYI, just noticed, recently updated clang to version 6, from its
upstream git repo.
Do you recall
Em Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 04:16:52PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann escreveu:
> [ +Yonghong ]
>
> On 11/24/2017 03:47 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > FYI, just noticed, recently updated clang to version 6, from its
> > upstream git repo.
>
> Do you recall what was your LLVM version prior to this
Em Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 04:16:52PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann escreveu:
> [ +Yonghong ]
>
> On 11/24/2017 03:47 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > FYI, just noticed, recently updated clang to version 6, from its
> > upstream git repo.
>
> Do you recall what was your LLVM version prior to this
[ +Yonghong ]
On 11/24/2017 03:47 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> FYI, just noticed, recently updated clang to version 6, from its
> upstream git repo.
Do you recall what was your LLVM version prior to this where it was
working fine? (Wild guess from below would be the BPF inline asm
[ +Yonghong ]
On 11/24/2017 03:47 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> FYI, just noticed, recently updated clang to version 6, from its
> upstream git repo.
Do you recall what was your LLVM version prior to this where it was
working fine? (Wild guess from below would be the BPF inline asm
FYI, just noticed, recently updated clang to version 6, from its
upstream git repo.
root@jouet ~]# perf test -v LLVM
37: LLVM search and compile :
37.1: Basic BPF llvm compile :
--- start ---
test child forked, pid 5255
Kernel build dir
FYI, just noticed, recently updated clang to version 6, from its
upstream git repo.
root@jouet ~]# perf test -v LLVM
37: LLVM search and compile :
37.1: Basic BPF llvm compile :
--- start ---
test child forked, pid 5255
Kernel build dir
26 matches
Mail list logo