Re: put/get_module_symbol vs. inter_module_register/put/get/etc.

On Fri, 1 Dec 2000 10:52:35 -0800 (PST), Al Peat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've followed the thread on "Persistent module >storage" but haven't come across a general explanation >of the changes to the inter-module symbol stuff >between 2.4test10 and test11. Anyone care to comment >on the

put/get_module_symbol vs. inter_module_register/put/get/etc.

I've followed the thread on "Persistent module storage" but haven't come across a general explanation of the changes to the inter-module symbol stuff between 2.4test10 and test11. Anyone care to comment on the differences or on whether this is going to be a stable API for 2.4 (it won't be

put/get_module_symbol vs. inter_module_register/put/get/etc.

I've followed the thread on "Persistent module storage" but haven't come across a general explanation of the changes to the inter-module symbol stuff between 2.4test10 and test11. Anyone care to comment on the differences or on whether this is going to be a stable API for 2.4 (it won't be

Re: put/get_module_symbol vs. inter_module_register/put/get/etc.

On Fri, 1 Dec 2000 10:52:35 -0800 (PST), Al Peat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've followed the thread on "Persistent module storage" but haven't come across a general explanation of the changes to the inter-module symbol stuff between 2.4test10 and test11. Anyone care to comment on the