Re: regression(?): starting with 2.6.21 sending packets became broken.

2007-10-28 Thread Peter Volkov
ion. I think may be it's good idea to mark that patch as questionable on site? === vlad031 answer on linuximq mailing list=== Re: regression(?): starting with 2.6.21 sending packets became broken We allready know that ... almos

Re: regression(?): starting with 2.6.21 sending packets became broken.

2007-10-28 Thread Peter Volkov
that patch as questionable on site? === vlad031 answer on linuximq mailing list=== Re: regression(?): starting with 2.6.21 sending packets became broken We allready know that ... almost everybody does ... that's why we have

Re: regression(?): starting with 2.6.21 sending packets became broken.

2007-10-13 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:35:25 +0200 (CEST) Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Oct 13 2007 19:59, David wrote: > >Try > > > >echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_window_scaling > > > >I bet you have broken router(s) between your machine and the problem > >site(s). > > There is an

Re: regression(?): starting with 2.6.21 sending packets became broken.

2007-10-13 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Oct 13 2007 19:59, David wrote: >Try > >echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_window_scaling > >I bet you have broken router(s) between your machine and the problem >site(s). There is an xt_TCPOPTSTRIP module in the works that allows you to strip Window Scaling only on the connections you want

Re: regression(?): starting with 2.6.21 sending packets became broken.

2007-10-13 Thread David
Peter Volkov wrote: > Hello, all on the list. > > Please CC me in answers, I'm not subscribed. Please, if this is wrong > list tell me what is correct. > > Starting with 2.6.21 (or may be 2.6.20 as I have not tried it) kernel I > have problem that most tcp based services freeze at some point of >

regression(?): starting with 2.6.21 sending packets became broken.

2007-10-13 Thread Peter Volkov
Hello, all on the list. Please CC me in answers, I'm not subscribed. Please, if this is wrong list tell me what is correct. Starting with 2.6.21 (or may be 2.6.20 as I have not tried it) kernel I have problem that most tcp based services freeze at some point of operation. I've noticed this first

regression(?): starting with 2.6.21 sending packets became broken.

2007-10-13 Thread Peter Volkov
Hello, all on the list. Please CC me in answers, I'm not subscribed. Please, if this is wrong list tell me what is correct. Starting with 2.6.21 (or may be 2.6.20 as I have not tried it) kernel I have problem that most tcp based services freeze at some point of operation. I've noticed this first

Re: regression(?): starting with 2.6.21 sending packets became broken.

2007-10-13 Thread David
Peter Volkov wrote: Hello, all on the list. Please CC me in answers, I'm not subscribed. Please, if this is wrong list tell me what is correct. Starting with 2.6.21 (or may be 2.6.20 as I have not tried it) kernel I have problem that most tcp based services freeze at some point of

Re: regression(?): starting with 2.6.21 sending packets became broken.

2007-10-13 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Oct 13 2007 19:59, David wrote: Try echo 0 /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_window_scaling I bet you have broken router(s) between your machine and the problem site(s). There is an xt_TCPOPTSTRIP module in the works that allows you to strip Window Scaling only on the connections you want (rather

Re: regression(?): starting with 2.6.21 sending packets became broken.

2007-10-13 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:35:25 +0200 (CEST) Jan Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Oct 13 2007 19:59, David wrote: Try echo 0 /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_window_scaling I bet you have broken router(s) between your machine and the problem site(s). There is an xt_TCPOPTSTRIP module in