On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 06:18:46PM -0800, David wrote:
> > Well, I run glibc-2.2.1 as well, so that might be one of the factors
> > contributing to this. Then again, glibc-2.2.1 with ext2 does not cause any
> > problems whatsoever with mozilla. So it could be that reiserfs + glibc-2.2.1 is
> > a b
> Minor nit, but I'd rather clear it up now. Which distribution you run
> doesn't matter for debugging. What does matter is that we've got known
> problems with a given compiler, and that compiler goes by a few different
> flavors with the same version number. Since there are known problems, if
>
> Well, I run glibc-2.2.1 as well, so that might be one of the factors
> contributing to this. Then again, glibc-2.2.1 with ext2 does not cause any
> problems whatsoever with mozilla. So it could be that reiserfs + glibc-2.2.1 is
> a bad combination, question remains which of these two is the culp
On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 05:47:49PM -0800, David wrote:
> I can say "me too" for this. I thought it was perhaps glibc or binutils
> tho. I only have reiserfs systems now so I don't have a basis for
> comparison.
>
> However I -can- say that I didn't experience this until I put glibc
> 2.2.1 o
I can say "me too" for this. I thought it was perhaps glibc or binutils
tho. I only have reiserfs systems now so I don't have a basis for
comparison.
However I -can- say that I didn't experience this until I put glibc
2.2.1 on my systems. I do use an "approved" gcc, stock 2.95.2.
I wouldn'
On Sun, Feb 18, 2001 at 01:57:15AM +0100, Frank de Lange wrote:
> I will retry this with 'all warnings and bells and whistles' turned on in
> reiserfs (on 2.4.1-ac18), and see if anything out of the ordinary is logged. I
> somehow doubt it, since repeated forced reiserfsck's have turned up nothing
> At least the patch didn't make it worse. Would anyone care to comment on
> how the elf-dynstr-gc option changes the file access patterns for the
> compile?
It does not change the file access patterns, it adds an extra step. A separate
binary (dist/bin/elf-dynstr-gc, a convoluted version of s
> That's not good. Which compiler did you use to compile the kernel? This
> sounds lame, but reiserfs exercises the cpu/mem more than ext2, so we hit
> bad ram more often. If we run out of other things to try, please run a
> memory tester.
I use 'good old' gcc 2.95.2:
gcc -v: gcc version 2.95.2
Hi'all,
Well, subject says it all... When I try to compile mozilla (CVS version) with
the '--enable-elf-dynstr-gc' option, the compile fails with a segfault:
../../dist/bin/elf-dynstr-gc ../../dist/lib/components/libsample.so
make[2]: *** [install] Segmentation fault (core dumped)
compiling the
9 matches
Mail list logo
