On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 5:37 AM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 07:07:01PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am getting the following reports while running syzkaller fuzzer:
>>
>> [ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
>> 4.9.0+ #85 Not
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 5:37 AM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 07:07:01PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am getting the following reports while running syzkaller fuzzer:
>>
>> [ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
>> 4.9.0+ #85 Not tainted
>>
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 07:07:01PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am getting the following reports while running syzkaller fuzzer:
>
> [ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
> 4.9.0+ #85 Not tainted
> ---
> ./include/linux/rhashtable.h:572 suspicious
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 07:07:01PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am getting the following reports while running syzkaller fuzzer:
>
> [ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
> 4.9.0+ #85 Not tainted
> ---
> ./include/linux/rhashtable.h:572 suspicious
Hello,
I am getting the following reports while running syzkaller fuzzer:
[ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
4.9.0+ #85 Not tainted
---
./include/linux/rhashtable.h:572 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
other info that might help us debug this:
Hello,
I am getting the following reports while running syzkaller fuzzer:
[ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
4.9.0+ #85 Not tainted
---
./include/linux/rhashtable.h:572 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
other info that might help us debug this:
6 matches
Mail list logo