Re: sparc compile error

2008-02-10 Thread Robert Reif
David Rientjes wrote: Please try Linus' latest git that includes 60c12b12 (from yesterday) that fixes this issue. I get this with latest git: CC init/do_mounts.o In file included from include/linux/mm.h:39, from include/linux/memcontrol.h:24, from

Re: sparc compile error

2008-02-10 Thread David Rientjes
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008, Martin Habets wrote: > This still gives build errors with CGROUP_MEM_CONT off. > Some ifdef-ing will fix that. > Please try Linus' latest git that includes 60c12b12 (from yesterday) that fixes this issue. David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the

Re: sparc compile error

2008-02-10 Thread Martin Habets
This still gives build errors with CGROUP_MEM_CONT off. Some ifdef-ing will fix that. Martin Signed-off-by: Martin Habets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Index: sparc-2.6.git/mm/rmap.c === --- sparc-2.6.git.orig/mm/rmap.c

Re: sparc compile error

2008-02-10 Thread Martin Habets
This still gives build errors with CGROUP_MEM_CONT off. Some ifdef-ing will fix that. Martin Signed-off-by: Martin Habets [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: sparc-2.6.git/mm/rmap.c === --- sparc-2.6.git.orig/mm/rmap.c

Re: sparc compile error

2008-02-10 Thread David Rientjes
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008, Martin Habets wrote: This still gives build errors with CGROUP_MEM_CONT off. Some ifdef-ing will fix that. Please try Linus' latest git that includes 60c12b12 (from yesterday) that fixes this issue. David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: sparc compile error

2008-02-10 Thread Robert Reif
David Rientjes wrote: Please try Linus' latest git that includes 60c12b12 (from yesterday) that fixes this issue. I get this with latest git: CC init/do_mounts.o In file included from include/linux/mm.h:39, from include/linux/memcontrol.h:24, from

Re: sparc compile error

2008-02-07 Thread David Rientjes
3062fc67 introduced far too many build errors for the convenience it allows. It's not even always necessary to rcu deference mm->mem_cgroup in the first place, so we'll use it on a case by case basis. Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- include/linux/memcontrol.h | 13

sparc compile error

2008-02-07 Thread Adrian Bunk
Commit 3062fc67dad01b1d2a15d58c709eff946389eca4 broke sparc: <-- snip --> ... CC init/do_mounts.o In file included from include/linux/mm.h:39, from include/linux/memcontrol.h:24, from include/linux/swap.h:8, from

sparc compile error

2008-02-07 Thread Adrian Bunk
Commit 3062fc67dad01b1d2a15d58c709eff946389eca4 broke sparc: -- snip -- ... CC init/do_mounts.o In file included from include/linux/mm.h:39, from include/linux/memcontrol.h:24, from include/linux/swap.h:8, from

Re: sparc compile error

2008-02-07 Thread David Rientjes
3062fc67 introduced far too many build errors for the convenience it allows. It's not even always necessary to rcu deference mm-mem_cgroup in the first place, so we'll use it on a case by case basis. Signed-off-by: David Rientjes [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- include/linux/memcontrol.h | 13

Re: sparc compile error caused by x86 arch updates

2008-01-31 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Adrian, could you please check whether latest x86.git: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-x86.git > > > > resolves the Sparc build failure you were seeing? All known issues > > are fixed in it. (let me know if you

Re: sparc compile error caused by x86 arch updates

2008-01-31 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 06:43:31PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > But I guess I overlooked the comment... > > > > I guess the fix is to scatter linux/pagemap.h into the appropriate > > places where these macros are used (asm-generic/tlb.h,

Re: sparc compile error caused by x86 arch updates

2008-01-31 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Ingo Molnar wrote: * Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: But I guess I overlooked the comment... I guess the fix is to scatter linux/pagemap.h into the appropriate places where these macros are used (asm-generic/tlb.h, for a start). no. The fix is always to undo the

Re: sparc compile error caused by x86 arch updates

2008-01-31 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But I guess I overlooked the comment... > > I guess the fix is to scatter linux/pagemap.h into the appropriate > places where these macros are used (asm-generic/tlb.h, for a start). no. The fix is always to undo the damage ASAP, to keep the

Re: sparc compile error caused by x86 arch updates

2008-01-31 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Adrian Bunk wrote: On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 05:15:23PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 05:00:33PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You tested x86 but broke more than half a

sparc compile error caused by x86 arch updates

2008-01-31 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 05:15:23PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 05:00:33PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > * Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > You tested x86 but broke more than half a dozen other

Re: sparc compile error caused by x86 arch updates

2008-01-31 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Adrian Bunk wrote: On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 05:15:23PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 05:00:33PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You tested x86 but broke more than half a dozen

sparc compile error caused by x86 arch updates

2008-01-31 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 05:15:23PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 05:00:33PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You tested x86 but broke more than half a dozen other archtectures,

Re: sparc compile error caused by x86 arch updates

2008-01-31 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But I guess I overlooked the comment... I guess the fix is to scatter linux/pagemap.h into the appropriate places where these macros are used (asm-generic/tlb.h, for a start). no. The fix is always to undo the damage ASAP, to keep the window

Re: sparc compile error caused by x86 arch updates

2008-01-31 Thread Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Ingo Molnar wrote: * Jeremy Fitzhardinge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But I guess I overlooked the comment... I guess the fix is to scatter linux/pagemap.h into the appropriate places where these macros are used (asm-generic/tlb.h, for a start). no. The fix is always to undo the damage

Re: sparc compile error caused by x86 arch updates

2008-01-31 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 06:43:31PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Jeremy Fitzhardinge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But I guess I overlooked the comment... I guess the fix is to scatter linux/pagemap.h into the appropriate places where these macros are used (asm-generic/tlb.h, for a start).

Re: sparc compile error caused by x86 arch updates

2008-01-31 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Adrian, could you please check whether latest x86.git: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-x86.git resolves the Sparc build failure you were seeing? All known issues are fixed in it. (let me know if you know about

[PATCH 1/1] Char: mxser_new, fix sparc compile error

2007-01-12 Thread Jiri Slaby
mxser_new, fix sparc compile error On sparc B400 is not defined. Use B200 for special baudrate, which is defined on all platforms. Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- commit 2826e3a35f34046890c84a77bc2784a184f9bf6a tree fcfd15b000e703d91361f2b2c3c1bafb0d18b05d

[PATCH 1/1] Char: mxser_new, fix sparc compile error

2007-01-12 Thread Jiri Slaby
mxser_new, fix sparc compile error On sparc B400 is not defined. Use B200 for special baudrate, which is defined on all platforms. Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- commit 2826e3a35f34046890c84a77bc2784a184f9bf6a tree fcfd15b000e703d91361f2b2c3c1bafb0d18b05d parent