* Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It would be nice to make that warning tell us that - we've hit it a
> few times and I never knew this was the reason.
i'm a mind-reader and a time-traveler as well, so i've got the patch
below lined up in my sched.git queue already :-)
On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 04:01 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 11:31:28 +0100 Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 01:21 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, 4 of December 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > > > [ 34.455096]
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 11:31:28 +0100 Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 01:21 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 4 of December 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > > [ 34.455096] ipw2200: Failed to send WEP_KEY: Command timed out.
> > > [ 34.911876]
On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 01:21 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, 4 of December 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > [ 34.455096] ipw2200: Failed to send WEP_KEY: Command timed out.
> > [ 34.911876] Syncing filesystems ... done.
> > [ 34.934526] Freezing user space processes ... WARNING:
On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 01:21 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, 4 of December 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
[ 34.455096] ipw2200: Failed to send WEP_KEY: Command timed out.
[ 34.911876] Syncing filesystems ... done.
[ 34.934526] Freezing user space processes ... WARNING: at
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 11:31:28 +0100 Peter Zijlstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 01:21 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, 4 of December 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
[ 34.455096] ipw2200: Failed to send WEP_KEY: Command timed out.
[ 34.911876] Syncing
On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 04:01 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 11:31:28 +0100 Peter Zijlstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 01:21 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, 4 of December 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
[ 34.455096] ipw2200: Failed to
* Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would be nice to make that warning tell us that - we've hit it a
few times and I never knew this was the reason.
i'm a mind-reader and a time-traveler as well, so i've got the patch
below lined up in my sched.git queue already :-)
Ingo
On Tuesday, 4 of December 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 23:34:26 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > On Monday, 3 of December 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 21:33:23 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
On Tuesday, 4 of December 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 23:34:26 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Monday, 3 of December 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 21:33:23 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Saturday, 1 of
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 23:34:26 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday, 3 of December 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 21:33:23 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Saturday, 1 of December 2007, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > >
On Monday, 3 of December 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 21:33:23 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > On Saturday, 1 of December 2007, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > > 2.6.24-rc3-mm2 (which will be released if it boots on two more machines
>
On Monday, 3 of December 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 21:33:23 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Saturday, 1 of December 2007, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
2.6.24-rc3-mm2 (which will be released if it boots on two more machines
and
if I stay
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 23:34:26 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday, 3 of December 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 21:33:23 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Saturday, 1 of December 2007, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 21:33:23 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday, 1 of December 2007, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > 2.6.24-rc3-mm2 (which will be released if it boots on two more machines
> > > and
> > > if I stay awake) will say this during suspend-to-RAM
On Saturday, 1 of December 2007, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > 2.6.24-rc3-mm2 (which will be released if it boots on two more machines and
> > if I stay awake) will say this during suspend-to-RAM on the Vaio:
> >
> > [ 91.876445] Syncing filesystems ... done.
> > [ 92.382595] Freezing user
Hi!
> 2.6.24-rc3-mm2 (which will be released if it boots on two more machines and
> if I stay awake) will say this during suspend-to-RAM on the Vaio:
>
> [ 91.876445] Syncing filesystems ... done.
> [ 92.382595] Freezing user space processes ... WARNING: at
> kernel/lockdep.c:2662
Hi!
2.6.24-rc3-mm2 (which will be released if it boots on two more machines and
if I stay awake) will say this during suspend-to-RAM on the Vaio:
[ 91.876445] Syncing filesystems ... done.
[ 92.382595] Freezing user space processes ... WARNING: at
kernel/lockdep.c:2662 check_flags()
On Saturday, 1 of December 2007, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
2.6.24-rc3-mm2 (which will be released if it boots on two more machines and
if I stay awake) will say this during suspend-to-RAM on the Vaio:
[ 91.876445] Syncing filesystems ... done.
[ 92.382595] Freezing user space
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007 21:33:23 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday, 1 of December 2007, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
2.6.24-rc3-mm2 (which will be released if it boots on two more machines
and
if I stay awake) will say this during suspend-to-RAM on the Vaio:
On Wednesday, 28 of November 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> 2.6.24-rc3-mm2 (which will be released if it boots on two more machines and
> if I stay awake) will say this during suspend-to-RAM on the Vaio:
>
> [ 91.876445] Syncing filesystems ... done.
> [ 92.382595] Freezing user space
2.6.24-rc3-mm2 (which will be released if it boots on two more machines and
if I stay awake) will say this during suspend-to-RAM on the Vaio:
[ 91.876445] Syncing filesystems ... done.
[ 92.382595] Freezing user space processes ... WARNING: at
kernel/lockdep.c:2662 check_flags()
[
2.6.24-rc3-mm2 (which will be released if it boots on two more machines and
if I stay awake) will say this during suspend-to-RAM on the Vaio:
[ 91.876445] Syncing filesystems ... done.
[ 92.382595] Freezing user space processes ... WARNING: at
kernel/lockdep.c:2662 check_flags()
[
On Wednesday, 28 of November 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
2.6.24-rc3-mm2 (which will be released if it boots on two more machines and
if I stay awake) will say this during suspend-to-RAM on the Vaio:
[ 91.876445] Syncing filesystems ... done.
[ 92.382595] Freezing user space processes
24 matches
Mail list logo