Hi Antonino :)
NEW INFORMATION ABOUT THE PROBLEM
* Antonino A. Daplas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit:
> On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 07:25 +0100, DervishD wrote:
> > > > With the patch, the scroll slows to a crawl and the system is
> > > > unusable. The time to scroll 30 lines is about a
Hi Antonino :)
NEW INFORMATION ABOUT THE PROBLEM
* Antonino A. Daplas [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit:
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 07:25 +0100, DervishD wrote:
With the patch, the scroll slows to a crawl and the system is
unusable. The time to scroll 30 lines is about a minute or so
Hi Antonino :)
* Antonino A. Daplas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit:
> On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 07:25 +0100, DervishD wrote:
> > > > If you want me to test other patches, just tell :)
> > >
> > > Can you change the mdelay to udelay and use higher/lower delay values
> > > to see if there's any
Hi Antonino :)
* Antonino A. Daplas [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit:
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 07:25 +0100, DervishD wrote:
If you want me to test other patches, just tell :)
Can you change the mdelay to udelay and use higher/lower delay values
to see if there's any improvement?
Hi Antonino :)
* Antonino A. Daplas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit:
> On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 07:25 +0100, DervishD wrote:
> > * Antonino A. Daplas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit:
> > > On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 17:01 +0100, DervishD wrote:
> > > > * Antonino A. Daplas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit:
> > > > >
Hi Antonino :)
* Antonino A. Daplas [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit:
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 07:25 +0100, DervishD wrote:
* Antonino A. Daplas [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit:
On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 17:01 +0100, DervishD wrote:
* Antonino A. Daplas [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit:
Can you try this
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 07:25 +0100, DervishD wrote:
> Hi Antonino :)
>
> * Antonino A. Daplas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit:
> > On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 17:01 +0100, DervishD wrote:
> > > * Antonino A. Daplas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit:
> > > > Can you try this patch? It might help with the screen
Hi Antonino :)
* Antonino A. Daplas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit:
> On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 17:01 +0100, DervishD wrote:
> > * Antonino A. Daplas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit:
> > > Can you try this patch? It might help with the screen
> > > corruption.
> >
> > With the patch, the scroll
On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 17:01 +0100, DervishD wrote:
> Hi Antonino :)
>
> * Antonino A. Daplas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit:
> > Can you try this patch? It might help with the screen corruption.
>
> With the patch, the scroll slows to a crawl and the system is
> unusable. The time to scroll
On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 17:01 +0100, DervishD wrote:
Hi Antonino :)
* Antonino A. Daplas [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit:
Can you try this patch? It might help with the screen corruption.
With the patch, the scroll slows to a crawl and the system is
unusable. The time to scroll 30 lines
Hi Antonino :)
* Antonino A. Daplas [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit:
On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 17:01 +0100, DervishD wrote:
* Antonino A. Daplas [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit:
Can you try this patch? It might help with the screen
corruption.
With the patch, the scroll slows to a crawl and
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 07:25 +0100, DervishD wrote:
Hi Antonino :)
* Antonino A. Daplas [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit:
On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 17:01 +0100, DervishD wrote:
* Antonino A. Daplas [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit:
Can you try this patch? It might help with the screen
corruption.
Hi Antonino :)
* Antonino A. Daplas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit:
> Can you try this patch? It might help with the screen corruption.
With the patch, the scroll slows to a crawl and the system is
unusable. The time to scroll 30 lines is about a minute or so (probably
more, I just measured
Hi Antonino :)
* Antonino A. Daplas [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit:
Can you try this patch? It might help with the screen corruption.
With the patch, the scroll slows to a crawl and the system is
unusable. The time to scroll 30 lines is about a minute or so (probably
more, I just measured
Hi Antonino :)
* Antonino A. Daplas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit:
> On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 21:32 +0100, DervishD wrote:
> > Probably setting it back to 4096 will make the problem reappear.
> > Right now I cannot test, but I'll make some experiments.
>
> Can you try this patch? It might
Hi Antonino :)
* Antonino A. Daplas [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit:
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 21:32 +0100, DervishD wrote:
Probably setting it back to 4096 will make the problem reappear.
Right now I cannot test, but I'll make some experiments.
Can you try this patch? It might help with
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 21:32 +0100, DervishD wrote:
> Hi Antonino :)
>
> * Antonino A. Daplas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit:
> > On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 18:13 +0100, DervishD wrote:
> > That's why tdfxb limits the vyres to a maximum of 4096. As to why the
> > problem disappeared just by changing
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 21:32 +0100, DervishD wrote:
Hi Antonino :)
* Antonino A. Daplas [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit:
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 18:13 +0100, DervishD wrote:
That's why tdfxb limits the vyres to a maximum of 4096. As to why the
problem disappeared just by changing this
Hi Antonino :)
* Antonino A. Daplas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit:
> On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 18:13 +0100, DervishD wrote:
> > > Try fbset -a -vyres 600 first and let us know of the result.
> >
> > After doing this, I no longer can garble the display (before, just a
> > "ls -lR /" was enough to do
Hi James :)
* James Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit:
> > From time to time, the tdfxfb driver from 2.6.19.5 (sorry, I cannot
> > test in 2.6.20.x because it doesn't compile, the infamous BDF negative
> > offset problem) garbles the display, leaving only a lot of thin lines,
> > just
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 18:13 +0100, DervishD wrote:
> Hi Antonino :)
>
> * Antonino A. Daplas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit:
> > On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 15:47 +0100, DervishD wrote:
> > > From time to time, the tdfxfb driver from 2.6.19.5 (sorry, I cannot
> > > test in 2.6.20.x because it
Hi Antonino :)
* Antonino A. Daplas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dixit:
> On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 15:47 +0100, DervishD wrote:
> > From time to time, the tdfxfb driver from 2.6.19.5 (sorry, I cannot
> > test in 2.6.20.x because it doesn't compile, the infamous BDF negative
> > offset problem)
> Hi all :)
>
> From time to time, the tdfxfb driver from 2.6.19.5 (sorry, I cannot
> test in 2.6.20.x because it doesn't compile, the infamous BDF negative
> offset problem) garbles the display, leaving only a lot of thin lines,
> just like sync was lost. The display can be repaired by
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 15:47 +0100, DervishD wrote:
> Hi all :)
>
> From time to time, the tdfxfb driver from 2.6.19.5 (sorry, I cannot
> test in 2.6.20.x because it doesn't compile, the infamous BDF negative
> offset problem) garbles the display, leaving only a lot of thin lines,
> just
Hi all :)
From time to time, the tdfxfb driver from 2.6.19.5 (sorry, I cannot
test in 2.6.20.x because it doesn't compile, the infamous BDF negative
offset problem) garbles the display, leaving only a lot of thin lines,
just like sync was lost. The display can be repaired by switching to
Hi all :)
From time to time, the tdfxfb driver from 2.6.19.5 (sorry, I cannot
test in 2.6.20.x because it doesn't compile, the infamous BDF negative
offset problem) garbles the display, leaving only a lot of thin lines,
just like sync was lost. The display can be repaired by switching to
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 15:47 +0100, DervishD wrote:
Hi all :)
From time to time, the tdfxfb driver from 2.6.19.5 (sorry, I cannot
test in 2.6.20.x because it doesn't compile, the infamous BDF negative
offset problem) garbles the display, leaving only a lot of thin lines,
just like
Hi all :)
From time to time, the tdfxfb driver from 2.6.19.5 (sorry, I cannot
test in 2.6.20.x because it doesn't compile, the infamous BDF negative
offset problem) garbles the display, leaving only a lot of thin lines,
just like sync was lost. The display can be repaired by
Hi Antonino :)
* Antonino A. Daplas [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit:
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 15:47 +0100, DervishD wrote:
From time to time, the tdfxfb driver from 2.6.19.5 (sorry, I cannot
test in 2.6.20.x because it doesn't compile, the infamous BDF negative
offset problem) garbles the
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 18:13 +0100, DervishD wrote:
Hi Antonino :)
* Antonino A. Daplas [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit:
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 15:47 +0100, DervishD wrote:
From time to time, the tdfxfb driver from 2.6.19.5 (sorry, I cannot
test in 2.6.20.x because it doesn't compile,
Hi James :)
* James Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit:
From time to time, the tdfxfb driver from 2.6.19.5 (sorry, I cannot
test in 2.6.20.x because it doesn't compile, the infamous BDF negative
offset problem) garbles the display, leaving only a lot of thin lines,
just like sync
Hi Antonino :)
* Antonino A. Daplas [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit:
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 18:13 +0100, DervishD wrote:
Try fbset -a -vyres 600 first and let us know of the result.
After doing this, I no longer can garble the display (before, just a
ls -lR / was enough to do it, in fact,
32 matches
Mail list logo