On Tue, 31 Oct 2000 17:24:24 -0800,
"Dunlap, Randy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Is it valid to run depmod like this before
>booting the kernel that has usbcore in-kernel?
>depmod -ae works after I boot that kernel + usbcore.
To run depmod against a new 2.4.0-test10 kernel,
make
> > > With CONFIG_USB=y and all other USB modules built as
> > > modules (=m), linking usbdrv.o into the kernel image
> > > gives this:
> >
> > > drivers/usb/usbdrv.o(.data+0x2f4): undefined reference to
> >
> > Works for me here, .config attached. Local changes, merge error, or
> > similar?
Randy Dunlap wrote:
> With CONFIG_USB=y and all other USB modules built as
> modules (=m), linking usbdrv.o into the kernel image
> gives this:
> drivers/usb/usbdrv.o(.data+0x2f4): undefined reference to
Works for me here, .config attached. Local changes, merge error, or
similar? I don't have
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
[snip]
>
> That was going to be my next question if somebody actually said "sure".
>
> The question was rhetorical, since the way LINK_FIRST is implemented
> means
> that it has all the same problems that $(obj-y) has, and is hard to get
> right in the generic case (but
Linus Torvalds wrote:
[snip]
That was going to be my next question if somebody actually said "sure".
The question was rhetorical, since the way LINK_FIRST is implemented
means
that it has all the same problems that $(obj-y) has, and is hard to get
right in the generic case (but you can
Randy Dunlap wrote:
With CONFIG_USB=y and all other USB modules built as
modules (=m), linking usbdrv.o into the kernel image
gives this:
drivers/usb/usbdrv.o(.data+0x2f4): undefined reference to
Works for me here, .config attached. Local changes, merge error, or
similar? I don't have any
With CONFIG_USB=y and all other USB modules built as
modules (=m), linking usbdrv.o into the kernel image
gives this:
drivers/usb/usbdrv.o(.data+0x2f4): undefined reference to
Works for me here, .config attached. Local changes, merge error, or
similar? I don't have any
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000 17:24:24 -0800,
"Dunlap, Randy" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it valid to run depmod like this before
booting the kernel that has usbcore in-kernel?
depmod -ae works after I boot that kernel + usbcore.
To run depmod against a new 2.4.0-test10 kernel,
make modules_install
8 matches
Mail list logo
