Alexander Viro wrote:
>
> On Sun, 17 Dec 2000, Jorg de Jong wrote:
>
> > > >On 13 Dec 2000, Henrik [ISO-8859-1] Strner wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Just to add a "me too" on this. I didn't report when I saw it last week,
> >
> > I'd like to second that. ME TOO !
> > Since I switched to 2.4.0.test12
On 17 Dec 2000, Henrik [ISO-8859-1] Størner wrote:
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Alexander Viro
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >On Sun, 17 Dec 2000, Jorg de Jong wrote:
>
> >> > >On 13 Dec 2000, Henrik [ISO-8859-1] Størner wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> Just to add a "me too" on this. I didn't
Alexander Viro wrote:
On Sun, 17 Dec 2000, Jorg de Jong wrote:
On 13 Dec 2000, Henrik [ISO-8859-1] Strner wrote:
Just to add a "me too" on this. I didn't report when I saw it last week,
I'd like to second that. ME TOO !
Since I switched to 2.4.0.test12 I again have the innd
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Alexander Viro
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>On Sun, 17 Dec 2000, Jorg de Jong wrote:
>> > >On 13 Dec 2000, Henrik [ISO-8859-1] Størner wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Just to add a "me too" on this. I didn't report when I saw it last week
>> I'd like to second that. ME TOO !
>>
On Sun, 17 Dec 2000, Jorg de Jong wrote:
> > >On 13 Dec 2000, Henrik [ISO-8859-1] Størner wrote:
> > >
> > >> Just to add a "me too" on this. I didn't report when I saw it last week,
>
> I'd like to second that. ME TOO !
> Since I switched to 2.4.0.test12 I again have the innd bug.
> ( well
> >On 13 Dec 2000, Henrik [ISO-8859-1] Størner wrote:
> >
> >> Just to add a "me too" on this. I didn't report when I saw it last week,
I'd like to second that. ME TOO !
Since I switched to 2.4.0.test12 I again have the innd bug.
( well at least the same symptoms !)
No problems with test10 and
On 13 Dec 2000, Henrik [ISO-8859-1] Størner wrote:
Just to add a "me too" on this. I didn't report when I saw it last week,
I'd like to second that. ME TOO !
Since I switched to 2.4.0.test12 I again have the innd bug.
( well at least the same symptoms !)
No problems with test10 and test11.
On Sun, 17 Dec 2000, Jorg de Jong wrote:
On 13 Dec 2000, Henrik [ISO-8859-1] Størner wrote:
Just to add a "me too" on this. I didn't report when I saw it last week,
I'd like to second that. ME TOO !
Since I switched to 2.4.0.test12 I again have the innd bug.
( well at least the
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Alexander Viro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 17 Dec 2000, Jorg de Jong wrote:
On 13 Dec 2000, Henrik [ISO-8859-1] Størner wrote:
Just to add a "me too" on this. I didn't report when I saw it last week
I'd like to second that. ME TOO !
Since I switched to
And the problem started with pre8 not final.
currently investigating difference pre7-pre8
Albert
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Alexander Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >On 13 Dec 2000, Henrik [ISO-8859-1] Størner wrote:
> >
> >> Just to add a "me too" on
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Alexander Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>On 13 Dec 2000, Henrik [ISO-8859-1] Størner wrote:
>
>> Just to add a "me too" on this. I didn't report when I saw it last week,
>> because I was uncertain of exactly what might have caused it - I was
>> booting
On 13 Dec 2000, Henrik [ISO-8859-1] Størner wrote:
> Just to add a "me too" on this. I didn't report when I saw it last week,
> because I was uncertain of exactly what might have caused it - I was
> booting several different kernels at the time, including one from a
> rescue disk (I was trying
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Anton Petrusevich
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Today I saw well-known "innd bug"(truncate(tm)), and my brother said
>he had seen it with -test12-pre7. I don't know about -test12-pre3,
>neither I nor my brother hadn't noticed it since -test10. But we could
>miss it with
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Anton Petrusevich
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Today I saw well-known "innd bug"(truncate(tm)), and my brother said
he had seen it with -test12-pre7. I don't know about -test12-pre3,
neither I nor my brother hadn't noticed it since -test10. But we could
miss it with
On 13 Dec 2000, Henrik [ISO-8859-1] Størner wrote:
Just to add a "me too" on this. I didn't report when I saw it last week,
because I was uncertain of exactly what might have caused it - I was
booting several different kernels at the time, including one from a
rescue disk (I was trying to
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Alexander Viro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 13 Dec 2000, Henrik [ISO-8859-1] Størner wrote:
Just to add a "me too" on this. I didn't report when I saw it last week,
because I was uncertain of exactly what might have caused it - I was
booting several different
And the problem started with pre8 not final.
currently investigating difference pre7-pre8
Albert
Linus Torvalds wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Alexander Viro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 13 Dec 2000, Henrik [ISO-8859-1] Størner wrote:
Just to add a "me too" on this. I didn't
Hi folks.
Today I saw well-known "innd bug"(truncate(tm)), and my brother said
he had seen it with -test12-pre7. I don't know about -test12-pre3,
neither I nor my brother hadn't noticed it since -test10. But we could
miss it with -test12-pre3, and I didn't try any -test11 kernels. Thus
possibly
Hi folks.
Today I saw well-known "innd bug"(truncate(tm)), and my brother said
he had seen it with -test12-pre7. I don't know about -test12-pre3,
neither I nor my brother hadn't noticed it since -test10. But we could
miss it with -test12-pre3, and I didn't try any -test11 kernels. Thus
possibly
19 matches
Mail list logo
