> I really dropped it because I was getting too many patches, and I don't
> realistically think it's a 2.4.0 issue (neither do you, I bet), so I
> decided that it's not worth it.
Ok. Not a problem. I'll leave it until post 2.4.0
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I really dropped it because I was getting too many patches, and I don't
> realistically think it's a 2.4.0 issue (neither do you, I bet), so I
> decided that it's not worth it.
Umm... Linus, how about a bunch of fixes I've sent to you several times
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Sparc is already sync'ed in my tree, and I'd love for other architectures
> > to synch up too (but if it takes a while it's not a major disaster - I
> > actually much prefer bugs that cause build failures over other kinds of
> > bugs ;).
>
> So you want
> Sparc is already sync'ed in my tree, and I'd love for other architectures
> to synch up too (but if it takes a while it's not a major disaster - I
> actually much prefer bugs that cause build failures over other kinds of
> bugs ;).
So you want drivers/gsc again ? I assumed you dropped it as
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 03:31:54PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> > I'm hoping that most of the fall-out from switching over exclusively to
> > the new-style Makefiles will be over in a day or two, at which point
> > I'll make a pre2 that is worth
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 03:31:54PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I'm hoping that most of the fall-out from switching over exclusively to
> the new-style Makefiles will be over in a day or two, at which point
> I'll make a pre2 that is worth announcing.
Does this mean other arches will have a
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Oliver Xymoron ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > > A 100ms delay sounds like some interrupt shut up or similar (and then
> > > timer handling makes it limp along).
> >
> > Possibly related datapoint:
* Oliver Xymoron ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> > A 100ms delay sounds like some interrupt shut up or similar (and then
> > timer handling makes it limp along).
>
> Possibly related datapoint: after several days of uptime, my
> 2.4.0-test10pre?
* Oliver Xymoron ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
A 100ms delay sounds like some interrupt shut up or similar (and then
timer handling makes it limp along).
Possibly related datapoint: after several days of uptime, my
2.4.0-test10pre? machine went
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Oliver Xymoron ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
A 100ms delay sounds like some interrupt shut up or similar (and then
timer handling makes it limp along).
Possibly related datapoint: after several
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 03:31:54PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
I'm hoping that most of the fall-out from switching over exclusively to
the new-style Makefiles will be over in a day or two, at which point
I'll make a pre2 that is worth announcing.
Does this mean other arches will have a
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Tom Rini wrote:
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 03:31:54PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
I'm hoping that most of the fall-out from switching over exclusively to
the new-style Makefiles will be over in a day or two, at which point
I'll make a pre2 that is worth announcing.
Sparc is already sync'ed in my tree, and I'd love for other architectures
to synch up too (but if it takes a while it's not a major disaster - I
actually much prefer bugs that cause build failures over other kinds of
bugs ;).
So you want drivers/gsc again ? I assumed you dropped it as you
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
Sparc is already sync'ed in my tree, and I'd love for other architectures
to synch up too (but if it takes a while it's not a major disaster - I
actually much prefer bugs that cause build failures over other kinds of
bugs ;).
So you want
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
I really dropped it because I was getting too many patches, and I don't
realistically think it's a 2.4.0 issue (neither do you, I bet), so I
decided that it's not worth it.
Umm... Linus, how about a bunch of fixes I've sent to you several times
I really dropped it because I was getting too many patches, and I don't
realistically think it's a 2.4.0 issue (neither do you, I bet), so I
decided that it's not worth it.
Ok. Not a problem. I'll leave it until post 2.4.0
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Stephen Frost wrote:
> >
> > Any idea if these issues would cause a general slow-down of a
> > machine? For no apparent reason after 5 days running 2.4.0test12
> > everything going through my firewall (set up using iptables)
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Linus Torvalds ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> > A 100ms delay sounds like some interrupt shut up or similar (and then
> > timer handling makes it limp along).
>
> Hmm, it's happening on all interfaces.
Ok, never mind me then. It's not an
* Linus Torvalds ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Stephen Frost wrote:
> >
> > This go around I compiled everything into the kernel, actually.
> > If it would be useful I can compile them as modules reboot and then see
> > what happens...
>
> Even when compiled into
* Linus Torvalds ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Stephen Frost wrote:
> >
> > Any idea if these issues would cause a general slow-down of a
> > machine? For no apparent reason after 5 days running 2.4.0test12
> > everything going through my firewall (set up using
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Stephen Frost wrote:
>
> This go around I compiled everything into the kernel, actually.
> If it would be useful I can compile them as modules reboot and then see
> what happens...
Even when compiled into the kernel, you might just ifdown/ifup the device.
That will
* Alan Cox ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > machine? For no apparent reason after 5 days running 2.4.0test12
> > everything going through my firewall (set up using iptables) I got about
> > 100ms time added on to pings and traceroutes. I'll probably reboot the
> > machine tonight and see if that
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Stephen Frost wrote:
>
> Any idea if these issues would cause a general slow-down of a
> machine? For no apparent reason after 5 days running 2.4.0test12
> everything going through my firewall (set up using iptables) I got about
> 100ms time added on to pings and
> machine? For no apparent reason after 5 days running 2.4.0test12
> everything going through my firewall (set up using iptables) I got about
> 100ms time added on to pings and traceroutes. I'll probably reboot the
> machine tonight and see if that helps.
Before you do that can you see if
* Linus Torvalds ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Especially if we get that netfilter problem sorted out (see the other
> thread about the IP fragmentation issues associated with that one), and
> if we figure out why apparently some people have trouble with external
> modules (at least one person
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
David Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Did I miss a post from Linus on the list, or is there no posted
>changelog for test13-pre1? Nothing's posted at kernel.org yet, either.
The test13-pre1 changes are almost exclusively a radical Makefile
cleanup, and it's
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Dr. Kelsey Hudson wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, David Riley wrote:
>
> > Did I miss a post from Linus on the list, or is there no posted
> > changelog for test13-pre1? Nothing's posted at kernel.org yet, either.
> >
>
> I musta missed the post too... But then again I
The test13-pre1 changelog was something along the lines of "alright, I
am sick of this Makefile crap. I fixed some, clean up the rest."
;-)
--
Jeff Garzik |
Building 1024 | These are not the J's you're lookin' for.
MandrakeSoft| It's an old Jedi
Hello,
Linus didn't annnounce test13-pre1 as far as I am aware of.
Regards,
Frank
--On Thursday, December 14, 2000 12:11 PM -0800 "Dr. Kelsey Hudson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, David Riley wrote:
>
>> Did I miss a post from Linus on the list, or is there no posted
>>
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, David Riley wrote:
> Did I miss a post from Linus on the list, or is there no posted
> changelog for test13-pre1? Nothing's posted at kernel.org yet, either.
>
I musta missed the post too... But then again I went back and looked for
it and couldnt find it so...
i'd like
Did I miss a post from Linus on the list, or is there no posted
changelog for test13-pre1? Nothing's posted at kernel.org yet, either.
--
"Windows for Dummies? Isn't that redundant?"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
Did I miss a post from Linus on the list, or is there no posted
changelog for test13-pre1? Nothing's posted at kernel.org yet, either.
--
"Windows for Dummies? Isn't that redundant?"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, David Riley wrote:
Did I miss a post from Linus on the list, or is there no posted
changelog for test13-pre1? Nothing's posted at kernel.org yet, either.
I musta missed the post too... But then again I went back and looked for
it and couldnt find it so...
i'd like to
Hello,
Linus didn't annnounce test13-pre1 as far as I am aware of.
Regards,
Frank
--On Thursday, December 14, 2000 12:11 PM -0800 "Dr. Kelsey Hudson"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, David Riley wrote:
Did I miss a post from Linus on the list, or is there no posted
changelog
The test13-pre1 changelog was something along the lines of "alright, I
am sick of this Makefile crap. I fixed some, clean up the rest."
;-)
--
Jeff Garzik |
Building 1024 | These are not the J's you're lookin' for.
MandrakeSoft| It's an old Jedi
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Dr. Kelsey Hudson wrote:
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, David Riley wrote:
Did I miss a post from Linus on the list, or is there no posted
changelog for test13-pre1? Nothing's posted at kernel.org yet, either.
I musta missed the post too... But then again I went back and
* Linus Torvalds ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Especially if we get that netfilter problem sorted out (see the other
thread about the IP fragmentation issues associated with that one), and
if we figure out why apparently some people have trouble with external
modules (at least one person has
machine? For no apparent reason after 5 days running 2.4.0test12
everything going through my firewall (set up using iptables) I got about
100ms time added on to pings and traceroutes. I'll probably reboot the
machine tonight and see if that helps.
Before you do that can you see if ifconfig
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Stephen Frost wrote:
Any idea if these issues would cause a general slow-down of a
machine? For no apparent reason after 5 days running 2.4.0test12
everything going through my firewall (set up using iptables) I got about
100ms time added on to pings and
* Alan Cox ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
machine? For no apparent reason after 5 days running 2.4.0test12
everything going through my firewall (set up using iptables) I got about
100ms time added on to pings and traceroutes. I'll probably reboot the
machine tonight and see if that helps.
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Stephen Frost wrote:
This go around I compiled everything into the kernel, actually.
If it would be useful I can compile them as modules reboot and then see
what happens...
Even when compiled into the kernel, you might just ifdown/ifup the device.
That will
* Linus Torvalds ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Stephen Frost wrote:
Any idea if these issues would cause a general slow-down of a
machine? For no apparent reason after 5 days running 2.4.0test12
everything going through my firewall (set up using iptables) I
* Linus Torvalds ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Stephen Frost wrote:
This go around I compiled everything into the kernel, actually.
If it would be useful I can compile them as modules reboot and then see
what happens...
Even when compiled into the kernel,
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Linus Torvalds ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
A 100ms delay sounds like some interrupt shut up or similar (and then
timer handling makes it limp along).
Hmm, it's happening on all interfaces.
Ok, never mind me then. It's not an
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Stephen Frost wrote:
Any idea if these issues would cause a general slow-down of a
machine? For no apparent reason after 5 days running 2.4.0test12
everything going through my firewall (set up using iptables) I got
45 matches
Mail list logo
