Dennis, Your comment isn´t that productive
What about ECN? Have acitivated it (proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn, if I remember
correctly)
Markus
Dennis wrote:
> At 11:06 PM 10/20/2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >We're having lots of trouble with eepro100 and Cisco Catalyst switch,
> >and my net are
Dennis, Your comment isn´t that productive
What about ECN? Have acitivated it (proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn, if I remember
correctly)
Markus
Dennis wrote:
At 11:06 PM 10/20/2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're having lots of trouble with eepro100 and Cisco Catalyst switch,
and my net are a
Dennis wrote:
>
> Ciscos and catalysts have all kinds of problems connecting to PCs.
>From Documentation/networking/vortex.txt
Cisco interoperability note from Walter Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On a side note, adding HAS_NWAY seems to share a problem with the
Cisco 6509 switch.
At 11:06 PM 10/20/2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>We're having lots of trouble with eepro100 and Cisco Catalyst switch,
>and my net are a vlan. I am using RedHat 6.2/7.0 and not ping to gateway,
>but with o Slackware 7.0 ok. What's the magic?
>
>Regards,
>
>Umberto
>Systems Analyst
>.comDominio
Dennis wrote:
Ciscos and catalysts have all kinds of problems connecting to PCs.
From Documentation/networking/vortex.txt
Cisco interoperability note from Walter Wong [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On a side note, adding HAS_NWAY seems to share a problem with the
Cisco 6509 switch. Specifically,
We're having lots of trouble with eepro100 and Cisco Catalyst switch,
and my net are a vlan. I am using RedHat 6.2/7.0 and not ping to gateway, but with o
Slackware 7.0 ok. What's the magic?
Regards,
Umberto
Systems Analyst
.comDominio
Brazil
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
6 matches
Mail list logo
