On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 09:03 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> Is this with a serial port? There were some changes to serial_core
> close in 4.9.
It's a combo of serial and hvc actually.
Cheers,
Ben.
On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 09:03 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> Is this with a serial port? There were some changes to serial_core
> close in 4.9.
It's a combo of serial and hvc actually.
Cheers,
Ben.
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 8:03 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-04-06 at 08:28 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>>
>> Can you try this one [1].
>>
>> Rob
>>
>> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/3/23/569
>
> Unless I missed something, that patch doesn't change barriers
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 8:03 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-04-06 at 08:28 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>>
>> Can you try this one [1].
>>
>> Rob
>>
>> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/3/23/569
>
> Unless I missed something, that patch doesn't change barriers or
> locking, so I don't
> > + /* This probably shouldn't happen, but return 0 data processed */
> > + if (!ldata)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > while (1) {
> > /*
> > * When PARMRK is set, each input char may take up to 3
> > chars
>
> Maybe your patch should looks like:
> +
> > + /* This probably shouldn't happen, but return 0 data processed */
> > + if (!ldata)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > while (1) {
> > /*
> > * When PARMRK is set, each input char may take up to 3
> > chars
>
> Maybe your patch should looks like:
> +
On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 05:04:41PM +1000, Michael Neuling wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We are seeing the following crash (in linux-next but has been around since at
> least v4.10).
>
> [ 417.514499] Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address
> 0x2260
> [ 417.515361] Faulting
On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 05:04:41PM +1000, Michael Neuling wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We are seeing the following crash (in linux-next but has been around since at
> least v4.10).
>
> [ 417.514499] Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address
> 0x2260
> [ 417.515361] Faulting
On Thu, 2017-04-06 at 08:28 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>
> Can you try this one [1].
>
> Rob
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/3/23/569
Unless I missed something, that patch doesn't change barriers or
locking, so I don't see how it could fix anything ...
Mind you we haven't quite figured out
On Thu, 2017-04-06 at 08:28 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>
> Can you try this one [1].
>
> Rob
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/3/23/569
Unless I missed something, that patch doesn't change barriers or
locking, so I don't see how it could fix anything ...
Mind you we haven't quite figured out
> > If anyone has an idea, I'm happy to try a patch.
>
> Can you try this one [1].
Rob, I'm still hitting it when I apply that on next-20170405. Crash below..
Any other clues?
[ 229.422825] Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address
0x2260
[ 229.423681] Faulting
> > If anyone has an idea, I'm happy to try a patch.
>
> Can you try this one [1].
Rob, I'm still hitting it when I apply that on next-20170405. Crash below..
Any other clues?
[ 229.422825] Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address
0x2260
[ 229.423681] Faulting
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 2:04 AM, Michael Neuling wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We are seeing the following crash (in linux-next but has been around since at
> least v4.10).
>
> [ 417.514499] Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address
> 0x2260
> [ 417.515361]
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 2:04 AM, Michael Neuling wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We are seeing the following crash (in linux-next but has been around since at
> least v4.10).
>
> [ 417.514499] Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address
> 0x2260
> [ 417.515361] Faulting instruction
On Thu, 2017-04-06 at 17:04 +1000, Michael Neuling wrote:
> We see this usually on boot but can also see it if we kill a getty attached to
> tty (which is then respawned by systemd). It seems like we are flushing data
> to
> a tty at the same time as it's being torn down and restarted.
>
> I
On Thu, 2017-04-06 at 17:04 +1000, Michael Neuling wrote:
> We see this usually on boot but can also see it if we kill a getty attached to
> tty (which is then respawned by systemd). It seems like we are flushing data
> to
> a tty at the same time as it's being torn down and restarted.
>
> I
Hi all,
We are seeing the following crash (in linux-next but has been around since at
least v4.10).
[ 417.514499] Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address
0x2260
[ 417.515361] Faulting instruction address: 0xc06fad80
cpu 0x15: Vector: 300 (Data Access) at
Hi all,
We are seeing the following crash (in linux-next but has been around since at
least v4.10).
[ 417.514499] Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address
0x2260
[ 417.515361] Faulting instruction address: 0xc06fad80
cpu 0x15: Vector: 300 (Data Access) at
18 matches
Mail list logo