Hi!
> What I've done is just rebased the ccp2 branch. In other words, the patches
> in that branch are no more ready than they were.
>
> To get these merged we should ideally
>
> 1) Make sure there will be no regressions,
I grepped dts trees a bit... where is omap3isp currently used?
Anything
Hi!
> What I've done is just rebased the ccp2 branch. In other words, the patches
> in that branch are no more ready than they were.
>
> To get these merged we should ideally
>
> 1) Make sure there will be no regressions,
I grepped dts trees a bit... where is omap3isp currently used?
Anything
Hi!
> > > 1) Make sure there will be no regressions,
> >
> > Well, all I have running recent kernels is N900. If ccp branch works
> > for you on N9, that's probably as much testing as we can get.
> >
> > > 2) clean things up in the omap3isp; which resources are needed and when
> > > (e.g.
Hi!
> > > 1) Make sure there will be no regressions,
> >
> > Well, all I have running recent kernels is N900. If ccp branch works
> > for you on N9, that's probably as much testing as we can get.
> >
> > > 2) clean things up in the omap3isp; which resources are needed and when
> > > (e.g.
Hi Pavel,
On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 12:38:51PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > > > I expect to have most of them in during the next merge window.
> > > > >
> > > > > So git://linuxtv.org/media_tree.git branch master is the right one to
> > > > > work one?
> > > >
> > > > I also pushed
Hi Pavel,
On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 12:38:51PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > > > I expect to have most of them in during the next merge window.
> > > > >
> > > > > So git://linuxtv.org/media_tree.git branch master is the right one to
> > > > > work one?
> > > >
> > > > I also pushed
Hi!
> > > > > I expect to have most of them in during the next merge window.
> > > >
> > > > So git://linuxtv.org/media_tree.git branch master is the right one to
> > > > work one?
> > >
> > > I also pushed the rebased ccp2 branch there:
> > >
> > >
Hi!
> > > > > I expect to have most of them in during the next merge window.
> > > >
> > > > So git://linuxtv.org/media_tree.git branch master is the right one to
> > > > work one?
> > >
> > > I also pushed the rebased ccp2 branch there:
> > >
> > >
On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 05:08:19PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > > Are there any news about the fwnode branch?
> > > > >
> > > > > I have quite usable camera, but it is still based on
> > > > > 982e8e40390d26430ef106fede41594139a4111c (that's v4.10). It would be
> > > > > good to
On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 05:08:19PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > > Are there any news about the fwnode branch?
> > > > >
> > > > > I have quite usable camera, but it is still based on
> > > > > 982e8e40390d26430ef106fede41594139a4111c (that's v4.10). It would be
> > > > > good to
Hi!
> > > > Are there any news about the fwnode branch?
> > > >
> > > > I have quite usable camera, but it is still based on
> > > > 982e8e40390d26430ef106fede41594139a4111c (that's v4.10). It would be
> > > > good to see fwnode stuff upstream... are there any plans for that?
> > > >
> > > > Is
Hi!
> > > > Are there any news about the fwnode branch?
> > > >
> > > > I have quite usable camera, but it is still based on
> > > > 982e8e40390d26430ef106fede41594139a4111c (that's v4.10). It would be
> > > > good to see fwnode stuff upstream... are there any plans for that?
> > > >
> > > > Is
On Fri 2017-06-16 01:07:00, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 09:41:29PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isp.c
> > b/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isp.c
> > index 4ca3fc9..b80debf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isp.c
> >
On Fri 2017-06-16 01:07:00, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 09:41:29PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isp.c
> > b/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isp.c
> > index 4ca3fc9..b80debf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isp.c
> >
Hi!
Ok, so I played a bit, and now I have working camera in v4.12-rc3.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pavel/linux-n900.git/
camera-fw5-3 is recommended branch to play with.
Sakari, should I attempt to clean/send you patches, or would it be
better to wait till ccp2 branch is
Hi!
Ok, so I played a bit, and now I have working camera in v4.12-rc3.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pavel/linux-n900.git/
camera-fw5-3 is recommended branch to play with.
Sakari, should I attempt to clean/send you patches, or would it be
better to wait till ccp2 branch is
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 09:41:29PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isp.c
> b/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isp.c
> index 4ca3fc9..b80debf 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isp.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isp.c
> @@ -2026,7
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 09:41:29PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isp.c
> b/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isp.c
> index 4ca3fc9..b80debf 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isp.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isp.c
> @@ -2026,7
Hi!
> > > > Are there any news about the fwnode branch?
> > > >
> > > > I have quite usable camera, but it is still based on
> > > > 982e8e40390d26430ef106fede41594139a4111c (that's v4.10). It would be
> > > > good to see fwnode stuff upstream... are there any plans for that?
> > > >
> > > > Is
Hi!
> > > > Are there any news about the fwnode branch?
> > > >
> > > > I have quite usable camera, but it is still based on
> > > > 982e8e40390d26430ef106fede41594139a4111c (that's v4.10). It would be
> > > > good to see fwnode stuff upstream... are there any plans for that?
> > > >
> > > > Is
Hi, Pavel!
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:09:00PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > Are there any news about the fwnode branch?
> > >
> > > I have quite usable camera, but it is still based on
> > > 982e8e40390d26430ef106fede41594139a4111c (that's v4.10). It would be
> > > good to see fwnode
Hi, Pavel!
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:09:00PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > Are there any news about the fwnode branch?
> > >
> > > I have quite usable camera, but it is still based on
> > > 982e8e40390d26430ef106fede41594139a4111c (that's v4.10). It would be
> > > good to see fwnode
Hi!
> > Are there any news about the fwnode branch?
> >
> > I have quite usable camera, but it is still based on
> > 982e8e40390d26430ef106fede41594139a4111c (that's v4.10). It would be
> > good to see fwnode stuff upstream... are there any plans for that?
> >
> > Is there stable branch to
Hi!
> > Are there any news about the fwnode branch?
> >
> > I have quite usable camera, but it is still based on
> > 982e8e40390d26430ef106fede41594139a4111c (that's v4.10). It would be
> > good to see fwnode stuff upstream... are there any plans for that?
> >
> > Is there stable branch to
Hi Pavel,
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 02:22:40PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Are there any news about the fwnode branch?
>
> I have quite usable camera, but it is still based on
> 982e8e40390d26430ef106fede41594139a4111c (that's v4.10). It would be
> good to see fwnode stuff upstream...
Hi Pavel,
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 02:22:40PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Are there any news about the fwnode branch?
>
> I have quite usable camera, but it is still based on
> 982e8e40390d26430ef106fede41594139a4111c (that's v4.10). It would be
> good to see fwnode stuff upstream...
Hi!
Are there any news about the fwnode branch?
I have quite usable camera, but it is still based on
982e8e40390d26430ef106fede41594139a4111c (that's v4.10). It would be
good to see fwnode stuff upstream... are there any plans for that?
Is there stable branch to which I could move the stuff?
Hi!
Are there any news about the fwnode branch?
I have quite usable camera, but it is still based on
982e8e40390d26430ef106fede41594139a4111c (that's v4.10). It would be
good to see fwnode stuff upstream... are there any plans for that?
Is there stable branch to which I could move the stuff?
28 matches
Mail list logo
