On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, WANG Cong wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 09:38:46AM +0200, Benny Halevy wrote:
> >On Nov. 29, 2007, 3:19 +0200, "Ming Lei" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> 2007/11/29, Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>> On Nov 29 2007 01:05, J.A. Magallón wrote:
> Since begin of
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, WANG Cong wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 09:38:46AM +0200, Benny Halevy wrote:
On Nov. 29, 2007, 3:19 +0200, Ming Lei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/11/29, Jan Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Nov 29 2007 01:05, J.A. Magallón wrote:
Since begin of the ages the build of
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 09:38:46AM +0200, Benny Halevy wrote:
>On Nov. 29, 2007, 3:19 +0200, "Ming Lei" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 2007/11/29, Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> On Nov 29 2007 01:05, J.A. Magallón wrote:
Since begin of the ages the build of the nvidia driver says
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 09:38:46AM +0200, Benny Halevy wrote:
On Nov. 29, 2007, 3:19 +0200, Ming Lei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/11/29, Jan Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Nov 29 2007 01:05, J.A. Magallón wrote:
Since begin of the ages the build of the nvidia driver says things like
this:
On Nov. 29, 2007, 3:19 +0200, "Ming Lei" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2007/11/29, Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On Nov 29 2007 01:05, J.A. Magallón wrote:
>>> Since begin of the ages the build of the nvidia driver says things like
>>> this:
>>>
>> Explicitly adding -Wpointer-arith to ones
2007/11/29, Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Nov 29 2007 01:05, J.A. Magallón wrote:
> >
> >Since begin of the ages the build of the nvidia driver says things like
> >this:
> >
>
> Explicitly adding -Wpointer-arith to ones own Makefile is like
> admitting the code might be problematic.
On Nov 29 2007 01:05, J.A. Magallón wrote:
>
>Since begin of the ages the build of the nvidia driver says things like
>this:
>
Explicitly adding -Wpointer-arith to ones own Makefile is like
admitting the code might be problematic. :->
I think sizeof(void *) == 1 is taken as granted as
Em Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 01:05:31AM +0100, J.A. Magallón escreveu:
> Hi all...
>
> Since begin of the ages the build of the nvidia driver says things like
> this:
>
> include/asm/compat.h:210: warning: pointer of type 'void *' used in arithmetic
>
> There are several of this warnings. The code
Hi all...
Since begin of the ages the build of the nvidia driver says things like
this:
include/asm/compat.h:210: warning: pointer of type 'void *' used in arithmetic
There are several of this warnings. The code in question for this example
is:
static __inline__ void __user
Hi all...
Since begin of the ages the build of the nvidia driver says things like
this:
include/asm/compat.h:210: warning: pointer of type 'void *' used in arithmetic
There are several of this warnings. The code in question for this example
is:
static __inline__ void __user
Em Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 01:05:31AM +0100, J.A. Magallón escreveu:
Hi all...
Since begin of the ages the build of the nvidia driver says things like
this:
include/asm/compat.h:210: warning: pointer of type 'void *' used in arithmetic
There are several of this warnings. The code in
On Nov 29 2007 01:05, J.A. Magallón wrote:
Since begin of the ages the build of the nvidia driver says things like
this:
Explicitly adding -Wpointer-arith to ones own Makefile is like
admitting the code might be problematic. :-
I think sizeof(void *) == 1 is taken as granted as sizeof(int) =
2007/11/29, Jan Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Nov 29 2007 01:05, J.A. Magallón wrote:
Since begin of the ages the build of the nvidia driver says things like
this:
Explicitly adding -Wpointer-arith to ones own Makefile is like
admitting the code might be problematic. :-
I think
On Nov. 29, 2007, 3:19 +0200, Ming Lei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/11/29, Jan Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Nov 29 2007 01:05, J.A. Magallón wrote:
Since begin of the ages the build of the nvidia driver says things like
this:
Explicitly adding -Wpointer-arith to ones own Makefile is
14 matches
Mail list logo