Re: will ip 6 in ip4 tunnelling be fixed anytime soon ?

2000-10-09 Thread David S. Miller
Date:Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:21:48 +0200 From: Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> We will see who feels responsible for adding it to the kernel source. Alexey? Andi? Davem? Alan? I have applied the fix, and will send it to Linus. Later, David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To

Re: will ip 6 in ip4 tunnelling be fixed anytime soon ?

2000-10-09 Thread David S. Miller
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2000 11:44:34 +0200 From: Jorg de Jong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> attached you will find my patch again Patch applied, thanks for being so patient. Later, David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body

Re: will ip 6 in ip4 tunnelling be fixed anytime soon ?

2000-10-09 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 11:44:34AM +0200, Jorg de Jong wrote: > your just a bit off here, I believe Gerhard has posted this bug > a number of times, further more I have submitted a fix for this > bug, but has still not been accepted. Neither has there been any feedback > on why ? the address

Re: will ip 6 in ip4 tunnelling be fixed anytime soon ?

2000-10-09 Thread Jorg de Jong
> But you are right, here is a bug nobody reported before. I will take care of > it. > Hmm, your just a bit off here, I believe Gerhard has posted this bug a number of times, further more I have submitted a fix for this bug, but has still not been accepted. Neither has there been any feedback

Re: will ip 6 in ip4 tunnelling be fixed anytime soon ?

2000-10-09 Thread Jorg de Jong
But you are right, here is a bug nobody reported before. I will take care of it. Hmm, your just a bit off here, I believe Gerhard has posted this bug a number of times, further more I have submitted a fix for this bug, but has still not been accepted. Neither has there been any feedback on

Re: will ip 6 in ip4 tunnelling be fixed anytime soon ?

2000-10-09 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 11:44:34AM +0200, Jorg de Jong wrote: your just a bit off here, I believe Gerhard has posted this bug a number of times, further more I have submitted a fix for this bug, but has still not been accepted. Neither has there been any feedback on why ? the address for

Re: will ip 6 in ip4 tunnelling be fixed anytime soon ?

2000-10-09 Thread David S. Miller
Date:Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:21:48 +0200 From: Bernd Eckenfels [EMAIL PROTECTED] We will see who feels responsible for adding it to the kernel source. Alexey? Andi? Davem? Alan? I have applied the fix, and will send it to Linus. Later, David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To

Re: will ip 6 in ip4 tunnelling be fixed anytime soon ?

2000-10-08 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 11:07:18PM -0700, Gerhard Mack wrote: > [root@innerfire /root]# ifconfig sit0 tunnel ::206.123.31.102 > SIOCSIFDSTADDR: No buffer space available what are you trying to do with this command? In case you want to set the IPv4 Endpoint of the Tunnel you should set the IPv4

Re: will ip 6 in ip4 tunnelling be fixed anytime soon ?

2000-10-08 Thread Andreas S. Kerber
On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 11:07:18PM -0700, Gerhard Mack wrote: > I would call this a bug: > [root@innerfire /root]# ifconfig sit0 tunnel ::206.123.31.102 > SIOCSIFDSTADDR: No buffer space available I noticed the same problem over here with Linux 2.4 (haven't tried test9 yet). BTW with Linux

Re: will ip 6 in ip4 tunnelling be fixed anytime soon ?

2000-10-08 Thread Gerhard Mack
On Sun, 8 Oct 2000, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > Is there an ETA on having ip6 in ip4 tunnelling working with the latest > > net-utils?? > > what is the problem? Do u have a bug or do u mean general IPv6 Support? > There are a lot of unoficial IPv6

Re: will ip 6 in ip4 tunnelling be fixed anytime soon ?

2000-10-08 Thread Andreas S. Kerber
On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 11:07:18PM -0700, Gerhard Mack wrote: I would call this a bug: [root@innerfire /root]# ifconfig sit0 tunnel ::206.123.31.102 SIOCSIFDSTADDR: No buffer space available I noticed the same problem over here with Linux 2.4 (haven't tried test9 yet). BTW with Linux 2.2.17

Re: will ip 6 in ip4 tunnelling be fixed anytime soon ?

2000-10-08 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 11:07:18PM -0700, Gerhard Mack wrote: [root@innerfire /root]# ifconfig sit0 tunnel ::206.123.31.102 SIOCSIFDSTADDR: No buffer space available what are you trying to do with this command? In case you want to set the IPv4 Endpoint of the Tunnel you should set the IPv4

Re: will ip 6 in ip4 tunnelling be fixed anytime soon ?

2000-10-07 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Is there an ETA on having ip6 in ip4 tunnelling working with the latest > net-utils?? what is the problem? Do u have a bug or do u mean general IPv6 Support? There are a lot of unoficial IPv6 Packages, Debian has a good Collection, and we are trying to

Re: will ip 6 in ip4 tunnelling be fixed anytime soon ?

2000-10-07 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: Is there an ETA on having ip6 in ip4 tunnelling working with the latest net-utils?? what is the problem? Do u have a bug or do u mean general IPv6 Support? There are a lot of unoficial IPv6 Packages, Debian has a good Collection, and we are trying to get

will ip 6 in ip4 tunnelling be fixed anytime soon ?

2000-10-06 Thread Gerhard Mack
Is there an ETA on having ip6 in ip4 tunnelling working with the latest net-utils?? -- Gerhard Mack [EMAIL PROTECTED] <>< As a computer I find your faith in technology amusing. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL

will ip 6 in ip4 tunnelling be fixed anytime soon ?

2000-10-06 Thread Gerhard Mack
Is there an ETA on having ip6 in ip4 tunnelling working with the latest net-utils?? -- Gerhard Mack [EMAIL PROTECTED] As a computer I find your faith in technology amusing. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]