Date:Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:21:48 +0200
From: Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
We will see who feels responsible for adding it to the kernel
source. Alexey? Andi? Davem? Alan?
I have applied the fix, and will send it to Linus.
Later,
David S. Miller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2000 11:44:34 +0200
From: Jorg de Jong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
attached you will find my patch again
Patch applied, thanks for being so patient.
Later,
David S. Miller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 11:44:34AM +0200, Jorg de Jong wrote:
> your just a bit off here, I believe Gerhard has posted this bug
> a number of times, further more I have submitted a fix for this
> bug, but has still not been accepted. Neither has there been any feedback
> on why ?
the address
> But you are right, here is a bug nobody reported before. I will take care of
> it.
>
Hmm,
your just a bit off here, I believe Gerhard has posted this bug
a number of times, further more I have submitted a fix for this
bug, but has still not been accepted. Neither has there been any feedback
But you are right, here is a bug nobody reported before. I will take care of
it.
Hmm,
your just a bit off here, I believe Gerhard has posted this bug
a number of times, further more I have submitted a fix for this
bug, but has still not been accepted. Neither has there been any feedback
on
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 11:44:34AM +0200, Jorg de Jong wrote:
your just a bit off here, I believe Gerhard has posted this bug
a number of times, further more I have submitted a fix for this
bug, but has still not been accepted. Neither has there been any feedback
on why ?
the address for
Date:Tue, 10 Oct 2000 02:21:48 +0200
From: Bernd Eckenfels [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We will see who feels responsible for adding it to the kernel
source. Alexey? Andi? Davem? Alan?
I have applied the fix, and will send it to Linus.
Later,
David S. Miller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To
On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 11:07:18PM -0700, Gerhard Mack wrote:
> [root@innerfire /root]# ifconfig sit0 tunnel ::206.123.31.102
> SIOCSIFDSTADDR: No buffer space available
what are you trying to do with this command? In case you want to set the
IPv4 Endpoint of the Tunnel you should set the IPv4
On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 11:07:18PM -0700, Gerhard Mack wrote:
> I would call this a bug:
> [root@innerfire /root]# ifconfig sit0 tunnel ::206.123.31.102
> SIOCSIFDSTADDR: No buffer space available
I noticed the same problem over here with Linux 2.4 (haven't tried test9 yet).
BTW with Linux
On Sun, 8 Oct 2000, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > Is there an ETA on having ip6 in ip4 tunnelling working with the latest
> > net-utils??
>
> what is the problem? Do u have a bug or do u mean general IPv6 Support?
> There are a lot of unoficial IPv6
On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 11:07:18PM -0700, Gerhard Mack wrote:
I would call this a bug:
[root@innerfire /root]# ifconfig sit0 tunnel ::206.123.31.102
SIOCSIFDSTADDR: No buffer space available
I noticed the same problem over here with Linux 2.4 (haven't tried test9 yet).
BTW with Linux 2.2.17
On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 11:07:18PM -0700, Gerhard Mack wrote:
[root@innerfire /root]# ifconfig sit0 tunnel ::206.123.31.102
SIOCSIFDSTADDR: No buffer space available
what are you trying to do with this command? In case you want to set the
IPv4 Endpoint of the Tunnel you should set the IPv4
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Is there an ETA on having ip6 in ip4 tunnelling working with the latest
> net-utils??
what is the problem? Do u have a bug or do u mean general IPv6 Support?
There are a lot of unoficial IPv6 Packages, Debian has a good Collection,
and we are trying to
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Is there an ETA on having ip6 in ip4 tunnelling working with the latest
net-utils??
what is the problem? Do u have a bug or do u mean general IPv6 Support?
There are a lot of unoficial IPv6 Packages, Debian has a good Collection,
and we are trying to get
Is there an ETA on having ip6 in ip4 tunnelling working with the latest
net-utils??
--
Gerhard Mack
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<>< As a computer I find your faith in technology amusing.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
Is there an ETA on having ip6 in ip4 tunnelling working with the latest
net-utils??
--
Gerhard Mack
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
As a computer I find your faith in technology amusing.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
16 matches
Mail list logo