- Original Message -
From: "David Chinner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Janos Haar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "David Chinner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 4:34 AM
Subject: Re: xfslogd-spin
- Original Message -
From: David Chinner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Janos Haar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: David Chinner [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 4:34 AM
Subject: Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug?
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 06:18
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 06:18:08PM +0100, Janos Haar wrote:
> From: "David Chinner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Different corruption in RBX here. Looks like semi-random garbage there.
> > I wonder - what's the mac and ip address(es) of your machine and nbd
> > servers?
>
> dy-base:
no matches. Oh
- Original Message -
From: "David Chinner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Haar János" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "David Chinner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 12:14 AM
Subject: Re: xfslogd-spinlock b
- Original Message -
From: David Chinner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Haar János [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: David Chinner [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 12:14 AM
Subject: Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug?
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 01:58
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 06:18:08PM +0100, Janos Haar wrote:
From: David Chinner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Different corruption in RBX here. Looks like semi-random garbage there.
I wonder - what's the mac and ip address(es) of your machine and nbd
servers?
dy-base:
no matches. Oh well, it was a
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 5:47 AM
> Subject: Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug?
>
>
> > On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 01:52:29PM +1100, David Chinner wrote:
> >
> > The filesystem was being shutdown so xfs_inode_item_destroy() just
>
:47 AM
Subject: Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug?
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 01:52:29PM +1100, David Chinner wrote:
The filesystem was being shutdown so xfs_inode_item_destroy() just
frees the inode log item without removing it from the AIL. I'll fix that,
and see if i have any luck
So I'd
Hello,
- Original Message -
From: "David Chinner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "David Chinner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Haar János" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 5:47 AM
Subject: Re: xfslog
Hello,
- Original Message -
From: David Chinner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: David Chinner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Haar János [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 5:47 AM
Subject: Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug?
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 01:52:29PM +1100, David Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 12:39:46AM +0100, Haar János wrote:
> > From: "David Chinner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > #define POISON_FREE 0x6b
> > >
> > > Can you confirm that you are running with CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB=y?
> >
> > Yes, i build
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 12:39:46AM +0100, Haar János wrote:
> From: "David Chinner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 09:17:50AM +0100, Haar János wrote:
> > > From: "David Chinner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Ok, I've never heard of a problem like this before and you are doing
> > >
- Original Message -
From: "David Chinner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Haar János" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "David Chinner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 11:36 PM
Subject: Re: xfslogd-spin
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 09:17:50AM +0100, Haar János wrote:
> From: "David Chinner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > The NBD serves through eth1, and it is on the CPU3, but the ide0 is on
> the
> > > CPU0.
> >
> > I'd say your NBD based XFS filesystem is having trouble.
> >
> > > > Are you using XFS on a
- Original Message -
From: "David Chinner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Haar János" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "David Chinner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 7:24 AM
Subject: Re: xfslogd-spinlock b
- Original Message -
From: David Chinner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Haar János [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: David Chinner [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 7:24 AM
Subject: Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug?
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 12:56
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 09:17:50AM +0100, Haar János wrote:
From: David Chinner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The NBD serves through eth1, and it is on the CPU3, but the ide0 is on
the
CPU0.
I'd say your NBD based XFS filesystem is having trouble.
Are you using XFS on a NBD?
Yes, on
- Original Message -
From: David Chinner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Haar János [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: David Chinner [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 11:36 PM
Subject: Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug?
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 09:17
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 12:39:46AM +0100, Haar János wrote:
From: David Chinner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 09:17:50AM +0100, Haar János wrote:
From: David Chinner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ok, I've never heard of a problem like this before and you are doing
something that very
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 01:52:29PM +1100, David Chinner wrote:
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 12:39:46AM +0100, Haar János wrote:
From: David Chinner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#define POISON_FREE 0x6b
Can you confirm that you are running with CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB=y?
Yes, i build with this option
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 12:56:41AM +0100, Haar János wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 12:19:45PM +0100, Haar János wrote:
> > > I dont know there is a context between 2 messages, but i can see, the
> > > spinlock bug comes always on cpu #3.
> > >
> > > Somebody have any idea?
> >
> > Your disk
- Original Message -
From: "David Chinner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Haar János" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2006 11:44 PM
Subject: Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug?
> On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 12:19:45PM +
On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 12:19:45PM +0100, Haar János wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have some news.
>
> I dont know there is a context between 2 messages, but i can see, the
> spinlock bug comes always on cpu #3.
>
> Somebody have any idea?
Your disk interrupts are directed to CPU 3, and so log I/O
On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 12:19:45PM +0100, Haar János wrote:
Hi
I have some news.
I dont know there is a context between 2 messages, but i can see, the
spinlock bug comes always on cpu #3.
Somebody have any idea?
Your disk interrupts are directed to CPU 3, and so log I/O completion
- Original Message -
From: David Chinner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Haar János [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2006 11:44 PM
Subject: Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug?
On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 12:19:45PM +0100, Haar János wrote
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 12:56:41AM +0100, Haar János wrote:
On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 12:19:45PM +0100, Haar János wrote:
I dont know there is a context between 2 messages, but i can see, the
spinlock bug comes always on cpu #3.
Somebody have any idea?
Your disk interrupts are
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 2:11 AM
Subject: Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug?
> Hello, Justin,
>
> This is a 64bit system.
>
> But i cannot understand, what is the curious? :-)
>
> I am not a kernel developer, and not a C programmer, but the long pointers
> shows me, the 6
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 2:11 AM
Subject: Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug?
Hello, Justin,
This is a 64bit system.
But i cannot understand, what is the curious? :-)
I am not a kernel developer, and not a C programmer
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Haar János" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 3:32 PM
Subject: Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug?
I'm not sure what is causing this problem but I was curious is this on a
32bit or 64bit platform?
Justin.
On Tue, 12 Dec
I'm not sure what is causing this problem but I was curious is this on a
32bit or 64bit platform?
Justin.
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Haar János wrote:
> Hello, list,
>
> I am the "big red button men" with the one big 14TB xfs, if somebody can
> remember me. :-)
>
> Now i found something in the
I'm not sure what is causing this problem but I was curious is this on a
32bit or 64bit platform?
Justin.
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Haar János wrote:
Hello, list,
I am the big red button men with the one big 14TB xfs, if somebody can
remember me. :-)
Now i found something in the 2.6.16.18,
]
To: Haar János [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 3:32 PM
Subject: Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug?
I'm not sure what is causing this problem but I was curious is this on a
32bit or 64bit platform?
Justin.
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Haar János
Hello, list,
I am the "big red button men" with the one big 14TB xfs, if somebody can
remember me. :-)
Now i found something in the 2.6.16.18, and try the 2.6.18.4, and the
2.6.19, but the bug still exists:
Dec 11 22:47:21 dy-base BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#3, xfslogd/3/317
Dec 11 22:47:21
Hello, list,
I am the big red button men with the one big 14TB xfs, if somebody can
remember me. :-)
Now i found something in the 2.6.16.18, and try the 2.6.18.4, and the
2.6.19, but the bug still exists:
Dec 11 22:47:21 dy-base BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#3, xfslogd/3/317
Dec 11 22:47:21
34 matches
Mail list logo
