; linux-n...@vger.kernel.org; Andrew Morton; Linus Torvalds; 'Mahavir
Prasad'; Prasanna Rao; Shimon Edelhaus
Subject: Re: xtensa port maintenance
On 08/16/2012 12:38 PM, Rakesh Jain wrote:
> Hi Marc,
> Is Skype library available for Xtensa Linux port?
> They are available for ARM.
I'd
; linux-n...@vger.kernel.org; Andrew Morton; Linus Torvalds; 'Mahavir
Prasad'; Prasanna Rao; Shimon Edelhaus
Subject: Re: xtensa port maintenance
On 08/16/2012 12:38 PM, Rakesh Jain wrote:
Hi Marc,
Is Skype library available for Xtensa Linux port?
They are available for ARM.
I'd also like to know
valds; 'Mahavir
> Prasad'; Prasanna Rao; Shimon Edelhaus; Rakesh Jain
> Subject: Re: xtensa port maintenance
>
> Chris Zankel wrote:
>> I have set up a tree on github for now, and will work close with Max
>> to get his changes to Stephen's linux-next tree and eventually
;
Kirill Krinkin; Stephen Rothwell; Greg KH; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Max
Filippov; linux-n...@vger.kernel.org; Andrew Morton; Linus Torvalds; 'Mahavir
Prasad'; Prasanna Rao; Shimon Edelhaus; Rakesh Jain
Subject: Re: xtensa port maintenance
Chris Zankel wrote:
> I have set up a tree on git
;
Kirill Krinkin; Stephen Rothwell; Greg KH; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Max
Filippov; linux-n...@vger.kernel.org; Andrew Morton; Linus Torvalds; 'Mahavir
Prasad'; Prasanna Rao; Shimon Edelhaus; Rakesh Jain
Subject: Re: xtensa port maintenance
Chris Zankel wrote:
I have set up a tree on github
Edelhaus; Rakesh Jain
Subject: Re: xtensa port maintenance
Chris Zankel wrote:
I have set up a tree on github for now, and will work close with Max
to get his changes to Stephen's linux-next tree and eventually Linus'
tree.
I think it's fine to add Max as a second maintainer [...]
Thanks
Chris Zankel wrote:
> I have set up a tree on github for now, and will work close
> with Max to get his changes to Stephen's linux-next tree and
> eventually Linus' tree.
> I think it's fine to add Max as a second maintainer [...]
Thanks for helping!
Pete Delaney wrote:
> I'm afraid that doing
Hi Arnd,
Given the recent renewed push for Xtensa, I'll step in to feed the
changes upstream. We might change that in future, though.
Max has volunteered to help bring the Xtensa port up-to-date. Most of
the recent development was done on outdated trees and never got
submitted in true
On Monday 06 August 2012, Max Filippov wrote:
> I have a couple of questions regarding the path of xtensa-specific patches
> upstream:
> - which git tree should they be targeted for? Should I set up a tree for
> pull requests, or will patches be picked up into some existing tree?
>
On Monday 06 August 2012, Max Filippov wrote:
I have a couple of questions regarding the path of xtensa-specific patches
upstream:
- which git tree should they be targeted for? Should I set up a tree for
pull requests, or will patches be picked up into some existing tree?
Hi Arnd,
Given the recent renewed push for Xtensa, I'll step in to feed the
changes upstream. We might change that in future, though.
Max has volunteered to help bring the Xtensa port up-to-date. Most of
the recent development was done on outdated trees and never got
submitted in true
Chris Zankel wrote:
I have set up a tree on github for now, and will work close
with Max to get his changes to Stephen's linux-next tree and
eventually Linus' tree.
I think it's fine to add Max as a second maintainer [...]
Thanks for helping!
Pete Delaney wrote:
I'm afraid that doing it
Hi Max,
On 08/07/2012 09:43 AM, Max Filippov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Chris Zankel wrote:
Hi Max,
On 08/06/2012 04:38 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
AFAIK xtensa linux port is currently in bad shape: it doesn't work in the
mainline, it fails to build in the linux-next. The latest
Hi Vadim,
On 08/06/2012 11:00 PM, Vadim Malenboim wrote:
Hi All,
I've beed dealing with the xtensa port for couple of months and I'd
like to contribute / help as much as possible.
I have an ML605 Xilinx Evaluation Board and already succeeded running
the clean-stable version from
Hi Vadim,
On 08/06/2012 11:00 PM, Vadim Malenboim wrote:
Hi All,
I've beed dealing with the xtensa port for couple of months and I'd
like to contribute / help as much as possible.
I have an ML605 Xilinx Evaluation Board and already succeeded running
the clean-stable version from
Hi Max,
On 08/07/2012 09:43 AM, Max Filippov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Chris Zankel ch...@zankel.net wrote:
Hi Max,
On 08/06/2012 04:38 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
AFAIK xtensa linux port is currently in bad shape: it doesn't work in the
mainline, it fails to build in the
Hi Max,
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
>>> https://github.com/jcmvbkbc/linux-xtensa/commit/edd7c14132388d5c09c57cf12c76c6631a1e0277
>>
>> Thanks, that
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Chris Zankel wrote:
> Hi Max,
>
> On 08/06/2012 04:38 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
>>
>> AFAIK xtensa linux port is currently in bad shape: it doesn't work in the
>> mainline, it fails to build in the linux-next. The latest working kernels
>> for
>> xtensa are
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Max,
>
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Chris Zankel wrote:
On 08/06/2012 04:38 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
Hi Max,
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Chris Zankel wrote:
>>> On 08/06/2012 04:38 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
AFAIK xtensa linux port is currently in bad shape: it doesn't
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Chris Zankel wrote:
>> On 08/06/2012 04:38 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
>>> AFAIK xtensa linux port is currently in bad shape: it doesn't work in the
>>> mainline, it fails to build in the
Hi Chris,
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Chris Zankel wrote:
> On 08/06/2012 04:38 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
>> AFAIK xtensa linux port is currently in bad shape: it doesn't work in the
>> mainline, it fails to build in the linux-next. The latest working kernels
>> for
>> xtensa are 2.6.29...31
Hi Chris,
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Chris Zankel ch...@zankel.net wrote:
On 08/06/2012 04:38 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
AFAIK xtensa linux port is currently in bad shape: it doesn't work in the
mainline, it fails to build in the linux-next. The latest working kernels
for
xtensa are
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven ge...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
Hi Chris,
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Chris Zankel ch...@zankel.net wrote:
On 08/06/2012 04:38 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
AFAIK xtensa linux port is currently in bad shape: it doesn't work in the
mainline, it
Hi Max,
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Max Filippov jcmvb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven ge...@linux-m68k.org
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Chris Zankel ch...@zankel.net wrote:
On 08/06/2012 04:38 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
AFAIK xtensa linux
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven ge...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
Hi Max,
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Max Filippov jcmvb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven ge...@linux-m68k.org
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Chris Zankel
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Chris Zankel ch...@zankel.net wrote:
Hi Max,
On 08/06/2012 04:38 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
AFAIK xtensa linux port is currently in bad shape: it doesn't work in the
mainline, it fails to build in the linux-next. The latest working kernels
for
xtensa are
Hi Max,
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Max Filippov jcmvb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven ge...@linux-m68k.org
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Max Filippov jcmvb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Max,
On 08/06/2012 04:38 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
AFAIK xtensa linux port is currently in bad shape: it doesn't work in the
mainline, it fails to build in the linux-next. The latest working kernels for
xtensa are 2.6.29...31 trees hosted at the git.linux-xtensa.org.
I wouldn't say it's in bad
Hi.
AFAIK xtensa linux port is currently in bad shape: it doesn't work in the
mainline, it fails to build in the linux-next. The latest working kernels for
xtensa are 2.6.29...31 trees hosted at the git.linux-xtensa.org.
I have a goal to make xtensa arch in the linux mainline usable.
Currently I
Hi.
AFAIK xtensa linux port is currently in bad shape: it doesn't work in the
mainline, it fails to build in the linux-next. The latest working kernels for
xtensa are 2.6.29...31 trees hosted at the git.linux-xtensa.org.
I have a goal to make xtensa arch in the linux mainline usable.
Currently I
Hi Max,
On 08/06/2012 04:38 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
AFAIK xtensa linux port is currently in bad shape: it doesn't work in the
mainline, it fails to build in the linux-next. The latest working kernels for
xtensa are 2.6.29...31 trees hosted at the git.linux-xtensa.org.
I wouldn't say it's in bad
32 matches
Mail list logo
