Re: Kernel 2.2.18 and GCC versions

2000-10-13 Thread Petri Kaukasoina
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 12:26:02AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: egcs-1.1.2 builds 2.2.18pre. I know this because thats the compiler I use to build it. Its also the recommended compiler. What do you mean by _the_ recommended compiler? Is 2.7.2.3 recommended no more? Is there some benefit using

Re: IRQ affinity vs. MTRRs, was Re: 36 bit MTRRs, Re: test10-pre1problems on 4-way SuperServer8050

2000-10-13 Thread Boszormenyi Zoltan
On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, James Simmons wrote: every CPU to avoid slowdowns. So that if you set that eth0's IRQ will be handled by CPU1, the MTRRs of CPU1 will be set accordingly, and the other CPUs will not care about eth0, so they do not need eth0's MTRR settings. A little

eepro100 problem [was: Re: test10-pre1 problems on 4-way SuperServer8050]

2000-10-13 Thread Andrey Savochkin
Hi, On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 02:19:27PM +0100, Tigran Aivazian wrote: Having done a few more reboots I got more info -- one of the eepro100 interfaces is dead only in 4 out 5 cases. So, sometimes, doing ifdown eth0 ; ifup eth0 does help. Tigran, please check if you have any driver's messages,

Re: [RFC] New ideas for the OOM handler

2000-10-13 Thread David Feuer
Long-running processes are not always important. If I'm running an RC5 cracker or similar program, I want that killed right after the fork bomb. While it's generally bad to interrupt simulations etc., it is perfectly fine to do so if they are properly designed so they save their state as

[PATCH] USB mdc800 driver fix for test10-pre2

2000-10-13 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 08:06:46AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * USB: fix setting urb-dev in plusb, wacom, mdc800) (Greg KH) {CRITICAL} Attached is a patch against 2.4.0-test10-pre2 for the mdc800.c driver to fix this problem. Could anyone who has this device, verify that

[PATCH] USB wacom driver fix for test10-pre2

2000-10-13 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 08:06:46AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * USB: fix setting urb-dev in plusb, wacom, mdc800) (Greg KH) {CRITICAL} Attached is a patch against 2.4.0-test10-pre2 for the wacom.c driver to fix this problem. Could anyone who has this device, verify that

[PATCH] USB plusb driver fix for test10-pre2

2000-10-13 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 08:06:46AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * USB: fix setting urb-dev in plusb, wacom, mdc800) (Greg KH) {CRITICAL} Attached is a patch against 2.4.0-test10-pre2 for the plusb.c driver to fix this problem. Could anyone who has this device, verify that

lock_kernel() in kernel thread

2000-10-13 Thread Armin Schindler
Hi, I was wondering why it is necessary for the usb_hub_thread() in drivers/usb/hub.c to have the big kernel lock with lock_kernel() ? What is it with lock_kernel() anyway ? extern __inline__ void lock_kernel(void) { #if 1 if (!++current-lock_depth)

Re: 2.2.14 SMP 3com905: transmit timed out: Odd lost irq and ip-stack lockup

2000-10-13 Thread Dr. Michael Weller
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Andrew Morton wrote: "Maciej W. Rozycki" wrote: On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Andrew Morton wrote: Oct 9 17:29:02 fwintern kernel: eth0: Interrupt posted but not delivered -- IRQ blocked by another device? This is the infamous APIC bug. I have about ten

Oops 2.2.x

2000-10-13 Thread Stefano Mason
I'm definitely convice that in the actual kernel source 2.2.16 2.2.17 there is a bug that generate this Oops: Oct 12 16:32:57 giulia kernel: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0900841f Oct 12 16:32:57 giulia kernel: current-tss.cr3 = 1c364000, %%cr3 = 1c364000 Oct 12

2.4.0-test8 locks up Aladdin V IDE

2000-10-13 Thread David Vrabel
Hi, I'm running 2.4.0-test9 on an Aladdin V based mother board. The IDE interface locks up (i.e. reads/writes etc fail, drives cannot be detected when booting) and only works again after power cycling. Same problem occured with 2.4.0-test5 and up. The problem does not occur with 2.2.x

[PATCH] Fix hashing in 2.4.0 rpcauth code (was Re: bug in rpc code)

2000-10-13 Thread Trond Myklebust
" " == Hai-Pao Fan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Problem: A returned address from kmalloc() can be overwritten to a wrong place in rpcauth_lookup_credcache() routine. Ouch. This is a bug that's been with us since 2.1.x at least... Linus, the problem is in fact twofold. 1)

[PATCH]Fix rpcauth in 2.2.18pre (was Re: bug in rpc code)

2000-10-13 Thread Trond Myklebust
" " == Hai-Pao Fan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Problem: A returned address from kmalloc() can be overwritten to a wrong place in rpcauth_lookup_credcache() routine. Hi Alan, The following patch fixes the bug in 2.2.18pre. As reported in the 2.4.0 patch on l-k, the problem

mapping user space buffer to kernel address space

2000-10-13 Thread mdaljeet
Hi, I have a user buffer and i want to map it to kernel address space can anyone tell how to do this like in AIX we have xmattach thanks daljeet - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at

Re: cannot connect to linuxtoday.com 80 with test9-pre9

2000-10-13 Thread Peter Samuelson
More with their firewall. But try echo 0 /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn [Mike Jagdis] Is there anyway that we could make ECN enable/disable a flag on a route? Would it help? It seems to me that typically, your busiest, best- connected routes are the ones where you could derive the most

Re: cannot connect to linuxtoday.com 80 with test9-pre9

2000-10-13 Thread Jan Niehusmann
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 10:32:32AM +, Peter Samuelson wrote: Is there anyway that we could make ECN enable/disable a flag on a route? Would it help? It seems to me that typically, your busiest, best- If it is configurable per route (and not per interface), it may help, as you could

Re: mapping user space buffer to kernel address space

2000-10-13 Thread Petr Vandrovec
On 13 Oct 00 at 15:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a user buffer and i want to map it to kernel address space can anyone tell how to do this like in AIX we have xmattach Look at mm/memory.c:map_user_kiobuf. It is used by drivers/char/raw.c, or by drivers/media/video/bttv-driver.c, for

Re: [PATCH] USB mdc800 driver fix for test10-pre2

2000-10-13 Thread Henning Zabel
Greg KH wrote: On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 08:06:46AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * USB: fix setting urb-dev in plusb, wacom, mdc800) (Greg KH) {CRITICAL} Attached is a patch against 2.4.0-test10-pre2 for the mdc800.c driver to fix this problem. Could anyone who has this

Re: cannot connect to linuxtoday.com 80 with test9-pre9

2000-10-13 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Craig Schlenter [EMAIL PROTECTED]] but you could add a host route for say linuxtoday with the NO_ECN flag (also pointing at the default route), right? [Jan Niehusmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]] If it is configurable per route (and not per interface), it may help, as you could add additional routes

Re: mapping user space buffer to kernel address space

2000-10-13 Thread Malcolm Beattie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have a user buffer and i want to map it to kernel address space can anyone tell how to do this like in AIX we have xmattach In 2.2, you're better off providing a fake character device driver which allocates the memory in kernel space and lets the user mmap it. In

Re: floppy on alpha

2000-10-13 Thread Guest section DW
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 10:13:11AM +0900, Tom Holroyd wrote: Mine works OK, except for that invalidate on last close thing (how do I go back to the old behavior? Why was it changed?). You go back to the old behaviour by commenting out the invalidate_buffers call in if

Re: Kernel 2.2.18 and GCC versions

2000-10-13 Thread Andre Tomt
I have to be wicked crazy - but: Linux version 2.2.18pre15 (root@juce) (gcc version 2.97 20001010 (experimental)) #7 Tue Oct 10 20:18:58 CEST 2000 It seems to "work", but it hasn't been put under stress, yet. The reason I tried the kernel with 2.97 was the -march=athlon option. -- Andre Tomt

Re: Kernel 2.2.18 and GCC versions

2000-10-13 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
"J . A . Magallon" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have a little problem when compiling new kernels. I run Mandrake 7.1 with many many updates (its almost 7.2beta). install the last egcs package from 7.2b and compile with kgcc (will be autodetect by the kernel). -- MandrakeSoft Inc

getting physical memory of buffer mapped bu kiobuf

2000-10-13 Thread aprasad
hi, I am mapping user space buffer to kernel space by using kiobufs. as .. .. struct kiobuf *iobuf, alloc_kiovec(1, *iobuf); map_user_kiobuf() /*for user buffer*/ lock_kiovec(); but to start dma transfers, i must know physical address of mapped pages.. is there any way out??? Anil Kumar

Re: SMP irq sharing problem in 2.2.17

2000-10-13 Thread Alan Cox
I had a similar problem with the USB driver assigned to IRQ19 but not receiving any interrupts. Perhaps someone more knowledgable can explain why linux fails under MPS1.4. Linux is fine with MPS1.4. There are two possible causes I see 1. Some clown built a USB controller with only 4

Re: kmap for dma buffer

2000-10-13 Thread Alan Cox
For dma transfers to/from user space buffer, one need to lock that user space buffer so that it won't be swaped out. and also its bus address is obtained by call virt_to_bus and then this bus address is written to dma controller. Thats what the kiovecs deal with yes but do we explicitly

2.2.18 ipc problem

2000-10-13 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
lotus domino server dies with deleting all semaphores, shared memory ... with ipcrm/ipcs does not help, only a reboot does. any idea what could be wrong ? i have no idea if this is a bug in linux or domino, but under linux usualy you don't need a to reboot a server. are there known issues with

Re: Kernel 2.2.18 and GCC versions

2000-10-13 Thread Alan Cox
What do you mean by _the_ recommended compiler? Is 2.7.2.3 recommended no more? Is there some benefit using egcs-1.1.2 instead of 2.7.2.3? Should Changes be changed? Umm looks like it - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to

Re: Kernel 2.2.18 and GCC versions

2000-10-13 Thread Eric Lowe
Hello, I will use 2.95.2, so that egcs seems to not being able to build 18-preX. egcs-1.1.2 builds 2.2.18pre. I know this because thats the compiler I use to build it. Its also the recommended compiler. 2.95 is still 'probably works'. In truth I think 2.95 is now at the point where if

Re: P4 detection / cache sizes / features

2000-10-13 Thread Alan Cox
has someone included detection support for P4 already (following P4 manuals on intel developer web site)? The CPU identification is in 2.2.18pre Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ

Re: Kernel 2.2.18 and GCC versions

2000-10-13 Thread Alan Cox
I have to be wicked crazy - but: Linux version 2.2.18pre15 (root@juce) (gcc version 2.97 20001010 (experimental)) #7 Tue Oct 10 20:18:58 CEST 2000 It seems to "work", but it hasn't been put under stress, yet. The reason I tried the kernel with 2.97 was the -march=athlon option. Let me

Re: mapping user space buffer to kernel address space

2000-10-13 Thread Eric Lowe
Hello, On 13 Oct 00 at 15:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a user buffer and i want to map it to kernel address space can anyone tell how to do this like in AIX we have xmattach Look at mm/memory.c:map_user_kiobuf. It is used by drivers/char/raw.c, or by

vfat problems in 2.4.0-test10-pre2

2000-10-13 Thread Rich Baum
When I copy a file from my linux partition to my windows partition and the filename is not in 8.3 format I get an error when I check my disk for errors saying that the long filename is no longer associated with a file. After fixing this the filename is in 8.3 format. Files already wine 8.3

Asynchronous notifications from networking device drivers

2000-10-13 Thread Mikko . Jaakkola
Hello, What's the best way to get proprietary notifications from networking device drivers? I need to get notification data through ioct-interface but I need some way to signal that data is ready. The only way I can think of is to put pending request from user-mode to kernel-mode and release it

Re: P4 detection / cache sizes / features

2000-10-13 Thread Alan Cox
The CPU identification is in 2.2.18pre Thanks, what about 2.4 ? DaveJ just posted a forward port fo the bits today. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: Kernel 2.2.18 and GCC versions

2000-10-13 Thread Alan Cox
In truth I think 2.95 is now at the point where if anything kernel side is broken it must be fairly obscure or a little used driver I've been using 2.95.2 to build PPC kernels and it seems to work OK, but I _know_ that 2.91.66 works with both 2.2 and 2.4 kernels so it should probably be

Re: floppy on alpha

2000-10-13 Thread Alexander Viro
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Guest section DW wrote: the command openflop: #include fcntl.h main(){ int fd = open("/dev/fd0", O_RDONLY); pause(); } sh -c 'kill -SIGSTOP $$' /dev/fd0 each time after inserting a floppy, and to kill it before

RE: cannot connect to linuxtoday.com 80 with test9-pre9

2000-10-13 Thread Mike Jagdis
[Mike Jagdis] Is there anyway that we could make ECN enable/disable a flag on a route? Would it help? It seems to me that typically, your busiest, best- connected routes are the ones where you could derive the most benefit from ECN -- and those same routes are where you are likely to find

Re: 2.2.18pre15 and do_try_to_free_page for ... w/ Andrea's patch

2000-10-13 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 02:09:42AM +0200, Sasi Peter wrote: Hi! Unfortunatelly I couldn't apply it: [root@iq src]# bzcat VM-global-2.2.18pre9-6.bz2 |patch -p0 Please check with `head -4 VM/Makefile` that it's 2.2.18pre15. andrea@athlon:~/devel/kernel fork 2.2.18pre15 z; cd z; apply

Re: Kernel 2.2.18 and GCC versions

2000-10-13 Thread Igmar Palsenberg
I will use 2.95.2, so that egcs seems to not being able to build 18-preX. egcs-1.1.2 builds 2.2.18pre. I know this because thats the compiler I use to build it. Its also the recommended compiler. 2.95 is still 'probably works'. In truth I think 2.95 is now at the point where if anything

Re: Kernel 2.2.18 and GCC versions

2000-10-13 Thread Michael Meding
Igmar Palsenberg wrote: I will use 2.95.2, so that egcs seems to not being able to build 18-preX. egcs-1.1.2 builds 2.2.18pre. I know this because thats the compiler I use to build it. Its also the recommended compiler. 2.95 is still 'probably works'. In truth I think 2.95 is now at

[PATCH] Rewritten drivers/block/paride/Makefile

2000-10-13 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Rewritten to use lists. Applies cleanly to t9/10p1/t10p2. Tested. -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- linux-240t9/drivers/block/paride/Makefile Tue Oct 3 00:16:47 2000 +++ linux/drivers/block/paride/Makefile Sat Oct 7 19:22:15 2000 @@ -1,183 +1,34 @@ # -# Makefile for

Re: VM: do_try_to_free_memory failed for XXXX, 2.2.17, 2.2.18pre3

2000-10-13 Thread Jeff Garzik
Andrea Arcangeli wrote: On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 12:47:39AM +0200, Krzysztof Sierota wrote: Marcelo Tosati assembled a kernel for us that had Andrea Arcangeli patches applied and some other stuff that we needed, and the machines are stable I recommend using 2.2.18pre15aa1 (without using

Re: [PATCH] usb audio.

2000-10-13 Thread Erik Mouw
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 03:08:59PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Only problem is that the sound has a lot of hickups and I get these messages in my syslog: I didn't see that. I think I _do_ have CONFIG_USB_BANDWIDTH enabled. What else do you have connected and

RE: SMP irq sharing problem in 2.2.17

2000-10-13 Thread Dunlap, Randy
I had a similar problem with the USB driver assigned to IRQ19 but not receiving any interrupts. Perhaps someone more knowledgable can explain why linux fails under MPS1.4. Linux is fine with MPS1.4. There are two possible causes I see 1.Some clown built a USB controller with

Re: vfat problems in 2.4.0-test10-pre2

2000-10-13 Thread Andris Pavenis
I have the same problem. As far as I remeber it appeared most likely beginning with 2.4.0-test7 (or maybe test6) Andris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

2.2.17 memory bug?

2000-10-13 Thread Hacksaw
I apologize if this is a known issue. I am running Linux version 2.2.17 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release)) #2 SMP Sun Oct 8 02:37:43 EDT 2000 On a dual Pentium III with 256M of SDRAM, aix-7xxx, sblive, kingston tulip, 3c905, 3dfx Voodoo3 AGP.

Re: VM: do_try_to_free_memory failed for XXXX, 2.2.17, 2.2.18pre3

2000-10-13 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 04:23:51PM +0200, David Weinehall wrote: On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 04:14:32PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 12:47:39AM +0200, Krzysztof Sierota wrote: Marcelo Tosati assembled a kernel for us that had Andrea Arcangeli patches applied and

Re: VM: do_try_to_free_memory failed for XXXX, 2.2.17, 2.2.18pre3

2000-10-13 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 10:54:50AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: Andrea Arcangeli wrote: On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 12:47:39AM +0200, Krzysztof Sierota wrote: Marcelo Tosati assembled a kernel for us that had Andrea Arcangeli patches applied and some other stuff that we needed, and the

Re: SMP irq sharing problem in 2.2.17

2000-10-13 Thread David Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Do we have any [non-kernel] software that will read/analyze MPS tables? I believe there's a port of http://people.freebsd.org/~fsmp/SMP/mptable/ somewhere. It's probably quicker to port it again yourself than search for it. -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this

Re: VM: do_try_to_free_memory failed for XXXX, 2.2.17, 2.2.18pre3

2000-10-13 Thread Jeff Garzik
Andrea Arcangeli wrote: On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 10:54:50AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: I've tested 2.2.18pre15 (w/out 'aa1') against FreeBSD, Solaris, and other Linux clients, and I'm very happy with the improvement over older Linux NFS. All of my testing and real-life usage was done w/

Re: VM: do_try_to_free_memory failed for XXXX, 2.2.17, 2.2.18pre3

2000-10-13 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 11:20:14AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: No problem here, I always use 8192 r/w size :) You would help me if you could try to do the same with 2.2.18pre15aa1 on both client and server side nfsv3 using also files larger than 2G. Maybe the problem with the bigger r/w size

Re: vfat problems in 2.4.0-test10-pre2

2000-10-13 Thread Petr Vandrovec
I have the same problem. As far as I remeber it appeared most likely beginning with 2.4.0-test7 (or maybe test6) I missed original problem, but what about this one? Fixes extension in MSDOS namespace when filename is longer than 12 chars... Someone familiar with VFAT should look whether

RE: [PATCH] usb audio.

2000-10-13 Thread Dunlap, Randy
Only problem is that the sound has a lot of hickups and I get these messages in my syslog: I didn't see that. I think I _do_ have CONFIG_USB_BANDWIDTH enabled. What else do you have connected and what else were you using at the time? Does the kernel whinge? Just

af_packet: recvfrom causing high processor load in system

2000-10-13 Thread Alexander Riesen
Hi, dear community, The problem: under heavy network load (2000 frame/sec and more, traffic produced with Fluke) reading from the packet socket (SOCK_PACKET) fully loads the processor every ~30 sec (PII-650). The higher is the traffic level, the longer is the "heavy system load" interval. I have

A20 Gate enable sequence (setup.S)

2000-10-13 Thread Robert Kaiser
Hi list, There seem to be two common methods for ix86-based boards to enable the A20 line: The traditional method that uses the keyboard controller (this is what Linux supports) and a method (sometimes referred to as "fast A20 Gate") that uses a special port address (0x92). Some boards

Re: why is modprobe (and nothing else) exec()'d?

2000-10-13 Thread Harald Welte
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 10:01:56AM -0400, Chris Swiedler wrote: Why is modprobe kept as a separate executable, when nothing else in the kernel is (seems to be)? What is the advantage to keeping modprobe separate, modprobe is a userspace tool. It resolves dependencies based on a textfile called

Re: test10-pre2

2000-10-13 Thread Ivan Kokshaysky
On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 01:18:53PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: See the arch/x86/mm/fault.c changes to see what arch-specific changes this can entail. This patch works for me... Ivan. --- linux/include/asm-alpha/bitops.h.orig Wed Oct 4 17:06:59 2000 +++

RE: why is modprobe (and nothing else) exec()'d?

2000-10-13 Thread Chris Swiedler
Ok, I should have thought of that ;-). I've never used modprobe directly myself, and had forgotten that was possible. Thanks to everyone who replied. chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ

Re: Kernel 2.2.18 and GCC versions

2000-10-13 Thread Harald Welte
On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 11:59:51PM +0200, J . A . Magallon wrote: Hi, everybody. Kernel 2.2.18-pre15 compiles fine under gcc-2.95.2. It is just plain 2.2.17 with Alan's patch to 18-pre15. I downloaded the gcc-2.96 rpms from rufus, and the compilation process there is no such thing as

Re: test10-pre1 problems on 4-way SuperServer8050

2000-10-13 Thread Rik van Riel
On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, Richard Guenther wrote: I reported this BUG on a few days ago but got no response - happens on UP with only 32M ram, too. (see below). Also note the second BUG at vmscan.c:538 which I believe never saw reported again. Oct 11 16:05:26 hilbert36 kernel: kernel BUG at

Slightly off topic...

2000-10-13 Thread Dabney, Blane
This is a bit off-topic, but is there a way to compile a shared library with a gcc 2.9x.xx compiler that will work with an executable compiled with gcc 2.7.2.3? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the

Re: test10-pre1 problems on 4-way SuperServer8050

2000-10-13 Thread Richard Guenther
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Rik van Riel wrote: On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, Richard Guenther wrote: I reported this BUG on a few days ago but got no response - happens on UP with only 32M ram, too. (see below). Also note the second BUG at vmscan.c:538 which I believe never saw reported again.

Re: A20 Gate enable sequence (setup.S)

2000-10-13 Thread Alan Cox
Some boards (especially in the embedded PC area) implement only the latter method (some don't even _have_ a keyboard controller). With these boards, Linux fails to boot. Try the current 2.2.18pre. This has fast A20 too and I suspect will boot on your box. Its had no problems on 2.2.18pre

Re: A20 Gate enable sequence (setup.S)

2000-10-13 Thread Tigran Aivazian
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Robert Kaiser wrote: + +# enable the "fast" A20 gate + + in al,#0x92 + or al,#2 + and al,#0xfe + out #0x92,al + this is not a valid ATT assembler but looks like some ancient Intel syntax. Linux kernel

Re: floppy on alpha

2000-10-13 Thread Thorsten Kranzkowski
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 10:13:11AM +0900, Tom Holroyd wrote: On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, Thorsten Kranzkowski wrote: Huh - your floppy is working? gcc version 2.96 2925 (experimental) Mine works OK, except for that invalidate on last close thing (how do I go back to the old behavior?

why is it taking so long to change interfaces?

2000-10-13 Thread Christopher Friesen
I'm trying to figure out why swapping from one NIC to another is taking so long (on the order of a few seconds), and I was hoping one of you could help me out. I'm running a bit of an odd setup, so bear with me for a minute while I explain. Machine A has two NICs each set to a different IP

Re: test10-pre1 problems on 4-way SuperServer8050

2000-10-13 Thread Rik van Riel
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Richard Guenther wrote: On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Rik van Riel wrote: On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, Richard Guenther wrote: I reported this BUG on a few days ago but got no response - happens on UP with only 32M ram, too. (see below). Also note the second BUG at vmscan.c:538

Re: test10-pre2

2000-10-13 Thread Richard Henderson
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 08:15:46PM +0400, Ivan Kokshaysky wrote: On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 01:18:53PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: See the arch/x86/mm/fault.c changes to see what arch-specific changes this can entail. This patch works for me... You shouldn't have needed any changes at all

Re: A20 Gate enable sequence (setup.S)

2000-10-13 Thread Robert Kaiser
On Fre, 13 Okt 2000 you wrote: Some boards (especially in the embedded PC area) implement only the latter method (some don't even _have_ a keyboard controller). With these boards, Linux fails to boot. Try the current 2.2.18pre. This has fast A20 too and I suspect will boot on your box.

Re: floppy on alpha

2000-10-13 Thread Thorsten Kranzkowski
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 04:40:45PM +, Thorsten Kranzkowski wrote: Since I received a success report for 2.4.0pre8 for the very same board but compiled with 2.96.2 I tend to think that it's indeed the compiler. ^^ 2.95.2 of course - friday 13th :-) -- | Thorsten

RE: [PATCH] usb audio.

2000-10-13 Thread Dunlap, Randy
I don't know about the sound hickups you are hearing. Tom Sailer suggested just a day or two ago something about changing the latency for the USB controller by using setpci. I tried: setpci -s 00:07.2 latency_timer=20 setpci -s 00:07.2 latency_timer=40 setpci -s 00:07.2

Re: A patch to loop.c for better cryption support

2000-10-13 Thread Marc Mutz
Andi Kleen wrote: snip 2.4 has already broken backwards compatibility to 2.2 (IV changed from disk absolute to relative). When you change it now (before 2.4.0) it is relatively painless. I think the change is a good idea. snip You're wrong. All kernels from int-2.2.10.4 onwards can be

Re: vfat problems in 2.4.0-test10-pre2

2000-10-13 Thread Andris Pavenis
On Friday 13 October 2000 19:55, Petr Vandrovec wrote: I missed original problem, but what about this one? Fixes extension in MSDOS namespace when filename is longer than 12 chars... Someone familiar with VFAT should look whether VFAT multibyte code cannot be cleaned up a bit... When I was

RE: large memory support for x86

2000-10-13 Thread Ingo Molnar
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Chris Swiedler wrote: Why is it that a user process can't intentionally switch segments? Dereferencing a 32-bit address causes the address to be calculated using the "current" segment descriptor, right? It seems to me that a process could set a new segment selector, in

HPT366 and 2.2.17

2000-10-13 Thread Adam Popik
Where can I found patch for UDMA 66 (BP6 board) based on hpt366 chip , and for kernel 2.2.17 Adam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: Updated Linux 2.4 Status/TODO List (from the ALS show)

2000-10-13 Thread Francois ROMIEU
Fwiw: - vmlist_modify_lock/unlock are turned into spin_lock/unlock; - ditto for vmlist_access/unaccess; - atomic_t rss (gross). Excuse the incorrect In-Reply-To field (my mail archive for the day is currently unavailable). diff -u --recursive linux-2.4.0-test10-pre2.orig/fs/binfmt_aout.c

Re: large memory support for x86

2000-10-13 Thread Timur Tabi
** Reply to message from Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 13 Oct 2000 20:44:19 +0200 (CEST) processes are not limited to a single segment, eg. Wine uses nonstandard segments. But as i said, using multiple segments does not let you out of 32 bits of virtual memory. Sure it does, just

Re: mapping user space buffer to kernel address space

2000-10-13 Thread Linus Torvalds
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a user buffer and i want to map it to kernel address space can anyone tell how to do this like in AIX we have xmattach Note that it is usually MUCH better to do this the other way around: having a kernel-side buffer, and mapping

[PATCH] drivers/net/starfire.c - ioremap return typr - 2.4.0-test10-pre2

2000-10-13 Thread Francois Romieu
- the cast on the return value of ioremap can be avoided; - we want to print pci_resource_start(pdev, 0) instead of ioaddr when ioaddr is NULL (tail of the patch). diff -u --recursive linux-2.4.0-test10-pre2.orig/drivers/net/starfire.c linux-2.4.0-test10-pre2/drivers/net/starfire.c ---

Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new addition WAS(test9 PCI resourcecollisions (fwd)

2000-10-13 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, jamal wrote: I am attaching the debug output on bootup after defining DEBUG in pci.c and the i386 pci header file with test10-pre2 Note: this is a Dell Lattitude docking station. The devices which are having resource problems are on the docking station. Works fine

Re: large memory support for x86

2000-10-13 Thread kernel
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Timur Tabi wrote: Sure it does, just like segments let 16-bit apps access more than 64KB of memory. If you have two selectors, each one can point to a different physical base address, and IIRC, the size of the physical address base can be 36 bits. That gives you 16

Re: large memory support for x86

2000-10-13 Thread Petr Vandrovec
On 13 Oct 00 at 13:42, Timur Tabi wrote: ** Reply to message from Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 13 Oct 2000 20:44:19 +0200 (CEST) processes are not limited to a single segment, eg. Wine uses nonstandard segments. But as i said, using multiple segments does not let you out of 32

Re: [patch] For 2.4: syscall revoke.

2000-10-13 Thread Alexander Viro
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Alan Cox wrote: 1) one process does read() on device, another does revoke() followed by rmmod. Oops - nothing holds module in memory, the first process is executing code from that module (-read(), that is) and we unmap that code. 2) every access to

Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new addition WAS(test9 PCI resourcecollisions (fwd)

2000-10-13 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote: Can you add the same extra debug code that I asked Dag Bakke to add for his problem: Oh, also, can you try to see what happens if you change the define for #define pcibios_assign_all_busses() 0 to a 1 in include/asm-i386/pci.h? That

Re: test10-pre2

2000-10-13 Thread Ivan Kokshaysky
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 09:54:14AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote: You shouldn't have needed any changes at all to work. But without that change I've got oopses (fortunately not fatal) in swapon and modprobe. The synchronization we already do for the vptb also takes care of vmalloc.

Re: [PATCH] Fix SCSI proc oops

2000-10-13 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Torben Mathiasen wrote: Yes it works, its not all that different from my patch ;). Yeah. The thing I actually cared most about was the comment, which makes the patch palatable to me. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Re: [PATCH] usb audio.

2000-10-13 Thread Erik Mouw
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 10:27:05AM -0700, Dunlap, Randy wrote: I tried: setpci -s 00:07.2 latency_timer=20 setpci -s 00:07.2 latency_timer=40 setpci -s 00:07.2 latency_timer=80 but without effect. However, the USB device doesn't have a latency timer, so that probably

Re: test10-pre2

2000-10-13 Thread Linus Torvalds
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Richard Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 08:15:46PM +0400, Ivan Kokshaysky wrote: On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 01:18:53PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: See the arch/x86/mm/fault.c changes to see what arch-specific changes this can entail.

Re: large memory support for x86

2000-10-13 Thread Timur Tabi
** Reply to message from Brian Gerst [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 13 Oct 2000 15:07:42 -0400 You missed the point. The layering on the X86 memory managment is such: Segment | Virtual Address- limited to 32 bits | Physical Address Segmentation never directly gives you

Re: large memory support for x86

2000-10-13 Thread Alexander Viro
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Timur Tabi wrote: I understand that a normal virtual address (i.e. a pointer) can only address a single 32-bit (4GB) memory block. My point was that by also using more than one 16-bit selector, you can have multiple 4GB areas. So for instance, 1000: can point

Re: Kernel 2.2.18 and GCC versions

2000-10-13 Thread J . A . Magallon
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000 13:37:21 Andre Tomt wrote: I have to be wicked crazy - but: Linux version 2.2.18pre15 (root@juce) (gcc version 2.97 20001010 (experimental)) #7 Tue Oct 10 20:18:58 CEST 2000 It seems to "work", but it hasn't been put under stress, yet. The reason I tried the kernel

Re: large memory support for x86

2000-10-13 Thread Alexander Viro
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Timur Tabi wrote: ** Reply to message from Alexander Viro [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 13 Oct 2000 15:25:31 -0400 (EDT) Ditto with PAE: 16:32-32-36. In _all_ cases you are limited by the size of linear address. I.e. all address modes are limited to 4Gb. All you

Dell smp won't boot

2000-10-13 Thread Greg Hennessy
One of my dual cpu dell server running 2.2.15 has stopped booting. It gets part way through the boot process and rints wait_oin_bh, cpu 1 irq: 0 [0 0] bh: 1 [1 0] [c010aefd] [c0119ecf] [c011a029] [c0113ad0] [c010933c] and repeats. Might this be a software problem, or should I simply call in for

RE: Dell smp won't boot

2000-10-13 Thread Matt_Domsch
It's likely the megaraid driver. Try the megaraid driver that's in the latest 2.2.18pre. Thanks, Matt -Original Message- From: Greg Hennessy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 13, 2000 2:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Dell smp won't boot One of my dual cpu dell

unresolved symbols in ipx module

2000-10-13 Thread John Williams
About a year ago there was a short thread about unresolved symbols in the ipx module, which doesn't appear to have come to a solution. I have just had the same problem, and have some new information to add. (kernel 2.2.16 on Redhat 6.2) The problem: "depmod -ae" says depmod: *** Unresolved

[PATCH] 2.4.0-test10-pre2 - drivers/net/rcpci45.c - conflicting types

2000-10-13 Thread Francois Romieu
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/tmp/romieu/tmp/linux-2.4.0-test10-pre2/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -march=i686 -fno-strict-aliasing -DMODULE -DMODVERSIONS -include /tmp/romieu/tmp/linux-2.4.0-test10-pre2/include/linux/modversions.h -c -o rcpci45.o rcpci45.c In

Re: 2.4.0-test6 network socket problems

2000-10-13 Thread J. Scott Kasten
I've found the problem. This type of loop does not work: do { alarm(t); read(fd); if (EINT) exception(); else alarm(0); } while (data); There are some semantics here that differ from other *nix where this works. The read() won't come out when the alarm comes, and

Re: A patch to loop.c for better cryption support

2000-10-13 Thread kernel
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 04:28:30AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: (snip) 2.4 has already broken backwards compatibility to 2.2 (IV changed from disk absolute to relative). When you change it now (before 2.4.0) it is relatively painless. I think the change is a good idea. Caution is advised when

Re: dual head r128

2000-10-13 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: Or, more general, treat [PCI] I/O space similar to [PCI] memory space. Just like we must use ioremap() for memory space: cookie = ioremap(memory_space_address, size); x = readb(cookie+offset); we could have ioportremap() for I/O

  1   2   3   4   >