Today I've found the following in my /var/log/messages:
Oct 28 20:14:36 some_host kernel: kmem_free: Bad obj addr (objp=c2b381e0,
name=size-64)
Oct 28 20:14:36 some_host kernel: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
virtual address
Oct 28 20:14:36 some_host kernel:
Horst von Brand wrote:
If you send SIGSTOP to syslogd on a Red Hat 6.2 system (glibc 2.1.3,
kernel 2.2.x), within a few minutes you will find your entire machine
grinds to a halt. For example, nobody can log in.
Great! Yet another way in which root can get the rope to shoot herself
Linus,
I have tracked down why I am getting the oops with page-mapping == 0
in block_read_full_page. Well, at least if not the ultimate cause,
then the penultimate cause. It's basically yet another truncate bug
(tm). I have some fairly detailed traces which I can send you if you
like, but the
On Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 06:43:42PM -0500, Stephen Crowley wrote:
kernel 2.4.0-test10-pre6, but this has been here as long as I can
remember.
starting wine triggers the bug, C: points to /win2k which is an NTFS
filesystem.
[snip]
Yep, there's a solution for this. Get yourself the complete
[Wakko Warner]
While this subject is fresh, what would be wrong with using the
entire drive as opposed to creating a partition and adding the
partition to the raid?
Does it autodetect an entire drive? The autodetect logic for
partitions looks at the 'partition type' byte, which of course
Just thought others besides Alan would want to know. There's some new data
too (and typo fixes, now that I'm at it :)
-klippeti-klippeti-klippeti-klap-
I'd like to report a successful heavy-duty test of 2.2.18pre17 with Andrea's
strict-VM-corruption-fix-1 (denoted 'vmfix'
I have attached a very small patch (test9) to remove the kernel lock from
kernel/acct.c. If I am missing something major (a brain?), I apologise in
advance. I have tested this on my UP x86 with spinlock debugging. I would
appreciate comments or an explanation of why this can't be done if you have
On Sun, 29 Oct 2000, Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Wakko Warner]
While this subject is fresh, what would be wrong with using the
entire drive as opposed to creating a partition and adding the
partition to the raid?
Does it autodetect an entire drive? The autodetect logic for
partitions
Paul Mackerras wrote:
I am not any kind of expert on the page cache but it seems to me that
maybe after locking the page we should check if it is still the page
we want (i.e. page-mapping and page-index are still correct), and go
back and look up the page again if not. Presumably there will
ugh Forgot to cc linux-kernel
Hi.
I get the following error when trying to compile 2.4.0-test10pre6
without procfs support:
drivers/ide/osb4.c: In function `pci_init_osb4':
drivers/ide/osb4.c:264: `osb4_revision' undeclared (first use in this function)
drivers/ide/osb4.c:264: (Each undeclared
Can anyone tell me about the viability of a guarantee_memory() syscall?
[I'm thinking: it would either kill the process, or allocate all virtual
memory needed for its shared libraries, buffers, allocated memory, etc.
Furthermore, it would render this process immune to the OOM killer,
unless it
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
The variable, osb4_revision, is inside a #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS block but
I was not able to discern if the line where it is referred should be
#ifdef'ed also. The following patch moves the variable declaration out-
side the #ifdef block, as a blind
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2.2.18pre18
o Fix rtc_lock for ide-probe, and hd.c(Richard Johnson)
I need this to get it to compile:
--- linux-2.2.18pre18.orig/drivers/block/ide-probe.cSun Oct 29 13:02:39 2000
+++
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep - known problem. AMI have one more pre patch to sort it our Im going back
to the older driver
I've tried the AMI patch and it appears to work. I'm now running
2.2.18pre18 + fix to ideprobe.c + ami megaraid fix and it looks OK
Raul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can anyone tell me about the viability of a guarantee_memory() syscall?
[I'm thinking: it would either kill the process, or allocate all virtual
memory needed for its shared libraries, buffers, allocated memory, etc.
Furthermore, it would render this
On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
The alternative is to have an entirely different approach, where the page
cache itself only knows about the maximum page (in which case your current
"last_page" calculation is right on), and then anybody who needs to know
about partial pages needs
Can anyone tell me about the viability of a guarantee_memory() syscall?
[I'm thinking: it would either kill the process, or allocate all virtual
memory needed for its shared libraries, buffers, allocated memory, etc.
Furthermore, it would render this process immune to the OOM killer,
unless
Hi!
Console colors are completely messed up (read: black, I even suspect
the font to be corrupt somehow) if switching back to console mode
from X (either by quitting or ctrl-alt-fX) in recent 2.4.0-textXX
kernels. 2.2.XX do work just fine. Is this a known problem with a
known fix?
Setup:
Hi,
I just got an Oops in block_read_full_page() (fs/buffer.c) in
test10-pre6 while logging out from X. The system is an Asus P6300
notebook with Mobile PII/266 and 112MB memory running SuSE 6.4.
Here is the output from ksymoops:
ksymoops 0.7c on i686 2.4.0-test10. Options used
-V
Can gcc generate ASM output with the source lines from the C file
interspersed as comments?
Thanks.
Jerry Kelley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at
On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 10:17:36AM -0500, Jerry Kelley wrote:
Can gcc generate ASM output with the source lines from the C file
interspersed as comments?
Yes, "gcc -S". Look in the gcc info pages for more information (the man
page in known to be outdated).
If that isn't what you want, try
I have been investigating this for quite a while and am at a
loss... (Please let me know if you need more information or this post is
unclear in anway, I tried to make it as complete as possible)
I am running a heavily hit web server (around half a million hits a
day) and am getting random
I apologise if this oops has already been fixed: it has happened twice but I
can't find the exact way to trigger it, I just want to make sure it is
reported ;)
Nick
oops
At 13.40 28/10/00 -0700, you wrote:
On Sat, Oct 28 2000, Lorenzo Allegrucci wrote:
I've got this while trying to play an audio CD by cdplay.
[snip]
NOTE:
2.4.0-test9 works without problems.
2.2.18-pre-latest will do then, could you try that?
Yes, I've tried 2.2.18pre17, problem
Can gcc generate ASM output with the source lines from the C file
interspersed as comments?
Not afak directly. The makelst stuff in 2.2.18pre IBM contributed claims to
do the job though
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
On Sun, 29 Oct 2000, Stephen Harris wrote:
Horst von Brand wrote:
If you send SIGSTOP to syslogd on a Red Hat 6.2 system (glibc 2.1.3,
kernel 2.2.x), within a few minutes you will find your entire machine
grinds to a halt. For example, nobody can log in.
Great! Yet another way in
Then I killed the two apache processes and the memory usage stayed
basically the same. I even checked top and ps, with no other programs
hogging memory. I can't seem to get the memory to "clear".
The memory usage stuff seems sane. We wont free memory because its unused its
just now cached
Hello,
While trying to compile a network driver for 2.4.0-test9 (+kdb-v1.5,
configured for UP) I'm getting multiple warnings:
/usr/src/linux/include/linux/sched.h:700: warning: can't inline call
to `__mmdrop'
/usr/src/linux/include/linux/sched.h:704: warning: called from here
Wierd thing about this oops is that it happened just
as I ticked over between the daylight savings adjustment,
and the system clock changed itself.
Coincidence ? :)
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
0010
c012efaa
*pde =
Oops:
CPU:0
EIP:
On Sun, 29 Oct 2000, Mohammad A. Haque wrote:
I JUST got the same oops. But daylight savings happened 9 or so hours
ago here.
Known problem, fix being tested. Basically, it's the same as mmap/truncate
races, with do_generic_file_read() in place of filemap_nopage(). I wonder
what made it
On Sun, 29 Oct 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
approach for 2.4.x where we just re-test against the file size in multiple
places where this can happen - but it would be nicer to handle this more
cleanly.
One possible way is to access page-mapping _only_ under the page lock
and in cases when we
On 29 Oct 2000, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Raul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can anyone tell me about the viability of a guarantee_memory() syscall?
[I'm thinking: it would either kill the process, or allocate all virtual
memory needed for its shared libraries, buffers, allocated
On Sun, 29 Oct 2000, Jesse Pollard wrote:
On Sun, 29 Oct 2000, Stephen Harris wrote:
Horst von Brand wrote:
If you send SIGSTOP to syslogd on a Red Hat 6.2 system (glibc 2.1.3,
kernel 2.2.x), within a few minutes you will find your entire machine
grinds to a halt. For example,
On Sun, 29 Oct 2000, Alexander Viro wrote:
One possible way is to access page-mapping _only_ under the page lock
and in cases when we call -i_mapping-a_ops-foo check the -mapping
before the method call.
I'm leaning towards this for a 2.4.x solution.
As far as I can tell, page-mapping is
On Sun, 29 Oct 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Making it policy that we have to re-test page-mapping after aquireing the
page lock might be the simplest fix for 2.4.x. It still means that we
might end up allowing people to have a "bad" page in the VM space due to
the "test-insert" race
pavel rabel wrote:
There are three drivers for n2k cards. One is MCA only, one is PCI only,
and the then the third one (ne.c) is both ISA and PCI. I think the ISA
driver should be ISA only, as is described in Documentation and in config
help. So I removed PCI code from ne.c to have ISA only
I would expect problems with truncate, mmap, rename, POSIX locks, fasync,
ptrace and mount go unnoticed for _long_. Ditto for parts of procfs
Well the ptrace one still has mysteriously breaks usermode linux against it
on my list here. Was that ever explained. It looked like the stack got
This change sounds ok to me, if noone else objects. (I added to the CC
a bit) I saw that code, and was thinking about doing the same thing
myself. ne2k-pci.c definitely has changes which are not included in
ne.c, and it seems silly to duplicate ne2000 PCI support.
Unless there are any
Could be a hardware problem. Check the errata/bios updates for your
board or system. I had a similar problem and it turned out to be a
hardware BUG with an Intel server board. It is funny the way they
describe the bug -- it is a manufacturer problem that affects only one
of 5 (or 6, I do not
Hi!
This oops is not a new one .. I've it for quite a long time.
It always happens when starting a hamradio program called 'ulistd'.
There is not any problem at all with this program and the 2.2.17 or 2.2.18prex
The system is frozen. I can access the 'magic keys'.
My configuration is Pentium
This patch, and a lot of others of a similar nature, are in my test10pre6
compile patch at
[snip]
(Added a bit to the cc list)
Hi Arjan.
Thanks for the pointer. However my test build still barfs in the final
link phase because we (in t10p6) morphed drivers/pcmcia/cs.c::pcmcia_
request_irq
On Sun, Oct 29 2000, Miles Lane wrote:
There were still some stalls but they only lasted a couple of
seconds. The patch did make a difference and for the better.
Ok, still needs a bit of work. Thanks for the feedback.
Have you resolved this problem completely, now?
I am testing
On Sun, Oct 29 2000, Hisaaki Shibata wrote:
I tried the patch.
But kernel said Oops both fdisk /dev/hdc and
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hdc bs=2048 count=1 .
After showing above strace message in a few seconds, kernel panic happened.
I can not see some head line of Oops messages. Sorry.
Is
Linus, please apply. Without this patch, USB has problems when built
into the kernel and modversions are used, I have confirmation that it
fixes the reported problem. The only changes from the previous version
of this patch are in the documentation.
This patch against 2.4.0-test10-pre6
I am posting the completed NWFS 2.4.4 tommorrow, and it NEVER exhibits
this lockup problem on the console, no matter how busy the I/O subsystem
underneath becomes. I think this is probably because I use my own
elevator and LRU and don't use Linus's buffer cache. Whatever is
causing it I would
Alan Cox wrote:
I would expect problems with truncate, mmap, rename, POSIX locks, fasync,
ptrace and mount go unnoticed for _long_. Ditto for parts of procfs
Well the ptrace one still has mysteriously breaks usermode linux against it
on my list here. Was that ever explained. It looked
Pavel Machek wrote:
Subject says it pretty much all. If you want to help with anything,
just get yourself sourceforge account and ask me ;-).
podfuk V3.7 is on the way, I've created my sourceforge account
("gisburn"). How can I upload it ?
Bye,
Roland
--
__ . . __
(o.\ \/ /.o)
Could someone who knows ide and drive inside and out (Andre?) please
take a look at these figures? Am I forgetting to do something (or doing
something I'm not suposed to) to get the best numbers? I thought I'd be
able to get more than ~4MB/sec off the HPT366 and a UDMA66 drive.
Kernel:
Alan,
I don't know what all changes you guys did to 2.2.18pre, but the LAN I/O
performance absolutely rocks on our tests here vs. NetWare. Good job.
It's still got some problems with NFS (I am seeing a few RPC timeout
errors) so I am backreving to 2.2.17 for the Ute-NWFS release next week,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
On Fri, 27 Oct 2000 19:45:13 +0200,
Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would it be possible to keep 2.7.2.3? You still need 2.7.2.3 to
reliably compile 2.0.X (and maybe even 2.2.all-but-latest?).
You can have multiple versions of gcc installed,
It was NOT ignored. If syslogd dies, then the system SHOULD stop, after a
Huh? "SHOULD"? Why? If syslog dies for any reason (bug, DOS, hack,
admin stupidity) then I sure don't want the system freezing up.
In some cases, I find the syslog messages of more importance then a
working
John Gardiner Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your proposed interface suffers from most of the same problems as the
other Unix event interfaces I've seen. Key among the problems are
inherent race conditions when the interface is used by multithreaded
applications.
The "stickiness" of
Hi,
Does the Linux kernel support POSIX message queues as defined by
the Single Unix Specification, v2, ie.
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007908799/xsh/mqueue.h.html
stuff like mq_open(), mq_send(), mq_close(), etc.
I've tried grepping the sources for 2.4.0, and could not find anything.
On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 12:04:23AM +, Alan Cox wrote:
It's still got some problems with NFS (I am seeing a few RPC timeout
errors) so I am backreving to 2.2.17 for the Ute-NWFS release next week,
but it's most impressive.
Can you send a summary of the NFS reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linus Torvalds wrote:
Now, I don't think this is really a valid usage pattern, so it's most
likely to be a result of a buggy application, but I can imagine having
some strange kind of user-space VM memory management scheme that depends
on SIGBUS to maintain a file length. I've never heard of
it look like you didn't add the lines to .config the stupid bttv drivers
that's why mine didnt work with bttv card i have read the .config under
video for linux and found no refernce to bttv???
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Listed in 2.4 headers as:
#define mem_map_reserve(p) set_bit(PG_reserved, p-flags)
#define mem_map_unreserve(p) clear_bit(PG_reserved, p-flags)
...but should be:
#define mem_map_reserve(p) set_bit(PG_reserved, ((p)-flags))
#define mem_map_unreserve(p)
On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 11:12:57PM +0100, Rasmus Andersen wrote:
Thanks for the pointer. However my test build still barfs in the final
link phase because we (in t10p6) morphed drivers/pcmcia/cs.c::pcmcia_
request_irq into (the static) cs_request_irq. The rename part
broke the two other
Linus,
Attached is a patch against 2.4.0-test10-pre6. I went the ultra-safe
route and put parentheses around every macro arg. Compiles ok for me
here...
If you were wondering if we can remove wrapper.h altogether, IMHO no,
there are too many users (43) right now..
Changes:
* add lots
I remember hearing about various debates about the /proc structure. I
was wondering if anyone had ever considered storing some of the data in
xml format rather than its current format? Things like /proc/meminfo
and cpuinfo may work good in this format as then it would be easy to
write a generic
bkz, any chance of a backport of this backport to 2.2.17?
On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Andre Hedrick wrote:
Hi Bart,
The point is that I have stopped with the backport because of 2.4.0 push,
and I was waiting on you to pick it up again.
On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 06:35:31PM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 12:04:23AM +, Alan Cox wrote:
It's still got some problems with NFS (I am seeing a few RPC timeout
errors) so I am backreving to 2.2.17 for the Ute-NWFS release next week,
but it's most
Andrey Savochkin wrote:
> > > Oct 26 16:38:01 ns29 kernel: eth0: card reports
no resources.
> > >
> > let me guess: intel eepro100 or similar??
>
> > 2.4.0-test9-pre3 it doesnt happen on my machine ...
I run 2.4.0-test10-pre5 and it still does it.
Trick : "ifconfig eth0 down" then "ifconfig eth0
Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I remember hearing about various debates about the /proc structure. I
was wondering if anyone had ever considered storing some of the data in
xml format rather than its current format? Things like /proc/meminfo
and cpuinfo may work good in this format as then
On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 11:58:21PM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 07:47:00AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 06:35:31PM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 12:04:23AM +, Alan Cox wrote:
It's still got some problems with NFS (I
On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Andi Kleen wrote:
One problem in Linux 2.2 is that kernel threads reload their VM on
context switch (that would include the nfsd thread), this should be
fixed in 2.4 with lazy mm. Hmm actually it should be only fixed for
true kernel threads that have been started with
On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 08:08:58AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 11:58:21PM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 07:47:00AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 06:35:31PM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 12:04:23AM
On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 09:26:59AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Andi Kleen wrote:
One problem in Linux 2.2 is that kernel threads reload their VM on
context switch (that would include the nfsd thread), this should be
fixed in 2.4 with lazy mm. Hmm actually it should
I want my / to be a ramfs filesystem. I intend to populate it from an
initrd image, and then remount / as the ramfs filesystem. Is that at
all possible? The way I see it the kernel requires / on a device
(major,minor) or nfs.
Am I out of luck using ramfs as /? If it's easy to fix, how do I
On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
Is there an option to map Linux into a flat address space [...]
nope, Linux is fundamentally multitasked.
what you can do to hack around this is to not switch to the idle thread
after having done work in nfsd. Some simple stupid thing in schedule:
Followup to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
By author:Anders Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
I want my / to be a ramfs filesystem. I intend to populate it from an
initrd image, and then remount / as the ramfs filesystem. Is that at
all possible? The way I see it the
On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 12:16:46AM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 08:08:58AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 11:58:21PM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 07:47:00AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 06:35:31PM
Anders Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I want my / to be a ramfs filesystem. I intend to populate it from an
initrd image, and then remount / as the ramfs filesystem. Is that at
all possible? The way I see it the kernel requires / on a device
(major,minor) or nfs.
Am I out of luck using
cool write up..
http://www.linuxdoc.org/LDP/tlk/tlk.html
but i just had 1 question:
is there anything similar to what microsoft has pulled of with msdn in the
linux world?
i mean there is man and all,
but is there anything more "user friendly" and in the digital means besides
Beg. Linux
On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 11:45:49AM -0800, dean gaudet wrote:
On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
The big question is: why is Apache using file locking so
much? Is this normal behaviour for Apache?
Apache uses file locking to serialize accept on hosts where accept either has
bad
On Sun, 29 Oct 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:
I can't quite put my finger on what wait_for_tcp_memory() is supposed
to do, [...]
it's waiting for TCP output packets to be processed. This is a TCP
protocol detail and is not connected to VM issues. The function name might
be a bit misleading, it
Today I've found the following in my /var/log/messages:
Oct 28 20:14:36 some_host kernel: kmem_free: Bad obj addr (objp=c2b381e0,
name=size-64)
Oct 28 20:14:36 some_host kernel: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
virtual address
Oct 28 20:14:36 some_host kernel:
Horst von Brand wrote:
> > > If you send SIGSTOP to syslogd on a Red Hat 6.2 system (glibc 2.1.3,
> > > kernel 2.2.x), within a few minutes you will find your entire machine
> > > grinds to a halt. For example, nobody can log in.
>
> Great! Yet another way in which root can get the rope to
Linus,
I have tracked down why I am getting the oops with page->mapping == 0
in block_read_full_page. Well, at least if not the ultimate cause,
then the penultimate cause. It's basically yet another truncate bug
(tm). I have some fairly detailed traces which I can send you if you
like, but
On Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 06:43:42PM -0500, Stephen Crowley wrote:
> kernel 2.4.0-test10-pre6, but this has been here as long as I can
> remember.
>
> starting wine triggers the bug, C: points to /win2k which is an NTFS
> filesystem.
[snip]
Yep, there's a solution for this. Get yourself the
[Wakko Warner]
> While this subject is fresh, what would be wrong with using the
> entire drive as opposed to creating a partition and adding the
> partition to the raid?
Does it autodetect an entire drive? The autodetect logic for
partitions looks at the 'partition type' byte, which of course
Just thought others besides Alan would want to know. There's some new data
too (and typo fixes, now that I'm at it :)
-klippeti-klippeti-klippeti-klap-
I'd like to report a successful heavy-duty test of 2.2.18pre17 with Andrea's
strict-VM-corruption-fix-1 (denoted 'vmfix'
I have attached a very small patch (test9) to remove the kernel lock from
kernel/acct.c. If I am missing something major (a brain?), I apologise in
advance. I have tested this on my UP x86 with spinlock debugging. I would
appreciate comments or an explanation of why this can't be done if you have
On Sun, 29 Oct 2000, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> [Wakko Warner]
> > While this subject is fresh, what would be wrong with using the
> > entire drive as opposed to creating a partition and adding the
> > partition to the raid?
>
> Does it autodetect an entire drive? The autodetect logic for
>
Paul Mackerras wrote:
> I am not any kind of expert on the page cache but it seems to me that
> maybe after locking the page we should check if it is still the page
> we want (i.e. page->mapping and page->index are still correct), and go
> back and look up the page again if not. Presumably there
> > [Wakko Warner]
> > > While this subject is fresh, what would be wrong with using the
> > > entire drive as opposed to creating a partition and adding the
> > > partition to the raid?
> >
> > Does it autodetect an entire drive? The autodetect logic for
> > partitions looks at the 'partition
Forgot to cc linux-kernel
Hi.
I get the following error when trying to compile 2.4.0-test10pre6
without procfs support:
drivers/ide/osb4.c: In function `pci_init_osb4':
drivers/ide/osb4.c:264: `osb4_revision' undeclared (first use in this function)
drivers/ide/osb4.c:264: (Each undeclared
Can anyone tell me about the viability of a guarantee_memory() syscall?
[I'm thinking: it would either kill the process, or allocate all virtual
memory needed for its shared libraries, buffers, allocated memory, etc.
Furthermore, it would render this process immune to the OOM killer,
unless it
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> The variable, osb4_revision, is inside a #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS block but
> I was not able to discern if the line where it is referred should be
> #ifdef'ed also. The following patch moves the variable declaration out-
> side the #ifdef block, as a
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>2.2.18pre18
>o Fix rtc_lock for ide-probe, and hd.c(Richard Johnson)
I need this to get it to compile:
--- linux-2.2.18pre18.orig/drivers/block/ide-probe.cSun Oct 29 13:02:39 2000
+++
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Yep - known problem. AMI have one more pre patch to sort it our Im going back
>to the older driver
I've tried the AMI patch and it appears to work. I'm now running
2.2.18pre18 + fix to ideprobe.c + ami megaraid fix and it
> I have attached a very small patch (test9) to remove the kernel lock from
> kernel/acct.c. If I am missing something major (a brain?), I apologise in
> advance. I have tested this on my UP x86 with spinlock debugging. I would
> appreciate comments or an explanation of why this can't be done if
Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can anyone tell me about the viability of a guarantee_memory() syscall?
>
> [I'm thinking: it would either kill the process, or allocate all virtual
> memory needed for its shared libraries, buffers, allocated memory, etc.
> Furthermore, it would render
On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> The alternative is to have an entirely different approach, where the page
> cache itself only knows about the maximum page (in which case your current
> "last_page" calculation is right on), and then anybody who needs to know
> about partial pages
> Can anyone tell me about the viability of a guarantee_memory() syscall?
> [I'm thinking: it would either kill the process, or allocate all virtual
> memory needed for its shared libraries, buffers, allocated memory, etc.
> Furthermore, it would render this process immune to the OOM killer,
>
Hi!
Console colors are completely messed up (read: black, I even suspect
the font to be corrupt somehow) if switching back to console mode
from X (either by quitting or ctrl-alt-fX) in recent 2.4.0-textXX
kernels. 2.2.XX do work just fine. Is this a known problem with a
known fix?
Setup:
Hi,
I just got an Oops in block_read_full_page() (fs/buffer.c) in
test10-pre6 while logging out from X. The system is an Asus P6300
notebook with Mobile PII/266 and 112MB memory running SuSE 6.4.
Here is the output from ksymoops:
ksymoops 0.7c on i686 2.4.0-test10. Options used
-V
Can gcc generate ASM output with the source lines from the C file
interspersed as comments?
Thanks.
Jerry Kelley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at
On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 10:17:36AM -0500, Jerry Kelley wrote:
> Can gcc generate ASM output with the source lines from the C file
> interspersed as comments?
Yes, "gcc -S". Look in the gcc info pages for more information (the man
page in known to be outdated).
If that isn't what you want, try
I have been investigating this for quite a while and am at a
loss... (Please let me know if you need more information or this post is
unclear in anway, I tried to make it as complete as possible)
I am running a heavily hit web server (around half a million hits a
day) and am getting random
1 - 100 of 164 matches
Mail list logo
