I'm getting a keyboard lock whenever anything tries to access the PS/2 port.
This topic seems to have been discussed back in March
(http://www.uwsg.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0003.2/0097.html), but the only
helpful information that came out of it was "change the IRQs in the BIOS", which
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
Wow. Ok, I'm maintaining the 2.4.0 VIA driver, so I'd like to know more
about this:
1) What's the ISA bridge revision?
00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8501 (rev 02)
00:01.0 PCI bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8501
00:07.0 ISA bridge:
Can any one of you point to some good stuffs that deals with ISA device
driver programming . Can we get hardware manuals for various
networking cards from any site.
Shiju
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi all,
this one patch i believe is harmless as it only
reads partition table, but who knows. the diff
is against 2.4.0.
the patch locates partitions inside the plan9
partition table.
as you may know, a plan9 partition table has three
Pentium-III 256Mo
For testing, I try to compile glibc. The start is good.
When the process PID reaches a value around 22000
(variable), all goes wrong. Make gives error messages
such as :
make[2]: *** No rule to make target
`../sysdeps/wordsize-32/bits/wordsi:e.h'
make[2]: *** No rule to make
Hi,
The appended patch (additional to my read/write support patch) makes
the shm filesystem configurable and renames it to the more sensible
name swapfs. Since the fs type "shm" is quite established with 2.4 I
register that name also.
It also updates the documentation.
Greetings
Hi Alan,
Here is a patch which makes the shm fs a full swappable file system
like Solaris' tmpfs.
Does anybody have a really good fs check tool? Not benchmarking, but
concurrent truncate, read, write, unlink stress test. Would be good to
test it with that. I did my usual POSIX/SYSV shm tests
On Sat, 13 Jan 2001, Keith Owens wrote:
Over emphasis for humorous effect. Must remember to add smiley.
Heh. But it does deserve to get into the fortune file.
What this patch and David Woodhouse's comments show is that I need to
look at a generic and safe mechanism for kernel/module symbol
Hi all,
I am trying to install linux on IBM PS/2 server 95 MCA machine
with Pentium 90 . But it is not bootingSince it is not booting fro the CD
I am booting the kernel from floppy disk with boot.img. The halts after the
message "POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX". The kernel
"Pierre Rousselet wrote:"
Pentium-III 256Mo
For testing, I try to compile glibc. The start is good.
When the process PID reaches a value around 22000
(variable), all goes wrong. Make gives error messages
such as :
make[2]: *** No rule to make target
log attached.
same problem with ac8
gcc-2.95.2.1
UP
Garst
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2
-fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2
-march=i586 -DUTS_MACHINE='"i386"' -c -o init/version.o init/version.c
make
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 12:11:31PM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My apologies. I read the patch, not the full source code and the patch
does not have enough programming context to show that the driver is
only searching its own symbol space. In my own defense, the references
to spinlock_t
On Sat, 13 Jan 2001 10:46:44 + (GMT),
David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jan 2001, Keith Owens wrote:
Actually, my testing showed that modutils was quite OK with symbols which
may or may not be present. But compiling such code into the kernel, at
least on MIPS and m68k,
Hello
Today my important machine has dicsonneted from network with message
like this:
Jan 13 12:24:25 portraits kernel: eth0: can't fill rx buffer (force 0)!
Jan 13 12:24:25 portraits kernel: eth0: can't fill rx buffer (force 1)!
Jan 13 12:24:26 portraits kernel: eth0: can't fill rx buffer
On Sat, 13 Jan 2001 12:46:00 +0100,
Christian Zander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see what you mean. What do you suggest should be done in the context of
the driver? As you can easily tell, I'm not overly familiar with the
internal workings of the kernel. That and the mere impossibility to get
any
On Sat, 13 Jan 2001 07:33:47 -0400,
"Garst R. Reese" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2
-fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2
-march=i586-DEXPORT_SYMTAB -c ksyms.c
In file included from
Christoph Rohland wrote:
Hi,
The appended patch (additional to my read/write support patch) makes
the shm filesystem configurable and renames it to the more sensible
name swapfs. Since the fs type "shm" is quite established with 2.4 I
register that name also.
Now...is this shared memory
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 02:27:07PM -0800, Dr. Kelsey Hudson wrote:
This is due to your piece of trash motherboard. The reason that the older
kernel didn't catch these errors is because (IIRC) it wasn't looking for
them; they were there even then. The BP6 is a low-end mainboard and was
Andrew Morton writes:
Linus Torvalds wrote:
I'm also nervous about the complete lack of locking in vortex_timer():
disabling interrupts doesn't mean that transmits couldn't be
pending. But maybe the hardware is ok with changing status concurrently.
disable_irq() is very useful in
--- arch/sparc64/kernel/sys_sparc32.c.orig Sat Jan 13 07:59:43 2001
+++ arch/sparc64/kernel/sys_sparc32.c Sat Jan 13 08:00:23 2001
@@ -904,7 +904,7 @@
{
int cmds = cmd SUBCMDSHIFT;
int err;
- struct dqblk d;
+ struct dqblk32 d;
mm_segment_t old_fs;
Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Patrick wrote:
I am running a medium-high traffic web server on an SMP machine. I have
always had problems with linux hanging (No syslog messages and no
console response). I have tried kernel versions 2.2.12, 2.2.14 and
2.2.16
Recently I
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, dean gaudet wrote:
anyhow a real network benchmark might show that kHTTPd latency is actually
not as broken as this one indicates. i'd however really hesitate to call
this a win.
Well as Arjan says: khttpd starves userspace and that might cause the
latency. I dont have
David Ford [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Now...is this shared memory or swap? If it's swap, why is it
different than a swapfile? If you are intending the shmem be called
swapfs, I personally thing that it'll cause a significant amount of
confusion.
It is a filesystem which lives in RAM and
Hi!
I think that with 2.4.0 your board will operate just fine at UDMA33. If
you can, please do test that. Best mount your drives read only at first,
but I doubt there will be any problems.
Vojtech
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 08:03:49PM -0700, Tkil wrote:
Alan asked:
I think its significant
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 04:52:00PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, John Heil wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jan 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 00:25:28 + (GMT)
From: Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Vojtech Pavlik
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 11:47:41PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
However - Alan's IDE patch for 2.2 kills autodma on ALL VIA chipsets.
That's because all VIA chipsets starting from vt82c586 to vt82c686b
(UDMA100), share the same PCI ID.
I have no reports of problems with the later stuff
At
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 11:43:23PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
I'd like to hear about such reports so that I can start debugging (and
perhaps get me one of those failing boards, they must be quite cheap
these days).
This is one of the most precise reports I have
|The system is an AMD K6-3
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 02:43:30AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|The system is an AMD K6-3 on a FIC PA-2013 mobo with 3 IDE disks. The
|size of hda is 4.3 GB, the size of hdb is 854 MB and the size of hdc is
|1.2 GB. Hdd is an IDE CDROM drive
I think its significant that two
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 04:09:22PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
However - Alan's IDE patch for 2.2 kills autodma on ALL VIA chipsets.
That's because all VIA chipsets starting from vt82c586 to vt82c686b
(UDMA100), share the same PCI ID.
Hi Linus,
The shmem_symlink function is completely broken in 2.4.0 and never
worked.
This patch removes the function from 2.4.0
Greetings
Christoph
P.S.: For those which test read/write support patch: I will post patch
for my swapfs soon which will make it working on top
It is a filesystem which lives in RAM and can swap out. SYSV shm and
shared anonymous maps are still build on top of this (The config
option only disables the part not needed for this).
I am quite open about naming, but "shm" is not appropriate any more
since the fs does a lot more than
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 07:48:09PM -0800, Ron Calderon wrote:
every kernel after 2.4.0-test5 hangs my sparc10
at the same spot. Has anyone looked into this?
Well, that's when highmen support was introduced into sparc32, right?
Uncompressing image...
PROMLIB: obio_ranges 5
bootmem_init:
Hi,
A rethinking of the rescheduling strategy...
I have come to this conclusion.
A spinlock prevents other processes to enter that specific region.
But interrupts are allowed they might delay
execution of a spin locked
reqion for a undefined (small but anyway) time.
Code with critical
$B$4@.?M%*%a%G%H%&%4%6%$%^%9(B
http://www.gem.hi-ho.ne.jp/p-head/tobi/infdex.htm
$B$4@.?M0J30$O:o=|$7$F$/$@$5$$(B
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
When will the powerpc tree be merged ? Neither the
official 2.4 nor the -ac8 work. They don't even compile.
Bye.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Hi!
I found the time to make some tests with 2.4 and the blk-13B patch.
It performs very well, no process starvation, no missed merges,
etc., but sometimes it happens dbflush and kswapd start eating
100% CPU for about 20-30 secs.:
11:02am up 18 min, 5 users, load average: 2.74, 1.97, 1.15
Hi,
on plain 2.4.0 vanilla any mouse access kills the keyboard. Only way to
restore functionality is to kill gpm.
gpm writes 'protocol error' to syslog. I have access to this machine on
monday, so I can post details then.
Changing the IRQ is totally unrelated, machine works in 2.2.x with the
David Ford [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hmm, ok, what are the activities that use this other than shm?
You can e.g. use it for your /tmp filesystem. there seem to be some
people out there which used ramfs for that...
What do you think about "vmfs"? This probably reflects its nature
better than
--- reiserfs_fs.h.old Sat Jan 13 22:17:45 2001
+++ reiserfs_fs.h Sat Jan 13 22:46:42 2001
@@ -1420,7 +1420,7 @@
#define op_is_left_mergeable(key,bsize) item_ops[le_key_k_type
(le_key_version (key), key)]-is_left_mergeable (key, bsize)
#define op_print_item(ih,item)
Hi Alan,
Here comes a patch which fixes the totally broken symlink support in
shm/swapfs. It is additional to my former patches for read and write
support.
It survives now a parallel kernel make on my 8way.
Greetings
Christoph
diff -uNr
Russell King wrote:
Doesn't the NCR53C9x SCSI drivers use disable_irq() a lot? Do they have
any problems?
It seems that a certain timing is necessary: one flood ping or a single
ncp usually doesn't trigger any problems, but 2 concurrent flood pings
hang the network after 5-10 seconds. It's
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 09:12:27AM +0100, Tobias Ringstrom wrote:
Wow. Ok, I'm maintaining the 2.4.0 VIA driver, so I'd like to know more
about this:
1) What's the ISA bridge revision?
00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8501 (rev 02)
00:01.0 PCI bridge: VIA Technologies,
On Sat, 13 Jan 2001, Keith Owens wrote:
BTW, modutils cannot automatically fill in upward references when a
module is loaded. A reference is a use count, an automatic reference
would be an automatic use count with no way of removing it. Code that
calls upwards to a symbol must perform an
I know there is something about loop device hangs in the 2.4
TODO list and I don't know if that is supposed to be fixed.
If this BUG is known, please appreciate
[1.] One line summary of the problem:
[240-ac8] loop device hangs and sync does not return any more
[2.] Full description of the
v I can make one for you, but first I'd like to find out what exactly are
v the problem cases.
I have a VT82C686 motherboard. It has one UDMA-100 slot and two
regular IDE slots. I have an IBM DTTA-371440 (about 18 months old) as
hda (only fat32 filesystems), and an IBM DTLA-307030 as hde
(i.e.
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 06:03:11AM -0600, Thomas Molina wrote:
Are you looking for specific chipsets or configurations? Following is
my VP3/MVP3 chipset lspci output if you are gathering a group of
testers. I've enabled autoDMA at various points in the testing cycle
(not consistently) but
This patch (against 2.4.0-ac8) _may_ enable the NMI watchdog on
some K7 systems. It won't help if you have an old K7 without a
local APIC, or if your BIOS disables it.
This is a quick hack to test the mechanism -- I'll submit a
cleaner patch later if this one works.
If you try this, please cc:
Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
"Pierre Rousselet wrote:"
Pentium-III 256Mo
For testing, I try to compile glibc. The start is good.
When the process PID reaches a value around 22000
(variable), all goes wrong. Make gives error messages
such as :
make[2]: *** No rule to make target
on boot the following happens:
--
SILO boot: linux2.4
Uncompressing image...
PROMLIB: obio_ranges 5
bootmem_init: Scan sp_banks, init_bootmem(spfn[211],bpfn[211],mlpfn[c000])
free_bootmem: base[0] size[100]
free_bootmem: base[200] size[10]
free_bootmem: base[400]
--- reiserfs_fs.h Sat Jan 13 22:46:42 2001
+++ reiserfs_fs.h.old Sat Jan 13 22:17:45 2001
@@ -1420,7 +1420,7 @@
#define op_is_left_mergeable(key,bsize) item_ops[le_key_k_type
(le_key_version (key), key)]-is_left_mergeable (key, bsize)
#define op_print_item(ih,item)
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 06:43:23PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
Anton, you write:
Have a look at 2.4, arch/sparc64/kernel/ioctl32.c
Yuk.
Would it be possible to clean up the ioctl interface so we dont need
such large hacks for LVM support? I can do the work but I want to be
sure you
Hi!
This is not the case I'm looking for. You have a 686b, a chip that is
not supported in 2.4.0 yet. You can try the via 3.11 driver I posted a
while ago, it adds support for this chip, including UDMA100.
Thanks anyway,
Vojtech
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 09:09:05AM -0800, Bryan
Hi,
kernel : 2.4.0 vanilla
iproute2 version : ss001007
After building I've got a few problems :
./ip rule list
RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
Dump terminated
Version should be OK according to the Changes file.
config is attached
Regards,
Igmar
--
--
Igmar
On Sat, 13 Jan 2001, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 09:12:27AM +0100, Tobias Ringstrom wrote:
2) What's in /proc/ide/via?
It's not there since I disabled the VIA driver.
Ok. Could you send me this file when you boot with fs r-o?
Ok, but this is with the wrong disc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joe Pranevich) wrote on 06.01.01 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
much of the code, including a long awaited combination of the PPP
layers from the ISDN layer and the serial device PPP layer, such as
I've heard about that before, but I can find no hint about that in
On 12 Jan 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
In short, let's leave it out of a stable kernel for now, and add
blacklisting of auto-DMA. Alan has a list. We can play around with
trying to _fix_ DMA on the VIA chipsets in 2.5.x (and possibly backport
the thing once it has been sufficiently
FWIW: POSIX mq_send does not promise that the buffer is safe, it only
promises that the message is queued. Interesting interface.
On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 09:41:24AM +0100, Manfred Spraul wrote:
In user space, how do you know when its safe to reuse the buffer that
was handed to
Meino Cramer wrote:
short question: How cabn I activate/where can I find the raw devices
often described as /dev/raw[12]* in/with kernel linux-2.4.0.
There doesn't seem to be any config option for raw
devices in lk 2.4.0 , they are just there. However
the raw (8) utility expects them in a
David Woodhouse writes:
Please can we also stop HPT366 from attempting UDMA66 on the IBM DTLA
drives, while we're at it? I don't care if it's done by blacklisting the
DTLA drives, as was done by the patch I resent numerous times, or if it's
done the other way round by putting known-compatible
David Woodhouse writes:
We don't need to overdesign it. get_module_symbol() basically provided
this for us. The only thing really wrong with it was the lack of use
count handling, which I fixed a while ago.
And the fact that it doesn't work if you turn module support off, which
you'd want to
Jan 13 01:58:17 iq kernel: probable hardware bug: clock timer
configuration lost - probably a VIA686a.
Jan 13 01:58:17 iq kernel: probable hardware bug: restoring chip
configuration.
I get these, do not know why. MB is abit BH6, IDE controllers are the
onboard and a WinFast CMD648.
Have never
if (IDE_PCI_DEVID_EQ(d-devid, DEVID_SIS5513) ||
IDE_PCI_DEVID_EQ(d-devid, DEVID_AEC6260) ||
IDE_PCI_DEVID_EQ(d-devid, DEVID_PIIX4NX) ||
- IDE_PCI_DEVID_EQ(d-devid, DEVID_HPT34X))
+ IDE_PCI_DEVID_EQ(d-devid,
HP Pavilion 8290, PII 400MHz, 256MB hangs on boot 2.4 and 2.4-test9 on RH7.0.
I tried to compile 2.4-test9 on RH 7.0 with gcc versions 2.96-54, 2.96-69,
and with kgcc 1.1.2-40 (egcs-2.91.66) without success.
The first and last message I get is:
"Uncompressing Linux... OK, booting the kernel"
COOL!
This will kill the VIA problem and allow us to clobber the timeout.
I know where and what to do but it is the how with the current mess of the
driver held togather with duct tape and paper clips and a little bit of
spit here and there.
I can not wait for 2.5 to get started to begin with
[alsa folks, i'd appreciate a comment on this thread from
linux-audio-dev]
hello everyone !
in a post related to his latest low-latency patch, andrew morton
gave a pointer to
http://www.zefiro.com/vgakills.txt , which addresses the problem of
dropped samples due to agressive video drivers
I guess I confused some people. I didn't copy the kernel from PIII to
PII etc.. I compiled the kernel on all my PCs separately.
I just have problems with one PC, the HP Pavilion.
On Sat, 13 Jan 2001, Werner wrote:
HP Pavilion 8290, PII 400MHz, 256MB hangs on boot 2.4 and 2.4-test9 on
Christoph Rohland writes:
I am quite open about naming, but "shm" is not appropriate any more
since the fs does a lot more than shared memory. Solaris calles this
"tmpfs" but I did not want to 'steal' their name and I also do not
think that it's a very good name.
Admins already know what
On Sat, 13 Jan 2001, Werner wrote:
The first and last message I get is:
"Uncompressing Linux... OK, booting the kernel"
# lspci
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 440BX/ZX - 82443BX/ZX Host bridge(rev 02)
00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 440BX/ZX - 82443BX/ZX AGP bridge(rev 02)
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 08:10:33PM +0100, Sasi Peter wrote:
Jan 13 01:58:17 iq kernel: probable hardware bug: clock timer
configuration lost - probably a VIA686a.
Jan 13 01:58:17 iq kernel: probable hardware bug: restoring chip
configuration.
I get these, do not know why. MB is abit BH6,
} When will the powerpc tree be merged ? Neither the
} official 2.4 nor the -ac8 work. They don't even compile.
Grab a tree from www.fsmlabs.com/linuxppcbk.html. Those always compile and
are up-to-date.
I send patches, but they don't always make it into the main tree. In the
mean time, you
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 07:53:14PM -0800, Rob Landley wrote:
If I do the dd line in the title under 2.4.0 I get an
out.txt file of 591 bytes.
And it's the same under 2.2.x, too.
dd says it completes happily even when copying from
random. 0+100 records in, 0+100 records out. It
It's not a
Albert D. Cahalan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Christoph Rohland writes:
I am quite open about naming, but "shm" is not appropriate any more
since the fs does a lot more than shared memory. Solaris calles this
"tmpfs" but I did not want to 'steal' their name and I also do not
think
On Sat, 13 Jan 2001, Andre Hedrick wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jan 2001, Werner wrote:
The first and last message I get is:
"Uncompressing Linux... OK, booting the kernel"
# lspci
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 440BX/ZX - 82443BX/ZX Host bridge(rev 02)
00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel
Hi,
Since 2.4.0 (from XFS CVS source tree) i get such things from kernel:
Jan 13 20:55:48 main kernel: reset_xmit_timer sk=c299b9a0 1 when=0x6061,
caller=c0218f88
Jan 13 20:58:09 main kernel: reset_xmit_timer sk=c49aa040 1 when=0x594b,
caller=c0218f88
Jan 13 21:01:30 main kernel:
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 10:11:42PM +0100, Krzysztof Rusocki wrote:
Hi,
Since 2.4.0 (from XFS CVS source tree) i get such things from kernel:
Jan 13 20:55:48 main kernel: reset_xmit_timer sk=c299b9a0 1 when=0x6061,
caller=c0218f88
It's harmless. Just ignore them or comment out the
On Sat, 13 Jan 2001, Roger Larsson wrote:
A rethinking of the rescheduling strategy...
Actually, I think you have more-or-less described how successful
preemptible kernels have already been developed, given that your
"sleeping spin locks" are really just sleeping mutexes (or binary
semaphores).
With vt86c686b (AOpen AK73Pro) I am having a strange problem.
When accessing disks old-fashioned way (/dev/hdaN or /dev/hdcN)
I do not see corruption, but writing to a RAID-1 made out of
them produces corrupted results.
Does RAID code access the underlying block device the same way
as single
Christoph Rohland wrote:
What do you think about "vmfs"? This probably reflects its nature
better than swapfs.
That sounds applicable and pretty good.
-d
-- ---NOTICE
-- fwd: fwd: fwd: type emails will be deleted automatically.
"There is a natural aristocracy among men. The grounds
David Santinoli wrote:
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 07:53:14PM -0800, Rob Landley wrote:
If I do the dd line in the title under 2.4.0 I get an
out.txt file of 591 bytes.
And it's the same under 2.2.x, too.
dd says it completes happily even when copying from
random. 0+100 records in, 0+100
Petru Paler writes:
- struct dqblk d;
+ struct dqblk32 d;
What does this fix? Things compile just fine without
it and looking at the code it was intended to be of
the original type.
Please explain exactly what submitted patches fix in
the future, thanks.
Later,
David S.
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/
2.4.0-ac9
o Remove duplicated 8139 fixes(Jeff Garzik)
o Drop out PS/2 mouse changes (me)
o Fix raid5 bug (Neil Brown)
o Fix mmio
Dear LKML,
Sam I have been discussing his patch for formatting 1.44MB floppies in
an LS-120 drive, and we decided to move the discussion out in the open.
One of my concerns is that we don't take the ide-floppy driver in a
different direction to the other removeable media drives.
For Alan Cox,
I have now tried the SAMSUNG VG34323A disk with two other controllers at
home (Promise ATA100 an VIA vt82c686a rev 0x22, both on an ASUS A7V
motherboard), and there are no problems to be found with DMA enabled.
Streaming 10 MB/s without glitches.
However, writing to the SAMSUNG VG34323A disk
From kufel!ankry Sun Jan 14 00:30:25 2001
Return-Path: kufel!ankry
Received: from kufel.UUCP (uucp@localhost)
by green.mif.pg.gda.pl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with UUCP id AAA00889
for green.mif.pg.gda.pl!ankry; Sun, 14 Jan 2001 00:30:25 +0100
Received: (from ankry@localhost)
by
Hi,
The code below is suspect.
Anton
diff -r -u --new-file --exclude-from=/home/anton/kernel/exclude
linux/drivers/net/pcnet32.c linux_work/drivers/net/pcnet32.c
--- linux/drivers/net/pcnet32.c Tue Dec 12 14:27:56 2000
+++ linux_work/drivers/net/pcnet32.cTue Jan 9 15:12:20 2001
@@
It seems that noone uses a Ne2000 compatible pci NIC with a newer
motherboard (every K7 board, Intel 8xx boards, via apollo pro 133), but
I've set up a tiny web site that describes my problem:
colorfullife.com/~manfred/io_apic
--
Manfred
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
One of my concerns is that we don't take the ide-floppy driver in a
different direction to the other removeable media drives.
In general the others do it raw via scsi commands and sg.
For Alan Cox, could you back out Sam's patch for now. It will be back
soon.
When the new one is sorted.
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 02:55:42PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
Petru Paler writes:
- struct dqblk d;
+ struct dqblk32 d;
What does this fix? Things compile just fine without
it and looking at the code it was intended to be of
the original type.
Please explain exactly
Trond, did you actually look at how this code works before
you made modifications to my fixes?
xprt_lock serializes sleep/wakeup sequences in the xprt code, so you
cannot remove xprt_lock from the sections where I added holding of
xprt_sock_lock to protect the state of xprt-snd_task. So for
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 09:03:49PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
well, some time ago i had an ne2k card in an SMP system as well, and found
this very problem. Disabling/enabling focus-cpu appeared to make a
difference, but later on i made experiments that show that in both cases
the hang happens.
On 2001.01.13 Manfred Spraul wrote:
Any volunteers with ne2k-pci cards and other motherboards that include
an io apic (e.g. all Intel motherboards that use an IO Controller Hub,
Via Apollo Pro133, Pro133A, KX133)?
Please:
* apply the attached patch.
* compile the kernel for SMP, or at
On Sat, 13 Jan 2001 15:09:40 + (GMT),
David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lack of [module symbol] runtime typechecking isn't a showstopper.
It is when users try to insert modules from kernel A into kernel B when
the ABI changed between A and B. This is not type checking to catch
On 2001.01.13 Manfred Spraul wrote:
Please:
* apply the attached patch.
--
Manfred
--- linux/arch/i386/kernel/apic.c Tue Dec 5 21:43:48 2000
+++ linux/arch/i386/kernel/apic.c.new Sat Jan 13 15:54:56 2001
@@ -270,7 +270,7 @@
* PCI Ne2000 networking cards and PII/PIII
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 12:13:58AM +, Roeland Th. Jansen wrote:
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 09:03:49PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
well, some time ago i had an ne2k card in an SMP system as well, and found
this very problem. Disabling/enabling focus-cpu appeared to make a
difference, but
On Sat, 13 Jan 2001 16:12:13 -0500 (EST),
Werner Puschitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a safe way to add debug information like simple string prints in
arch/i386/boot/compressed/head.s and in arch/i386/kernel/head.S
so that I can see at the console where the boot process hangs?
Time for
Nigel Gamble wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jan 2001, Roger Larsson wrote:
A rethinking of the rescheduling strategy...
Actually, I think you have more-or-less described how successful
preemptible kernels have already been developed, given that your
"sleeping spin locks" are really just sleeping
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Shawn Starr wrote:
Snoop through /proc, and you'll find a file where you can disable
"ecn" support.
echo 0 /proc
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 16:37:35 -0500
From: Shawn Starr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Donald Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The longs are the biggest problem AFAICS.
long is 64bit on sparc64 and 32bit on sparc32...
Embedding pointers in ioctls is much worse. When this happens we basically
end up duplicating the ioctl parsing code (this code courtesy of jakub's
sharp mind, but it would be nice not to require this
the patch locates partitions inside the plan9
i can't find anyone with plan9 to test,
I'll have a look.
A week ago you sent almost the same patch.
Was there a reason to change __u32 into unsigned long?
Andries
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the
What does this fix? Things compile just fine without
it and looking at the code it was intended to be of
the original type.
2.4.0-ac has quota fixes (there are bad quota races in 2.4.0) and changes
to support 32bit uid. They aren't in the sparc64 diffs yet and until Linus
has the major bugs
1 - 100 of 240 matches
Mail list logo