On Thu, 1 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to compile devfsd on my system running RedHat linux 7.0
(kernel 2.2.16-22). I get the error "RTLD_NEXT" undefined. I am not
sure where this symbol is defined. Is there anything that I am missing
on my system.
It's a problem
On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 12:13:45AM +, Alan Cox wrote:
the used board BP6 (abit), apics enabled. non-overclocked. card is a
00:09.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
RTL-8029(AS)
Try 2.4.1ac - that should fix it
ok, downloading the -ac1 patch; I'll report.
--
oops, I forgot to send this to linux-kernel as well...
- Original Message -
From: "Nicholas Knight" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "David D.W. Downey" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 5:24 AM
Subject: Re: VT82C686A corruption with 2.4.x
- Original Message -
From:
On 01-Feb-2001 Roeland Th. Jansen wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 03:38:28PM -0600, Mark Orr wrote:
I dont like to be the sort of person who, when people report problems,
fires back "it works fine here!"...but...just as a point of reference,
I have a Hayes ESP too -- it's connected to a 56k
"H. Peter Anvin" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What happened with this being a management tool for shared memory
segments?!
Unfortunately we lost this ability in the 2.4.0-test series. SYSV shm
now works only on an internal mounted instance and does not link the
directory entry to the deleted
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 07:32:55PM -0800, Mike Castle wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 12:19:56AM +, Alan Chandler wrote:
I now find myself confused with the new approach.
try "man -k disc" and compare the output with "man -k disk"
Since nearly all of the utilities refer to "disk"
I know I've seen this in the past, but the answer slips my mind and I
can't find anything in the archives.
I've just set up a box w/ an aic7xxx card. The boot drive hangs off
that card. During installation, the boot drive is sda. Lilo contains
"root=/dev/sda8".
I compiled a new kernel
"David S. Miller" wrote:
...
Finally, please do some tests on loopback. It is usually a great
way to get "pure software overhead" measurements of our TCP stack.
Here we are. TCP and NFS/UDP over lo.
Machine is a dual-PII. I didn't bother running CPU utilisation
testing while
Hi *,
i just backported the 2.4.x serial.c changes to enable MAGIC_SYSRQ via
serial console
on 2.2.18. Patch is working ok so far, i have included it here, maybe it
is useful for
someone. You need to enable CONFIG_SERIAL_CONSOLE CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ
to use it.
To trigger MAGIC_SYSRQ send a
Peter Samuelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| [Admin Mailing Lists]
| i have no bits directory
|
| Really? What version of libc, and on what Linux distro? I thought all
| versions of glibc2 had /usr/include/bits/.
No, it was introduced in glibc 2.0.5.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab
"Michael B. Trausch" wrote:
[...]
DevFSd provides symlinks as follows:
/dev/ttyS0 = /dev/tts/0
/dev/tty0 = /dev/vc/0
/dev/pty* = /dev/pty/*
Until programs use the new names (e.g., init should tell getty to use
/dev/vc/0 instead of /dev/tty0), and everything on
I want to install on a RAID volume controlled by a Mylex 170.
Built an image of a 2.4.1 with DAC960/DAC1100 "compiled in" and copied
it over vmlinuz on a Red Hat 7 boot diskette (boot.img).
I entered this at the boot prompt
boot: linux root=/dev/rd/c0d0
DAC960 appears to detect correctly the
Hi!
Kernel 2.4.1-ac1 doesn't boot on a vaio c1ve (crusoe). I boot a kernel
via the usb floppy drive, and it ends with:
...
Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK.
POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX
PCI: PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xfd98e, last bus=0
PCI: Using configuration type 1
PCI: Probing
Here it hangs hard. It used to boot with 2.4.0 and 2.4.1-prex Should I
try to determine which patch made the fatal change? Should I send my
That would be great.
Firstly however does 2.4.1 (Linus) boot ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of
Hello,
with ReiserFS support in 2.4.1 I have decided to give it a try.
I created a filesystem on a spare partition, mounted it as /mnt,
and tried to use it. The kernel crashed - I am able to reproduce it
with the following steps:
- boot linux with init=/bin/bash
- [optional]
Hi Alan,
Here it hangs hard. It used to boot with 2.4.0 and 2.4.1-prex Should I
try to determine which patch made the fatal change? Should I send my
That would be great.
Firstly however does 2.4.1 (Linus) boot ?
It does boot. :-) Is there something I can do now?
All,
I updated the Cisco local directors in front of this email cluster. ECN
should work now, let me know if you have any further troubles.
Adelphia isn't a bad ISP, we are just a little to big for our own good
sometimes, and getting in touch with the right people to solve problems like
this
#include stdio.h
#include unistd.h
#include sys/types.h
#include sys/socket.h
int
main(int argc, const char* argv[])
{
int retval;
int sockets[2];
char buf[1];
retval = socketpair(PF_UNIX, SOCK_DGRAM, 0, sockets);
if (retval != 0)
{
perror("socketpair");
On 2 Feb 01 at 3:35, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001 01:37:28 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
* NMI watchdog cleanups: mark setup_apic_nmi_watchdog() as __init,
fix the K7 init code to not leave any perfctr MSR uninitialised,
Georg Nikodym ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Also, RH7's /etc/rc.sysinit can already start devfsd automatically
with the following line:
[ -e /dev/.devfsd -a -x /sbin/devfsd ] /sbin/devfsd /dev
So, all you have to do is create an empty file /dev/.devfsd
That file is created by devfs
This is why our next patch will detect the use of gcc 2.96, and complain, in the
reiserfs Makefile.
Hans
Jan Kasprzak wrote:
Hello,
with ReiserFS support in 2.4.1 I have decided to give it a try.
I created a filesystem on a spare partition, mounted it as /mnt,
and tried
On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 12:13:45AM +, Alan Cox wrote:
the used board BP6 (abit), apics enabled. non-overclocked. card is a
00:09.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
RTL-8029(AS)
Try 2.4.1ac - that should fix it
ok, it doesn't crash (the first test) but the
On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 03:44:07AM -0600, Mark Orr wrote:
Well that surely shouldnt happen...I use minicom all the time (I still
call BBSes), and havent had any crashes. I can quit/disconnect, or
quit/stay connected and it works okay. I've even got it set up to
use 23bps, which is the
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 09:25:08PM +, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
No. Just allow passing the multiple of the devices blocksize over
ll_rw_block.
That was just one example: you need the sub-ios just as much when
you split up an IO over stripe boundaries in LVM or raid0, for
example.
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 10:07:44PM +, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
No. I want something good for zero-copy IO in general, but a lot of
that concerns the problem of interacting with the user, and the basic
center of that interaction in 99% of the interesting cases is either a
user VM buffer
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 11:18:56PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
A kiobuf is 124 bytes, a buffer_head 96. And a buffer_head is additionally
used for caching data, a kiobuf not.
Go measure the cost of a distant cache miss, then complain
Recompile with pre 2.96.
John
Hello,
with ReiserFS support in 2.4.1 I have decided to give it a try.
I created a filesystem on a spare partition, mounted it as /mnt,
and tried to use it. The kernel crashed - I am able to reproduce it
with the following steps:
- boot linux
Hans Reiser wrote:
: This is why our next patch will detect the use of gcc 2.96, and complain, in the
: reiserfs Makefile.
:
OK, thanks. It works with older compiler (altough I use gcc 2.96
for a long time for compiling various 2.[34] kernels without problem).
-Yenya
--
\ Jan "Yenya"
" " == Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Much the same story. Big increase in sendfile() efficiency,
small drop in send() and NFS unchanged.
This is normal. The server doesn't do zero copy reads, but instead
copies from the page cache into an NFS-specific buffer using
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Andrew Morton wrote:
Your latest patch passes all my testing.
2.4.1+irq-whacker+netperf:APIC dies instantly
2.4.1+irq-whacker+netperf+patch: 8 million interrupts, then I got bored.
Linus, would you please apply the following patch for 2.4.2? The idea of
This is why our next patch will detect the use of gcc 2.96, and complain, in the
reiserfs Makefile.
What makes you think its gcc 2.96 ?
If the person concerned can clarify what they built with (2.96-69 or
egcs-1.1.2 (kgcc)), that would be useful.
I've certainly done the Reiserfs testing I
Firstly however does 2.4.1 (Linus) boot ?
It does boot. :-) Is there something I can do now?
Ok that means its something in my patches.
Time to do some patch searching. I see two probable candidates - the local apic
code and the pci changes.
Does 2.4.1 with the following patch applied
Hans Reiser wrote:
: This is why our next patch will detect the use of gcc 2.96, and complain, in the
: reiserfs Makefile.
:
OK, thanks. It works with older compiler (altough I use gcc 2.96
for a long time for compiling various 2.[34] kernels without problem).
Ok which 2.96 compiler
Hi...
Fredrik Vraalsen wrote:
This is a small patch to Linux kernel 2.4.1 that fixes a problem with
DVD playback in OMS (Open Media System). With the stock 2.4.1 kernel
OMS will only play up to a certain point on the DVD before it complains
about no more data left on input (basically
Hello,
Szymon Polom wrote:
Fredrik Vraalsen wrote:
This is a small patch to Linux kernel 2.4.1 that fixes a problem with
DVD playback in OMS (Open Media System). With the stock 2.4.1 kernel
OMS will only play up to a certain point on the DVD before it complains
about no more data
Mike Harrold [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My understanding (going back to the 80s) is that the correct term is
disc. "disk" is short for diskette. (discette would be pronounced as
"dissect" (think miscellaneous), so "diskette" was used instead.
No, this isn't right. "Disk" was used for hard disks.
Hi Alan,
Firstly however does 2.4.1 (Linus) boot ?
It does boot. :-) Is there something I can do now?
Ok that means its something in my patches.
Time to do some patch searching. I see two probable candidates - the
local apic code and the pci changes.
Does 2.4.1 with the
Alan Cox wrote:
: Hans Reiser wrote:
: : This is why our next patch will detect the use of gcc 2.96, and complain, in the
: : reiserfs Makefile.
: :
: OK, thanks. It works with older compiler (altough I use gcc 2.96
: for a long time for compiling various 2.[34] kernels without problem).
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That problem solved by compiling the correct SCSI driver into
the kernel. Now it is the problem with input console. It says
Unable to open Input console. This is after mounting VFS.
Same thing ... you haven't compiled in a console driver.
I guess
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
Linus,
There is a significative amount of people who use sard's additional block
layer statistics (I'm one of them). It would be nice to have it in the
official free.
Definitely.
Cheers
Chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Run the following script (It's been tried on linux-2.2.x and linux-2.4.x):
#!/bin/sh
cd /tmp
mkdir x
cd x
mkdir x y z
strace -etrace=rename,mkdir,rmdir,chmod mv x z
echo -
chmod -w y
strace -etrace=rename,mkdir,rmdir,chmod mv y z
The output:
rename("x", "z/x") = 0
I must say that I dont know what the standards say, but...
On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 01:28:28PM +, David Howells wrote:
(1) Linux can't rename directories that are marked as read-only. This is
strange because the directories actually being modified _do_ have write
permission.
Hi,
I just thought I'd pass piece of information this to those of you who have
done work on the kernel. Attached is a PNG image of the CPU usage graph on
one of my most loaded webservers over the past four weeks. It shows the
HUGE difference in CPU consumption from the now old 2.2+ kernel;
2.4.1. rebuilt here and with a floodping towards my machine causes a
hard crash where nothing works anymore.
I'm currently running 2.4.1 with Maciej's patch-2.4.0-io_apic-4. Additionally,
I disabled focus_processor in apic.c to get rid of some network delays. Flood
pings both from and to this
- Original Message -
From: "David Ford" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Michael J. Dikkema" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 11:58 PM
Subject: Re: 2.4.1 - can't read root fs (devfs maybe?)
"Michael J. Dikkema" wrote:
I went from 2.4.0 to 2.4.1 and
- Original Message -
From: "Roeland Th. Jansen" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 11:16 PM
Subject: hard crashes 2.4.0/1 with NE2K stuff
2.4.1. rebuilt here and with a floodping towards my machine causes a
hard crash where nothing works
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 12:51:35PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
If I have a page vector with a single offset/length pair, I can build
a new header with the same vector and modified offset/length to split
the vector in two without copying it.
You just say in the higher-level
On Thu, Feb 01 2001, Fredrik Vraalsen wrote:
This is a small patch to Linux kernel 2.4.1 that fixes a problem with
DVD playback in OMS (Open Media System). With the stock 2.4.1 kernel
OMS will only play up to a certain point on the DVD before it complains
about no more data left on input
Oh you English people,
why do you do it so complicated?
We even don't need a kernel locale.
Take the nominations as they are, color/colour,
disk/disc/diskette/floppy, etc.
And if you write by yourself, do it as you spell it.
I'd even write it German if I wasn't used to speak
fully English
If these 3 drives are on the adaptec aha-2940UW, I get an oops (reply for
oops as I have to do it again and capture it) and the system locks (in
interrupt handler, not syncing) when the copy completes. I did a timed cp
the first time and it took 3.5 minutes and crashed as soon as I got the
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Jens Axboe wrote:
Thanks applied, guess we need another work-around for buggy changers...
--
Jens Axboe
To quote my friend, about comments agreeing with Hale Landis.
WHY!!! are you still supporting junk? ;-)
Cheers,
Andre Hedrick
Linux ATA Development
ASL Kernel
Michael Pacey wrote:
On Fri, 02 Feb 2001 10:09:21 Drew Bertola wrote:
I know I've seen this in the past, but the answer slips my mind and I
can't find anything in the archives.
I've just set up a box w/ an aic7xxx card. The boot drive hangs off
that card. During installation, the
Mikael,
I've forgotten to cc you when sending Ingo my patch-2.4.0-ac12-upapic-19
fixes a few days ago, my apologies. Since the two patches conflict with
each other, I've merged them together and provide the result below.
Please check if it is fine for you.
I'm unsure about the K7_NMI_EVENT
"M" == Meunier iso-8859-1 writes:
M Not true. I'm pretty sure /dev/.devfsd is only created when you
M mount devfs at boot time or via mount -t devfs devfs /dev in your
M system initialization script. Creating /dev/.devfsd with touch
M defeats the purpose of /etc/rc.sysinit example.
Right
Paul Flinders [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gregory Maxwell wrote:
Looks like TUX caught MS's attention:
http://www.spec.org/osg/web99/results/res2000q4/web99-20001211-00082.html
Anyone know if their method of achieveing this is as flexible as TUX, or is
their "SWC 3.0" simply mean
On Jan 29 2001, Dylan Griffiths wrote:
The VIA KT133 chipset exhibits the following bugs under Linux 2.2.17 and
2.4.0:
1) PS/2 mouse cursor randomly jumps to upper right hand corner of screen and
locks for a bit
2) Detects a maximum of 64mb of ram, unless worked around by the "mem="
switch
On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 02:52:16PM +0100, Frank de Lange wrote:
I'm currently running 2.4.1 with Maciej's patch-2.4.0-io_apic-4. Additionally,
I disabled focus_processor in apic.c to get rid of some network delays. Flood
pings both from and to this system do not cause any problems, other than
Does 2.4.1 with the following patch applied still boot
No, it doesn't boot anymore (hangs at probing pci hardware again).
I hope this helps. :-)
Excellent. That means I have a good handle on the problem. It also means I
know which bits to not send Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
Hi,
I tried to run ISDN STAC compression on my 2.4.0 kernel. It compiled fine
but once I dialed in and started to use STAC compression it gave me a big
fat oops. I mailed Andre Beck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), the author of
isdn_lzscomp.c (available at www.isdn4linux.de) if this was a known problem,
On Friday, February 02, 2001 12:26:52 PM + Alan Cox
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is why our next patch will detect the use of gcc 2.96, and
complain, in the reiserfs Makefile.
What makes you think its gcc 2.96 ?
We have had many reports of exactly this symlink problem, and each
What makes you think its gcc 2.96 ?
We have had many reports of exactly this symlink problem, and each time it
was a redhat user with a gcc 2.96, and switching to kgcc fixed it. We have
one report (now two with Alan's) that 2.96-69 does not show this crash.
Ok. That would make sense.
eth0: memprobe, Can't find memory at 0xc!
I get the same memprobe error. Haven't bothered with it for some time as I
had problems getting the IBMMCASCSI recognized in 2.4.x but that seems to
have been fixed now.
I have patches that I believe fix this, but their own my box at home
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
sarcasm
What we really need is the ability to
echo en_US/en_GB /proc/sys/kernel/locale
so you can choose the one you want.
/sarcasm
Heh. But you don't need the explicit sarcasm tags in the en_GB version.
--
dwmw2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Random quick poking
Does this fix the ramfs problem in -ac ?
--- fs/ramfs/inode.c~ Wed Jan 31 22:02:16 2001
+++ fs/ramfs/inode.cFri Feb 2 14:51:47 2001
@@ -174,7 +174,6 @@
inode-i_blocks += IBLOCKS_PER_PAGE;
rsb-free_pages--;
hi,
I have a D-Link DFE-530TX Rev A, PCI ethernet card, but it refuses
to work.
I have looked at http://www.scyld.com/network/index.html#pci
which sugests using the via-rhine driver.
I did this and compiled it into the kernel. It detects it at boot (via-
rhine v1.08-LK1.1.6 8/9/2000 Donald
I've started cleaning up mpparse.c/ioapic.c for the addition of acpi
support, but I got stuck in the mess of global variables.
What's the purpose of of the irq_2_pin in io_apic.c?
I assume that I overlook something, but afaics the code allows one
physical interrupt source (e.g. INTA from device
Maciej W. Rozycki writes:
I've forgotten to cc you when sending Ingo my patch-2.4.0-ac12-upapic-19
fixes a few days ago, my apologies. Since the two patches conflict with
each other, I've merged them together and provide the result below.
Please check if it is fine for you.
Looks
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Andre Hedrick wrote:
Sorry, but the ALI code was written based upon ix86 :-(
Where were you guys during 2.3.X development?
We had lots of problems with the few 2.3.x kernels we downloaded; and RD
effort was needed elsewhere.
Would it help if a UP1100 was somehow made
From: Rogerio Brito [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
While I don't have problems with the Duron above, I do have a
486 here with 8MB of memory that I intend to use as a router
for my local LAN, but 2.4.0 only recognizes 7MB, while 2.2.18
recognizes all 8MB. Under 2.4.0 (I
: It is the original one. I'll try with the -69:
:
With 2.96-69 the reiserfs seems to work well.
Sorry for the confusion, I forgot to upgrade the gcc on my machine.
Excellent. Im just glad to know its a fixed bug.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Martin Diehl wrote:
Sorry, wasn't clear enough. I've meant, the kernel (PCI stuff) changing
the BAR bus address in the config space when enabling the device (i.e.
the bus address value which is used for later mapping). Doing so would
make the pci_resource_start() value
We're trying to port some code that currently runs on SGI using the IRIX
direct I/O facility. From searching the web, it appears that a similar
feature either already is or will soon be available under Linux. Could
anyone fill me in on what the status is?
(I know about mapping block
On Thu, 01 Feb 2001 01:44:01 Tom Sightler wrote:
My patches also include changes that should improve this, but I doubt it
will eliminate the problem. The basic thing here is that it's a horrid
card
in regards to performance and most of them only have 8K of buffer, it's
just
too easy to
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, infernix wrote:
However, the patch hasn't been implemented yet, neither in 2.4.1 or in
2.4.1-ac1, because the obvious "HACK,HACK,HACK" sentence is still present :)
Could someone see to it that this mail reaches the kernel's isdn_ppp.c
maintainer and get this thing
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Manfred wrote:
What's the purpose of of the irq_2_pin in io_apic.c?
Just for what the comment says: to map our IRQ number to an apic:pin
entity in O(1). It has to be fast! You would have to parse the MP table
otherwise -- see pin_2_irq().
I assume that I overlook
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
Can that happen, is that important?
Silly question: Why can't we ignore all but the first pin? If we don't
enable the additional pins, we don't have to disable them during
disable_irq().
Possibly yes -- I haven't seen such a system.
it
On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 03:51:53PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
Does this fix the ramfs problem in -ac ?
--- fs/ramfs/inode.c~ Wed Jan 31 22:02:16 2001
+++ fs/ramfs/inode.c Fri Feb 2 14:51:47 2001
@@ -174,7 +174,6 @@
inode-i_blocks += IBLOCKS_PER_PAGE;
I have been watching this thread with interest for a while now, but am
wondering about the real-world use of this, given the performance penalty
for write()
As I see it there are two basic cases you are saying this will help in.
1. webservers
2. other fileservers
I also freely admit that I
Chris Mason wrote:
Hans, decisions about proper compilers should not be made in each
individual part of the kernel. If unpatched gcc 2.96 is getting reiserfs
broke is broke. If you use reiserfs, DO NOT use 2.96. Period. Nobody gains
by letting a single user make this mistake.
wrong,
There is a rare SMP race in brelse:
1138 void __brelse(struct buffer_head * buf)
1139 {
1140 if (atomic_read(buf-b_count)) {
1141 atomic_dec(buf-b_count);
1142 return;
1143 }
1144 printk("VFS: brelse: Trying to free free buffer\n");
1145 }
So, did Linus say no? If not, let's ask him with a patch. Quite simply,
neither we nor the users should be burdened with this, and the patch removes
the burden.
Since egcs-1.1.2 and gcc 2.95 miscompile the kernel strstr code dont forget
to stop those being used as well. Oh look you'll need
Good day;
I have been having consistent trouble with the last several kernels; all the
test[9-12], 2.4.0 (all patched with reiser) and the 2.4.1 kernel (unpatched)
seem to do this for me. I have devfs enabled as well, but this seems to happen
with or without devfs. I don't believe it happened
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Ingo Molnar wrote:
(hm, dont we have an assert in there to catch ISA IRQs bound to the second
IO-APIC?) In any case, it would be a very surprising move if anyone added
a second IO-APIC for the sake of *ISA* devices. This would be truly
backwards.
It's just the matter of
I have a D-Link DFE-530TX Rev A, PCI ethernet card, but it refuses
to work.
I have looked at http://www.scyld.com/network/index.html#pci
which sugests using the via-rhine driver.
I did this and compiled it into the kernel. It detects it at boot (via-
rhine v1.08-LK1.1.6 8/9/2000 Donald Becker)
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
I'm unsure about the K7_NMI_EVENT macro -- I think it should go into
include/asm-i386/msr.h, but the comment should remain here. It should get
reworded a bit in this case, I suppose, though.
I'd prefer to keep it in nmi.c -- it doesn't
Hi Alan, hi others,
source of problems with matroxfb on G450 was revealed: BIOS forgets
to initialize ZORG (0x1C0C) register, and although matroxfb does not use
it, it must contain reasonable value, as it was proved that otherwise it
does not work...
Patch contains:
1) matroxfb_DAC1064.c:
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 06:06:32PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
The information page about this bugzilla can be found here:
http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/bugzilla.shtml
OK, I just registered linux-mm.org and changed the
httpd
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 06:06:32PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
The information page about this bugzilla can be found here:
http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/bugzilla.shtml
OK, I just
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 01:28:33PM +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's a second pass attempt, based on Ben's wait queue extensions:
Does this sound any better ?
It's a mechanism, all right, but you haven't described what problems
it is trying to solve, and where it is likely to be
Hi.
This patch tries to fix the potential rss accounting race where we
change mm-rss without holding page_table_lock.
My reasoning for the correctness of the patch below is as follows.
First I cover the lock pairs added by the patch (top to bottom)
and then the places it does not touch.
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Andrew Morton wrote:
+/*
+ * It appears there is an erratum which affects at least the 82093AA
+ * I/O APIC. If a level-triggered interrupt input is being masked in
+ * the redirection entry while the interrupt is send
I did this and compiled it into the kernel. It detects it at boot (via-
rhine v1.08-LK1.1.6 8/9/2000 Donald Becker) but says the
hardware address (mac address?) is 00-00-00-00-00-00.
This is a good example of what is missed by not copying the exact message.
For example, mine says:
eth0: VIA
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Ingo Oeser wrote:
No, so have to unlock it also, if you return -ENOSPC.
So the correct fix seems to be:
--- linux/fs/ramfs/inode.c~ Wed Jan 31 22:02:16 2001
+++ linux/fs/ramfs/inode.cFri Feb 2 14:51:47 2001
@@ -174,7 +174,6 @@
inode-i_blocks +=
Hey folks,
First off, sorry for spamming all the mailing lists, but I want to make
sure that everyone interested in kiobufs, aio and the like sees this.
Since the mass of discussion going on about kiobufs started, I ran a few
tests of the behaviour of various code when reading from a cached
Files generated by e2fsck in lost+found cannot be removed.
Script started on Fri Feb 2 14:29:55 2001
# df
Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sdc1 6356624 2473924 3559796 41% /
/dev/sdc3 2253284 1373532765292 64%
Hi!
Everyone who says, disk is cheap, ought to donate me one.
Everyone who says, memory is cheap, has to send me some.
I'm still stuck with a P-133, 56 MB RAM (60-70 ns, some EDO,
some FPM) and not only Linux but also W2K on a 2.1 and a 0.8 GB
HDD.
I accept donations in IDE and SCSI,
WARNING!! Messages to linux-kernel are now being intercepted
(and answered) by this company:
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My message was sent directly to linux-kernel, with no cc address.
It should not have gone anywhere else.
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your
Hi!
I am asking because I have just ordered a new drive for my Vaio (8.1 gig
in a 8.45mm drive!) and I want to install 2.4.x on it. (I like getting
8.1GB in under centimeter? That's 8.1GB in compactflash slot?
Pavel
--
I'm
Hi!
This fixes units, and makes format tag: value. Please apply.
Pavel
--- clean/drivers/acpi/cmbatt.c Wed Jan 31 16:14:26 2001
+++ linux/drivers/acpi/cmbatt.c Thu Feb 1 10:55:31 2001
@@ -246,38 +254,32 @@
goto
Hi!
It's not an incompatibility with the k7 chip, just bad code in
include/asm-i386/string.h.
So you're saying SMP *is* supported on Athlon? Do motherboards exist?
Check today's slashdot ;-).
Pavel
--
I'm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 460 matches
Mail list logo
