Re: IBM Thinkpad G41 PCMCIA problems [Was: Yenta TI: ... no PCI interrupts. Fish. Please report.]

2005-02-20 Thread Russell King
On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 08:36:12PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: Linux version 2.6.10 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-8)) #13 SMP Sat Feb 19 20:12:19 EST 2005 BIOS-provided physical RAM map: BIOS-e820: - 0009f000 (usable) BIOS-e820:

Re: Yenta TI: ... no PCI interrupts. Fish. Please report.

2005-02-20 Thread Norbert van Nobelen
Have you tried it to get it to work without ACPI in the kernel at all, and start from there? Best regards, Norbert On Saturday 19 February 2005 22:54, you wrote: Hi everyone, I've been banging my head on this one a couple of days with no luck. I have a IBM Thinkpad G41 with a pentium4M

Re: [ACPI] Re: Call for help: list of machines with working S3

2005-02-20 Thread Luca Capello
Hello! On Fri 18 Feb 2005 21:49, Alistair John Strachan wrote: I discovered that either the i2c_core.ko or i2c_i801.ko modules cause the hang on resume! If you stop the entire i2c subsystem from being loaded by hotplug (note this is the BUS driver, not the sensors driver!), then resume

Re: IBM Thinkpad G41 PCMCIA problems

2005-02-20 Thread David Härdeman
Steven Rostedt wrote: I have a IBM Thinkpad G41 with a pentium4M with Hyperthreading. I can't get the PCMCIA working at all. I've tried turning off hyperthreading, I've tried with and without preempt, I've even added pci=noacpi. I've added Len's ACPI patches, but nothing works. I see the same

Re: IBM Thinkpad G41 PCMCIA problems

2005-02-20 Thread Russell King
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 10:22:09AM +0100, David Härdeman wrote: Steven Rostedt wrote: I have a IBM Thinkpad G41 with a pentium4M with Hyperthreading. I can't get the PCMCIA working at all. I've tried turning off hyperthreading, I've tried with and without preempt, I've even added

Re: Bootsplash for 2.6.11-rc4

2005-02-20 Thread Arjan van de Ven
How many distros do use some variant of bootsplash? SuSE does, from above url I guess gentoo does, too... Does Red Hat do something similar? [Or do they just set log-level to very high giving them clean look?] What about Debian? Red Hat/Fedora uses quiet boot option, plus a userspace early

Re: IBM Thinkpad G41 PCMCIA problems

2005-02-20 Thread David Härdeman
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 09:26:59AM +, Russell King wrote: On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 10:22:09AM +0100, David Härdeman wrote: I see the same problem with an IBM Thinkpad G40, and only when there is 1Gb of memory or more in the machine. Check to see if your e820 map has a hole in it, and whether

Re: IBM Thinkpad G41 PCMCIA problems

2005-02-20 Thread Russell King
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 10:52:12AM +0100, David Härdeman wrote: e820 map: BIOS-provided physical RAM map: BIOS-e820: - 0009f000 (usable) BIOS-e820: 0009f000 - 000a (reserved) BIOS-e820: 000ce000 - 000d (reserved) BIOS-e820:

Re: IBM Thinkpad G41 PCMCIA problems [Was: Yenta TI: ... no PCI interrupts. Fish. Please report.]

2005-02-20 Thread Russell King
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 08:22:26AM +, Russell King wrote: On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 08:36:12PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: Linux version 2.6.10 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-8)) #13 SMP Sat Feb 19 20:12:19 EST 2005 BIOS-provided physical RAM map: BIOS-e820:

Re: IBM Thinkpad G41 PCMCIA problems

2005-02-20 Thread Dominik Brodowski
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 10:52:12AM +0100, David Härdeman wrote: On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 09:26:59AM +, Russell King wrote: On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 10:22:09AM +0100, David Härdeman wrote: I see the same problem with an IBM Thinkpad G40, and only when there is 1Gb of memory or more in the

Re: IBM Thinkpad G41 PCMCIA problems

2005-02-20 Thread Russell King
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 11:20:59AM +0100, Dominik Brodowski wrote: Is the hole between 0x36f6fa000 and 0x3f70? And what would be the proper way of fixing it (assuming that IBM won't issue a fixed BIOS)? passing reserve=0x3f6fa000,0x600 as kernel boot option. Please also post

Re: [darcs-users] Re: [BK] upgrade will be needed

2005-02-20 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Hi, David Roundy, creator of darcs, wrote: On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 05:42:13PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: I read in the webpage of the darcs kernel repository that they had to add RAM serveral times to avoid running out of memory. They needed more than 1G IIRC, and that was enough for

[SOLVED] Linux 2.6.10-rc3-bk15 hanged under high load (i386)

2005-02-20 Thread Jose Luis Domingo Lopez
Hi: This is more an attempt to get this indexed by web search engines than a request for help, although maybe someone can draw some conclusion from the following and be of some use to anyone. Although the subject refers to some specific kernel version, what is reported in the mail is also valid

Re: updated list of unused kernel exports posted

2005-02-20 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Sat, 2005-02-19 at 22:14 +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote: +wait_for_completion_interruptible +wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout +wait_for_completion_timeout These are emerging functionality type. There are some patches in the pipeline, which make use of this and waited for inclusion

Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/net/smc-mca.c: cleanups

2005-02-20 Thread Herbert Xu
Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've used this technique in a few very small programs to reduce their size (I could strip off both their bss and data sections to save space). Also, I believe that the compiler is able to optimize code using consts, but this is pure speculation, I've

Needed faster implementation of do_gettimeofday()

2005-02-20 Thread puneet_kaushik
Hello all, I am running oprofile on some program. Following is the oprofile output. --- Counted GLOBAL_POWER_EVENTS events (time during which processor is not stopped) with a unit mask of 0x01 (mandatory) count 10 samples

Re: [SOLVED] Linux 2.6.10-rc3-bk15 hanged under high load (i386)

2005-02-20 Thread Norbert van Nobelen
I have the same broken box here: Graphics freezes, sometime the whole box: It needs to warm up. Once warmed up, it will keep running stable forever (-: (Ok, the forever claim can not be verified). On Sunday 20 February 2005 11:39, Jose Luis Domingo Lopez wrote: Hi: This is more an attempt to

Re: IBM Thinkpad G41 PCMCIA problems

2005-02-20 Thread David Härdeman
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 10:19:02AM +, Russell King wrote: On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 10:52:12AM +0100, David Härdeman wrote: Is the hole between 0x36f6fa000 and 0x3f70? Looks like it. And what would be the proper way of fixing it (assuming that IBM won't issue a fixed BIOS)? Try passing:

Why does printk helps PCMCIA card to initialise?

2005-02-20 Thread Martin Drohmann
Hi, After updating to a new kernel (2.6.8) my PCMCIA ISDN did not work anymore. My test system now looks like this: uname -s -r -v -m Linux 2.6.11-rc4 #5 Sun Feb 20 05:19:02 CET 2005 x86_64 lspci | grep CardBus :02:07.0 CardBus bridge: Texas Instruments PCI4510 PC card Cardbus

[patch ide] fix ide_get_error_location() for LBA28

2005-02-20 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Higher bits (16-23) of the address were ignored Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff -Nru a/drivers/ide/ide-io.c b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c --- a/drivers/ide/ide-io.c 2005-02-19 17:38:53 +01:00 +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c 2005-02-19 17:38:53 +01:00 @@ -238,9

Re: IBM Thinkpad G41 PCMCIA problems [Was: Yenta TI: ... no PCI interrupts. Fish. Please report.]

2005-02-20 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Sat, 2005-02-19 at 22:51 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: Does a patch like this (instead of your version) work for you? It removes the Intel quirk entirely, and replaces it with the if there's no resource, use the parent resource as the default fallback code. Hi Linus, I live on the East

Re: IBM Thinkpad G41 PCMCIA problems [Was: Yenta TI: ... no PCI interrupts. Fish. Please report.]

2005-02-20 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Sun, 2005-02-20 at 08:22 +, Russell King wrote: Your BIOS is broken. You probably have 1GB of RAM which extends from 0x to 0x4000. Just to leave no doubt. Yes, I have a Gig of RAM. -- Steve - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the

Re: IBM Thinkpad G41 PCMCIA problems [Was: Yenta TI: ... no PCI interrupts. Fish. Please report.]

2005-02-20 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Sun, 2005-02-20 at 10:20 +, Russell King wrote: BTW, try passing: reserve=0x3fefa000,0x6000 to the kernel - this will mark the hole reserved and should reallocate the resources which are clashing with the RAM. I just tried this on 2.6.9 (with no patches) and it worked. So

Re: Why does printk helps PCMCIA card to initialise?

2005-02-20 Thread Vicente Feito
Hello On Sunday 20 February 2005 11:44 am, you wrote: diff -u -U 7 /linux-2.6.11-rc4.changed/drivers/pcmcia/rsrc_nonstatic.c ../linux-2.6.11-rc4/drivers/pcmcia/rsrc_nonstatic.c --- /linux-2.6.11-rc4.changed/drivers/pcmcia/rsrc_nonstatic.c 2005-02-20 11:37:39.0 +0100 +++

Re: [PATCH 2/2] page table iterators

2005-02-20 Thread Nick Piggin
Andi Kleen wrote: On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 03:30:31PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 00:03:42 +0100 Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And to be honest we only have about 6 or 7 of these walkers in the whole kernel. And 90% of them are in memory.c While doing 4level I think I

Re: Why does printk helps PCMCIA card to initialise?

2005-02-20 Thread Russell King
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 12:44:25PM +0100, Martin Drohmann wrote: #ifdef CONFIG_PCI if (s-cb_dev) { ret = pci_bus_alloc_resource(s-cb_dev-bus, res, num, 1, min, 0, pcmcia_align, data); } else #endif -

Re: Bootsplash for 2.6.11-rc4

2005-02-20 Thread Michal Januszewski
On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 03:03:26PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: Pavel, I agree with Michal, take a look at this version of the code instead of the version that you posted. It's a _whole_ lot more sane, and possibly even mergable. Michal, any thoughts on submitting it for inclusion? It seems

Re: Bootsplash for 2.6.11-rc4

2005-02-20 Thread Michal Januszewski
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 12:25:19AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: Hi, Yes, I agree, almost anything is more sane than code I posted :-(. My only requirement is that it works with radeonfb and similar low-level drivers (so that I can get suspend-to-ram to work) and that it gets past our branding

Kernel 2.4.29 (Sparc64) and iproute

2005-02-20 Thread BERTRAND Joël
Hello, I'm trying to use iproute (20041019) with 2.4.29 official kernel on a UltraSparc 1E. I have marked all packets that come from an intranet server (192.168.0.130:3000 / tcp) like this : Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 13344 packets, 1830K bytes) pkts bytes

[PATCH] Replaces (2 * HZ) with DATA_TIMEOUT in /drivers/usb/atm/speedtch.c

2005-02-20 Thread Telemaque Ndizihiwe
This Patch replaces (2 * HZ) with DATA_TIMEOUT which is defined as #define DATA_TIMEOUT (2 * HZ) in /drivers/usb/atm/speedtch.c in kernel 2.6.10. Signed-off-by: Telemaque Ndizihiwe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- linux-2.6.10/drivers/usb/atm/speedtch.c.orig2005-02-20 12:44:22.235267848

Intel Gigabit NIC (2.6.5 - 2.6.10) Bug(?) Found

2005-02-20 Thread Justin Piszcz
What is this e-mail about? Something in the kernel changed regarding the Intel e1000 driver from 2.6.5 to 2.6.10. The change resulted in thousands of errors when the NIC is receiving data. For the past two weeks I have thought about this and tried everything I could think of, it had really been

[BK PATCHES] ide-2.6 update

2005-02-20 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Hi, Please do a bk pull bk://bart.bkbits.net/ide-2.6 This will update the following files: drivers/ide/Kconfig |2 +- drivers/ide/ide-io.c |5 +++-- drivers/ide/ide.c|4 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) through these ChangeSets: [EMAIL

Re: Question on CONFIG_IRQBALANCE / 2.6.x

2005-02-20 Thread Martin J. Bligh
there's something I don't understand: With IRQBALANCE *enabled* almost all interrupts are processed on CPU0. This changed in an unexpected way after disabling IRQBALANCE: now all interrupts are distributed uniformly to both CPUs. Maybe it's intentional, but it's not what I expect when a

Re: Should kirqd work on HT?

2005-02-20 Thread Martin J. Bligh
--Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (on Saturday, February 19, 2005 11:30:53 -0500): Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote: You are right. Kernel balancer doesn't move around the irqs, unless it has too many interrupts. The logic is moving around interrupts all the time will not be good on caches.

Re: Should kirqd work on HT?

2005-02-20 Thread Martin J. Bligh
I've noticed this problem for a while, but only now decided to ask. Interrupt balancing doesn't do anything on my system. CPU0 CPU1 0: 31931808 0IO-APIC-edge timer 1: 76595 0IO-APIC-edge i8042 8: 1 0

[PATCH][2.6.11-rc3-mm2] perfctr-2.7.10 API update 1/4: common

2005-02-20 Thread Mikael Pettersson
Andrew, This set of patches form the first half of a major perfctr API update. The goal is to change the upload-new-control-data system call to be much more generic and independent of struct layouts. To this end the upload-new-control-data syscall will become ret = sys_vperfctr_write(fd,

[PATCH][2.6.11-rc3-mm2] perfctr-2.7.10 API update 2/4: i386

2005-02-20 Thread Mikael Pettersson
perfctr-2.7.10 update, 2/4: - Update i386 syscall table for perfctr-2.7.10 API changes. Signed-off-by: Mikael Pettersson [EMAIL PROTECTED] arch/i386/kernel/entry.S |3 +-- arch/x86_64/ia32/ia32entry.S |3 +-- include/asm-i386/unistd.h|7 +++

[PATCH][2.6.11-rc3-mm2] perfctr-2.7.10 API update 3/4: x86_64

2005-02-20 Thread Mikael Pettersson
perfctr-2.7.10 update, 3/4: - Update x86_64 syscall table for perfctr-2.7.10 API changes. Signed-off-by: Mikael Pettersson [EMAIL PROTECTED] include/asm-x86_64/unistd.h |8 +++- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff -rupN linux-2.6.11-rc3-mm2/include/asm-x86_64/unistd.h

Frequent Oops on Shutdown 2.6.10

2005-02-20 Thread AndyLiebman
Hi, I compiled the 2.6.10 kernel with HyperThreading optimization (I'm running a 3.06 Ghz single Xeon processor with HT enabled). More or less, I'm running Mandrake 10 Official, but with my own kernel. Can anybody help explain why I'm getting this Oops on shutdown? It doesn't happen all the

[PATCH][2.6.11-rc3-mm2] perfctr-2.7.10 API update 4/4: ppc32

2005-02-20 Thread Mikael Pettersson
perfctr-2.7.10 update, 4/4: - Update ppc32 syscall table for perfctr-2.7.10 API changes. Signed-off-by: Mikael Pettersson [EMAIL PROTECTED] arch/ppc/kernel/misc.S |5 ++--- include/asm-ppc/unistd.h |7 +++ 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff -rupN

GL520SM Sensor Chip driver fix

2005-02-20 Thread Adam 'dredzik' Kuczynski
Hi, I've been recently trying to get my lmsensors working under 2.6.9, and i've found this: http://seclists.org/lists/linux-kernel/2005/Feb/2856.html http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/2/11/90 kernel patch for gl520 chip, but after applying it kernel refused to compile. So I've fixed it using

Re: [PATCH] i2c.h: Fix another gcc 4.0 compile failure

2005-02-20 Thread Mickey Stein
Greg KH wrote: On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 08:58:48AM -0800, Mickey Stein wrote: From: Mickey Stein Versions: linux-2.6.11-rc4-bk7, gcc4 (GCC) 4.0.0 20050217 (latest fc rawhide from 19Feb DL) gcc4 cvs seems to dislike include/linux/i2c.h file: Error msg: include/linux/i2c.h:{55,194} error:

Re: Needed faster implementation of do_gettimeofday()

2005-02-20 Thread Parag Warudkar
On Sunday 20 February 2005 05:58 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 985913    8.6083  vmlinux                  mark_offset_tsc 584473    5.1032  libc-2.3.2.so            getc What makes you think mark_offset_tsc is slow? Do you have any comparative numbers? It might just be that the workload you

2.6.11rc4: irq 5, nobody cared

2005-02-20 Thread Folkert van Heusden
Hi, My linux laptop says: irq 5: nobody cared! [c0133044] __report_bad_irq+0x24/0x90 [c0133141] note_interrupt+0x61/0x90 [c0132b2b] __do_IRQ+0x13b/0x150 [c0104a33] do_IRQ+0x23/0x40 [c01031fe] common_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 [c0119dee] __do_softirq+0x2e/0x80 [c0119e67] do_softirq+0x27/0x30

Re: 2.6.11rc4: irq 5, nobody cared

2005-02-20 Thread Rogério Brito
On Feb 20 2005, Folkert van Heusden wrote: My linux laptop says: irq 5: nobody cared! (...) Does anyone care? :-) Well, I'm getting similar stack traces with my system and those are sure scary, but it seems that my e-mails to the list are simply ignored, unfortunately. I am willing to test

Re: 2.6.11rc4: irq 5, nobody cared

2005-02-20 Thread Arjan van de Ven
[dca21690] (ndis_irq_th+0x0/0xf0 [ndiswrapper]) Disabling IRQ #5 Does anyone care? :-) doubt it ... ;) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: 2.6.11rc4: irq 5, nobody cared

2005-02-20 Thread Matthias-Christian Ott
Rogério Brito wrote: On Feb 20 2005, Folkert van Heusden wrote: My linux laptop says: irq 5: nobody cared! (...) Does anyone care? :-) Well, I'm getting similar stack traces with my system and those are sure scary, but it seems that my e-mails to the list are simply ignored,

Re: IBM Thinkpad G41 PCMCIA problems [Was: Yenta TI: ... no PCI interrupts. Fish. Please report.]

2005-02-20 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005, Russell King wrote: On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 08:36:12PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: BIOS-e820: - 0009f000 (usable) BIOS-e820: 0009f000 - 000a (reserved) BIOS-e820: 000d - 000d4000 (reserved)

USB Storage problem (usb hangs)

2005-02-20 Thread me
Hi. The device is: USB2.0 to IDE 3.5 hard disk enclosure. Producer: Seven. Part of /var/log/messages with USB debug enabled in kernel is attached to this email. Kernel: 2.6.9, 2.6.10 (i cant remember from which one is attached log). Distribution: Gentoo. I'm not subscribed to the list, pleas

Re: IBM Thinkpad G41 PCMCIA problems [Was: Yenta TI: ... no PCI interrupts. Fish. Please report.]

2005-02-20 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote: But the PCI allocations are not at all limited by MAXMEM - they want to be in the low 4GB, but that's the only real limit. So using max_low_pfn to determine where to start PCI allocations is pretty bogus. I'll try to write something that

Re: 2.6.11rc4: irq 5, nobody cared

2005-02-20 Thread Rogério Brito
On Feb 20 2005, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote: Rogério Brito wrote: I am willing to test any patch and configuration (let's call me a guinea pig), but I don't know what I should do. I have, OTOH, reported my problem many times in the past few days. :-( I will retry sending my message to the

http://kernel.org down

2005-02-20 Thread Stephen R. Bordeleau
I get time-outs when trying to access kernel.org but the ftp works. Is this scheduled? smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

PROBLEM: agpgart-via: probe fails with error -22

2005-02-20 Thread Kenton Groombridge
[1.] PROBLEM: agpgart-via: probe fails with error -22 [2.] When loading agpgart/agpgart-via the following occurs: Linux agpgart interface v0.100 (c) Dave Jones agpgart: Detected VIA KT400/KT400A/KT600 chipset agpgart: Maximum main memory to use for agp memory: 816M agpgart: unable to determine

Re: http://kernel.org down

2005-02-20 Thread Randy.Dunlap
Stephen R. Bordeleau wrote: I get time-outs when trying to access kernel.org but the ftp works. Is this scheduled? thanks. should be ok now. -- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at

[PATCH][2.4] Fix timer override on nforce

2005-02-20 Thread Zwane Mwaikambo
Per our discussion, i've ported the 2.6 nforce skip timer override (and early PCI access) code to 2.4. This fixes an issue whereupon nforce systems have incorrect override values for irq0. Architectures affected are i386 and x86_64 Signed-off-by: Zwane Mwaikambo [EMAIL PROTECTED] # This is a

Panic in 2.6.11-rc4

2005-02-20 Thread Ben Greear
I see this panic when booting 2.6.11-rc4 (plus some of my own patches...but my modules have not loaded at the point of the crash). The system is a Shuttle system with the FB65 motherboard. CPU is 3.0Ghz P4 with 1MB cache and hyperthreading. HD is an 80GB SATA disk. NVIDIA card is installed

Re: 2.6.11rc4: irq 5, nobody cared

2005-02-20 Thread Matthias-Christian Ott
Rogério Brito wrote: On Feb 20 2005, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote: Rogério Brito wrote: I am willing to test any patch and configuration (let's call me a guinea pig), but I don't know what I should do. I have, OTOH, reported my problem many times in the past few days. :-( I will retry

proc path_walk glitch ?

2005-02-20 Thread Der Herr Hofrat
HI ! I noticed a slight proc filesystem strangness in the 2.4.2X and 2.6.X (atleast up to 2.6.8). Assuming that process 8655 exists and is running long enough (ls -lR / or so) cd /proc/8655 kill -9 8655 ls /usr/bin/ls: .: Stale NFS file handle open(.,

Re: Panic in 2.6.11-rc4

2005-02-20 Thread Ben Greear
Ben Greear wrote: I see this panic when booting 2.6.11-rc4 (plus some of my own patches...but my modules have not loaded at the point of the crash). Same things happens with a kernel built w/out any of my patches, by the way... Ben -- Ben Greear [EMAIL PROTECTED] Candela Technologies Inc

Re: Wake-on-LAN/PCI Linux support

2005-02-20 Thread Piotr Rzezniczak
Does Linux currently support Wake-on-LAN/PCI? I have a 3Com 3c905 TX-M NIC which supports wake-on-LAN and wake-on-PCI. On Windows XP, I have configured the system so that I can use ether-wake to wake up mysystem from standby/hibernation remotely through the network. (cut) However, when I

6300ESB watchdog driver

2005-02-20 Thread David Härdeman
Hi I wrote earlier to the list[1] asking for a driver for the watchdog included in the 6300ESB chipset. I got a 2.4 driver via private email from Ross Biro which I've changed into what I hope resembles a 2.6 driver (which was done by looking a lot at the watchdog drivers already in the 2.6

ASUS P2B-DS

2005-02-20 Thread Kari Laine
Hi Vise People, GH1N2J3JKL - this helps, me to find answers - please keep line ASUS P2B-DS board seems NOT work very well with default kernel in FED Core 3. smp-kernel hangs booting at various stages. I am goig to try 2.6.10 today. non-smp-kernel boots fine. This is my first time I try to test

[PATCH] /proc/kmalloc

2005-02-20 Thread Matt Mackall
I've been sitting on this for over a year now, kicking it out in the hopes that someone finds it useful. kernel.org was down when I was tidying this up so it's against 2.6.10 which is what I had handy. /proc/kmalloc allocation tracing This quick hack adds accounting for kmalloc/kfree callers.

Re: Panic in 2.6.11-rc4

2005-02-20 Thread Matthias-Christian Ott
Ben Greear wrote: I see this panic when booting 2.6.11-rc4 (plus some of my own patches...but my modules have not loaded at the point of the crash). The system is a Shuttle system with the FB65 motherboard. CPU is 3.0Ghz P4 with 1MB cache and hyperthreading. HD is an 80GB SATA disk. NVIDIA

Re: proc path_walk glitch ?

2005-02-20 Thread Matthias-Christian Ott
Der Herr Hofrat wrote: HI ! I noticed a slight proc filesystem strangness in the 2.4.2X and 2.6.X (atleast up to 2.6.8). Assuming that process 8655 exists and is running long enough (ls -lR / or so) cd /proc/8655 kill -9 8655 ls /usr/bin/ls: .: Stale NFS file handle open(.,

Re: IBM Thinkpad G41 PCMCIA problems [Was: Yenta TI: ... no PCI

2005-02-20 Thread David Härdeman
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote: Russell, what do your eagle-eyes think of a patch like this? Steven, does this fix it without the need for any kernel command line (or any other patches, for that matter - ie revert all the transparency- changing ones)? Linus I tried the patch on my G40

[PATCH] typo in include/linux/compiler.h

2005-02-20 Thread Olaf Hering
small nitpick, __KERNEL__ is the inner ifdef. Signed-off-by: Olaf Hering [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff -purN linux-2.6.11-rc4.orig/include/linux/compiler.h linux-2.6.11-rc4-klibc/include/linux/compiler.h --- linux-2.6.11-rc4.orig/include/linux/compiler.h 2005-02-13 04:06:55.0 +0100 +++

Re: [RFC 2.6.11-rc2-mm2 0/7] mm: manual page migration -- overview II

2005-02-20 Thread Andi Kleen
Perhaps node masks would be better and teaching the kernel to handle relative distances inside the masks transparently while migrating? Not sure how complicated this would be to implement though. Supporting interleaving on the new nodes may be also useful, that would need a policy argument

Re: 2.6.11-rc3-mm2: lockup in sys_timer_settime

2005-02-20 Thread Alexander Nyberg
When running a Posix conformance test (from posixtestsuite), the kernel locks up with: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0 Pid: 1873, comm: 10-1.test EIP: 0060:[c0126fda] CPU: 0 EIP is at sys_timer_settime+0xfa+0x1f0 EFLAGS: 0282 Not tainted (2.6.11-rc3-mm2) EAX: 0282 EBX:

Re: [PATCH] /proc/kmalloc

2005-02-20 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Sünndag 20 Februar 2005 21:47, Matt Mackall wrote: I've been sitting on this for over a year now, kicking it out in the hopes that someone finds it useful. kernel.org was down when I was tidying this up so it's against 2.6.10 which is what I had handy. /proc/kmalloc allocation tracing

Re: proc path_walk glitch ?

2005-02-20 Thread Bodo Eggert
Der Herr Hofrat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: cd /proc/8655 kill -9 8655 ls /usr/bin/ls: .: Stale NFS file handle Seems to be fixed in 2.6.10-ac9 or earlier - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at

Re: [RFC 2.6.11-rc2-mm2 0/7] mm: manual page migration -- overview II

2005-02-20 Thread Paul Jackson
Andi wrote: I still think it's fundamentally unclean and racy. External processes shouldn't mess with virtual addresses of other processes. It's not really messing with (changing) the virtual addresses of another process. It's messing with the physical placement. It's using the virtual

Re: [RFC 2.6.11-rc2-mm2 0/7] mm: manual page migration -- overview II

2005-02-20 Thread Andi Kleen
Do you have any better way to suggest, Andi, for a batch manager to relocate a job? The typical scenario, as Ray explained it to me, is - Give the shared libraries and any other files a suitable policy (by mapping them and applying mbind) - Then execute migrate_pages() for the anonymous

Re: ASUS P2B-DS

2005-02-20 Thread Tim Schmielau
Hi Vise People, GH1N2J3JKL - this helps, me to find answers - please keep line ASUS P2B-DS board seems NOT work very well with default kernel in FED Core 3. smp-kernel hangs booting at various stages. I am goig to try 2.6.10 today. non-smp-kernel boots fine. This is my first time I try to

cifs connection loss hangs

2005-02-20 Thread Cameron Harris
Being a wireless user i experience the occasional connection loss due to walking out of range or something, recently after starting to use cifs mounts instead of smbfs, I've noticed that stuff tends to break if i lose connection. I first noticed this when my bootscript brought down the wireless

Help - really messed up kernel

2005-02-20 Thread Joshua Hudson
I am trying to install linux on a laptop that cannot boot from cdrom. I got a stripped-down kernel to boot from floppy, ran lspci to get the hardware information. I then reconfigured and rebuilt the kernel for the image. I built this kernel from stock 2.6.10 from www.kernel.org. This is the

Re: [RFC] pdirops: vfs patch

2005-02-20 Thread Jan Blunck
Alex Tomas wrote: +static inline struct semaphore * lock_sem(struct inode *dir, struct qstr *name) +{ + if (IS_PDIROPS(dir)) { + struct super_block *sb; + /* name-hash expected to be already calculated */ + sb = dir-i_sb; +

Re: PROBLEM: agpgart-via: probe fails with error -22

2005-02-20 Thread Dave Jones
On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 01:57:22PM -0500, Kenton Groombridge wrote: [1.] PROBLEM: agpgart-via: probe fails with error -22 [2.] When loading agpgart/agpgart-via the following occurs: Linux agpgart interface v0.100 (c) Dave Jones agpgart: Detected VIA KT400/KT400A/KT600 chipset

Re: [RFC] pdirops: vfs patch

2005-02-20 Thread Alex Tomas
Jan Blunck (JB) writes: JB With luck you have s_pdirops_size (or 1024) different renames altering JB concurrently one directory inode. Therefore you need a lock protecting JB your filesystem data. This is basically the job done by i_sem. So in JB my opinion you only move The Problem from the

Re: Help - really messed up kernel

2005-02-20 Thread Brian Beattie
On Sun, 2005-02-20 at 15:22 -0800, Joshua Hudson wrote: I am trying to install linux on a laptop that cannot boot from cdrom. I handled this by putting smart-boot http://btmgr.webframe.org/ in the hard drive MBR from a dos floppy, smart-boot can boot from a cdrom. Then as long as you don't wipe

Re: Help - really messed up kernel

2005-02-20 Thread Joshua Hudson
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005, Brian Beattie wrote: On Sun, 2005-02-20 at 15:22 -0800, Joshua Hudson wrote: I am trying to install linux on a laptop that cannot boot from cdrom. I handled this by putting smart-boot http://btmgr.webframe.org/ in the hard drive MBR from a dos floppy, smart-boot can

Re: Should kirqd work on HT?

2005-02-20 Thread Jeff Garzik
Martin J. Bligh wrote: --Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (on Saturday, February 19, 2005 11:30:53 -0500): Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote: You are right. Kernel balancer doesn't move around the irqs, unless it has too many interrupts. The logic is moving around interrupts all the time will not be

Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/net/smc-mca.c: cleanups

2005-02-20 Thread Jeff Garzik
Adrian Bunk wrote: This patch contains the following cleanups: - make a needlessly global function static - make three needlessly global structs static Since after moving the now-static stucts to smc-mca.c the file smc-mca.h was empty except for two #define's, I've also killed the rest of

Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/net/seeq8005.c: cleanups

2005-02-20 Thread Jeff Garzik
this patch needlessly eats formfeeds - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/net/sb1000.c: make some variables static

2005-02-20 Thread Jeff Garzik
this patch eats formfeeds - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/net/ne3210.c: cleanups

2005-02-20 Thread Jeff Garzik
Adrian Bunk wrote: - if (ei_debug 0) - printk(version); I agree the version variable is outdated, but I disagree that the driver intro banner should be removed completely. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a

Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/net/lp486e.c: make some code static

2005-02-20 Thread Jeff Garzik
Adrian Bunk wrote: This patch makes some needlessly global code static. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- drivers/net/lp486e.c |8 +--- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- linux-2.6.11-rc3-mm2-full/drivers/net/lp486e.c.old 2005-02-16 16:08:34.0

Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/net/appletalk/: make firmware static

2005-02-20 Thread Jeff Garzik
Adrian Bunk wrote: This patch makes some needlessly global firmware static. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- drivers/net/appletalk/cops_ffdrv.h |2 +- drivers/net/appletalk/cops_ltdrv.h |2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) ---

Re: [RFC 2.6.11-rc2-mm2 0/7] mm: manual page migration -- overview II

2005-02-20 Thread Paul Jackson
- Give the shared libraries and any other files a suitable policy (by mapping them and applying mbind) Ah - I think you've said this before, and I'm being a bit retarded. You're saying that one could horse around with the physical placement of existing files mapped into another tasks space by

Re: Bootsplash for 2.6.11-rc4

2005-02-20 Thread Marcos D. Marado Torres
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 20 Feb 2005, Michal Januszewski wrote: On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 12:25:19AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: How many distros do use some variant of bootsplash? SuSE does, from above url I guess gentoo does, too... Does RedHat do something similar? [Or

Re: Panic in 2.6.11-rc4

2005-02-20 Thread Ben Greear
Matthias-Christian Ott wrote: Hi! The first one is allocation error (linuxrc wants to get/read memory, but the allocation fails?). The other errors are _maybe_ caused by the first error (the scheduler schedules while a atomic operation is in progress). Is your Kernel configuration different to

driver compile Parse error with gcc-3.4.3

2005-02-20 Thread Anil Kumar
Hi, I am new to linux. I am trying to build one of my drivers for 2.6.9-5.EL, RHEL 4, I am getting compile parse errors as follows: error: parse error before '(' token #gcc -v Configured with: ./configure --prefix=/usr/adaptec/build/gcc343-32bit --enable-threads=posix --disable-checking

Re: Help - really messed up kernel

2005-02-20 Thread Pedro Venda
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Joshua Hudson wrote: | I am trying to install linux on a laptop that cannot boot from cdrom. | I got a stripped-down kernel to boot from floppy, ran lspci to get | the hardware information. | | I then reconfigured and rebuilt the kernel for the image.

Re: [PATCH] /proc/kmalloc

2005-02-20 Thread Baruch Even
Matt Mackall wrote: I've been sitting on this for over a year now, kicking it out in the hopes that someone finds it useful. kernel.org was down when I was tidying this up so it's against 2.6.10 which is what I had handy. /proc/kmalloc allocation tracing This quick hack adds accounting for

Re: driver compile Parse error with gcc-3.4.3

2005-02-20 Thread Randy.Dunlap
Anil Kumar wrote: Hi, I am new to linux. I am trying to build one of my drivers for 2.6.9-5.EL, RHEL 4, I am getting compile parse errors as follows: error: parse error before '(' token Complete gcc output plus driver source file would help a lot. #gcc -v Configured with: ./configure

Merging fails reading /dev/uba1

2005-02-20 Thread Pete Zaitcev
Hi, Jens: I think this question belongs to your domain, but please let me know if I'm mistaken, so I can pursue this elsewhere. I encountered a strange performance anomaly. I do the following: - Plug USB key [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# time dd if=/dev/uba of=/dev/null bs=10k count=10240 10240+0

Re: [RFC 2.6.11-rc2-mm2 0/7] mm: manual page migration -- overview II

2005-02-20 Thread Ray Bryant
Andi Kleen wrote: But we are least at the level of agreeing that the new system call looks something like the following: migrate_pages(pid, count, old_list, new_list); right? For the external case probably yes. For internal (process does this on its own address space) it should be hooked into

Re: IBM Thinkpad G41 PCMCIA problems [Was: Yenta TI: ... no PCI interrupts. Fish. Please report.]

2005-02-20 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Sun, 2005-02-20 at 09:56 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: Steven, does this fix it without the need for any kernel command line (or any other patches, for that matter - ie revert all the transparency- changing ones)? Linus Hi Linus, I just tried it out (after removing all

[PATCH] Re: slab corruption on 2.6.10-rc4-bk7

2005-02-20 Thread Jeff Garzik
Andrew Morton wrote: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (This has actually been there for a while, but I only noticed it in dmesg this morning). During boot on a dual em64t I see .. scsi2 : ata_piix isa bounce pool size: 16 pages slab error in cache_free_debugcheck(): cache `size-2048': double

[PATCH #2] Re: slab corruption on 2.6.10-rc4-bk7

2005-02-20 Thread Jeff Garzik
Actually, here's a better fix. Jeff = drivers/scsi/libata-core.c 1.116 vs edited = --- 1.116/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c 2005-02-01 20:23:51 -05:00 +++ edited/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c 2005-02-20 23:34:32 -05:00 @@ -2800,7 +2800,7 @@ return 1; /* fall through */ - +

  1   2   3   >