On Jun 22, 2007, Theodore Tso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
has probably made it made it much more *unlikely* that the Linux
kernel will ever go GPLv3.
That was a given from the start. The spin that there was any chance
whatsoever it could possibly happen was just that. Even if Linus
could
Hi.
I have recently begun to try and use suspend to ram more, and have an
intermittent problem. Actually, it's a couple of (possibly related) problems,
but I'll start with the one that's easiest.
Sometimes, when I resume, the keyboard stops responding. I then need to hold
down the power
Hi,
2007/6/22, Rob Landley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thursday 21 June 2007 23:23:54 dave young wrote:
Hi,
2007/6/22, Rob Landley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thursday 21 June 2007 10:40:17 Li Yang wrote:
This is a Chinese translated version of Documentation/HOWTO. Currently
Chinese involvement
-Original Message-
From: Rob Landley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 1:33 PM
To: dave young
Cc: Li Yang-r58472; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; TripleX Chung; Maggie
Chen;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 08:53:47PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
Hi Sergei,
Thanks for taking the time to look over my patch.
I guess it's been based on the prior work by John Stultz (and me too :-)?
At some level I guess so. John did send me a patch a while ago.
If you mean
On Saturday 16 June 2007 22:40:53 Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
Hello All , Does anoyone know howto identify a cause for these(*) ?
Or of any tools to help in the identification of the cause ?
So far the Machine checks only happen when I am running bonnie++ against
my
On Jun 22, 2007, Al Viro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 01:26:54AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
No, this thread was about additional permissions to combine with other
licenses. I didn't suggest anything about relicensing whatsoever,
that's all noise out of not
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 07:57:19AM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
Hi Daniel.
As I said in our private thread, I do think you should be using
update_vsyscall() .. update_vsyscall() is just called when the time is
set, usually that happens in the timer interrupt and sometimes that
happens in
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 02:06:01PM -0700, john stultz wrote:
Hi John.
Hey Tony,
Thanks for sending this out! I really appreciate this work, as its been
on my todo forever, and I've just not been able to focus on it.
Currently it seems a bit minimal of a conversion (ideally there should
from: Marc Pignat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
kunmap must be called on the pointer returned by kmap.
Signed-off-by: Marc Pignat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
N.B: This is the same patch as yesterday, with proper Signed-off-by and more
comments.
The buffer variable is used this way:
buffer =
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 00:00 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
plain text document attachment (tasklet-driver-hacks.patch)
Update the DRM driver to use the new tasklet API, which does not rely
on the tasklet implementation details.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index:
diff --git a/drivers/macintosh/Kconfig b/drivers/macintosh/Kconfig
index 0852d33..dbe9626 100644
--- a/drivers/macintosh/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/macintosh/Kconfig
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
menuconfig MACINTOSH_DRIVERS
bool Macintosh device drivers
depends on PPC || MAC || X86
-
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 10:31 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Ram Pai wrote:
Peter, I am not working on it currently. But i am interested in getting
it done. I have the seed set of patches which had Al Viro's ideas
incorporated. Infact those patches were sent on lkml 2 months back.
Shall we
While working on unshare support for the network namespace I noticed
we were putting clone flags in an int. Which is weird because the
syscall uses unsigned long and we at least need an unsigned to
properly hold all of the unshare flags.
So to make the code consistent, this patch updates the
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 23:36 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 00:00 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
plain text document attachment (tasklet-driver-hacks.patch)
Update the DRM driver to use the new tasklet API, which does not rely
on the tasklet implementation details.
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 11:15:25PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
btw., back then we also tried a spin_is_locked() based inner loop
but it didnt help the -tree_lock lockups either. In any case i very
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 05:26:33AM +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Hugh Dickins wrote:
The oops seems to occur after a page unmapping using dma_unmap_page()
followed
by a flush_dcache_page() (in
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 12:00:14AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
The most part, tasklets today are not used for time critical functions.
Running tasklets in thread context is not harmful to performance of
the overall system. But running them in interrupt context is, since
they increase the
Ram Pai wrote:
the second patch made a /proc/propagation interface which had almost the
same fields, but also added fields to show the propagation type of the
mount as well as pointers to its peers and master depending on the type
of the mount.
I think the consensus seems to have a new
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 00:00 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
plain text document attachment (tasklets-to-workqueues.patch)
This patch creates an alternative for drivers from using tasklets.
It creates a work_tasklet. When configured to use work_tasklets
instead of tasklets, instead of creating
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 12:00:15AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
I believe this was originally done by Dipankar Sarma. I pulled these
changes from the -rt kernel.
For better preformance, RCU should use a softirq instead of a
tasklet.
I was under the imporession we had merged this a while ago
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 08:49 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 23:36 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 00:00 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
plain text document attachment (tasklet-driver-hacks.patch)
Update the DRM driver to use the new tasklet API, which
Hi Stephane,
On 2007.06.21 01:36:45 -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
Bjorn,
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 02:59:33PM -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
Bjorn,
I ran into one issue related with the new allocator.
Should be the same with 2.6.21 and earlier, the new allocator should
do exactly the
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 13:31 +0200, Michal Schmidt wrote:
OK, I fixed the spacing in both occurences.
Signed-off-by: Michal Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c.orig 2007-06-19 08:40:05.0 -0400
+++ arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c2007-06-21 06:51:16.0
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
While working on unshare support for the network namespace I noticed
we were putting clone flags in an int. Which is weird because the
syscall uses unsigned long and we at least need an unsigned to
properly hold all of the unshare flags.
So to make the code
On 14/06/07, Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i'm pleased to announce release -v17 of the CFS scheduler patchset.
The rolled-up CFS patch against v2.6.22-rc4, v2.6.22-rc4-mm2, v2.6.21.5
or v2.6.20.13 can be downloaded from the usual place:
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/cfs-scheduler/
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 00:06 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Ram Pai wrote:
the second patch made a /proc/propagation interface which had almost the
same fields, but also added fields to show the propagation type of the
mount as well as pointers to its peers and master depending on the type
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 09:06:40PM -0400, James Morris wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Chris Mason wrote:
The incomplete mediation flows from the design, since the pathname-based
mediation doesn't generalize to cover all objects unlike label- or
attribute-based mediation. And the use the
At Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:05:45 -0700 (PDT),
David Miller wrote:
From: Yoshinori Sato [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:59:16 +0900
At Tue, 12 Jun 2007 01:08:55 -0700 (PDT),
David Miller wrote:
2) It is much better to add the appropriate CONFIG_SYSCTL
ifdefs to the
* Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 12:00:15AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
I believe this was originally done by Dipankar Sarma. I pulled these
changes from the -rt kernel.
For better preformance, RCU should use a softirq instead of a
tasklet.
I
Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 22:53:13 +0200
Cedric Le Goater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+static int __init nsproxy_cache_init(void)
+{
+ nsproxy_cachep = kmem_cache_create(nsproxy, sizeof(struct nsproxy),
+
Paul Menage wrote:
On 6/20/07, Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Display the current usage and limit in a more user friendly manner.
Number
of pages can be confusing if the page size is different. Some systems
can choose a page size of 64KB.
I'm not sure that's such a great idea.
* Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we probably want some numbers, at least for tasklets used in
potentially performance critical code.
which actual in-kernel tasklets do you have in mind? I'm not aware of
any in performance critical code. (now that both the RCU and the
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 09:51:35AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we probably want some numbers, at least for tasklets used in
potentially performance critical code.
which actual in-kernel tasklets do you have in mind? I'm not aware of
Ram Pai wrote:
Ok. so you think /proc/mounts can be extended easily without breaking
any userspace commands?
well lets see..
1. to disambiguate bind mounts, we have to add a field that displays the
path to the mount's root dentry from the filesystem's root
dentry. Agree?
Mark,
please fix your mail client to do proper line wraps at column 78.
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 15:39 -0400, Beauchemin, Mark wrote:
Hi,
I've found a preemption problem in kernel/rtmutex.c:649. The BUG_ON
listed in the patch below makes sure a preemption event hasn't
occurred since the
Balbir Singh wrote:
[snip]
With the current dual list approach, something like that could be done
by treating the container lists as pure FIFO (and ignore the reference
bit and all that) and make container reclaim only unmap, not write out
pages.
Then global reclaim will do the work (if
Current -rt is broken when compiling with CONFIG_PARAVIRT and
CONFIG_MCOUNT both enabled. Because CONFIG_MCOUNT disables
CONFIG_REGPARM, the calling convention must once again be explicit
with fastcall. However, this was only half-way addressed in the -rt
patch (adding fastcall back to
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 04:59:54PM -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 21:54 +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2007-06-21T15:42:28, James Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And now, yes, I know AA doesn't mediate IPC or networking (yet), but
that's a missing feature, not
Because the page which SLOB allocator got does not have PG_slab,
I put back the result that kobjsize made a mistake in.
allocateしたページにPG_slabを付ける必要があるのでは無いでしょうか。
I need to add PG_slab to the allocate page, and will not there be it?
Signed-off-by: Yoshinori Sato [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git
Neil Brown wrote:
On Thursday June 21, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't get a comment on my suggestion for a quick and dirty fix for
-assume-clean issues...
Bill Davidsen wrote:
How about a simple solution which would get an array on line and still
be safe? All it would take is a flag which
* Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the freezes that Miklos was seeing were hardirq contexts blocking in
task_rq_lock() - that is done with interrupts disabled. (Miklos i
think also tried !NOHZ kernels and older kernels, with a similar
result.)
plus on the ptrace side, the
Update to checkpatch.pl v0.06. Of note:
- do { and else handled correctly as control structures for { matching
- trailing whitespace correctly tripped when line otherwise empty
- support for const, including const foo * const bar
- multiline macros defining values correctly reported
This
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 08:50:54AM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Jun 18 2007 22:11, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
...
PDF version
http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/files/handbook/handbook-en-0.3-rc1.pdf
No HTML version?
I see I'm not the last of a kind... Or? So:
No txt version?
Any
Robert Hancock wrote:
Peter Rabbitson wrote:
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
What does /proc/mtrr look like in the two cases?
Identical for mem=3900 and without it.
reg00: base=0x ( 0MB), size=2048MB: write-back, count=1
reg01: base=0x8000 (2048MB), size=1024MB: write-back, count=1
* Chris Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Current -rt is broken when compiling with CONFIG_PARAVIRT and
CONFIG_MCOUNT both enabled. Because CONFIG_MCOUNT disables
CONFIG_REGPARM, the calling convention must once again be explicit
with fastcall. However, this was only half-way addressed in
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 00:57 +0200, Zoltán HUBERT wrote:
[...]
Well, I'm using SuSE Pro 9.3 (excellent choice by the way),
Perhaps in April 2005. And if I read
http://www.pro-linux.de/security/7043 correctly it is unsupported
anyways (sorry, I can't find a date on that page).
ATM there are
On 06/22, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Yeah well... I wanted to have the least surprise path... that is,
without my patch, signalfd will sometimes steal the SIGSEGV depending
on who races to the lock first, thus causing the target thread to
re-execute the faulting instruction and taking
On Jun 21 2007 16:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For my part, I think the 2.6.odd did not go as well as the 2.6.even,
beginning with x=16.
you misunderstood the even/odd it was never 2.x.y with y odd/even being stable
/ development, it was the x being even/odd to indicate stable /
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 01:52:11 +0200
Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Users should use the libata based drivers for SATA drives.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
--- linux-2.6.22-rc4-mm2/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt.old
2007-06-21 23:41:03.0
It's this simple, those who chose the GPLv2 for Linux and their
contributions to it don't want people to create derivative works of their
works that can't be Tivoized. They see this as a feature, and it's the
Untrue. Many of us think (and the lawyers are unsure) that it is covered
by GPLv2
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 11:39:45 +0800
David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 01:52 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Users should use the libata based drivers for SATA drives.
NAK. Not all IDE drivers are converted yet. Not even all the relatively
common ones.
All the common
Nicolas Ferre :
Marc Pignat :
please use this patch, sorry for the later
My eyes are too tired or this patch is the same as the previous one :-\
Indeed, my eyes where too tired ;-) Sorry for the trouble.
--
Nicolas Ferre
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
The question is, do the kernel developers want to encourage people who don't
speak English to mess with the kernel, any more than they want to encourage
kernel developers who don't know C? Is kernel documentation in Chinese a
The majority of the world population do not speak English. There
Hi ,
Nay body has idea about OOB layout of YAFFS2?
Thanks
Nobin Mathew
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 11:49:37PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, 21 June 2007 21:39, Alan Stern wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
I'll see if I can reproduce your problem here.
Yes, I can. It's only necessary to load usb-storage (without any
Another law of negotiations --- don't goad people into hardening their
positions; it helps neither you nor your interests.
That always depends which side you really support, whether you want to
force someone to wedge themselves in an undefendable corner and so on..
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from
2007/6/19, Jarek Poplawski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 08:10:00AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 13:08:49 +0200
Jarek Poplawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 16-06-2007 23:35, Marcin .lusarz wrote:
hi
after upgrading kernel from 2.6.20 to 2.6.21.3 i'm
I don't see any reason why this is a semaphore, convert.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
fs/sysfs/file.c | 13 +++--
fs/sysfs/inode.c |4 ++--
fs/sysfs/sysfs.h |2 +-
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--- wireless-dev.orig/fs/sysfs/file.c
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 23:49 +0200, Zoltán HUBERT wrote:
While some of you dislike
closed source drivers, the choices we users face are:
- closed source drivers with closed source OS
- closed source drivers with open source OS
Please consider that we are living in a REAL world, and not
On Thu, 21 June 2007 13:57:15 -0400, James Bruce wrote:
efficient atomic snapshots on a filesystem. There are still some issues
with unexpected disk space usage (it requires _additional_ disk space to
_delete_ a file), and it tends to use more memory (you want to delay
client writes as
Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Marco Berizzi wrote:
Some RCU callback (that calls kmem_cache_free()) oopsed and
panic'ed his box. [ Marco had experienced fs issues lately, so
we
could
suspect file_free_rcu() here, but I can't really tell from the
stack
trace;
I just updated my linux tree from 2.6.20-rc6 to 2.6.22-rc3 for my
custom PXA270 based board and I discovered that now sleep/wakeup
functionality doesn't work anymore! :'(
After several merges, compiling stages and tests I discovered that the
problem arises from 2.6.21 to 2.6.22-rc1 and that the
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 11:19 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 23:49 +0200, Zoltán HUBERT wrote:
While some of you dislike
closed source drivers, the choices we users face are:
- closed source drivers with closed source OS
- closed source drivers with open source OS
You
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, David Greaves wrote:
That's not a bad thing - until you look at the complexity it brings - and
then consider the impact and exceptions when you do, eg hardware
acceleration? md information fed up to the fs layer for xfs? simple long term
maintenance?
Often these
On Saturday 16 June 2007 02:20, Pavel Machek wrote:
Ok, so mv gets slower for big trees... and open() gets faster for deep
trees. Previously, open in current directory was one atomic read of
directory entry, now it has to read directory, and its parent, and its
parent parent, and its...
(Or
Bjorn,
You have the following registers to consider (for P4/Core):
#define MSR_IA32_PEBS_ENABLE0x03f1
#define MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR00x0309
#define MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR10x030a
#define MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR20x030b
#define
Hello! I'm a newbuy in kernel development.
Now I'm just trying to find out what is going in it =).
I noticed this:
(BTW. There is a new category called Will be fixed in 2.6.23)
Is it really important to release 2.6.22 as soon as possible? I think
kernel should be 99% stable. Why not to wait
On Friday 22 June 2007, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
- Interface for preallocating hugetlbfs pages per node instead of system
wide
We may want to get a bit higher level than that. General way of
controlling subsystem use on nodes. One wants to
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 10:55:49AM +0100, Ben Dooks wrote:
This is already on linux-arm-kernel, the best place to find people
who do Linux on ARM.
I see... but after looking at ARM changes I find nothing useful to
resolve the problem, that's why I decided to write here also.
Ciao,
Rodolfo
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 11:34:36AM +0200, Rodolfo Giometti wrote:
I just updated my linux tree from 2.6.20-rc6 to 2.6.22-rc3 for my
custom PXA270 based board and I discovered that now sleep/wakeup
functionality doesn't work anymore! :'(
This is already on linux-arm-kernel, the best place to
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 12:30:48PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
Joerg Roedel wrote:
From: Joerg Roedel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This patch adds an implementation to the svm is_disabled function to
detect reliably if the BIOS disabled the SVM feature in the CPU. This
fixes the issues with kernel
Joerg Roedel wrote:
From: Joerg Roedel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This patch adds an implementation to the svm is_disabled function to
detect reliably if the BIOS disabled the SVM feature in the CPU. This
fixes the issues with kernel panics when loading the kvm-amd module on
machines where SVM is
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 10:30:04AM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
...
It's probably mainly because my contribution (i.e. some comas)
is untranslatable!
After full awakening I've recalled there were a few very nice commas
as well!
Jarek P.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On 2007-06-21T23:45:36, Joshua Brindle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
remember, the policies define a white-list
Except for unconfined processes.
The argument that AA doesn't mediate what it is not configured to
mediate is correct, yes, but I don't think that's a valid _design_ issue
with AA.
Or
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 09:01:28AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
...
So I don't see how you could possibly having two different CPU's getting
into some lock-step in that loop: changing task_rq() is a really quite
heavy operation (it's about
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 12:33:13AM +0300, Al Boldi wrote:
Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 04:41:28PM +0300, Al Boldi wrote:
Adrian Bunk wrote:
Talk is cheap, but unless YOU will do it your emails will only be a
waste of bandwidth.
Thanks, and good luck with involving
* Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
which actual in-kernel tasklets do you have in mind? I'm not aware
of any in performance critical code. (now that both the RCU and the
sched tasklet has been fixed.)
the one in megaraid_sas for example is in a performance-critical path
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 04:35:01PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
In http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8659, Dustin is reporting
that this patch broke tcp-on-ipv6.
Oops. Two instructions operating on the 'len' arg ($18) got swapped...
This should fix ev6 version, ev5 one seems to be ok.
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 23:17 +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2007-06-21T16:59:54, Stephen Smalley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or can access the data under a different path to which their profile
does give them access, whether in its final destination or in some
temporary file processed
On 2007-06-22T07:19:39, Stephen Smalley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or can access the data under a different path to which their profile
does give them access, whether in its final destination or in some
temporary file processed along the way.
Well, yes. That is intentional.
Your
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 21:34 +1000, Neil Brown wrote:
On Friday June 22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes. Your use case is different than mine.
My use case is being able to protect data reliably. Yours?
Saying protect data is nearly meaningless without a threat model.
I bet you don't
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 14:39:50 +0300
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have patches for very high non-preempt latency in
context_struct_compute_av() and list_add corruption. prev-next
should be next (f7d28794), but was f0df8ed4 (prev=f0df8ed4) Kernel Bug
at lib/list_debug.c:33,
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 01:06 -0700, John Johansen wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 04:59:54PM -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 21:54 +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2007-06-21T15:42:28, James Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And now, yes, I know AA doesn't
OK. But in that case I think we should go further, and make signalfd
per process, not per thread, see
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=118241815219430
Every thread gets its own local signals plus shared ones.
(I promise, this is the last piece of spam from me on this topic, but
On Friday June 22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes. Your use case is different than mine.
My use case is being able to protect data reliably. Yours?
Saying protect data is nearly meaningless without a threat model.
I bet you don't try to protect data from a direct nuclear hit, or a
court
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 12:50:11AM +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
Fix compile warnings:
drivers/acpi/bus.c: In function 'acpi_bus_get_power':
drivers/acpi/bus.c:162: warning: implicit declaration of function
'acpi_power_get_inferred_state'
drivers/acpi/bus.c: In function
We have patches for very high non-preempt latency in
context_struct_compute_av() and list_add corruption. prev-next
should be next (f7d28794), but was f0df8ed4 (prev=f0df8ed4) Kernel Bug
at lib/list_debug.c:33, but both are too intrusive.
Anyway, those bugs are not regressions.
Are you going
Tejun Heo wrote:
Albert Lee wrote:
libata can do most of this too by using ATA_FLAG_PIO_POLLING (doesn't
cover nodata commands tho).
Hi Tejun,
Polling of nodata commands was fixed in:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-idem=116546272916399w=2
Right. Thanks for reminding me. :-)
That would be a bit like waiting for a Debian release and never happen.
Ok, offtopbut Debian seems to be stable and sometimes their teem
make releases =)./offtop
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo
On 22/06/07, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 14:39:50 +0300
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have patches for very high non-preempt latency in
context_struct_compute_av() and list_add corruption. prev-next
should be next (f7d28794), but was f0df8ed4
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 00:08 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
No sense in having a patch just for this, may as well merge this with
patch 3 ..
Wrong. patch 3 adds the API and this one makes use of it. Stevens split
makes perfectly sense.
Clearly it doesn't make sense to me ;) .. The
Hi,
On 6/22/07, Arnd Bergmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 21 June 2007, Carsten Otte wrote:
This is an updated version of my bugfix patch. Yan Zheng pointed out,
that ext2_remount lacks checking if -o xip should be enabled or not.
This patch checks for presence of direct_access on
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 09:06:40PM -0400, James Morris wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Chris Mason wrote:
The incomplete mediation flows from the design, since the pathname-based
mediation doesn't generalize to cover all objects unlike label- or
attribute-based mediation. And the use the
On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 22:17 -0600, Crispin Cowan wrote:
James Morris wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Chris Mason wrote:
The incomplete mediation flows from the design, since the pathname-based
mediation doesn't generalize to cover all objects unlike label- or
attribute-based mediation. And
On 6/17/07, Natalie Protasevich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/17/07, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 06:26:55PM +0200, Stefan Richter wrote:
Adrian Bunk wrote:
And we should be aware that reverting is only a workaround for the
real
problem which lies in our
Yinghai Lu wrote:
[PATCH] serial : convert early_uart to earlycon for 8250 fix 3 alias
make the console=uart,io,0x3f8,9600n8 like console=uart8250,io,0x3f8,9600
suggested by Andy Whitcroft.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Marc Pignat wrote:
from: Marc Pignat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
kunmap must be called on the pointer returned by kmap.
Not necessarily: an offset within the same page is acceptable.
Signed-off-by: Marc Pignat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
N.B: This is the same patch as
Hi,
I'm experiencing a strange problem with a via rhine network card on Ubuntu
7.04 (2.6.20-16-generic #2 SMP). The hardware seemed to come into an
inconsistent state, since rmmod'ing and modprobe'ing the via-rhine driver
back didn't help.
After the problem had appeared, I could see the
Christoph,
Thanks for taking the time to look at my patches!
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 08:09 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
I've developed this way to replace all tasklets with work queues without
having to change all the drivers that use them. I created an API that
uses the tasklet API as
1 - 100 of 831 matches
Mail list logo
