You're welcome. Will be merged this patch?
Thank you
Hugh Kang
No One ever is defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality.
강인혁 (Hugh Kang) Chief Engineer
SW Platform(연) Advanced OS Technology TEAM (AOT)
Mobile: +82-10-5513-7957
-Original Message-
From: Javi Merino
t;
> > As already pointed by Javi, this patch has already been proposed (more
> > than one time by different people), but, it still continues to be
> > unacceptable.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Lukasz
> > >
Thank you for reviewing this patch. I understand your ideas.
During the thermal testing into device, the thermal policy should be applied in
the begging of kernel boot sometimes.
Hence, I have suggested above solution.
Anyway, the DT perspective like above, this patch is better not to be upstream.
Thank you very much.
Regards,
Hugh Kang
No One ever is defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality.
강인혁 (Hugh Kang) Chief Engineer
SW Platform(연) Advanced OS Technology TEAM (AOT)
Mobile: +82-10-5513-7957
Hello, David.
There is some problem on my e-mail client so I have to use another one.
Please understand broken reply style.
Yeah, I like this version much. Can we do account slabs_free directly in
get_first_slab()
and get_valid_first_slab()? Passing page_is_free isn't needed if we do it
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Zijlstra [mailto:pet...@infradead.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2017 4:26 PM
> To: Byungchul Park
> Cc: t...@kernel.org; johannes.b...@intel.com; mi...@kernel.org;
> t...@linutronix.de; o...@redhat.com; da...@fromorbit.com; linux-
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Huang, Ying [mailto:ying.hu...@intel.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 5:14 PM
> To: 박병철/선임연구원/SW Platform(연)AOT팀(byungchul.p...@lge.com)
> Cc: Huang, Ying; pet...@infradead.org; mi...@kernel.org; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org; k
> -Original Message-
> From: Huang, Ying [mailto:ying.hu...@intel.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 4:02 PM
> To: Byungchul Park
> Cc: pet...@infradead.org; mi...@kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> kernel-t...@lge.com; ying.hu...@intel.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] llist: Put
> -Original Message-
> From: Coly Li [mailto:i...@coly.li]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 5:00 PM
> To: Byungchul Park
> Subject: Fwd: [PATCH] bcache: use llist_for_each_entry_safe() in
> __closure_wake_up()
>
> Hi Byungchul,
>
> I posted the fix on linux-bcache mailing list, could
> -Original Message-
> From: Byungchul Park [mailto:byungchul.p...@lge.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 01, 2017 7:16 PM
> To: Peter Zijlstra
> Cc: mi...@kernel.org; t...@kernel.org; boqun.f...@gmail.com;
> da...@fromorbit.com; johan...@sipsolutions.net; o...@redhat.com; linux-
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ingo Molnar [mailto:mingo.kernel@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Ingo
>
> > At the time, cross-release was falsely accused. AFAIK, cross-release has
> > not crashed system yet.
>
> I'm talking about the crash fixed here:
>
> 8b405d5c5d09: locking/lockdep: Fix
> -Original Message-
> From: Byungchul Park [mailto:byungchul.p...@lge.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 01, 2017 7:16 PM
> To: Peter Zijlstra
> Cc: mi...@kernel.org; t...@kernel.org; boqun.f...@gmail.com;
> da...@fromorbit.com; johan...@sipsolutions.net; o...@redhat.com; linux-
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Zijlstra [mailto:pet...@infradead.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2017 4:26 PM
> To: Byungchul Park
> Cc: t...@kernel.org; johannes.b...@intel.com; mi...@kernel.org;
> t...@linutronix.de; o...@redhat.com; da...@fromorbit.com; linux-
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Huang, Ying [mailto:ying.hu...@intel.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 4:02 PM
> To: Byungchul Park
> Cc: pet...@infradead.org; mi...@kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> kernel-t...@lge.com; ying.hu...@intel.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] llist: Put
> -Original Message-
> From: Coly Li [mailto:i...@coly.li]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 5:00 PM
> To: Byungchul Park
> Subject: Fwd: [PATCH] bcache: use llist_for_each_entry_safe() in
> __closure_wake_up()
>
> Hi Byungchul,
>
> I posted the fix on linux-bcache mailing list, could
> -Original Message-
> From: Huang, Ying [mailto:ying.hu...@intel.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 5:14 PM
> To: 박병철/선임연구원/SW Platform(연)AOT팀(byungchul.p...@lge.com)
> Cc: Huang, Ying; pet...@infradead.org; mi...@kernel.org; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org; k
> -Original Message-
> From: Ingo Molnar [mailto:mingo.kernel@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Ingo
>
> > At the time, cross-release was falsely accused. AFAIK, cross-release has
> > not crashed system yet.
>
> I'm talking about the crash fixed here:
>
> 8b405d5c5d09: locking/lockdep: Fix
You're welcome. Will be merged this patch?
Thank you
Hugh Kang
No One ever is defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality.
강인혁 (Hugh Kang) Chief Engineer
SW Platform(연) Advanced OS Technology TEAM (AOT)
Mobile: +82-10-5513-7957
-Original Message-
From: Javi Merino
pointed by Javi, this patch has already been proposed (more
> > than one time by different people), but, it still continues to be
> > unacceptable.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Lukasz
> > >
Thank you for reviewing this patch. I understand your ideas.
During the thermal testing into device, the thermal policy should be applied in
the begging of kernel boot sometimes.
Hence, I have suggested above solution.
Anyway, the DT perspective like above, this patch is better not to be upstream.
Thank you very much.
Regards,
Hugh Kang
No One ever is defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality.
강인혁 (Hugh Kang) Chief Engineer
SW Platform(연) Advanced OS Technology TEAM (AOT)
Mobile: +82-10-5513-7957
Hello, David.
There is some problem on my e-mail client so I have to use another one.
Please understand broken reply style.
Yeah, I like this version much. Can we do account slabs_free directly in
get_first_slab()
and get_valid_first_slab()? Passing page_is_free isn't needed if we do it
Hi, Minchan.
I have a question.
The problem mentioned can't be resolved with compaction?
Is there any reason that zsmalloc pages can't be moved by compaction
operation in direct reclaim?
2014-12-02 오전 11:49에 Minchan Kim 이(가) 쓴 글:
Recently, there was issue about zsmalloc fragmentation and
I got
Hi, Minchan.
Sorry, I got it. You made zsmalloc pages movable.
forget it.
Seungho.
2014-12-04 오후 3:49에 박승호/책임연구원/SW Platform(연)AOT팀
(seungho1.p...@lge.com) 이(가) 쓴 글:
Hi, Minchan.
I have a question.
The problem mentioned can't be resolved with compaction?
Is there any reason that zsmalloc
Hi, Minchan.
I got it. Thank u :).
Seungho.
2014-12-04 오후 4:20에 Minchan Kim 이(가) 쓴 글:
Hey Seungho,
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 03:49:21PM +0900, 박승호/책임연구원/SW
Platform(연)AOT팀(seungho1.p...@lge.com) wrote:
Hi, Minchan.
I have a question.
The problem mentioned can't be resolved with compaction
Hi, Minchan.
I have a question.
The problem mentioned can't be resolved with compaction?
Is there any reason that zsmalloc pages can't be moved by compaction
operation in direct reclaim?
2014-12-02 오전 11:49에 Minchan Kim 이(가) 쓴 글:
Recently, there was issue about zsmalloc fragmentation and
I got
Hi, Minchan.
Sorry, I got it. You made zsmalloc pages movable.
forget it.
Seungho.
2014-12-04 오후 3:49에 "박승호/책임연구원/SW Platform(연)AOT팀
(seungho1.p...@lge.com)" 이(가) 쓴 글:
Hi, Minchan.
I have a question.
The problem mentioned can't be resolved with compaction?
Is there any reason tha
Hi, Minchan.
I got it. Thank u :).
Seungho.
2014-12-04 오후 4:20에 Minchan Kim 이(가) 쓴 글:
Hey Seungho,
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 03:49:21PM +0900, "박승호/책임연구원/SW
Platform(연)AOT팀(seungho1.p...@lge.com)" wrote:
Hi, Minchan.
I have a question.
The problem mentioned can't be resolved with
24 matches
Mail list logo
