The CoC is extremely ambiguously written for an enforceable document, any
behavior disliked by the maintainers can be punished, and the level of
naivete of the maintainers defending it is suprising for such a far reaching
document.
> In the interest of fostering an open and welcoming environment,
Hallo Martin,
> What I see here is that a lot of people who are not even contributing to
> the Linux kernel in a major way apparently want to make their opinion
> about Code of Conduct heard loudly.
>
> I ask myself: What the point of it?
So far, the Contributor Covenant CoC always left a
You will not be brainwashed by the CoC
but a Twitter goon squad will be waiting for you.
In summary, your comparison of Richard Stallman's lobbying to the tweets
of the CoC author are inappropriate. Your comparison of the GNU General
Public License with the Contributor Covenant CoC is an insult to the
FS
338
> I'd really want to know who authored the
> document, because it is making statements that are untrue.
Here is the author's post-meritocracy manifesto:
https://postmeritocracy.org/
Here is the author's patreon:
https://www.patreon.com/coraline
Sincerely
Christoph Conrads
PS: Get back to work!
h
To whom it may concern,
in this e-mail I will highlight what is fundamentally wrong with Contributor
Covenant Code of Conduct (CoC for short).
> Examples of unacceptable behavior by participants include:
> [snip]
> * Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a
>
g/web/20091024034824/http://www.ilaw.com.au/public/licencearticle.html
Sincerely
Christoph Conrads
On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 23:57:15 +0100
Edward Cree wrote:
> On 20/09/18 10:27, unconditionedwitn...@redchan.it wrote:
> > Contributors can, at any time, rescind the license grant regarding the
Red Hat, and
Microsoft, all of them members of the Linux Initiative [10]. (Microsoft
is a LF platinum member.)
For at least six years, these people have had an axe to grind with Linux.
Sincerely
Christoph Conrads
[1]
https://www.infoworld.com/article/2989588/linux/linux-i
witter.com/CoralineAda/status/1035009876152467456
[2] http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=8106
Sincerely
Christoph Conrads
The CoC is extremely ambiguously written for an enforceable document, any
behavior disliked by the maintainers can be punished, and the level of
naivete of the maintainers defending it is suprising for such a far reaching
document.
> In the interest of fostering an open and welcoming environment,
Hallo Martin,
> What I see here is that a lot of people who are not even contributing to
> the Linux kernel in a major way apparently want to make their opinion
> about Code of Conduct heard loudly.
>
> I ask myself: What the point of it?
So far, the Contributor Covenant CoC always left a
g/web/20091024034824/http://www.ilaw.com.au/public/licencearticle.html
Sincerely
Christoph Conrads
On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 23:57:15 +0100
Edward Cree wrote:
> On 20/09/18 10:27, unconditionedwitn...@redchan.it wrote:
> > Contributors can, at any time, rescind the license grant regarding the
338
> I'd really want to know who authored the
> document, because it is making statements that are untrue.
Here is the author's post-meritocracy manifesto:
https://postmeritocracy.org/
Here is the author's patreon:
https://www.patreon.com/coraline
Sincerely
Christoph Conrads
PS: Get back to work!
h
witter.com/CoralineAda/status/1035009876152467456
[2] http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=8106
Sincerely
Christoph Conrads
You will not be brainwashed by the CoC
but a Twitter goon squad will be waiting for you.
In summary, your comparison of Richard Stallman's lobbying to the tweets
of the CoC author are inappropriate. Your comparison of the GNU General
Public License with the Contributor Covenant CoC is an insult to the
FS
Red Hat, and
Microsoft, all of them members of the Linux Initiative [10]. (Microsoft
is a LF platinum member.)
For at least six years, these people have had an axe to grind with Linux.
Sincerely
Christoph Conrads
[1]
https://www.infoworld.com/article/2989588/linux/linux-i
To whom it may concern,
in this e-mail I will highlight what is fundamentally wrong with Contributor
Covenant Code of Conduct (CoC for short).
> Examples of unacceptable behavior by participants include:
> [snip]
> * Other conduct which could reasonably be considered inappropriate in a
>
16 matches
Mail list logo
