Re: Revised add_key(2) man page for review

http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ > Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/ -- Eugene Syromyatnikov mailto:evg...@gmail.com xmpp:esyr@jabber.{ru|org}

CONFIG_* in UAPI headers

fitted with comments regarding necessity of these guards useful only in kernel space? -- Eugene Syromyatnikov mailto:evg...@gmail.com xmpp:esyr@jabber.{ru|org}

Re: [PATCH] x86/asm/64: do not clear high 32 bits of syscall number when CONFIG_X86_X32=y

efinition of struct seccomp_data -- Eugene Syromyatnikov mailto:evg...@gmail.com xmpp:esyr@jabber.{ru|org}

[PATCH RESEND 0/2] Fix typo in RWH_WRITE_LIFE_NOT_SET constant name

Hello. This is a small fix of a typo (or, more specifically, some remnant of the old patch version spelling) in RWH_WRITE_LIFE_NOT_SET constant, which is named as RWF_WRITE_LIFE_NOT_SET currently. Since the name with "H" is used in man page and everywhere else, it's probably worth to make the

Re: [PATCH] x86/asm/64: do not clear high 32 bits of syscall number when CONFIG_X86_X32=y

ata -- Eugene Syromyatnikov mailto:evg...@gmail.com xmpp:esyr@jabber.{ru|org}

[PATCH RESEND 0/2] Fix typo in RWH_WRITE_LIFE_NOT_SET constant name

Hello. This is a small fix of a typo (or, more specifically, some remnant of the old patch version spelling) in RWH_WRITE_LIFE_NOT_SET constant, which is named as RWF_WRITE_LIFE_NOT_SET currently. Since the name with "H" is used in man page and everywhere else, it's probably worth to make the

Re: Revised add_key(2) man page for review

gt; Since 4.8, that is. > > Which commit was that? I could not find it? 13100a72f40f5748a04017e0ab3df4cf27c809ef, v4.7-rc1~124^2~2^2~2^2~1 > > -- > Michael Kerrisk > Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ > Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man

CONFIG_* in UAPI headers

fitted with comments regarding necessity of these guards useful only in kernel space? -- Eugene Syromyatnikov mailto:evg...@gmail.com xmpp:esyr@jabber.{ru|org}