Re: ivtv: use arch_phys_wc_add() and require PAT disabled

On Sat, 10 Mar 2018 16:57:41 + "French, Nicholas A." wrote: > > > No what if the framebuffer driver is just requested as a > > > secondary step after firmware loading? > > > > Its a possibility. The decoder firmware gets loaded at the > > beginning of the decoder memory range

Re: ivtv: use arch_phys_wc_add() and require PAT disabled

On Sun, 11 Mar 2018 23:04:02 -0500 Nick French <n...@ou.edu> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 11:24:38PM +0000, Ian Armstrong wrote: > > On Sat, 10 Mar 2018 16:57:41 + > > "French, Nicholas A." <n...@ou.edu> wrote: > > > > > >

Re: ivtv: use arch_phys_wc_add() and require PAT disabled

On Sat, 10 Mar 2018 16:57:41 + "French, Nicholas A." wrote: > > > No what if the framebuffer driver is just requested as a > > > secondary step after firmware loading? > > > > Its a possibility. The decoder firmware gets loaded at the > > beginning of the decoder memory range and we know

Re: ivtv: use arch_phys_wc_add() and require PAT disabled

On Sun, 11 Mar 2018 23:04:02 -0500 Nick French wrote: > On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 11:24:38PM +0000, Ian Armstrong wrote: > > On Sat, 10 Mar 2018 16:57:41 + > > "French, Nicholas A." wrote: > > > > > > > No what if the framebuffer driver is just