On 12/19/16 12:49, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Dec 2016, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 19/12/16 03:56, Jiandi An wrote:
>>> Ensure all reserved fields of xatp are zero before making hypervisor
>>> call to XEN in xen_map_device_mmio(). xenmem_add_to_phy
On 12/19/16 07:56, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 10:20:53PM -0600, Jiandi An wrote:
>> crb_check_resource() in TPM CRB driver calls
>> acpi_dev_resource_memory() which only handles 32-bit resources.
>> Adding a call to acpi_dev_resource_address_space() in TP
crb_check_resource() in TPM CRB driver calls
acpi_dev_resource_memory() which only handles 32-bit resources.
Adding a call to acpi_dev_resource_address_space() in TPM CRB
driver which handles 64-bit resources.
Signed-off-by: Jiandi An <anjia...@codeaurora.org>
---
drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb
Ensure all reserved fields of xatp are zero before making hypervisor
call to XEN in xen_map_device_mmio(). xenmem_add_to_physmap_one() in
XEN fails the mapping request if extra.res reserved field in xatp is
not zero for XENMAPSPACE_dev_mmio request.
Signed-off-by: Jiandi An <an
Ensure all reserved fields of xatp are zero before making
hypervisor call to XEN in xen_map_device_mmio().
xenmem_add_to_physmap_one() in XEN fails the mapping request if
extra.res reserved field in xatp is not zero for XENMAPSPACE_dev_mmio
request.
Signed-off-by: Jiandi An <an
device drivers should be able to use the NUMA aware memory
allocation functions kmalloc_node() and alloc_pages_node() to improve
the performance.
Signed-off-by: Shanker Donthineni <shank...@codeaurora.org>
Tested-by: Jiandi An <anjia...@codeaurora.org>
---
Changes since v1: Edited
B_CTRL_REQ.
Change the if condition to be only for CRB_FL_CRB_START
in crb_go_idle() and crb_cmd_ready().
Signed-off-by: Jiandi An <anjia...@codeaurora.org>
---
v2
Changed if condition to CRB_FL_CRB_START for go idle
and crb_cmd_ready per maintainer's comment.
drivers/char/tp
B_CTRL_REQ.
Change the if condition to be only for CRB_FL_CRB_START
in crb_go_idle() and crb_cmd_ready().
Signed-off-by: Jiandi An <anjia...@codeaurora.org>
---
drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c | 12 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.
On 08/19/2017 12:05 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 11:15:36PM -0500, Jiandi An wrote:
For ARM64, the locality is handled by Trust Zone in FW.
The layout does not have crb_regs_head. It is hitting
the following line.
dev_warn(dev, FW_BUG "Bad ACPI memory layout")
On 08/22/2017 12:39 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 11:15:36PM -0500, Jiandi An wrote:
For ARM64, the locality is handled by Trust Zone in FW.
The layout does not have crb_regs_head. It is hitting
the following line.
dev_warn(dev, FW_BUG "Bad ACPI memory layout")
black list.
Signed-off-by: Jiandi An <anjia...@codeaurora.org>
---
drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c | 35 ---
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c
index 8f0a98d..cbfdbdde 100644
--- a/
On 08/24/2017 07:26 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 04:28:54PM -0500, Jiandi An wrote:
> > {
- if ((priv->flags & CRB_FL_ACPI_START) ||
- (priv->flags & CRB_FL_CRB_SMC_START))
- return 0;
-
- iowrite32(CRB_CTRL_
o
maintain and undrestand. It is better to make code deal with start
method value from ACPI table directly.
Signed-off-by: Jiandi An <anjia...@codeaurora.org>
---
drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c | 59 +++---
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff
is introduced.
Yes please
Jason
Okay, I'll work on moving sm to priv and getting rid of flags from
priv. Will submit a new patch with appropriate patch name and not
a v2 of this patch since the scope of changes have changed.
Thanks for your comments and feedback.
--
Jiandi An
Qualcomm Datacenter
, 2018 at 11:26:26PM -0600, Jiandi An wrote:
TPM_CRB driver is the TPM support for ARM64. If it
is built as module, TPM chip is registered after IMA
init. tpm_pcr_read() in IMA driver would fail and
display the following message even though eventually
there is TPM chip on the system:
ima: No TPM
On 03/07/2018 07:34 AM, Corey Minyard wrote:
On 03/06/2018 11:49 PM, Jiandi An wrote:
IPMI SSIF driver's parameter tryacpi and trydmi both
are set to true. The addition of IPMI DMI driver to
create platform device for each IPMI device causes
SSIF probe to be done twice on the same SMB I2C
from SPMI ACPI table and
probe successfully.
Signed-off-by: Jiandi An <anjia...@codeaurora.org>
---
drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c | 35 ---
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_
)
Fix IMA Kconfig to select TPM_CRB so TPM_CRB driver is
built in kernel and initializes before IMA driver.
Signed-off-by: Jiandi An <anjia...@codeaurora.org>
---
security/integrity/ima/Kconfig | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig b/security/int
e some confusion
during the probing process.
Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <cminy...@mvista.com>
Cc: Jiandi An <anjia...@codeaurora.org>
---
Jiandi, this just yanks out the SPMI code. Your platform
should have an ACPI control method in it's namespace specifying the
IPMI interface. If
On 03/09/2018 08:42 PM, Corey Minyard wrote:
On 03/09/2018 04:28 PM, Jiandi An wrote:
On 03/08/2018 03:08 PM, miny...@acm.org wrote:
From: Corey Minyard <cminy...@mvista.com>
The IPMI spec states:
The purpose of the SPMI Table is to provide a mechanism that can
be used by th
On 03/08/2018 08:10 AM, Corey Minyard wrote:
On 03/07/2018 05:59 PM, Jiandi An wrote:
On 03/07/2018 07:34 AM, Corey Minyard wrote:
On 03/06/2018 11:49 PM, Jiandi An wrote:
IPMI SSIF driver's parameter tryacpi and trydmi both
are set to true. The addition of IPMI DMI driver to
create
:51 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 11:26:26PM -0600, Jiandi An wrote:
TPM_CRB driver is the TPM support for ARM64. If it
is built as module, TPM chip is registered after IMA
init. tpm_pcr_read() in IMA driver would fail and
display the following message even though
On 08/24/2018 02:21 AM, Christian König wrote:
> Am 24.08.2018 um 01:05 schrieb Jiandi An:
>>
>>
>> On 08/23/2018 01:47 AM, Christian König wrote:
>>> Am 22.08.2018 um 22:57 schrieb Jiandi An:
>>>>
>>>> On 08/22/2018 02:09 PM, Christian Kö
On 03/09/2018 08:42 PM, Corey Minyard wrote:
On 03/09/2018 04:28 PM, Jiandi An wrote:
On 03/08/2018 03:08 PM, miny...@acm.org wrote:
From: Corey Minyard
The IPMI spec states:
The purpose of the SPMI Table is to provide a mechanism that can
be used by the OSPM (an ACPI term for “OS
On 03/08/2018 08:10 AM, Corey Minyard wrote:
On 03/07/2018 05:59 PM, Jiandi An wrote:
On 03/07/2018 07:34 AM, Corey Minyard wrote:
On 03/06/2018 11:49 PM, Jiandi An wrote:
IPMI SSIF driver's parameter tryacpi and trydmi both
are set to true. The addition of IPMI DMI driver to
create
:51 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 11:26:26PM -0600, Jiandi An wrote:
TPM_CRB driver is the TPM support for ARM64. If it
is built as module, TPM chip is registered after IMA
init. tpm_pcr_read() in IMA driver would fail and
display the following message even though
the probing process.
Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard
Cc: Jiandi An
---
Jiandi, this just yanks out the SPMI code. Your platform
should have an ACPI control method in it's namespace specifying the
IPMI interface. If it doesn't, that's a bug in your platform and
really needs to be fixed. Finding IPMI
black list.
Signed-off-by: Jiandi An
---
drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c | 35 ---
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c
index 8f0a98d..cbfdbdde 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c
+++
B_CTRL_REQ.
Change the if condition to be only for CRB_FL_CRB_START
in crb_go_idle() and crb_cmd_ready().
Signed-off-by: Jiandi An
---
v2
Changed if condition to CRB_FL_CRB_START for go idle
and crb_cmd_ready per maintainer's comment.
drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c | 36 +
B_CTRL_REQ.
Change the if condition to be only for CRB_FL_CRB_START
in crb_go_idle() and crb_cmd_ready().
Signed-off-by: Jiandi An
---
drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c | 12 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_c
On 08/19/2017 12:05 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 11:15:36PM -0500, Jiandi An wrote:
For ARM64, the locality is handled by Trust Zone in FW.
The layout does not have crb_regs_head. It is hitting
the following line.
dev_warn(dev, FW_BUG "Bad ACPI memory layout")
is introduced.
Yes please
Jason
Okay, I'll work on moving sm to priv and getting rid of flags from
priv. Will submit a new patch with appropriate patch name and not
a v2 of this patch since the scope of changes have changed.
Thanks for your comments and feedback.
--
Jiandi An
Qualcomm Datacenter
o
maintain and undrestand. It is better to make code deal with start
method value from ACPI table directly.
Signed-off-by: Jiandi An
---
drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c | 59 +++---
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/t
On 08/22/2017 12:39 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 11:15:36PM -0500, Jiandi An wrote:
For ARM64, the locality is handled by Trust Zone in FW.
The layout does not have crb_regs_head. It is hitting
the following line.
dev_warn(dev, FW_BUG "Bad ACPI memory layout")
On 08/24/2017 07:26 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 04:28:54PM -0500, Jiandi An wrote:
> > {
- if ((priv->flags & CRB_FL_ACPI_START) ||
- (priv->flags & CRB_FL_CRB_SMC_START))
- return 0;
-
- iowrite32(CRB_CTRL_
)
Fix IMA Kconfig to select TPM_CRB so TPM_CRB driver is
built in kernel and initializes before IMA driver.
Signed-off-by: Jiandi An
---
security/integrity/ima/Kconfig | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig b/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig
index 35ef693
from SPMI ACPI table and
probe successfully.
Signed-off-by: Jiandi An
---
drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c | 35 ---
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c
index 9d3b0fa..5c57363
, 2018 at 11:26:26PM -0600, Jiandi An wrote:
TPM_CRB driver is the TPM support for ARM64. If it
is built as module, TPM chip is registered after IMA
init. tpm_pcr_read() in IMA driver would fail and
display the following message even though eventually
there is TPM chip on the system:
ima: No TPM
On 03/07/2018 07:34 AM, Corey Minyard wrote:
On 03/06/2018 11:49 PM, Jiandi An wrote:
IPMI SSIF driver's parameter tryacpi and trydmi both
are set to true. The addition of IPMI DMI driver to
create platform device for each IPMI device causes
SSIF probe to be done twice on the same SMB I2C
On 08/24/2018 02:21 AM, Christian König wrote:
> Am 24.08.2018 um 01:05 schrieb Jiandi An:
>>
>>
>> On 08/23/2018 01:47 AM, Christian König wrote:
>>> Am 22.08.2018 um 22:57 schrieb Jiandi An:
>>>>
>>>> On 08/22/2018 02:09 PM, Christian Kö
Ensure all reserved fields of xatp are zero before making hypervisor
call to XEN in xen_map_device_mmio(). xenmem_add_to_physmap_one() in
XEN fails the mapping request if extra.res reserved field in xatp is
not zero for XENMAPSPACE_dev_mmio request.
Signed-off-by: Jiandi An
---
drivers/xen/arm
crb_check_resource() in TPM CRB driver calls
acpi_dev_resource_memory() which only handles 32-bit resources.
Adding a call to acpi_dev_resource_address_space() in TPM CRB
driver which handles 64-bit resources.
Signed-off-by: Jiandi An
---
drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c | 8 +---
1 file changed
On 12/19/16 12:49, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Dec 2016, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 19/12/16 03:56, Jiandi An wrote:
>>> Ensure all reserved fields of xatp are zero before making hypervisor
>>> call to XEN in xen_map_device_mmio(). xenmem_add_to_phy
On 12/19/16 07:56, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 10:20:53PM -0600, Jiandi An wrote:
>> crb_check_resource() in TPM CRB driver calls
>> acpi_dev_resource_memory() which only handles 32-bit resources.
>> Adding a call to acpi_dev_resource_address_space() in TP
device drivers should be able to use the NUMA aware memory
allocation functions kmalloc_node() and alloc_pages_node() to improve
the performance.
Signed-off-by: Shanker Donthineni
Tested-by: Jiandi An
---
Changes since v1: Edited commit text.
Not all the platform devices are attached
Ensure all reserved fields of xatp are zero before making
hypervisor call to XEN in xen_map_device_mmio().
xenmem_add_to_physmap_one() in XEN fails the mapping request if
extra.res reserved field in xatp is not zero for XENMAPSPACE_dev_mmio
request.
Signed-off-by: Jiandi An
---
Changed zeroing
46 matches
Mail list logo
