On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 21:34 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
On Monday 12 March 2007 20:38, Xavier Bestel wrote:
On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 20:22 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
On Monday 12 March 2007 19:55, Mike Galbraith wrote:
Hmm. So... anything that's client/server is going to suffer horribly
On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 01:08 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
[Hopefully fixed email client to make it to the list this time]
[This series has changed by using git-diff -M]
snip
Seems appropriate, but I really don't care what it's called. One thing about
this name, is that typing arch/x86Tab
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 21:13 -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Con Kolivas wrote:
snip
Now for something constructive... by any chance is Mike running KDE
instead of GNOME? I only had a short time to play because I had to look
at another problem in 2.6.21-rc3 (nbd not working), so the test
On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 07:17 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 23:55 +0300, Al Boldi wrote:
Mike, I'm not saying RSDL is perfect, but v0.31 is by far better than
mainline. Try this easy test:
startx with the vesa driver
run reflect from the mesa5.0-demos
load 5
On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 08:38 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 08:22 +0100, Radoslaw Szkodzinski wrote:
I'd recon KDE regresses because of kioslaves waiting on a pipe
(communication with the app they're doing IO for) and then expiring.
That's why splitting IO from an app
On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 08:16 -0700, Ray Lee wrote:
On 3/20/07, Mark Lord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've droppped it from my machine -- interactive response is much
more important for my primary machine right now.
Help out with a data point? Are you running KDE as well? If you are,
then it
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 16:47 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Kasper Sandberg wrote:
On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 08:38 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 08:22 +0100, Radoslaw Szkodzinski wrote:
I'd recon KDE regresses because of kioslaves waiting on a pipe
(communication
On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 21:41 +0100, Christoph Maier wrote:
Jan C. Nordholz wrote:
I think I'm experiencing a race condition: Irregularly my kernel runs
into an Oops when it tries to initialize my crypt containers.
FYI, there are similiar reports on the net, going as far back as May 2006:
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 19:18 -0400, David R. Litwin wrote:
Before I go on, let me appologise. I don't really know what I hope to
accomplish, beyond trying to garner thoughts (and support?) for the topic.
Essentially: I want to use Linux and ZFS. I don't particularly care about
licences or
On Sun, 2007-04-15 at 04:57 -0400, David R. Litwin wrote:
On 15/04/07, Kasper Sandberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 19:18 -0400, David R. Litwin wrote:
By the way, forget about this FUSE business. I don't know why they're
bothering: It's not real, it's slow
Sorry for top posting, but this is MAYBE a related matter, i am not
sure.
the thing is, i am running with libata and reiserfs on a raid5 with 6
disks, and after i changed to libata it has worked excellently (before
it used to give DMA errors and then go boom).
however now i sometimes, if theres
On Sun, 2007-07-22 at 14:04 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Ok, right on time, two weeks afetr 2.6.22, there's a 2.6.23-rc1 out there.
And it has a *ton* of changes as usual for the merge window, way too much
for me to be able to post even just the shortlog or diffstat on the
mailing list
(sorry for repost, but there seemed to have been some troubles..)
On Sun, 2007-07-22 at 14:04 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Ok, right on time, two weeks afetr 2.6.22, there's a 2.6.23-rc1 out there.
And it has a *ton* of changes as usual for the merge window, way too much
for me to be able
On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 19:35 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
Im still not so keen about this, Ingo never did get CFS to match SD in
smoothness for 3d applications, where my test subjects are quake(s),
world of warcraft via wine, unreal tournament
On Sat, 2007-07-28 at 10:50 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
First off, i've personally run tests on many more machines than my own,
i've had lots of people try on their machines, and i've seen totally
unrelated posts to lkml, plus i've seen
On Sun, 2007-07-29 at 01:41 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
Hi,
I never tried Con's patchset, for two reasons:
I tried his 2.4 patches ones, and I never saw any improvements. So when
people
were reporting huge improvements with his SD scheduler, I compared that with
the reports of
On Sun, 2007-07-29 at 17:04 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
hi Kasper,
* Kasper Sandberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Im still not so keen about this, Ingo never did get CFS to match SD in
smoothness for 3d applications, where my test subjects are quake(s),
world of warcraft via wine, unreal
On Sun, 2007-07-29 at 19:06 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Kasper Sandberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Im still not so keen about this, Ingo never did get CFS to match SD in
smoothness for 3d applications, where my test subjects are quake(s),
world of warcraft via wine, unreal tournament 2004
On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 10:57 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Peter Zijlstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 01:46 +0200, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
could perhaps be filesystem related, i have my maildir(extremely
large) on reiserfs, and /home on xfs. what my mail client
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 10:41 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
snip
Compared to mainline? I still think this is a 100% keeper for desktop users
like me.
Here its alot worse, just playing an ogg with ogg123 even without
anything reniced (X is 0), just pressing a link in konqueror can make
audio skip
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 21:01 -0700, hechacker1 wrote:
snip
Overall:
SD-0.46 is my new choice for scheduler. When not under load everything
run's better or similarly to cfs or mainline. Under load however it
shows the most responsiveness.
Occasionally I had complete mouse freezes with cfs
On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 13:55 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
update for lkml readers: this is some really 'catastrophic' condition
triggering on your box. Here ogg123 just never skips on an older 750
MHz box, which is 4-5 times slower than your 2GHz box -
it will skip
for 200 ms and then hurry to display the 35 frames. This means it does
get the workload done, but not in a very plesant matter, and its here i
see SD as being in such a high league that its really impossible to
describe the results with any other word than Perfect.
mvh.
Kasper Sandberg
On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 08:59 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Willy Tarreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know if Mike still has problems with SD, but there are now
several interesting reports of SD giving better feedback than CFS on
real work. In my experience, CFS seems smoother on
On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 12:30 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Willy,
snip
As a sidenote: I really wonder if anybody noticed yet, that the whole
CFS / SD comparison is so ridiculous, that it is not even funny anymore.
CFS modifies the scheduler and nothing else, SD fiddles all over the
kernel in
On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 13:11 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 12:30:54PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
snip
Contrarily to most people, I don't see them as competitors. I see SD as
a first step with a low risk of regression, and CFS as an ultimate
solution relying on a more
On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 14:13 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 14:00 +0200, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 13:11 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 12:30:54PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
snip
Contrarily to most people, I don't see them
On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 08:42 -0700, Ray Lee wrote:
On 4/29/07, Kasper Sandberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 08:59 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
well, there are several reports of CFS being significantly better than
SD on a number of workloads - and i know of only two reports
hey greg
i remember for some months back, you posted something similar.. is this
a version thats ready for use? if it is! im gonna use it! :D
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 16:52 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 04:40:33PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
I'd like to announce, yet-another-hotplug
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 22:41 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 02:30 +0100, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
hey greg
i remember for some months back, you posted something similar.. is this
a version thats ready for use? if it is! im gonna use it! :D
Yes, this is that version, cleaned
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 09:06 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 12:47:07PM +0100, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 22:41 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 02:30 +0100, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
hey greg
i remember for some months back, you posted
confirmed, i run 2.6.12 with reiserfs, created with reiserfsprogs 3.6.19
On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 23:19 +, Tarmo Tänav wrote:
Hi,
I think I've found a bug in reiserfs acls. If triggered
it means that any program trying to access the partition,
where the bug occured, will just hang in D
device..
anyone that can help? perhaps a fix is known?
--
Kasper Sandberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read
On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 16:07 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Sun, Jan 23 2005, Alessandro Suardi wrote:
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 21:26:55 +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
have you checked, that cdrecord is not suid root, and
growisofs/dvd+rw-tools
is?
I
On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 11:46 +1000, Tim Fairchild wrote:
On Monday 24 Jan 2005 06:59, Alessandro Suardi wrote:
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 21:26:55 +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
have you checked, that cdrecord is not suid root, and
growisofs/dvd+rw-tools is?
On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 21:44 +, Alan Cox wrote:
On Llu, 2005-01-24 at 20:45, Jens Axboe wrote:
I've got several reports like this that only happen with ACPI, and one
user whose burns report fine but are corrupted if ACPI is allowed to do
power manglement.
Really weird, I cannot
On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 23:48 +, Alan Cox wrote:
On Llu, 2005-01-24 at 23:01, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
there are certainly chipset and CPU errata in this area.
would this mean that i should not use cpu frequency scaling?
Worth an experiment but I'd be suprised if it was your fix. The more
On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 14:47 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Fri, Jan 28 2005, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 23:48 +, Alan Cox wrote:
On Llu, 2005-01-24 at 23:01, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
there are certainly chipset and CPU errata in this area.
would this mean that i
first, sorry for posting so much :|
On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 15:05 +0100, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 14:47 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Fri, Jan 28 2005, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 23:48 +, Alan Cox wrote:
On Llu, 2005-01-24 at 23:01, Kasper Sandberg
its nice to see that this project is not dead after all :DD
On Thu, 2005-01-20 at 12:23 +1100, Peter Williams wrote:
... are now available from:
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/cpuse/plugsched-2.0-for-2.6.10.patch?download
as a single patch to linux-2.6.10 and at:
hello, i followed the last thread, unable to burn DVD, and there was a
patch, which was said to work, but it does not.. (i am running
2.6.11-rc1-bk9)..
the problem started around 2.6.9 (or something like it), when i was only
able to burn 1 dvd, then i had to restart before i could burn another
On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 15:34 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
Miklos Szeredi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Andrew!
Do you plan to send FUSE to Linus for 2.6.14?
snip
i use fuse too, and i like it, it works good, and its quite fast and
easy. it has given me no problems at all, i suggest
://sh.nu/p/8002
second bug:
notice on these pastes the lines at bottom, the keyboard stuff, these
are repeated constantly, and caps/scrolllock button on keyboard is
blinking.
mvh.
Kasper Sandberg
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message
On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 20:07 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On 1/4/07, Kasper Sandberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello.
i just attempted to test .20-rc3-git4 on a box, which has 6 drives in
raid5. it uses raid autodetection, and 2 ide controllers (via and
promise 20269
On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 23:05 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On 1/4/07, Kasper Sandberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 22:06 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On 1/4/07, Kasper Sandberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 21:07 +0100, Bartlomiej
extremely verbose information from libata? for example if it corrects
errors? cause i'd really like to know if it still happens, and if i
perhaps get corruption as before, even though not severe.
Regards,
Kasper Sandberg
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel
On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 12:21 -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
Kasper Sandberg wrote:
i have heard that libata has much better error handling (this is what
made me try it), and from initial observations, that appears to be very
true, however, im wondering, is there something i can do to get
On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 13:01 -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
Kasper Sandberg wrote:
On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 12:21 -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
Kasper Sandberg wrote:
i have heard that libata has much better error handling (this is what
made me try it), and from initial observations
On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 20:28 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On 1/6/07, Kasper Sandberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 13:01 -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
Kasper Sandberg wrote:
On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 12:21 -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
Kasper Sandberg wrote
On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 16:36 +0100, Dirk wrote:
Helge Hafting wrote:
Dirk wrote:
Jay Vaughan wrote:
At 13:13 +0100 8/1/07, Dirk wrote:
Trent Waddington wrote:
Call me crazy, but game manufacturers want directx right? You aint
running that in the kernel.
They want
On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 08:22 +0100, Dirk wrote:
Kasper Sandberg wrote:
On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 16:36 +0100, Dirk wrote:
Helge Hafting wrote:
Dirk wrote:
Jay Vaughan wrote:
At 13:13 +0100 8/1/07, Dirk wrote:
Trent Waddington wrote:
Call me crazy, but game manufacturers want
On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 08:14 +0100, Dirk wrote:
Jan Dittmer wrote:
Dirk wrote:
Alright. I came to discuss an idea I had because I realized that
installing Windows and running Linux in VMware is the only _fun_ way to
play real Games and have Linux at the same time.
And everyone who
On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 17:08 +1000, Trent Waddington wrote:
On 1/9/07, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And remember Picasa as a success story for Wine - exactly because a port
would have required too much effort for developers that were busy with
other things.
I understand what
hello, i run 2.6.13-rc4-git2, and i am experiencing problems with
sk98lin, suddenly it just stops working, and i need to reboot to get
network up again, does this fix it?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 11:22 +0200, Condor wrote:
Hello,
[1.] Files if 100 MB saving in USB memory stick 4 GB with FAT32. While
saving all files is broken.
im sorry, i do not understand this.
you are saying that if you copy files larger than 100mb into drive, all
files die?
[2.] I have USB
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 14:19 +, David Howells wrote:
Chuck Ebbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is a patch to reverse that. Kasper, can you test it?
(Your filesystem is on a FAT/VFAT volume, I assume.)
I do have a fat32 filesystem mounted using the vfat driver (the msdos
one arent
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 21:31 -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 22:11:11 +, David Howells wrote:
I only have 32-bit userspace. When I run your program against
a directory on a JFS filesystem (msdos ioctls not supported)
I get this on
On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 13:08 +, David Howells wrote:
Kasper Sandberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and i am very very sure its because of this, i can run with the kernel
(atleast with rc5 i had that long) for 10 days, and then chroot in, run
the 32bit apps, and within hours of using
On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 16:48 +, David Howells wrote:
Kasper Sandberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you mean by hardlock? Do you mean the application has to be
killed,
or do you mean the kernel is stuck and the machine has to be rebooted?
i mean the kernel itself, two
On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 22:29 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
and i am very very sure its because of this, i can run with the kernel
(atleast with rc5 i had that long) for 10 days, and then chroot in, run
the 32bit apps, and within hours of using, hardlock.
Early AMD K8 platforms had a hardware
On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 03:27 -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 06 Dec 2006 13:58:00 +0100, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
Kasper, what problems (other that the annoying message) are you having?
if it had only been the messages i wouldnt have complained
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 02:50 -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 05:39:43 +0100, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
do you think it may be a bug in the kernel? the stuff with wine that
gets thrown in the kernel messages?
Let's just say the behavior has
release is affected too
On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 15:25 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:29:02 +0100
Kasper Sandberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it appears some sort of bug has gotten into .19, in regards to x86
emulation on x86_64.
i have only tested with =rc5, thw folling
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 03:36 +0100, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
i know i said i suspected this was another bug, but i have revised my
suspecisions, and i do believe its in relation to x86 chroot on x86_64
install, as it has happened with more stuff now, inside the chroot, and
only inside the chroot
On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 15:25 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:29:02 +0100
Kasper Sandberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it appears some sort of bug has gotten into .19, in regards to x86
emulation on x86_64.
i have only tested with =rc5, thw folling, as an example, appears
On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 15:25 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:29:02 +0100
Kasper Sandberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it appears some sort of bug has gotten into .19, in regards to x86
emulation on x86_64.
i have only tested with =rc5, thw folling, as an example, appears
On Sun, 2006-11-26 at 19:52 +, Alistair John Strachan wrote:
On Sunday 26 November 2006 18:07, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 15:25 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:29:02 +0100
Kasper Sandberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it appears some sort of bug
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 11:35 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Monday 28 January 2008, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
Gene Heskett writes:
On Monday 28 January 2008, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 09:17 +0100, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
1. Wrong mailing list; use linux-ide (@vger)
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 23:49 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Monday 28 January 2008, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
[...]
snip
I can invalidate this theory...
i helped a guy on irc debug this problem, and he had ati. I tried having
him stop using fglrx, and go to r300.. same problem, and same problem
On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 21:22 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
Greeting;
snip
None were logged during the time I was running an -rc7 or -rc8.
The previous hits on this resulted in the udma speed being downgraded
till it was actually running in pio just before the freeze that
required the
Hello Ingo.
Sorry it has taken this long, but i've been quite busy with work.
Here are my results with v11 for smoothness.
under slight load (spamasassin nice 19'ed), its now doing okay in
smoothness, almost as good as SD. but under harder load such as pressing
a link in a browser while 3d(at
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 18:59 +0200, Christian wrote:
Hello lkml, hello Ingo!
I've been using CFS-v10 for a few days and I must say that I'm verry
impressed ;-)
Desktop performance without any manual renicing is excellent, even with
make -j20. Gaming performance is at least on par with SD
this to be a problem in wine, however, in sd it
actually does not skip. On the desktop however, the audio issues were totally
fixed in v7..
mvh.
Kasper Sandberg
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info
On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 22:17 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Kasper Sandberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch makes things much worse, [...]
yeah, the small patch i sent to you in private mail was indeed buggy,
please disregard it.
It also hardlocked my box :) but it was worth a shot
hey greg
i remember for some months back, you posted something similar.. is this
a version thats ready for use? if it is! im gonna use it! :D
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 16:52 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 04:40:33PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > I'd like to announce, yet-another-hotplug
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 22:41 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 02:30 +0100, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
> > hey greg
> >
> > i remember for some months back, you posted something similar.. is this
> > a version thats ready for use? if it is! i
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 09:06 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 12:47:07PM +0100, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 22:41 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 02:30 +0100, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
> > > > hey greg
> > >
On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 23:48 +, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Llu, 2005-01-24 at 23:01, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
> > > there are certainly chipset and CPU errata in this area.
> > would this mean that i should not use cpu frequency scaling?
>
> Worth an experiment but I'd be sup
On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 14:47 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28 2005, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 23:48 +, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > On Llu, 2005-01-24 at 23:01, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
> > > > > there are certainly chipset and CPU e
first, sorry for posting so much :|
On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 15:05 +0100, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 14:47 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 28 2005, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 23:48 +, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > > On Ll
hello, i run 2.6.13-rc4-git2, and i am experiencing problems with
sk98lin, suddenly it just stops working, and i need to reboot to get
network up again, does this fix it?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
confirmed, i run 2.6.12 with reiserfs, created with reiserfsprogs 3.6.19
On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 23:19 +, Tarmo Tänav wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think I've found a bug in reiserfs acls. If triggered
> it means that any program trying to access the partition,
> where the bug occured, will just hang in
device..
anyone that can help? perhaps a fix is known?
--
Kasper Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.
On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 15:34 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Andrew!
> >
> > Do you plan to send FUSE to Linus for 2.6.14?
>
i use fuse too, and i like it, it works good, and its quite fast and
easy. it has given me no problems at all, i
://sh.nu/p/8002
second bug:
notice on these pastes the lines at bottom, the keyboard stuff, these
are repeated constantly, and caps/scrolllock button on keyboard is
blinking.
mvh.
Kasper Sandberg
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of
On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 20:07 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On 1/4/07, Kasper Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > i just attempted to test .20-rc3-git4 on a box, which has 6 drives in
> > raid5. it uses raid autodetection, and 2 ide
On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 23:05 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On 1/4/07, Kasper Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 22:06 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > On 1/4/07, Kasper Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > &
extremely verbose information from libata? for example if it corrects
errors? cause i'd really like to know if it still happens, and if i
perhaps get corruption as before, even though not severe.
Regards,
Kasper Sandberg
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-k
On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 12:21 -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
> Kasper Sandberg wrote:
> > i have heard that libata has much better error handling (this is what
> > made me try it), and from initial observations, that appears to be very
> > true, however, im wondering, is the
On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 13:01 -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
> Kasper Sandberg wrote:
> > On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 12:21 -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
> >> Kasper Sandberg wrote:
> >>> i have heard that libata has much better error handling (this is what
> >
On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 20:28 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On 1/6/07, Kasper Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 13:01 -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
> > > Kasper Sandberg wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 12:21 -0600, R
On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 16:36 +0100, Dirk wrote:
> Helge Hafting wrote:
> > Dirk wrote:
> >> Jay Vaughan wrote:
> >>
> >>> At 13:13 +0100 8/1/07, Dirk wrote:
> >>>
> Trent Waddington wrote:
> > Call me crazy, but game manufacturers want directx right? You aint
> > running
On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 08:22 +0100, Dirk wrote:
> Kasper Sandberg wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 16:36 +0100, Dirk wrote:
> >> Helge Hafting wrote:
> >>> Dirk wrote:
> >>>> Jay Vaughan wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>
On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 08:14 +0100, Dirk wrote:
> Jan Dittmer wrote:
> > Dirk wrote:
> >> Alright. I came to discuss an idea I had because I realized that
> >> installing Windows and running Linux in VMware is the only _fun_ way to
> >> play "real" Games and have Linux at the same time.
> >>
> >>
On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 17:08 +1000, Trent Waddington wrote:
> On 1/9/07, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > And remember Picasa as a success story for Wine - exactly because a port
> > would have required too much effort for developers that were busy with
> > other things.
>
> I understand
release is affected too
On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 15:25 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:29:02 +0100
> Kasper Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > it appears some sort of bug has gotten into .19, in regards to x86
> > emulation on x86_64.
> >
>
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 03:36 +0100, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
> i know i said i suspected this was another bug, but i have revised my
> suspecisions, and i do believe its in relation to x86 chroot on x86_64
> install, as it has happened with more stuff now, inside the chroot, and
>
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 14:19 +, David Howells wrote:
> Chuck Ebbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Here is a patch to reverse that. Kasper, can you test it?
> > (Your filesystem is on a FAT/VFAT volume, I assume.)
I do have a fat32 filesystem mounted using the vfat driver (the msdos
one
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 21:31 -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 22:11:11 +, David Howells wrote:
>
> > > I only have 32-bit userspace. When I run your program against
> > > a directory on a JFS filesystem (msdos ioctls not supported)
> > > I
On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 13:08 +, David Howells wrote:
> Kasper Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > and i am very very sure its because of this, i can run with the kernel
> > (atleast with rc5 i had that long) for 10 days, and then chroot in, run
> > th
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
