Re: [Linux-cluster] Re: GFS, what's remaining

2005-09-05 Thread kurt . hackel
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 05:24:33PM +0800, David Teigland wrote: On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 01:54:08AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: David Teigland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We export our full dlm API through read/write/poll on a misc device. inotify did that for a while, but we ended

Re: GFS, what's remaining

2005-09-05 Thread Kurt Hackel
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 10:24:03PM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 04:16:31PM +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: That is the whole point why OCFS exists ;-) The whole point of the orcacle cluster filesystem as it was described in old papers was about pfiles, control

Re: [Linux-cluster] Re: GFS, what's remaining

2005-09-05 Thread kurt . hackel
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 05:24:33PM +0800, David Teigland wrote: > On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 01:54:08AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > David Teigland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > We export our full dlm API through read/write/poll on a misc device. > > > > > > > inotify did that for a

Re: GFS, what's remaining

2005-09-05 Thread Kurt Hackel
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 10:24:03PM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 04:16:31PM +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > > That is the whole point why OCFS exists ;-) > > The whole point of the orcacle cluster filesystem as it was described in old > papers was about pfiles,