Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Paulo Zanoni
://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Paulo Zanoni -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Paulo Zanoni
Hi 2013/2/28 Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com: On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Paulo Zanoni przan...@gmail.com wrote: Hi 2013/2/28 Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk: On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:06:28AM +0100

Re: [Intel-gfx] [pull] drm-intel-next

2012-09-14 Thread Paulo Zanoni
-intel-next drm/fb helper: don't call drm_helper_connector_dpms directly Jani Nikula (2): drm/i915: only enable sdvo hotplug irq if needed drm/i915: fix sdvo hotplug support check and activation Paulo Zanoni (3): drm/i915: add gen7_render_ring_flush drm

Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: add fast boot support for Haswell

2013-08-20 Thread Paulo Zanoni
://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel -- Paulo Zanoni -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: Allow for 5.4Gbps for Haswell.

2014-02-27 Thread Paulo Zanoni
...@intel.com ___ Intel-gfx mailing list intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Paulo Zanoni -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message

Re: [PATCH] drm/sysfs: Do not drop device reference twice

2013-10-30 Thread Paulo Zanoni
...@nvidia.com I started investigating this problem yesterday and reached the same conclusion. The connector path can be easily reproduced on i915.ko: get a machine that has an eDP panel, physically disconnect the panel, boot the machine, modprobe i915 and watch the segfault. Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni

Re: [Intel-gfx] 'power well on' trace in Linus current tree.

2013-12-13 Thread Paulo Zanoni
-...@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Paulo Zanoni -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please

Regression: audit: x86: drop arch from __audit_syscall_entry() interface

2014-10-22 Thread Paulo Zanoni
this discussion on the bugzilla report if you want. Thanks, Paulo -- Paulo Zanoni -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] gpu: drm: i915: intel_display.c: Remove unused function

2014-12-08 Thread Paulo Zanoni
Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch ___ Intel-gfx mailing list intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Paulo Zanoni -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] gpu: drm: i915: intel_display.c: Remove unused function

2014-12-08 Thread Paulo Zanoni
2014-12-08 12:17 GMT-02:00 Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch: On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 10:32:49AM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote: 2014-12-08 6:42 GMT-02:00 Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch: On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 07:29:17PM +0100, Rickard Strandqvist wrote: Remove the function intel_output_name

[PATCH] x86/gpu: GLK uses the same GMS values as SKL

2017-01-24 Thread Paulo Zanoni
de.olive...@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com> --- arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) Found by code inspection. This is completely untested since I don't have GLK hardware. diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c b/arch/x

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915/gen9: Get rid of redundant watermark values

2016-10-05 Thread Paulo Zanoni
Em Qua, 2016-10-05 às 11:33 -0400, Lyude escreveu: > Now that we've make skl_wm_levels make a little more sense, we can > remove all of the redundant wm information. Up until now we'd been > storing two copies of all of the skl watermarks: one being the > skl_pipe_wm structs, the other being the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Add enable_sagv option

2016-10-05 Thread Paulo Zanoni
Em Qua, 2016-10-05 às 11:33 -0400, Lyude escreveu: > This option allows us to manually control the SAGV at module load > time. > This can be useful in situations such as trying to debug watermark > changes, since enabled SAGV + incorrect watermarks = total GPU > annihilation. I'm not a huge fan

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915/gen9: Make skl_wm_level per-plane

2016-10-05 Thread Paulo Zanoni
Em Qua, 2016-10-05 às 11:33 -0400, Lyude escreveu: > Having skl_wm_level contain all of the watermarks for each plane is > annoying since it prevents us from having any sort of object to > represent a single watermark level, something we take advantage of in > the next commit to cut down on all of

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915/skl: Move per-pipe ddb allocations into crtc states

2016-10-05 Thread Paulo Zanoni
Em Qua, 2016-10-05 às 11:33 -0400, Lyude escreveu: > First part of cleaning up all of the skl watermark code. This moves > the > structures for storing the ddb allocations of each pipe into > intel_crtc_state, along with moving the structures for storing the > current ddb allocations active on

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915/skl: Remove linetime from skl_wm_values

2016-10-05 Thread Paulo Zanoni
Em Qua, 2016-10-05 às 11:33 -0400, Lyude escreveu: > Next part of cleaning up the watermark code for skl. This is easy, > since > it seems that we never actually needed to keep track of the linetime > in > the skl_wm_values struct anyway. Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.

Re: [PATCH v2 07/10] drm/i915/gen9: Make skl_pipe_wm_get_hw_state() reusable

2016-10-18 Thread Paulo Zanoni
need this function to be reusable for the next patch. > > Changes since v1: > - Fix accidental behavior change in the code that Paulo pointed out Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com> I just submitted v4 of patch 5 solving the conflicts I created. With that + this review,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915/gen9: Cleanup skl_pipe_wm_active_state

2016-10-11 Thread Paulo Zanoni
ing more meaningful. Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com> > > (adding Maarten's reviewed-by since this is just a split-up version > of one > of the previous patches) > > Signed-off-by: Lyude <cp...@redhat.com> > Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/10] drm/i915/skl: Move per-pipe ddb allocations into crtc states

2016-10-11 Thread Paulo Zanoni
ocations active on hardware into intel_crtc. > > Changes since v1: > - Don't replace alloc->start = alloc->end = 0; > > Signed-off-by: Lyude <cp...@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com> > Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lank

Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] drm/i915/gen9: Make skl_wm_level per-plane

2016-10-11 Thread Paulo Zanoni
down on all of the copy paste code in here. > > Changes since v1: > - Style nitpicks > - Fix accidental usage of i vs. PLANE_CURSOR > - Split out skl_pipe_wm_active_state simplification into separate > patch > > Signed-off-by: Lyude <cp...@redhat.com> Reviewed-

Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] drm/i915/gen9: Add ddb changes to atomic debug output

2016-10-13 Thread Paulo Zanoni
iewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com> > --- >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 57 > + >  1 file changed, 57

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/10] drm/i915/gen9: Get rid of redundant watermark values

2016-10-13 Thread Paulo Zanoni
> > - Fixup skl_write_wm_level() > > - Fixup skl_wm_level_from_reg_val() > > - Don't forget to copy *active to intel_crtc->wm.active.skl > > > > Signed-off-by: Lyude <cp...@redhat.com> > > Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankho...@linux

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/10] drm/i915/gen9: Get rid of redundant watermark values

2016-10-13 Thread Paulo Zanoni
Em Qui, 2016-10-13 às 17:04 -0300, Paulo Zanoni escreveu: > Em Qui, 2016-10-13 às 15:39 +0200, Maarten Lankhorst escreveu: > > > > Op 08-10-16 om 02:11 schreef Lyude: > > > > > > > > > Now that we've make skl_wm_levels make a little more sense, we >

Re: [PATCH 07/10] drm/i915/gen9: Make skl_pipe_wm_get_hw_state() reusable

2016-10-13 Thread Paulo Zanoni
need this function to be reusable for the next patch. > > Signed-off-by: Lyude <cp...@redhat.com> > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com> > --- &g

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915/gen9: Actually verify WM levels in verify_wm_state()

2016-10-13 Thread Paulo Zanoni
Em Qui, 2016-10-13 às 18:15 -0300, Paulo Zanoni escreveu: > Em Sex, 2016-10-07 às 20:11 -0400, Lyude escreveu: > > > > Thanks to Paulo Zanoni for indirectly pointing this out. > > > > Looks like we never actually added any code for checking whether or > > no

Re: [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915/gen9: Actually verify WM levels in verify_wm_state()

2016-10-13 Thread Paulo Zanoni
Em Sex, 2016-10-07 às 20:11 -0400, Lyude escreveu: > Thanks to Paulo Zanoni for indirectly pointing this out. > > Looks like we never actually added any code for checking whether or > not > we actually wrote watermark levels properly. Let's fix that. Thanks for doing this! Rev

Re: [PATCH 08/10] drm/i915/gen9: Add skl_wm_level_equals()

2016-10-13 Thread Paulo Zanoni
Em Sex, 2016-10-07 às 20:11 -0400, Lyude escreveu: > Helper we're going to be using for implementing verification of the > wm > levels in skl_verify_wm_level(). > > Signed-off-by: Lyude <cp...@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com&g

Re: [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915/gen9: Don't wrap strings in verify_wm_state()

2016-10-13 Thread Paulo Zanoni
Em Sex, 2016-10-07 às 20:11 -0400, Lyude escreveu: Bikesheding: it would be nice to write a commit message explaining why, even if the message just tells the user to read Documentation/CodingStyle. Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Lyude <cp..

Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: add fast boot support for Haswell

2013-08-20 Thread Paulo Zanoni
pu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > index e0069f4..1c6a3d2 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > @@ -9579,6 +9579,7 @@ static void intel_init_display(struct drm_device *dev) > > if (HAS_DDI(dev)) { > dev_priv-

Re: [PATCH] drm/sysfs: Do not drop device reference twice

2013-10-30 Thread Paulo Zanoni
d investigating this problem yesterday and reached the same conclusion. The connector path can be easily reproduced on i915.ko: get a machine that has an eDP panel, physically disconnect the panel, boot the machine, "modprobe i915" and watch the segfault. Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni Te

Re: [Intel-gfx] 'power well on' trace in Linus current tree.

2013-12-13 Thread Paulo Zanoni
a5bfabb3a8c0505ffd2149 > > > 00:02.0 8086:0412 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Xeon E3-1200 > v3/4th Gen Core Processor Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 06) > > _______ > Intel-gfx mailing list > intel-...@lists.freedesktop

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Paulo Zanoni
of 0x44008 is 0x0 while the value of 0xC4008 is not, then this patch should help: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2177841/ > > That second '{' is the source of the compile error. > -Chris > > -- > Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre > _

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Paulo Zanoni
Hi 2013/2/28 Sedat Dilek : > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> 2013/2/28 Chris Wilson : >>>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:06:28AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: Allow for 5.4Gbps for Haswell.

2014-02-27 Thread Paulo Zanoni
> -- > keith.pack...@intel.com > > ___ > Intel-gfx mailing list > intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx > -- Paulo Zanoni -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel&

Re: [Intel-gfx] [pull] drm-intel-next

2012-09-14 Thread Paulo Zanoni
disabling into set_mode >> > drm/i915: extract adjusted mode computation >> > drm/i915: use staged outuput config in tv->mode_fixup >> > drm/i915: use staged outuput config in lvds->mode_fixup >> > drm/i915: compute masks of crtcs affec

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] gpu: drm: i915: intel_display.c: Remove unused function

2014-12-08 Thread Paulo Zanoni
etter > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation > +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch > ___ > Intel-gfx mailing list > intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Paulo Zanoni -- T

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] gpu: drm: i915: intel_display.c: Remove unused function

2014-12-08 Thread Paulo Zanoni
2014-12-08 12:17 GMT-02:00 Daniel Vetter : > On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 10:32:49AM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >> 2014-12-08 6:42 GMT-02:00 Daniel Vetter : >> > On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 07:29:17PM +0100, Rickard Strandqvist wrote: >> >> Remove the function intel_output_na

Regression: audit: x86: drop arch from __audit_syscall_entry() interface

2014-10-22 Thread Paulo Zanoni
o continue this discussion on the bugzilla report if you want. Thanks, Paulo -- Paulo Zanoni -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please r

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Add enable_sagv option

2016-10-05 Thread Paulo Zanoni
Em Qua, 2016-10-05 às 11:33 -0400, Lyude escreveu: > This option allows us to manually control the SAGV at module load > time. > This can be useful in situations such as trying to debug watermark > changes, since enabled SAGV + incorrect watermarks = total GPU > annihilation. I'm not a huge fan

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915/skl: Move per-pipe ddb allocations into crtc states

2016-10-05 Thread Paulo Zanoni
Em Qua, 2016-10-05 às 11:33 -0400, Lyude escreveu: > First part of cleaning up all of the skl watermark code. This moves > the > structures for storing the ddb allocations of each pipe into > intel_crtc_state, along with moving the structures for storing the > current ddb allocations active on

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915/skl: Remove linetime from skl_wm_values

2016-10-05 Thread Paulo Zanoni
Em Qua, 2016-10-05 às 11:33 -0400, Lyude escreveu: > Next part of cleaning up the watermark code for skl. This is easy, > since > it seems that we never actually needed to keep track of the linetime > in > the skl_wm_values struct anyway. Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915/gen9: Make skl_wm_level per-plane

2016-10-05 Thread Paulo Zanoni
Em Qua, 2016-10-05 às 11:33 -0400, Lyude escreveu: > Having skl_wm_level contain all of the watermarks for each plane is > annoying since it prevents us from having any sort of object to > represent a single watermark level, something we take advantage of in > the next commit to cut down on all of

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915/gen9: Get rid of redundant watermark values

2016-10-05 Thread Paulo Zanoni
Em Qua, 2016-10-05 às 11:33 -0400, Lyude escreveu: > Now that we've make skl_wm_levels make a little more sense, we can > remove all of the redundant wm information. Up until now we'd been > storing two copies of all of the skl watermarks: one being the > skl_pipe_wm structs, the other being the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/10] drm/i915/gen9: Get rid of redundant watermark values

2016-10-13 Thread Paulo Zanoni
> > - Fixup skl_write_wm_level() > > - Fixup skl_wm_level_from_reg_val() > > - Don't forget to copy *active to intel_crtc->wm.active.skl > > > > Signed-off-by: Lyude > > Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst > > Cc: Ville Syrjälä > > Cc: Paulo Zanon

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/10] drm/i915/gen9: Get rid of redundant watermark values

2016-10-13 Thread Paulo Zanoni
Em Qui, 2016-10-13 às 17:04 -0300, Paulo Zanoni escreveu: > Em Qui, 2016-10-13 às 15:39 +0200, Maarten Lankhorst escreveu: > > > > Op 08-10-16 om 02:11 schreef Lyude: > > > > > > > > > Now that we've make skl_wm_levels make a little more sense, we >

Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] drm/i915/gen9: Add ddb changes to atomic debug output

2016-10-13 Thread Paulo Zanoni
Cc: Ville Syrjälä > Cc: Paulo Zanoni > --- >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 57 > + >  1 file changed, 57 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > index 5cb537c..9e5

Re: [PATCH 07/10] drm/i915/gen9: Make skl_pipe_wm_get_hw_state() reusable

2016-10-13 Thread Paulo Zanoni
need this function to be reusable for the next patch. > > Signed-off-by: Lyude > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst > Cc: Ville Syrjälä > Cc: Paulo Zanoni > --- >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h |  2 ++ >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c  | 27 +-- >  2

Re: [PATCH 08/10] drm/i915/gen9: Add skl_wm_level_equals()

2016-10-13 Thread Paulo Zanoni
Em Sex, 2016-10-07 às 20:11 -0400, Lyude escreveu: > Helper we're going to be using for implementing verification of the > wm > levels in skl_verify_wm_level(). > > Signed-off-by: Lyude Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst > Cc: Ville Syrjäl

Re: [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915/gen9: Actually verify WM levels in verify_wm_state()

2016-10-13 Thread Paulo Zanoni
Em Sex, 2016-10-07 às 20:11 -0400, Lyude escreveu: > Thanks to Paulo Zanoni for indirectly pointing this out. > > Looks like we never actually added any code for checking whether or > not > we actually wrote watermark levels properly. Let's fix that. Thanks for doing this! Rev

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915/gen9: Actually verify WM levels in verify_wm_state()

2016-10-13 Thread Paulo Zanoni
Em Qui, 2016-10-13 às 18:15 -0300, Paulo Zanoni escreveu: > Em Sex, 2016-10-07 às 20:11 -0400, Lyude escreveu: > > > > Thanks to Paulo Zanoni for indirectly pointing this out. > > > > Looks like we never actually added any code for checking whether or > > no

Re: [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915/gen9: Don't wrap strings in verify_wm_state()

2016-10-13 Thread Paulo Zanoni
Em Sex, 2016-10-07 às 20:11 -0400, Lyude escreveu: Bikesheding: it would be nice to write a commit message explaining why, even if the message just tells the user to read Documentation/CodingStyle. Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni > Signed-off-by: Lyude > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst > Cc: Vill

Re: [PATCH v2 07/10] drm/i915/gen9: Make skl_pipe_wm_get_hw_state() reusable

2016-10-18 Thread Paulo Zanoni
need this function to be reusable for the next patch. > > Changes since v1: > - Fix accidental behavior change in the code that Paulo pointed out Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni I just submitted v4 of patch 5 solving the conflicts I created. With that + this review, we can merge this series. If you

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/10] drm/i915/skl: Move per-pipe ddb allocations into crtc states

2016-10-11 Thread Paulo Zanoni
ocations active on hardware into intel_crtc. > > Changes since v1: > - Don't replace alloc->start = alloc->end = 0; > > Signed-off-by: Lyude Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni > Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst > Cc: Ville Syrjälä > Cc: Paulo Zanoni > --- >  drivers/gpu

Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] drm/i915/gen9: Make skl_wm_level per-plane

2016-10-11 Thread Paulo Zanoni
down on all of the copy paste code in here. > > Changes since v1: > - Style nitpicks > - Fix accidental usage of i vs. PLANE_CURSOR > - Split out skl_pipe_wm_active_state simplification into separate > patch > > Signed-off-by: Lyude Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni > Revi

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915/gen9: Cleanup skl_pipe_wm_active_state

2016-10-11 Thread Paulo Zanoni
ing more meaningful. Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni > > (adding Maarten's reviewed-by since this is just a split-up version > of one > of the previous patches) > > Signed-off-by: Lyude > Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst > Cc: Ville Syrjälä > Cc: Paulo Zanoni

[PATCH] x86/gpu: GLK uses the same GMS values as SKL

2017-01-24 Thread Paulo Zanoni
So don't forget to reserve its stolen memory bits. Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: H. Peter Anvin Cc: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira Cc: x...@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni --- arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) Found