> On Oct 24, 2017, at 11:20 AM, Lennart Sorensen
> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 09:41:02PM +0200, Benjamin Poirier wrote:
>> On 2017/09/19 12:38, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> We’ve been running this patchset (all 5) for about as
Sorry for being late to the party…
I tried to use this patch backported to 4.9.49 but could only get the system to
reset (presumably the SMI but not certain since I’m not that current on BMC/SMI
architecture) when it hung.
It’s a Lanner FW-8771 with AMI BIOS 4.6.5 on a Xeon E3-1225 v3.
Also, i
Hi.
We’ve been running this patchset (all 5) for about as long as they’ve been
under review… about 2 months. And in a burn-in lab with heavy traffic.
We’ve not seen a single link-flap in hundreds of ours of saturated traffic.
Would love to see some resolution soon on this as we don’t want to s
> On Jul 20, 2017, at 5:44 PM, Benjamin Poirier wrote:
>
> [snip]
> Could you please test the following patch and let me know if it:
> 1) reduces the interrupt rate of the Other msi-x vector
> 2) avoids the link flaps
> or
> 3) logs some dmesg warnings of the form "Other interrupt with unhandled
> On Jul 21, 2017, at 12:48 PM, Lennart Sorensen
> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 11:36:27AM -0700, Benjamin Poirier wrote:
>> When e1000e_poll() is not fast enough to keep up with incoming traffic, the
>> adapter (when operating in msix mode) raises the Other interrupt to signal
>> Receive
> On Aug 11, 2017, at 8:13 PM, Philip Prindeville
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 21, 2017, at 12:48 PM, Lennart Sorensen
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 11:36:27AM -0700, Benjamin Poirier wrote:
>>> When e1000e_poll() is not fast enough t
6 matches
Mail list logo
