Re: [pull] drm-intel-next

On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 7:18 AM, Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote: Hi Dave, The big ticket item here is the new i915 modeset infrastructure. Shockingly it didn't not blow up all over the place (i.e. I've managed to fix the ugly issues before merging). 1-2 smaller corner cases broke, but

[PATCH] drivers/tty: Don't hangup shared ttys

hanging up a tty. Signed-off-by: Stéphane Marchesin marc...@chromium.org --- drivers/tty/tty_io.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c index 6464029..62a0f02 100644 --- a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c +++ b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c @@ -619,6 +619,9

Re: [PATCH] drivers/tty: Don't hangup shared ttys

On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 04:03:07PM -0700, Stéphane Marchesin wrote: When quickly restarting X servers, we can run into a situation where one X server quits while another one starts on the same tty. For a while, two X

Re: [Nouveau] [RFC] drm/nouveau: disable caching for VRAM BOs on ARM

On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Alexandre Courbot gnu...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Lucas Stach l.st...@pengutronix.de wrote: Am Montag, den 26.05.2014, 09:45 +0300 schrieb Terje Bergström: On 23.05.2014 17:40, Alex Courbot wrote: On 05/23/2014 06:59 PM, Lucas Stach

Re: [Nouveau] [RFC] drm/nouveau: disable caching for VRAM BOs on ARM

On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Alexandre Courbot gnu...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Stéphane Marchesin stephane.marche...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Alexandre Courbot gnu...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Lucas Stach l.st

Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/ttm: introduce dma cache sync helpers

On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 6:25 AM, Lucas Stach l.st...@pengutronix.de wrote: Am Dienstag, den 24.06.2014, 14:27 +0200 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: op 24-06-14 14:23, Alexandre Courbot schreef: On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Alexandre Courbot acour...@nvidia.com wrote: On 06/24/2014 07:33

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] memory: tegra124-emc: Add EMC driver

On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Thierry Reding thierry.red...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 07:23:47PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: On 06/17/2014 06:15 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: On 06/17/2014 06:16 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: On 06/16/2014 10:02 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: On 06/16/2014

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Support DDI lane reversal for DP

On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Benjamin Tissoires benjamin.tissoi...@redhat.com wrote: On Jul 30 2015 or thereabouts, Sivakumar Thulasimani wrote: On 7/29/2015 8:52 PM, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: On Jul 29 2015 or thereabouts, Sivakumar Thulasimani wrote: why not detect reverse in

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: add Starry KR122EA0SRA panel binding

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Rob Clark wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Doug Anderson wrote: >> Rob, >> >> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Rob Clark wrote: >>> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Douglas Anderson

Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] drm/panel: simple: Add support for Samsung LSN122DL01-C01 2560x1600 panel

On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 4:52 AM, Yakir Yang wrote: > The Samsung LSN122DL01-C01 is an 12.2" 2560x1600 (WQXGA) TFT-LCD panel > connected using eDP interfaces. > > Signed-off-by: Yakir Yang > --- > Changes in v2: None > >

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/panel: simple: Add support BOE nv101wxmn51

Reviewed-by: Stéphane Marchesin <marc...@chromium.org> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 7:19 PM, Caesar Wang <w...@rock-chips.com> wrote: > 10.1WXGA is a color active matrix TFT LCD module using amorphous silicon > TFT's as an active switching devices. It can be supported by the >

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/panel: simple: Add support BOE nv101wxmn51

On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 11:26 PM, Caesar Wang wrote: > 10.1WXGA is a color active matrix TFT LCD module using amorphous silicon > TFT's as an active switching devices. It can be supported by the > simple-panel driver. > > Read the panel edid information; > > EDID MODE DETAILS

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/panel: add innolux,p079zca panel driver

can you add bps here too? On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Chris Zhong wrote: > Support Innolux P079ZCA 7.85" 768x1024 TFT LCD panel, it is a MIPI DSI > panel. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Zhong > Reviewed-by: Sean Paul > Tested-by:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH RESEND] drm/i915: Fix pipe/transcoder enum mismatches

On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 3:13 AM, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 07:28:14PM -0700, Stéphane Marchesin wrote: >> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Ville Syrjälä >> <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> wrote: >> > >>

Re: [PATCH] drm/udl: Make page_flip asynchronous

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 11:58 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 7:48 AM, Dawid Kurek > wrote: >> In page_flip vblank is sent with no delay. Driver does not know when the >> actual update is present on the display and has no means for

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH RESEND] drm/i915: Fix pipe/transcoder enum mismatches

On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 09:23:11AM -0700, Stéphane Marchesin wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 3:13 AM, Ville Syrjälä >> <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> wrote: >> > On W

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH RESEND] drm/i915: Fix pipe/transcoder enum mismatches

On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 10:26:36AM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > > El Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 02:56:05PM -0700 Matthias Kaehlcke ha dit: > > > > > In several instances the driver passes an 'enum pipe' value

Re: [PATCH] drm: udl: Destroy framebuffer only if it was initialized

On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 6:04 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 09:55:32AM -0400, Sean Paul wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 01:50:01PM +0200, Emil Lundmark wrote: >> > This fixes a NULL pointer dereference that can happen if the UDL >> > driver is unloaded

Re: [pull] drm-intel-next

On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 7:18 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi Dave, > > The big ticket item here is the new i915 modeset infrastructure. > Shockingly it didn't not blow up all over the place (i.e. I've managed to > fix the ugly issues before merging). 1-2 smaller corner cases broke, but > we have

Re: [Nouveau] [RFC] drm/nouveau: disable caching for VRAM BOs on ARM

On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Lucas Stach wrote: >> Am Montag, den 26.05.2014, 09:45 +0300 schrieb Terje Bergström: >>> On 23.05.2014 17:40, Alex Courbot wrote: >>> > On 05/23/2014 06:59 PM, Lucas Stach wrote: >>> > So after checking

Re: [Nouveau] [RFC] drm/nouveau: disable caching for VRAM BOs on ARM

On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Stéphane Marchesin > wrote: >> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: >>> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Lucas Stach wrote: >>>> Am Montag, de

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] memory: tegra124-emc: Add EMC driver

On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 07:23:47PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> On 06/17/2014 06:15 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: >> >On 06/17/2014 06:16 AM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> >>On 06/16/2014 10:02 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: >> >>>On 06/16/2014 07:35 AM,

Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/ttm: introduce dma cache sync helpers

On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 6:25 AM, Lucas Stach wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 24.06.2014, 14:27 +0200 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst: >> op 24-06-14 14:23, Alexandre Courbot schreef: >> > On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Alexandre Courbot >> > wrote: >> >> On 06/24/2014 07:33 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:

Re: [PATCH] drm: udl: Destroy framebuffer only if it was initialized

On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 6:04 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 09:55:32AM -0400, Sean Paul wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 01:50:01PM +0200, Emil Lundmark wrote: >> > This fixes a NULL pointer dereference that can happen if the UDL >> > driver is unloaded before the framebuffer

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH RESEND] drm/i915: Fix pipe/transcoder enum mismatches

On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 10:26:36AM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > > El Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 02:56:05PM -0700 Matthias Kaehlcke ha dit: > > > > > In several instances the driver passes an 'enum pipe' value to a > > > function expecting

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH RESEND] drm/i915: Fix pipe/transcoder enum mismatches

On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 3:13 AM, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 07:28:14PM -0700, Stéphane Marchesin wrote: >> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Ville Syrjälä >> wrote: >> > >> > On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 10:26:36AM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:

Re: [PATCH] drm/udl: Make page_flip asynchronous

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 11:58 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 7:48 AM, Dawid Kurek > wrote: >> In page_flip vblank is sent with no delay. Driver does not know when the >> actual update is present on the display and has no means for getting >> this information from a device. It

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH RESEND] drm/i915: Fix pipe/transcoder enum mismatches

On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 09:23:11AM -0700, Stéphane Marchesin wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 3:13 AM, Ville Syrjälä >> wrote: >> > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 07:28:14PM -0700, Stéphane Marchesin wrote: >> >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: Support DDI lane reversal for DP

On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > On Jul 30 2015 or thereabouts, Sivakumar Thulasimani wrote: >> >> >> On 7/29/2015 8:52 PM, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: >> >On Jul 29 2015 or thereabouts, Sivakumar Thulasimani wrote: >> >>why not detect reverse in

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/panel: simple: Add support BOE nv101wxmn51

Reviewed-by: Stéphane Marchesin On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 7:19 PM, Caesar Wang wrote: > 10.1WXGA is a color active matrix TFT LCD module using amorphous silicon > TFT's as an active switching devices. It can be supported by the > simple-panel driver. > > Read the panel default e

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/panel: add innolux,p079zca panel driver

can you add bps here too? On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Chris Zhong wrote: > Support Innolux P079ZCA 7.85" 768x1024 TFT LCD panel, it is a MIPI DSI > panel. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Zhong > Reviewed-by: Sean Paul > Tested-by: Brian Norris > --- > > Changes in v3: > - printk err after

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/panel: simple: Add support BOE nv101wxmn51

On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 11:26 PM, Caesar Wang wrote: > 10.1WXGA is a color active matrix TFT LCD module using amorphous silicon > TFT's as an active switching devices. It can be supported by the > simple-panel driver. > > Read the panel edid information; > > EDID MODE DETAILS >

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: add Starry KR122EA0SRA panel binding

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Rob Clark wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Doug Anderson wrote: >> Rob, >> >> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Rob Clark wrote: >>> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Douglas Anderson >>> wrote: The Starry KR122EA0SRA is a 12.2", 1920x1200 TFT-LCD

Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] drm/panel: simple: Add support for Samsung LSN122DL01-C01 2560x1600 panel

On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 4:52 AM, Yakir Yang wrote: > The Samsung LSN122DL01-C01 is an 12.2" 2560x1600 (WQXGA) TFT-LCD panel > connected using eDP interfaces. > > Signed-off-by: Yakir Yang > --- > Changes in v2: None > > drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c | 25 + > 1

[PATCH] drivers/tty: Don't hangup shared ttys

mer before hanging up a tty. Signed-off-by: Stéphane Marchesin --- drivers/tty/tty_io.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c index 6464029..62a0f02 100644 --- a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c +++ b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c @@ -619,6 +619,9 @@ static v

Re: [PATCH] drivers/tty: Don't hangup shared ttys

On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 04:03:07PM -0700, Stéphane Marchesin wrote: >> When quickly restarting X servers, we can run into a situation where >> one X server quits while another one starts on the same tty. For a >> while, two X