:0 frame:0
> TX packets:1827 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
> Interrupt:10 Base address:0x9400
>
> Please CC me in any replies since im not subscribed to the kernel list.
>
> -- Chris
--
---
to FSCK a crashed
filesystem; ext3 also works fine. Get a 2.2.18, apply the ext3 fs
patches, bang, your done.
reiserfs won't work via NFS, without kernel patches.
--
+--
Thomas Davis| ASG Cluster guy
[
..
--
+--
Thomas Davis| PDSF Project Leader
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
(510) 486-4524 | "Only a petabyte of data this year?"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of
rom
enslavement.
--
+------
Thomas Davis| PDSF Project Leader
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
(510) 486-4524 | "Only a petabyte of data this year?"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [E
a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
+--
Thomas Davis| ASG Cluster guy
[EMAIL PROTECT
PALFFY Daniel wrote:
>
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Thomas Davis wrote:
>
> > Guus, there isn't a really official version of it..
> >
> > At http://pdsf.nersc.gov/linux/ifenslave.c is the last version I
> > produced, that works with bonding in v2.2 and v2.4 k
r is idle..
--
+------
Thomas Davis| PDSF Project Leader
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
(510) 486-4524 | "Only a petabyte of data this year?"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel&q
lave->next) != start_at);
kfree(skb);
return 0;
This simplifies the transmit path; and bonding is cpu intensive already!
I'd also like to get the help included.. see attached patch for that!
--
----+--
Thomas Davis
nce before
> 1996 could count as prior art. IANAL, of course.
>
Or, even better, the fact that Ethernet bonding has been available as a
Linux patch since about 1995..
I'm sure Donald Becker could produce prior art on that one!
--
--------+-
his:
http://docs.sun.com:80/ab2/coll.539.1/UGTRUNKING/@Ab2PageView/1311?Ab2Lang=C=iso-8859-1
for information on the 4 possible trunking transmittors.
--
----+------
Thomas Davis| PDSF Project Leader
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ils?pn=US06049528__ for the bonding
driver.. Since it's already in the kernel, and prior work can be
demonstrated also.
--
+--
Thomas Davis| PDSF Project Leader
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
(510) 486-4524 | &quo
it as Ethernet Bonding.
--
+------
Thomas Davis| PDSF Project Leader
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
(510) 486-4524 | "Only a petabyte of data this year?"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of
resume.
Only way out is to power cycle the poor thing..
I'm going to update to a newer version of the kernel, and see if the
other uhci driver suffers from this fate..
--
+--
Thomas Davis| PDSF Project Leader
Nick Piggin wrote:
It is a bit subtle: get_request may only drop the lock and return NULL
(after retaking the lock), if we fail on a memory allocation. If we
just fail due to unavailable queue slots, then the lock is never
dropped. And the mem allocation can't fail because it is a mempool
alloc
Dumitru Ciobarcianu wrote:
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 01:50 +0200, Matti Aarnio wrote:
I do already see spammers smart enough to retry addresses from
the zombie machine, but that share is now below 10% of all emails.
My prediction for next 200 days is that most spammers get the clue,
but it gives us
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 9 Jun 2007 22:59:49 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hmm, how's 2.6.22-rc4-mm2 doing on the Vaio?
People would have heard if it was busted ;)
Have seen occasional hangs in e100 resume-from-RAM, and occasional
all-black-and-dead symptoms after
:0x9400
Please CC me in any replies since im not subscribed to the kernel list.
-- Chris
--
+--
Thomas Davis| PDSF Project Leader
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
(510) 486-4524 | "Only a pet
.
--
+--
Thomas Davis| PDSF Project Leader
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
(510) 486-4524 | "Only a petabyte of data this year?"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please
ing is cpu intensive already!
I'd also like to get the help included.. see attached patch for that!
--
+------
Thomas Davis| PDSF Project Leader
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
(510) 486-4524 | "Only a petabyte of
?Ab2Lang=CAb2Enc=iso-8859-1
for information on the 4 possible trunking transmittors.
--
+--
Thomas Davis| PDSF Project Leader
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
(510) 486-4524 | "Only a petabyte of
the kernel, and prior work can be
demonstrated also.
--
+------
Thomas Davis| PDSF Project Leader
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
(510) 486-4524 | "Only a petabyte of data this year?"
-
To unsubscribe from this
.
reiserfs won't work via NFS, without kernel patches.
--
+--
Thomas Davis| ASG Cluster guy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
(510) 486-4524 | "80 nodes and chugging Captain!"
-
To unsubscribe from this
..
--
+--
Thomas Davis| PDSF Project Leader
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
(510) 486-4524 | "Only a petabyte of data this year?"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of
et Bonding.
--
+------
Thomas Davis| PDSF Project Leader
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
(510) 486-4524 | "Only a petabyte of data this year?"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
+--
Thomas Davis| ASG Cluster guy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
(510) 486-4524 | 80 nodes and chugging Captain!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
PALFFY Daniel wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Thomas Davis wrote:
Guus, there isn't a really official version of it..
At http://pdsf.nersc.gov/linux/ifenslave.c is the last version I
produced, that works with bonding in v2.2 and v2.4 kernels.
Guus Sliepen wrote:
Hello
resume.
Only way out is to power cycle the poor thing..
I'm going to update to a newer version of the kernel, and see if the
other uhci driver suffers from this fate..
--
+--
Thomas Davis| PDSF Project Leader
Nick Piggin wrote:
It is a bit subtle: get_request may only drop the lock and return NULL
(after retaking the lock), if we fail on a memory allocation. If we
just fail due to unavailable queue slots, then the lock is never
dropped. And the mem allocation can't fail because it is a mempool
alloc
Dumitru Ciobarcianu wrote:
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 01:50 +0200, Matti Aarnio wrote:
I do already see spammers smart enough to retry addresses from
the zombie machine, but that share is now below 10% of all emails.
My prediction for next 200 days is that most spammers get the clue,
but it gives us
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 9 Jun 2007 22:59:49 +0200 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, how's 2.6.22-rc4-mm2 doing on the Vaio?
People would have heard if it was busted ;)
Have seen occasional hangs in e100 resume-from-RAM, and occasional
all-black-and-dead symptoms after
30 matches
Mail list logo
