Hi Andre,
I remember you were very tired when you wrote this
code. There's a little thinko in it, I believe :
int tasksize = (HDIO_DRIVE_TASK) ?
HDIO_DRIVE_TASK_HDR_SIZE : HDIO_DRIVE_CMD_HDR_SIZE;
should be :
int tasksize = (cmd==HDIO_DRIVE_TASK) ?
HDIO_DRIVE_TASK_HDR_SIZE :
Hi Alexey,
I recently came across a rather strange thing using
source NAT with ip rule : if the packets to be
translated are matched ONLY by fwmark, and no
from prefix is specified, the resulting address will
be the original one ORed with the new desired one.
This
is because the srcmask field is
Hi !
This is a very interesting idea, but I think we will
quickly need two more types of information from the
patch sender :
- type of patch (fix, new feature, performance boost,
cleanup ...)
- the degree of reliability known to the sender :
- some patches are hand-coded (often proposals
Hello Constantine !
I also needed to be able to detect a failed link and to remove the
guilty interface from a trunk between a linux box and an Alteon A708
switch. So I've just written a little patch against 2.2.17 to implement
the BOND_RELEASE ioctl (Thomas Davis cc'd for this). I also quickly
Hello Thomas !
I've slightly enhanced the bonding code :
- MII link checking with automatic slave enabling/disabling :
Now the bond interface monitors all its MII-compliant slaves
and disables the ones which have a dead link, and enables those
which have a good one. The link check
Hi Alan,
with the ethernet frame diverter in 2.2.18,
netdevice.h
breaks compilation of user space progs because of an
include of net/divert.h. The following one-liner
patch fixes it.
BTW, in the 2.2.18pre14 main Makefile, the "CC = "
statement should be replaced with "CC := ". On my box,
the
Hi Alan,
2.2.18pre14 compiles and runs on Alpha with the
following patch. It only replaces loops_per_sec with
loops_per_jiffy*HZ. It works for me, although I'm not
totally sure this is quite correct.
BTW, I had to remove nvram and drm to compile. Will
see later why (unknown references to
rename bond_xmit to bond_xmit_roundrobin, so
bond_xmit_xor can be implemented, and used if
desired. bond_xmit_xor is what cisco
etherchannel/sun trunking really uses, not round
robin.
how does their xor method work ? do you know about an
RFC stating about this, that I could read ? I'm
Hello Thomas,
I've modified the slaves lists as you suggested to me.
The more I
tried to optimize the code, the more it looked like
2.4's, so it
seems the last one is already optimal. There's no
slave_queue
anymore, and the transmit path in bond_xmit_roundrobin
is far
faster.
I have also
Donald's email server has been down for few days, my
machine was not able to send him e-mail.
ok.
Regarding your last patch -- it does not include the
documentation update (ifenslave.c compile problem is
solved).
yes, it's just what I've discovered yesterday evening.
I'll attach the
Hello !
I think that you should wait a bit before writing a config in /proc for the
bonding driver.
I have rewritten quite a part of it to support link detection and make it a bit
fail safe.
Moreover, I had to rewrite partly ifenslave.c (which is included in the same
patch). Everything
*seems*
Hi Andrew Alan,
I noticed that in 2.4.2ac20, all netfilter logs come
to
the console, whatever the log levels, and the
beginning
of the line is always prepended with '4'.
I found in printk.c that a test is done for the length
of the message to be strictly larger than 3 chars. But
ipt_LOG uses 2
Hello !
while I was searching how to implement an rtnl_lock() in the bonding code,
I discovered that the rtnl_shlock() function in 2.2.1[78] could misbehave if
CONFIG_RTNETLINK is not set :
- it will nearly never allow concurrent accesses (seems to be what was
intented when it was
It is linux-2.2, guy. 8) "threads" are not threaded there.
Semaphores (rtnl_lock, particularly) protects only areas, which
are going to _schedule_ excplicitly or implicitly.
ok, thanks a lot Alexey, now I understand.
Please, read comments. People used to consider comments as something
When using ethernet bonding, does it divide the load between the
two based on connection, or packet by packet?
packet by packet, so you can use both links to aggregate your bandwidth. I've
used it at 200 Mbps with success.
Regards
Willy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Quoting "David S. Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 10:39:03 +0100 (MET)
From: Willy Tarreau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks in advance for any comment,
All of this is protected by lock_kernel() so none of the
A,B,C,whatever spots can be interrupted in
No, it guarentees that only one process may be in the middle
of modifying interface configuration state, the same and only
guarentee it makes in 2.4.x as well.
ok, Dave. But the code in dev_ioctl() actually is :
rtnl_lock();
ret = dev_ifsioc(ifr, cmd);
rtnl_unlock();
if only these
Hello !
(thanks Dave for the quick patch)
I also had to move the #include asm/uaccess.h
out of the #ifdef __sparc__/#endif because
copy_{from|to}_user were left undefined (see
simple patch below).
Regards,
Willy
--- drivers/net/sunhme.c-orig Wed Nov 15 12:56:33
2000
+++
BTW, XF4.0.1e is also very unhappy on this hardware.
Best regards,
Petr Vandrovec
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
does the Matrox driver work with it ? My G400 works very well
I asked people to explain why it was needed. I am still waiting. It is a
patch that does nothing. I will not put random deep magic into the
kernel.
Alan, I replied to you a few weeks ago (pre20 times) when you asked me why
I was sending you this patch. (perhaps you didn't receive my email).
It doesnt even apply
sorry Alan, I think it's because I had to copy/paste
it
with my mouse under X into my browser (I don't have
smtp access here at work), and it applies here with a
-12 lines offset...
Here it is attached for 2.2.18pre25, but since the
raid
server is running now (under
Bad day, Alan? ;)
Umm no but having people _keep_ sending you do
nothing patches gets annoying after a while ;)
Please accept all my apologies, Alan. When I quickly
sent you the last patch, I didn't notice that some
other broken code had been removed, what I discovered
later back home and
"I'm sure" meaning "I didn't test it" ?
absolutely, I believed that the driver was *exactly*
the same as the previous release which didn't boot and
needed the fix, but another fix has been applied and
corrected it. Now I think it will work with a clean
2.2.18pre25. Anyway, I left a kernel
One problem with warnings at compile time is that in many cases, administrators
use kernels provided by friends or collegues that "know linux better than them".
If an admin uses a kernel in which write support has been activated to mount
an NTFS file system without providing any option, he will
Alan has spoken. If DANGEROUS doesn't get their
attention, what will?
Jeff, I know that, but I was speaking about people who
use these features while they don't know they're
dangerous just because someone else has compiled the
kernel for them. There are people who claim to know
linux better
Hi Alan,
I've compiled a plain 2.2.18 kernel for the HP NetServer this afternoon,
and guess what ? (ok, I know that you guessed) : the netraid card now works
correctly.
BTW, I noticed that the firmware and bios versions are improperly displayed
(only garbage). According to the code, that's
Hello Alan,
did you receive the mails I sent to you on lxorguk last sunday with
the bonding driver updates ? I had mail problems, and received no ack.
If you want a resend, please just let me now.
Regards,
Willy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the
G !
For Christmas, I'd like to get a new mailer which doesn't eat my patches :-)
here it is again, after cut'n'paste. Please apply by hand or "patch -l".
Cheers,
Willy
--- linux-2.2.18/drivers/net/irda/smc-ircc.cSat Jun 24 14:57:49 2000
+++ linux/drivers/net/irda/smc-ircc.c Sun Dec 24
Hello Michael, I wonder about this patch which only fixes an Id/author but no
code. It may be perfectly normal, but could also come from a mangled file in
one of your trees. Just for info anyway...
Cheers,
Willy
diff -r -u -x CVS -x *.o linux-2.2.18pre25-VIRGIN/fs/proc/openpromfs.c
Hello Alan,
As previously discussed, I've slighlty arranged the version identification
code in the 2.2.18 megaraid driver so that it correcly sees bios and firmware
versions on a netraid. Without the patch, I only get smileys and hieroglyphs
because the version is interpreted as a string which
Anything which isnt a strict bug fix or previously
agreed is now 2.2.19 material.
Alan, do you consider it as a bugfix if I tell you
that
we can't get anymore oops with the new bonding code,
even in SMP ?
I've had reports of it working very well, and faster,
for a long time now and the link
However, it has not been tested enough that I may
bet
by head on saying there are no known issues.
I won't say there are no issues, but I'd say there are
no KNOWN issues.
This is because I did not have access to all
hardware that was needed to complete the tests in
time.
I know that,
is important. We could call it
ETHERNETCHANNEL (and even
"Etherchannel" or "ETHERCHANNEL") get
away with it clean.
...
/Matti Aarnio
Anything but "EtherChannel" -- trademark people
Ok, Matti. Let's keep "Etherchannel" as you proposed
and as it was
I don't like to call it BONDING.
"Bonding" is something where two (or more) channels
carry data in between two participating systems.
Like Multilink-PPP, and ISDN Channel Bonding. Often
indeed data goes out somehow inter-leaved on the
physical links. (Like ISDN Channel Bonding supplies
a
Alan,
I've patched the megaraid driver with these 2 lines
taken from RH7.0 2.2.16-22 kernel, and now my netraid
no longer hangs at boot. I don't know if this can
induce side effects, but it works again here.
Regards,
Willy
___
Do You
Dick, have you tried a simple "strace -f -p pid" ?
This often gives enough info.
BTW, there's one version of sendmail that tests the
capability security hole of a previous kernel version
(2.2.15 ?), and refuses to launch if it discovers it.
It may be possible that sendmail does other tests like
EtherChannel. Supposedly, it also supports failover
(though even "bonding" driver docs used to say that
was impossible because the linux networking
subsystem
didn't handle card failures gracefully enough).
the new bonding code supports failover. It probes the
cards itself. Although this is
Hi Robert,
in the company I left 3 months ago, there is a DNS
which has more than 500 days uptime now. It's based
on 2.2.10 and receives requests from internet and
intranet. I know this kernel is pretty old, but you
could try it on an unused system to see if it goes
down in 64 days or not. It
Is there a nice way to trap on file open() and
stat() ?
a few months ago, I helped a friend in writing a
generic syscall wrapper because he needed exactly
this.
You should take a look at the section "overloader" on
http://bdolez.free.fr/
Regards,
willy
Ok, Matti,
here's a final patch against the bonding patch I
posted
on Friday. Could you tell me if it fits your needs ?
If so, I would repost (offline) the complete one
against 2.2.18pre21. Anyway, for those curious here,
it's available at the following URL:
Oops !
better with the patch :-)
Willy
Ok, Matti,
here's a final patch against the bonding patch I
posted on Friday.
___
Do You Yahoo!? -- Pour dialoguer en direct avec vos amis,
Yahoo! Messenger : http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com
Alan,
here is what /proc/pci reports for the netraid
adapter:
Prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xf000
[0xf008].
So it's now clear that the base address (megaBase)
isn't always 16-bytes aligned, which explains why
my card works again with my minimal patch.
Regards,
Willy
Hi all,
I think that most of us using modems begin to experience a little pain in
downloading latest Alan's patches since they're becoming to be really big (and
interesting).
Since I have an occasionnal access to a system equipped with a good line, I
began to make incremental patches for these
Quoting "Robert A. Morris" [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[snip]
Apr 5 18:15:14 ryoko kernel: hdb: task_no_data_intr: status=0x51 {
DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
Apr 5 18:15:14 ryoko kernel: hdb: task_no_data_intr: error=0x04 {
DriveStatusError }
Apr 5 18:15:14 ryoko kernel: hdb: Write Cache FAILED
is due to debugging helpers, they'll be
removed later. (The new /proc/sched_debug file can be used to see the
fine details of CFS scheduling.)
Changes since -v1:
- make nice levels less starvable. (reported by Willy Tarreau)
- fixed child-runs first. A /proc/sys/kernel/sched_child_runs_first
Hi Nick,
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 06:29:54AM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
(...)
And my scheduler for example cuts down the amount of policy code and
code size significantly. I haven't looked at Con's ones for a while,
but I believe they are also much more straightforward than mainline...
For
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 12:12:14PM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
On Thursday 19 April 2007 10:41, Con Kolivas wrote:
On Thursday 19 April 2007 09:59, Con Kolivas wrote:
Since there is so much work currently ongoing with alternative cpu
schedulers, as a standard for comparison with the
Hi Ingo,
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 11:01:44AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Willy Tarreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good idea. The machine I'm typing from now has 1000 scheddos running
at +19, and 12 gears at nice 0. [...]
From time to time, one of the 12 aligned gears will quickly
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 05:18:03PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Willy Tarreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can certainly script it with -geometry. But it is the wrong
application for this matter, because you benchmark X more than
glxgears itself. What would be better is something like
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 10:10:45AM +1000, Peter Williams wrote:
Ingo Molnar wrote:
- bugfix: use constant offset factor for nice levels instead of
sched_granularity_ns. Thus nice levels work even if someone sets
sched_granularity_ns to 0. NOTE: nice support is still naive, i'll
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 02:52:38AM +0300, Jan Knutar wrote:
On Thursday 19 April 2007 18:18, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Willy Tarreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can certainly script it with -geometry. But it is the wrong
application for this matter, because you benchmark X more than
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 04:02:41PM +1000, Peter Williams wrote:
Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 10:10:45AM +1000, Peter Williams wrote:
Ingo Molnar wrote:
- bugfix: use constant offset factor for nice levels instead of
sched_granularity_ns. Thus nice levels work even
Hi Ingo,
I'm replying to your 3 mails at once.
On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 12:45:22PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It could become a useful scheduler benchmark !
i just tried ocbench-0.3, and it is indeed very nice!
So as you've noticed just one
Hi Björn,
On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 01:29:41PM +0200, Björn Steinbrink wrote:
Hi,
On 2007.04.21 13:07:48 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
another thing i noticed: when using a -y larger then 1, then the window
title (at least on Metacity) overlaps and thus the ocbench tasks have
different
Hi Ingo, Hi Con,
I promised to perform some tests on your code. I'm short in time right now,
but I observed behaviours that should be commented on.
1) machine : dual athlon 1533 MHz, 1G RAM, kernel 2.6.21-rc7 + either scheduler
Test: ./ocbench -R 25 -S 75 -x 8 -y 8
ocbench:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 10:40:18PM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
On Saturday 21 April 2007 22:12, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Ingo, Hi Con,
I promised to perform some tests on your code. I'm short in time right now,
but I observed behaviours that should be commented on.
1) machine : dual
On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 06:00:08PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Con Kolivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Feels even better, mouse movements are very smooth even under high
load. I noticed that X gets reniced to -19 with this scheduler.
I've not looked at the code yet but this
On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 05:46:14PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Willy Tarreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I promised to perform some tests on your code. I'm short in time right
now, but I observed behaviours that should be commented on.
thanks for the feedback!
3) CFS-v4
Feels
On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 09:34:07AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007, Willy Tarreau wrote:
If you remember, with 50/50, I noticed some difficulties to fork many
processes. I think that during a fork(), the parent has a higher probability
of forking other processes than
On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 06:53:47PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would be even better to simply have the rule:
- child gets almost no points at startup
- but when a parent does a waitpid() call and blocks, it will spread
out its points to
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 02:41:48PM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
A significant bugfix for SMP balancing was just posted for the staircase
deadline cpu scheduler which improves behaviour dramatically on any SMP
machine.
Thanks to Willy Tarreau for noticing likely fault point.
Also requested
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 05:31:58PM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
On Sunday 22 April 2007 17:27, Con Kolivas wrote:
On Sunday 22 April 2007 17:00, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 02:41:48PM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
A significant bugfix for SMP balancing was just posted
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 06:53:58PM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
On Sunday 22 April 2007 18:06, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 05:31:58PM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
On Sunday 22 April 2007 17:27, Con Kolivas wrote:
On Sunday 22 April 2007 17:00, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Sun
Kelrich (2):
2.6 backport of Watchdog wdt83627 (Winbond W83627HF/F/HG/G) driver
Watchdog w83977ef (Winbond W83977EF) driver
Willy Tarreau (6):
[DECNet] fib: Fix out of bound access of dn_fib_props[]
[IPv4] fib: Fix out of bound access of fib_props[]
[PPP]: Don't leak
/kernel/git/stable/linux-v2.4.34.3.y.git
Fixed in this version :
CVE-2007-1353 : Bluetooth: L2CAP and HCI setsockopt() information leaks
Summary of changes from v2.4.34.2 to v2.4.34.3
Willy Tarreau (6):
[DECNet] fib: Fix out of bound access
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 10:18:32PM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
On Sunday 22 April 2007 21:42, Con Kolivas wrote:
Willy I'm still investigating the idle time and fluctuating load as a
separate
issue. Is it possible the multiple ocbench processes are naturally
synchronising and
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 10:18:32PM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
On Sunday 22 April 2007 21:42, Con Kolivas wrote:
Willy I'm still investigating the idle time and fluctuating load as a
separate
issue.
OK.
Is it possible the multiple ocbench processes are naturally
synchronising and
://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-v2.4.34.y.git
Summary of changes from v2.4.34.3 to v2.4.34.4
Urs Thermann (1):
recent patch to fib_semantics broke build
Willy Tarreau (1):
Change VERSION to 2.4.34.4
-
To unsubscribe from
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 03:33:58PM +0200, Urs Thuermann wrote:
Willy Tarreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've just released Linux 2.4.34.3.
Nothing critical, just a bunch of bugfixes and small security fix.
I get the following compile error:
[snip]
Grrr... I'm very sorry. Thanks
interface:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/wtarreau/linux-2.4.git
Summary of changes from v2.4.35-pre3 to v2.4.35-pre4
Urs Thermann (1):
recent patch to fib_semantics broke build
Willy Tarreau (1):
Change VERSION to 2.4.35-pre4
Hi !
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 09:11:43PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but the point I'm trying to make is that X shouldn't get more CPU-time
because it's more important (it's not: and as noted earlier,
thinking that it's more important skews the
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 10:38:32AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Tuesday 24 April 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* David Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(Btw., to protect against such mishaps in the future i have changed
the SysRq-N [SysRq-Nice] implementation in my tree to not only
change
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 03:39:59PM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 08:19:18AM +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
On Saturday 10 March 2007 08:07, Con Kolivas wrote:
On Saturday 10 March 2007 07:46, Matt Mackall wrote:
My suspicion is the problem lies in giving too much quanta
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 09:12:07AM +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
(...)
Matt, could you check with plain 2.6.20 + Con's patch ? It is possible
that he added bugs when porting to -mm, or that someting in -mm causes
the trouble. Your experience with -mm seems so much different from mine
with
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 01:09:35PM -0500, Stephen Clark wrote:
Con Kolivas wrote:
Here is an update for RSDL to version 0.28
Full patch:
http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20-sched-rsdl-0.28.patch
Series:
http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.20/
The
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 04:56:57PM -0500, michael chang wrote:
On 3/10/07, Willy Tarreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, Con, I think that you should base your work on 2.6.20.[23] and not
2.6.20 next time, due to this conflict. It will get wider adoption.
^^
Maybe I'm naive
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 07:51:35PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
From: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 19:10:47 -0800
David Miller wrote:
What about Willy Tarreau's supposedly even faster variant?
Or does this incorporate that set of improvements?
That's
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 07:35:06PM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
I've tested -mm2 against -mm2+noyield and -mm2+rsdl+noyield. The
noyield patch simply makes the sched_yield syscall return immediately.
Xorg and all tests are run at nice 0.
[skipped long and precise test report]
Also note I could
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 02:05:23PM +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
On Tuesday 13 March 2007 10:46, David Miller wrote:
From: Con Kolivas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 10:58:11 +1100
http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/staircase-deadline/2.6.21-rc3-sched-rsdl-0.
30.patch
FWIW, this
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 12:04:42AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Monday 12 March 2007, Nish Aravamudan wrote:
On 3/12/07, Gene Heskett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 12 March 2007, Douglas McNaught wrote:
Patrick Mau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why not temporarly replace /bin/tar with a
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 05:49:22AM +0530, Syed Ahemed wrote:
Hello all.
I have a tricky problem on hand and a straight forward question.
Tricky problem:
-
While debugging a simple multithreaded application using gdb linux
2.4.28 , i noticed the thread that has crashed
lookups only.
* Avg err ~= 0.613%
*/
static uint32_t ncubic_tab0(uint64_t a)
{
uint32_t b;
uint32_t shift;
/*
* cbrt(x) MSB values for x MSB values in [0..63].
* Precomputed then refined by hand - Willy Tarreau
*
* For x in [0..63
Hello,
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 04:35:55PM +0300, Konstantin Kalin wrote:
Hello, All
I have the following configuration: CentOS 3.8, kernel
2.4.21-41.0.01.EL, Dialogic boards.
Sometimes a kernel panic happens. I setup netdump and got several crash
dumps and logs. Backtrace shows that
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 11:12:48PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Wednesday 14 March 2007, Ray Lee wrote:
On 3/13/07, Gene Heskett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 13 March 2007, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Tuesday 13 March 2007, Gene Heskett wrote:
Greetings;
Someone suggested a fresh
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 08:53:06AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 03:14 +0530, Syed Ahemed wrote:
Getting RHEL's source ( http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/3/21/380 ) was an
idea i thought about but then a download of the RHEL source from the
following location was denied .
Hi Grzegorz,
you were right to resend, I did not catch your first email.
Sorry about that.
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 12:10:19PM +0100, Grzegorz Ja?kiewicz wrote:
Hi folks.
I have a simple program, that analyzes ethernet packets. Counting
traffic on from/to basis, and dumping that informatio
Hi Nigel,
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 09:37:06AM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 23:20 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
(...)
What about this:
If the device requires that, implement .suspend and .resume or at least
define .suspend that will always return -ENOSYS (then
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 08:50:27PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Saturday, 10 February 2007 18:52, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
On Sat, 10 Feb 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Saturday, 10 February 2007 11:02, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Well, the original desire was to stop new
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 01:37:31AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 11:12:34PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 01:02:47 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD=y
Regards,
Vito Caputo
BTW, this isnt the
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 12:13:40PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 07:54:04AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
instead of modifying all drivers to explicitly state that they don't support
it, we should start with a test of the NULL pointer for .suspend which
should
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 01:19:57PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 02:09:43PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Then change the PCI layer to do the basic PM only for known compatible
drivers, and modify only the known-compatible drivers to mark them
explicitly compatible
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 02:50:48PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 11 February 2007 14:37, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 01:19:57PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 02:09:43PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Then change the PCI layer to do
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 12:31:14PM -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
Willy Tarreau wrote:
Nigel, don't take it as a personal offense, but I think it is a very
centric view of Linux usages. Where I work, Linux is used a lot on
servers and appliances. It is used for mail relays, HTTP proxies,
anti
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 09:26:26AM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Hi.
On Sun, 2007-02-11 at 22:52 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 12:31:14PM -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
Willy Tarreau wrote:
Nigel, don't take it as a personal offense, but I think it is a very
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 10:18:42AM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
[snip]
Hmm sorry, but we don't have the same usages of notebooks. For no reason
would I keep documents open, for two reasons :
- when I shutdown my notebook, it is to move from one customer to
home/company/another
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 12:26:52AM +, Alan wrote:
Unless I'm mistaken, I have to type the passphrase twice then :
- once at suspend
- once at resume
which is once more per boot than what I'm doing on loop-aes.
You don't need to type in a key at suspend time if you don't want
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 07:59:40AM -0500, Gerhard Mack wrote:
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 09:37:06AM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 23:20 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Many people also have Linux on their notebooks
Hi Ingo !
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 03:20:10PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
I'm pleased to announce the first release of the Syslet kernel feature
and kernel subsystem, which provides generic asynchrous system call
support:
http://redhat.com/~mingo/syslet-patches/
Syslets are small,
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 08:45:00AM +0100, Németh Márton wrote:
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Richard Purdie wrote:
This has been discussed in several places several times.
The problem
with hardware accelerated flashing is that you're are
Hi Phy !
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 06:02:17PM -0800, Phy Prabab wrote:
Hello everyone,
I am trying to set affinity on a program to make sure I can get the
best use of the cache as possible and to eliminate as much noise as
possible with running my program. I have tried unsuccessfully to set
1 - 100 of 7649 matches
Mail list logo
