of kernelcore_max_addr [PATCH 19 - 25]
- Bug fix [PATCH 26]
Why don't you separate the patch-set into each feature development?
By separating the patch-set, many people can easily participate
in your development.
Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012/10/30 0:07, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
Movable memory is a very important
Hi Greg,
2012/10/27 0:25, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 04:33:49PM +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
Hi Greg,
Sorry for late reply.
2012/10/20 2:59, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 06:29:52AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday 11 of October 2012
, container_device_remove()
keeps hot remove operation. Finally, the function sends _EJ0
to firmware. In this case, if the memory is accessed, kernel
panic occurs.
The example is as follows:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/26/318
Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu
change log v2 - v3:
1. Add 1 patch(patch1
Hi Len,
Ping...
I want you to merge the patch into your tree for linux-3.7.
Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012/08/30 10:34, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
Hi Len,
Three weeks passed after I post the patch.
All comments have already been applied to it. And I think there is no
comments about it. So I
Hi Dan,
At first, thank you for your comment.
2012/09/24 18:33, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 02:33:11PM +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
When I hot-added CPUs and memories simultaneously using container driver,
all the hot-added CPUs were mistakenly assigned to node0
Molnar mi...@kernel.org
CC: H. Peter Anvin h...@zytor.com
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
---
arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-3.6-rc5/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
This patch fixes to use the correct macros.
CC: Len Brown l...@kernel.org
CC: Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de
CC: Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org
CC: H. Peter Anvin h...@zytor.com
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
---
arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c |2 +-
drivers
Hi Kosaki-san,
2012/09/28 5:13, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 1:45 AM, we...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
When calling unregister_node(), the function shows following message at
device_release().
This description doesn't have
Hi Chen,
2012/09/27 19:20, Ni zhan Chen wrote:
Hi Congyang,
2012/9/27 we...@cn.fujitsu.com
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
When calling remove_memory_block(), the function shows following message at
device_release().
Device 'memory528' does not have a release
Hi Kosaki-san,
2012/09/28 10:13, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu
isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com wrote:
Hi Kosaki-san,
2012/09/28 5:13, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 1:45 AM, we...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu
Hi Kosaki-san,
2012/09/28 10:35, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu
isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com wrote:
Hi Chen,
2012/09/27 19:20, Ni zhan Chen wrote:
Hi Congyang,
2012/9/27 we...@cn.fujitsu.com
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu
Hi Chen,
2012/09/28 11:22, Ni zhan Chen wrote:
On 09/05/2012 05:25 PM, we...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
remove_memory() only try to offline pages. It is called in two cases:
1. hot remove a memory device
2. echo offline /sys/devices/system
Hi Chen,
2012/09/28 15:04, Ni zhan Chen wrote:
On 09/28/2012 11:45 AM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
Hi Kosaki-san,
2012/09/28 10:35, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu
isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com wrote:
Hi Chen,
2012/09/27 19:20, Ni zhan Chen wrote
We are trying to implement a physical memory hot removing function as
following thread.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/5/201
But there is not enough review to merge into linux kernel.
I think there are following blockades.
1. no physical memory hot removable system
2. huge patch-set
If you
Hi Len,
Ping...
Pleae merge the patch into your tree.
Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012/09/24 11:31, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
Hi Len,
Ping...
I want you to merge the patch into your tree for linux-3.7.
Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012/08/30 10:34, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
Hi Len
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
The memory device can be removed by 2 ways:
1. send eject request by SCI
2. echo 1 /sys/bus/pci/devices/PNP0C80:XX/eject
In the 1st case, acpi_memory_disable_device() will be called.
In the 2nd case, acpi_memory_device_remove
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
add_memory() hot adds a physical memory. But remove_memory does not
hot remove a phsical memory. It only offlines memory. The name
confuse us.
So the patch renames remove_memory() to offline_memory(). We will
use rename_memory() for hot
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
For hot removing physical memory, the patch adds remove_memory() into
acpi_memory_remove_memory(). But we cannot support physical memory
hot remove. So remove_memory() do nothinig.
CC: David Rientjes rient...@google.com
CC: Jiang Liu liu
: Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org
CC: Paul Mackerras pau...@samba.org
CC: Christoph Lameter c...@linux.com
Cc: Minchan Kim minchan@gmail.com
CC: Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org
CC: KOSAKI Motohiro kosaki.motoh...@jp.fujitsu.com
CC: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
The patch-set was divided from following thread's patch-set.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/5/201
If you want to know the reason, please read following thread.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/2/83
The patch exports acpi_bus_remove() for removing a acpi device from a
acpi bus at memory hot plug.
From: Wen Congyang we...@cn.fujitsu.com
The function acpi_bus_remove() can remove a acpi device from acpi bus.
When a acpi device is removed, we need to call this function to remove
the acpi device from acpi bus. So export this function.
CC: Len Brown len.br...@intel.com
Reviewed-by: Yasuaki
From: Wen Congyang we...@cn.fujitsu.com
The memory device has been ejected and powoffed, so we can call
acpi_bus_remove() to remove the memory device from acpi bus.
CC: Len Brown len.br...@intel.com
Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang we
Hi Chen,
Sorry for late reply.
2012/10/02 13:21, Ni zhan Chen wrote:
On 09/05/2012 05:25 PM, we...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
All pages of virtual mapping in removed memory cannot be freed, since some pages
used as PGD/PUD includes not only
Hi Kosaki-san,
2012/10/02 3:12, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 2:54 AM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu
isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com wrote:
Hi Kosaki-san,
2012/09/29 7:19, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
I don't understand it. How can we get rid of the warning?
See cpu_device_release
The patch-set was divided from following thread's patch-set.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/5/201
If you want to know the reason, please read following thread.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/2/83
The patch-set has only the function of kernel core side for physical
memory hot remove. So if you use
: Christoph Lameter c...@linux.com
Cc: Minchan Kim minchan@gmail.com
CC: Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org
CC: KOSAKI Motohiro kosaki.motoh...@jp.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang we...@cn.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
---
drivers/base/memory.c
Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang we...@cn.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
---
drivers/firmware/memmap.c| 98 ++-
include/linux/firmware-map.h |6 ++
mm/memory_hotplug.c |7 ++-
3 files changed
@gmail.com
CC: Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org
CC: KOSAKI Motohiro kosaki.motoh...@jp.fujitsu.com
CC: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang we...@cn.fujitsu.com
---
arch/ia64/mm/init.c| 18 ++
arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c
len.br...@intel.com
CC: Christoph Lameter c...@linux.com
Cc: Minchan Kim minchan@gmail.com
CC: Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org
CC: KOSAKI Motohiro kosaki.motoh...@jp.fujitsu.com
CC: Wen Congyang we...@cn.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
---
mm
: Jiang Liu liu...@gmail.com
CC: Len Brown len.br...@intel.com
CC: Christoph Lameter c...@linux.com
Cc: Minchan Kim minchan@gmail.com
CC: Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org
CC: KOSAKI Motohiro kosaki.motoh...@jp.fujitsu.com
CC: Wen Congyang we...@cn.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki
...@jp.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang we...@cn.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
---
arch/ia64/mm/discontig.c |6
arch/powerpc/mm/init_64.c |6
arch/s390/mm/vmem.c|6
arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c|6
@gmail.com
CC: Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org
CC: KOSAKI Motohiro kosaki.motoh...@jp.fujitsu.com
CC: Wen Congyang we...@cn.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
---
arch/ia64/mm/discontig.c |8 +++
arch/powerpc/mm/init_64.c |8 +++
arch/s390
...@intel.com
CC: Christoph Lameter c...@linux.com
Cc: Minchan Kim minchan@gmail.com
CC: Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org
CC: KOSAKI Motohiro kosaki.motoh...@jp.fujitsu.com
CC: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang we...@cn.fujitsu.com
---
arch/x86/include/asm
: Len Brown len.br...@intel.com
CC: Christoph Lameter c...@linux.com
Cc: Minchan Kim minchan@gmail.com
CC: Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org
CC: KOSAKI Motohiro kosaki.motoh...@jp.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang we
CC: Jiang Liu liu...@gmail.com
CC: Len Brown len.br...@intel.com
CC: Christoph Lameter c...@linux.com
Cc: Minchan Kim minchan@gmail.com
CC: Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org
CC: KOSAKI Motohiro kosaki.motoh...@jp.fujitsu.com
CC: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
Signed-off
with
a hotplug writer. So, add a WARN_ON() in put_online_cpus() to detect such cases
where the refcount can go negative, and also attempt to fix it up, so that we
can
continue to run.
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat srivatsa.b...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
---
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Yasuaki
Hi Rafael,
2012/10/19 10:06, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday 28 of September 2012 19:36:02 Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
Even if cpu_down() fails, acpi_processor_remove() continues to remove the cpu.
But in this case, it should return error number since some process may run on
the cpu
Hi Wen,
Some bug fix patches have been merged into linux-next.
So the patches confuse me.
Why did you send same patches again?
Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012/10/19 15:46, we...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
From: Wen Congyang we...@cn.fujitsu.com
Changes from v2 to v3:
Merge the bug fix from
2012/10/19 17:06, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
Hi Wen,
Some bug fix patches have been merged into linux-next.
So the patches confuse me.
The following patches have been already merged into linux-next
and mm-tree as long as I know.
Wen Congyang (6):
clear the memory to store struct page
2012/10/19 17:45, Wen Congyang wrote:
At 10/19/2012 04:19 PM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu Wrote:
2012/10/19 17:06, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
Hi Wen,
Some bug fix patches have been merged into linux-next.
So the patches confuse me.
Sorry, I don't check linux-next tree.
The following patches have
CCing Rafael, because he become ACPI Maintainer.
Hi Wen,
If you update the patch-set, please CCing Rafael from the next time.
Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012/10/19 19:03, we...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
From: Wen Congyang we...@cn.fujitsu.com
The patch-set implements a framework for hot
: KOSAKI Motohiro kosaki.motoh...@jp.fujitsu.com
Cc: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
Looks goot to me.
Reviewd-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
Thanks,
Yasuki Ishimatsu
Cc: Dave Hansen d...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Mel Gorman m...@csn.ul.ie
---
mm/page_alloc.c
parameter 0 makes the container_notify_cb() executed in
kacpi_notify_wq or kacpid_wq. So, we need to put the real hotplug code
into kacpi_hotplug_wq.
I cannot understand the purpose of the patch.
Is the patch a bug fix patch? If yes, what problem happens?
Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu
Signed-off
Hi Tang,
2012/10/24 16:24, Tang Chen wrote:
On 10/24/2012 02:54 PM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
Hi Tang,
2012/10/24 15:05, Tang Chen wrote:
As the comments in __acpi_os_execute() said:
We can't run hotplug code in keventd_wq/kacpid_wq/kacpid_notify_wq
because the hotplug code may
Hi Len,
What should I do to put this patch in your tree?
Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012/10/03 18:54, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
Hi Len,
Ping...
Pleae merge the patch into your tree.
Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012/09/24 11:31, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
Hi Len,
Ping...
I want you
Hi Len,
2012/10/09 14:05, Len Brown wrote:
On 10/08/2012 07:57 PM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
Hi Len,
What should I do to put this patch in your tree?
Please add a description of the attribute in
Documentation/ABI/testing/
A human needs to understand exactly what is in that file
because
printed on
the physical slot whenever possible.
So if we can know the value, we can identify the physical position of the
slot in the system.
The patch creates sun file in sysfs for identifying physical position
of the slot.
Reviewed-by: Toshi Kani toshi.k...@hp.com
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu
Hi Wen,
2012/10/09 17:02, Wen Congyang wrote:
Hi, ishimatsu:
At 07/12/2012 07:28 PM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu Wrote:
acpi_bus_trim() stops removing devices, when acpi_bus_remove() return error
number. But acpi_bus_remove() cannot return error number correctly.
acpi_bus_remove() only return -EINVAL
there is no impact with the
exceptionof CPU and Memory hotplug path. Because other device also fails
but the fail is an irregular case like device is NULL.
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
---
drivers/acpi/scan.c| 15 ---
drivers/base/dd.c
)
return ret;
}
I believe the error to be fixed with this patch.
Could you try it?
Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu
and this patch never
appeared in linux-next before being merged. :-(
It was first sighted October 3.
I have reverted that commit for today.
If this patch truly was authored
Hi Toshi,
2012/10/10 1:36, Toshi Kani wrote:
On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 17:48 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
acpi_bus_trim() stops removing devices, when acpi_bus_remove() return error
number. But acpi_bus_remove() cannot return error number correctly.
acpi_bus_remove() only return -EINVAL, when
-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu
drivers/acpi/dock.c | 26 +++---
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/dock.c b/drivers/acpi/dock.c
index 88eb143..ae4ebf2 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi
Hi Len,
How about v5 patch?
Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012/10/09 15:49, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
_SUN method provides the slot unique-ID in the ACPI namespace. And The value
is written in Advanced Configuration and Power Interface Specification as
follows:
The _SUN value is required
This patch-set is patches to which [1] and [2] are updated
[1] memory-hotplug: add memory_block_release
[2] memory-hotplug: add node_device_release
from following patch-set.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/27/39
So the patch-set version is v2.
v1 - v2
[PATCH 1/2]
- change subject to Suppress
...@gmail.com
Cc: Minchan Kim minchan@gmail.com
CC: Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org
CC: KOSAKI Motohiro kosaki.motoh...@jp.fujitsu.com
CC: Wen Congyang we...@cn.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
---
drivers/base/memory.c |9 -
1 file changed, 8
, it has a garbage.
CC: David Rientjes rient...@google.com
CC: Jiang Liu liu...@gmail.com
Cc: Minchan Kim minchan@gmail.com
CC: Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org
CC: KOSAKI Motohiro kosaki.motoh...@jp.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Wen
Hi Toshi,
2012/10/10 22:01, Toshi Kani wrote:
On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 10:07 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
:
if (acpi_drv) {
if (acpi_drv-ops.notify)
acpi_device_remove_notify_handler(acpi_dev);
THIS CALL
- if (acpi_drv
2012/10/06 4:36, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu
isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com wrote:
When (hot)adding memory into system, /sys/firmware/memmap/X/{end, start, type}
sysfs files are created. But there is no code to remove these files. The patch
there is no impact with the
exceptionof CPU and Memory hotplug path. Because other device also fails
but the fail is an irregular case like device is NULL.
v1-v2
- add a rollback for reinstalling a notify handler.
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
---
drivers/acpi
2012/10/12 5:31, David Rientjes wrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
When calling unregister_node(), the function shows following message at
device_release().
Device 'node2' does not have a release() function, it is broken and must
be fixed.
The reason is node's device struct
Hi Toshi,
2012/10/11 22:58, Toshi Kani wrote:
On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 19:12 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
acpi_bus_trim() stops removing devices, when acpi_bus_remove() return error
number. But acpi_bus_remove() cannot return error number correctly.
acpi_bus_remove() only return -EINVAL, when
register_node() is defined as extern in include/linux/node.h. But the function
is only called from register_one_node() in driver/base/node.c.
So the patch defines register_node() as static.
CC: David Rientjes rient...@google.com
CC: Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki
])
+ goto end;
How about prepare is_container_device() function and check whether
the device is the container device or not as below?
if (is_container_device())
goto end;
Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu
switch (*action) {
case
Hi Greg,
Sorry for late reply.
2012/10/20 2:59, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 06:29:52AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday 11 of October 2012 19:12:28 Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
acpi_bus_trim() stops removing devices, when acpi_bus_remove() return error
number
error number since some process may run on
the cpu. If the cpu has a running process and the cpu is turned the power off,
the system may not work well.
Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat srivatsa.b...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Reviewed-by: Toshi Kani toshi.k...@hp.com
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu
, end - 1);
+
+ memset(mr, 0, sizeof(mr));
+ nr_range = 0;
This is unnecessary since it is set in the below.
+ nr_range = split_mem_range(mr, nr_range, start, end);
Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu
+
/*
* Find space for the kernel direct mapping tables
.
The patch creates sun file in sysfs for identifying physical position
of the slot.
Reviewed-by: Toshi Kani toshi.k...@hp.com
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
---
Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-sun | 14 ++
drivers/acpi/scan.c
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu
---
drivers/acpi/glue.c |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/glue.c b/drivers/acpi/glue.c
index d1a2d74..0837308 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi
whether or not this ACPI object
implements _LCK method. Fix the stable pointer access by replacing
it with acpi_get_handle() to check if _LCK is implemented.
Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani toshi.k...@hp.com
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
this lockable flag.
Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani toshi.k...@hp.com
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
---
drivers/acpi/scan.c | 5 -
include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 3 +--
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi
,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu
Thanks
Wen Congyang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml
Hi Kosaki,
Sorry for late reply.
2012/10/13 4:28, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu
isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com wrote:
The function get_page_bootmem() may be called more than one time to the same
page. There is no need to set page's type, private
Hi Dave,
2012/07/12 22:40, Dave Hansen wrote:
On 07/11/2012 09:52 PM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
Does the following patch include your comment? If O.K., I will separate
the patch from the series and send it for bug fix.
Looks sane to me. It does now mean that the calling conventions
Hi Dave,
2012/07/12 22:40, Dave Hansen wrote:
On 07/11/2012 09:52 PM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
Does the following patch include your comment? If O.K., I will separate
the patch from the series and send it for bug fix.
Looks sane to me. It does now mean that the calling conventions
2012/07/12 21:41, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
On 07/12/2012 05:10 PM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
Even if acpi_processor_handle_eject() offlines cpu, there is a chance
to online the cpu after that. So the patch closes the window by using
get/put_online_cpus().
Why does the patch change _cpu_up
Hi Toshi,
2012/07/13 1:48, Toshi Kani wrote:
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 20:22 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
Even if cpu_down() fails, acpi_processor_remove() continues to remove the cpu.
But in this case, it should return error number since some process may run on
the cpu. If the cpu has
Hi Toshi,
2012/07/13 1:49, Toshi Kani wrote:
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 20:40 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
Even if acpi_processor_handle_eject() offlines cpu, there is a chance
to online the cpu after that. So the patch closes the window by using
get/put_online_cpus().
Why does the patch change
Hi Srivatsa,
2012/07/12 21:32, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
On 07/12/2012 04:52 PM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
Even if cpu_down() fails, acpi_processor_remove() continues to remove the
cpu.
But in this case, it should return error number since some process may run on
the cpu. If the cpu has
2012/07/13 1:50, Toshi Kani wrote:
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 20:28 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
acpi_bus_trim() stops removing devices, when acpi_bus_remove() return error
number. But acpi_bus_remove() cannot return error number correctly.
acpi_bus_remove() only return -EINVAL, when dev argument
srivatsa.b...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
---
drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c | 18 --
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Index: linux-3.5-rc6/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c
()|
continue hot-remove the cpu|
Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat srivatsa.b...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
---
drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c | 14 ++
kernel/cpu.c|8 +---
2 files changed, 19
of device_releae_driver().
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
---
drivers/acpi/scan.c| 15 ---
drivers/base/dd.c | 22 +-
include/linux/device.h |2 +-
3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Index: linux-3.5-rc6/drivers/acpi
Hi Wen,
2012/07/13 18:10, Wen Congyang wrote:
At 07/09/2012 06:26 PM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu Wrote:
When (hot)adding memory into system, /sys/firmware/memmap/X/{end, start,
type}
sysfs files are created. But there is no code to remove these files. The
patch
implements the function to remove
Hi Wen,
2012/07/16 11:32, Wen Congyang wrote:
At 07/09/2012 06:26 PM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu Wrote:
When (hot)adding memory into system, /sys/firmware/memmap/X/{end, start,
type}
sysfs files are created. But there is no code to remove these files. The
patch
implements the function to remove
Hi Wen,
2012/07/13 12:26, Wen Congyang wrote:
At 07/09/2012 06:24 PM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu Wrote:
acpi_memory_device_remove() has been prepared to remove physical memory.
But, the function only frees acpi_memory_device currentlry.
The patch adds following functions
Hi Wen,
2012/07/13 19:40, Wen Congyang wrote:
At 07/09/2012 06:24 PM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu Wrote:
acpi_memory_device_remove() has been prepared to remove physical memory.
But, the function only frees acpi_memory_device currentlry.
The patch adds following functions
Hi Wen,
2012/07/13 12:35, Wen Congyang wrote:
At 07/09/2012 06:24 PM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu Wrote:
acpi_memory_device_remove() has been prepared to remove physical memory.
But, the function only frees acpi_memory_device currentlry.
The patch adds following functions
Hi Wen,
2012/07/17 10:44, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
Hi Wen,
2012/07/13 12:35, Wen Congyang wrote:
At 07/09/2012 06:24 PM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu Wrote:
acpi_memory_device_remove() has been prepared to remove physical memory.
But, the function only frees acpi_memory_device currentlry.
The patch
: Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de
CC: Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org
CC: H. Peter Anvin h...@zytor.com
CC: Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org
CC: Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen d...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
---
arch
Hi Wen,
2012/07/17 11:32, Wen Congyang wrote:
At 07/17/2012 09:54 AM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu Wrote:
Hi Wen,
2012/07/17 10:44, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
Hi Wen,
2012/07/13 12:35, Wen Congyang wrote:
At 07/09/2012 06:24 PM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu Wrote:
acpi_memory_device_remove() has been prepared
Hi Wen,
2012/07/17 12:32, Wen Congyang wrote:
At 07/17/2012 11:08 AM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu Wrote:
Hi Wen,
2012/07/17 11:32, Wen Congyang wrote:
At 07/17/2012 09:54 AM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu Wrote:
Hi Wen,
2012/07/17 10:44, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
Hi Wen,
2012/07/13 12:35, Wen Congyang wrote
Hi Wen,
2012/07/17 14:17, Wen Congyang wrote:
At 07/17/2012 12:51 PM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu Wrote:
Hi Wen,
2012/07/17 12:32, Wen Congyang wrote:
At 07/17/2012 11:08 AM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu Wrote:
Hi Wen,
2012/07/17 11:32, Wen Congyang wrote:
At 07/17/2012 09:54 AM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu Wrote:
Hi
: Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de
CC: Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org
CC: H. Peter Anvin h...@zytor.com
CC: Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org
CC: Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen d...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
---
arch
...@samba.org
CC: Christoph Lameter c...@linux.com
Cc: Minchan Kim minchan@gmail.com
CC: Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org
CC: KOSAKI Motohiro kosaki.motoh...@jp.fujitsu.com
CC: Wen Congyang we...@cn.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
---
drivers
: Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org
CC: KOSAKI Motohiro kosaki.motoh...@jp.fujitsu.com
CC: Wen Congyang we...@cn.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
---
drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c | 27 ++-
drivers/base/memory.c
...@kernel.crashing.org
CC: Paul Mackerras pau...@samba.org
CC: Christoph Lameter c...@linux.com
Cc: Minchan Kim minchan@gmail.com
CC: Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org
CC: KOSAKI Motohiro kosaki.motoh...@jp.fujitsu.com
CC: Wen Congyang we...@cn.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu
: Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org
CC: KOSAKI Motohiro kosaki.motoh...@jp.fujitsu.com
CC: Wen Congyang we...@cn.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
---
drivers/firmware/memmap.c| 78 ++-
include/linux
CC: Christoph Lameter c...@linux.com
Cc: Minchan Kim minchan@gmail.com
CC: Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org
CC: KOSAKI Motohiro kosaki.motoh...@jp.fujitsu.com
CC: Wen Congyang we...@cn.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
---
arch/powerpc
: KOSAKI Motohiro kosaki.motoh...@jp.fujitsu.com
CC: Wen Congyang we...@cn.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c | 13 +
mm/memory_hotplug.c |4 ++--
2 files
: Andrew Morton a...@linux-foundation.org
CC: KOSAKI Motohiro kosaki.motoh...@jp.fujitsu.com
CC: Wen Congyang we...@cn.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu isimatu.yasu...@jp.fujitsu.com
---
drivers/base/memory.c | 11 ++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux
1 - 100 of 1268 matches
Mail list logo
