Re: [Kernel-discuss] Re: [PATCH 3/7] [RFC] Battery monitoring class

2007-04-15 Thread ian
On Sun, 2007-04-15 at 21:57 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: No, that won't help much. IMO, we want the sanest set of standard attributes we can get, and weird as it might be, average reporting are common properties of battery control firmware on laptops (maybe because of SBS, but

Re: [Kernel-discuss] Re: [PATCH 3/7] [RFC] Battery monitoring class

2007-04-16 Thread ian
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 07:12 +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote: Why? With current battery class we can do whatever everyone needs. No need for wrappers. cut Because of your original design, simple batteries are stay simple, and no noticing that there is some complicated attributes exists at all.

[patch] 2/4 Support for Toshiba TMIO multifunction devices

2007-11-20 Thread ian
Hi guys. This patchset contains support for three toshiba multifunction devices. This patch adds the core support code for three TMIO based MFDs. There are no complete datasheets for these chips so their drivers are not 100% complete, however they do work.

[patch] 3/4 Support for Toshiba TMIO multifunction devices

2007-11-20 Thread ian
Hi guys. This patchset contains support for three toshiba multifunction devices. This adds necessary IRQ and GPIO definitions for use by the e-series platform support code. 0003-add-IRQ-and-GPIO-definitions-for-eseries.patch Description: application/mbox

[patch] 4/4 Support for Toshiba TMIO multifunction devices

2007-11-20 Thread ian
Hi guys. This patchset contains support for three toshiba multifunction devices. This patch adds platform support for the TMIO devices used by the various e-series platforms. It depends on the previous patch in this series. 0004-add-eseries-platform-support-for-the-TMIO-multifunct.patch

[patch] 1/4 Support for Toshiba TMIO multifunction devices

2007-11-20 Thread ian
Hi guys. This patchset contains support for three toshiba multifunction devices. This patch introduces some useful library functions that handle common features in this type of MFD - local memory and IRQ resources. 0001-Reuseable-SOC-core-code-suitable-for-multifunction-c.patch Description:

[patch] 0/4 Support for Toshiba TMIO multifunction devices

2007-11-20 Thread ian
Hi guys. This patchset contains support for three toshiba multifunction devices. it introduces a small but useful bit of code as a library for similar devices, and includes support for these chips on the toshiba e-series family of handhelds. please copy me on reply! - To unsubscribe from this

Re: [patch] 0/4 Support for Toshiba TMIO multifunction devices

2007-11-20 Thread ian
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 01:04 +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: Just to note, that there is an alternative implementation for at least the tc6393 chip devices. Most current version of those patches can be found in the OpenEmbedded monotone. Yes, this is true. The core code in both cases

Re: [patch] 0/4 Support for Toshiba TMIO multifunction devices

2007-11-20 Thread ian
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 10:23 +0800, eric miao wrote: Roughly went through the patch, looks good, here comes the remind, though :-) 1. is it possible to use some name other than soc_core, maybe tmio_core so that other multifunction chips sharing a core base will live easier. It's (soc-core)

[UPDATED PATCH] Support for Toshiba TMIO multifunction devices

2007-11-21 Thread ian
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 12:05 +0800, eric miao wrote: On Nov 21, 2007 11:54 AM, ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 10:23 +0800, eric miao wrote: Roughly went through the patch, looks good, here comes the remind, though :-) 1. is it possible to use some name other than

Re: [UPDATED PATCH] Support for Toshiba TMIO multifunction devices

2007-11-22 Thread ian
On Thu, 2007-11-22 at 00:52 +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 12:34:09AM +, ian wrote: Unfortunately, this is broken as designed (in fact this whole file is.) Fix attached below. (Not looked at the rest because you really really need to get this right first

Re: RFC: Remove the arm26 port

2007-07-29 Thread ian
on it in future, I'll let you all know. -Ian - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH] ARM: Remove useless config option GENERIC_BUST_SPINLOCK.

2007-04-27 Thread ian
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 11:10 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: The below is clearly correct. Consider it... Acked-by: Ian Molton [EMAIL PROTECTED] arch/arm/Kconfig |3 --- arch/arm26/Kconfig |3 --- 2 files changed, 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig

Re: [PATCH 4/6] regulator: regulator core.

2008-02-23 Thread ian
On Sat, 2008-02-23 at 10:18 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: Renaming is not an option - current is an electronic term for which there is no alternative. amps, milliamps, Are units of current, not current itself. amperage (the latter of which I've always disliked) Ugh. -- To unsubscribe

Re: [PATCH 4/6] regulator: regulator core.

2008-02-24 Thread ian
On Sun, 2008-02-24 at 09:51 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: And what? You can't measure anything but current in amps, so ambiguity is not a problem. It not is the credible validation of the language English. Thanking you kindly. -Ian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe

Re: [PATCH] cross-architecture ELF clean up

2007-06-21 Thread ian
On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 16:08 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: arm26 changes acked-by: Ian Molton [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo

Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/4] SoC base drivers

2007-05-01 Thread ian
On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 09:39 +0100, Ben Dooks wrote: Wow, platform devices with a new name. I don't see how any of this is not handled by platfrom device. No, not so. That was a criticism levelled at a previous incarnation of this code which has since been addressed - this is now a

Re: [Kernel-discuss] Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/4] SoC base drivers

2007-05-01 Thread ian
On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 17:53 +0400, Dmitry Krivoschekov wrote: Hi Paul, I think your referring to the term SoC (system-on-chip) is confusing (at least for me). You rather consider companion chips than SoCs. A 'System' does not imply a CPU. A 'Computer System' would but the word system itself

Re: [Kernel-discuss] Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/4] SoC base drivers

2007-05-01 Thread ian
On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 20:29 +0400, Dmitry Krivoschekov wrote: If you used ASIC acronym it would be more appropriate and not so ambiguous. Actually, thats not bad. I'd be ok with that is SoC isnt used. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a

Re: [Kernel-discuss] [PATCH 3/8] Universal power supply class (was: battery class)

2007-05-03 Thread ian
On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 01:31 +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote: # cat /sys/class/power\ supply/ac/type AC # cat /sys/class/power\ supply/usb/type USB isnt that a bit redundant? I'd have thought sys/class/power\ supply/supplyX/type would be better? - To unsubscribe

Re: [Kernel-discuss] Re: [PATCH 3/8] Universal power supply class (was: battery class)

2007-05-05 Thread ian
On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 00:54 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: Given that USB-power *is* usually also dumb (i.e. it doesn't do any control signaling over the USB bus for power-control purposes), it might be dumb, but it is useful to know wether the PDA is charging from usb or mains

RE: Opportunity.

2015-10-19 Thread Ian
. Best Regards, Ian. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [PATCH] ARM: Remove useless config option GENERIC_BUST_SPINLOCK.

2007-04-27 Thread ian
On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 11:10 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: The below is clearly correct. Consider it... Acked-by: Ian Molton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > arch/arm/Kconfig |3 --- > arch/arm26/Kconfig |3 --- > 2 files changed, 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/a

Re: [Kernel-discuss] Re: [PATCH 3/7] [RFC] Battery monitoring class

2007-04-15 Thread ian
On Sun, 2007-04-15 at 21:57 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > No, that won't help much. IMO, we want the sanest set of standard > attributes we can get, and weird as it might be, average reporting are > common properties of battery control firmware on laptops (maybe > because of SBS,

Re: [Kernel-discuss] Re: [PATCH 3/7] [RFC] Battery monitoring class

2007-04-16 Thread ian
On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 07:12 +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > Why? With current battery class we can do whatever everyone needs. No > need for wrappers. > Because of your original design, simple batteries are stay simple, and > no noticing that there is some "complicated" attributes exists at

Re: [Kernel-discuss] [PATCH 3/8] Universal power supply class (was: battery class)

2007-05-03 Thread ian
On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 01:31 +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > # cat /sys/class/power\ supply/ac/type > AC > > # cat /sys/class/power\ supply/usb/type > USB isnt that a bit redundant? I'd have thought sys/class/power\ supply/supplyX/type would be better? - To

Re: [Kernel-discuss] Re: [PATCH 3/8] Universal power supply class (was: battery class)

2007-05-05 Thread ian
On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 00:54 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > Given that USB-power *is* usually also "dumb" (i.e. it doesn't do any > control signaling over the USB bus for power-control purposes), it might be dumb, but it is useful to know wether the PDA is charging from usb or mains

Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/4] SoC base drivers

2007-05-01 Thread ian
On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 09:39 +0100, Ben Dooks wrote: > > Wow, platform devices with a new name. I don't see how any of this is > not handled by platfrom device. No, not so. That was a criticism levelled at a previous incarnation of this code which has since been addressed - this is now a

Re: [Kernel-discuss] Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/4] SoC base drivers

2007-05-01 Thread ian
On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 17:53 +0400, Dmitry Krivoschekov wrote: > Hi Paul, > I think your referring to the term "SoC (system-on-chip)" is confusing > (at least for me). You rather consider companion chips than SoCs. A 'System' does not imply a CPU. A 'Computer System' would but the word system

Re: [Kernel-discuss] Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/4] SoC base drivers

2007-05-01 Thread ian
On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 20:29 +0400, Dmitry Krivoschekov wrote: > If you used ASIC acronym it would be more appropriate and not so > ambiguous. Actually, thats not bad. I'd be ok with that is SoC isnt used. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a

Re: [PATCH] cross-architecture ELF clean up

2007-06-21 Thread ian
On Wed, 2007-06-20 at 16:08 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: arm26 changes acked-by: Ian Molton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kern

Re: RFC: Remove the arm26 port

2007-07-29 Thread ian
ay. If I get time to work on it in future, I'll let you all know. -Ian - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[patch] 2/4 Support for Toshiba TMIO multifunction devices

2007-11-20 Thread ian
Hi guys. This patchset contains support for three toshiba multifunction devices. This patch adds the core support code for three TMIO based MFDs. There are no complete datasheets for these chips so their drivers are not 100% complete, however they do work.

[patch] 3/4 Support for Toshiba TMIO multifunction devices

2007-11-20 Thread ian
Hi guys. This patchset contains support for three toshiba multifunction devices. This adds necessary IRQ and GPIO definitions for use by the e-series platform support code. 0003-add-IRQ-and-GPIO-definitions-for-eseries.patch Description: application/mbox

[patch] 4/4 Support for Toshiba TMIO multifunction devices

2007-11-20 Thread ian
Hi guys. This patchset contains support for three toshiba multifunction devices. This patch adds platform support for the TMIO devices used by the various e-series platforms. It depends on the previous patch in this series. 0004-add-eseries-platform-support-for-the-TMIO-multifunct.patch

[patch] 1/4 Support for Toshiba TMIO multifunction devices

2007-11-20 Thread ian
Hi guys. This patchset contains support for three toshiba multifunction devices. This patch introduces some useful library functions that handle common features in this type of MFD - local memory and IRQ resources. 0001-Reuseable-SOC-core-code-suitable-for-multifunction-c.patch Description:

[patch] 0/4 Support for Toshiba TMIO multifunction devices

2007-11-20 Thread ian
Hi guys. This patchset contains support for three toshiba multifunction devices. it introduces a small but useful bit of code as a library for similar devices, and includes support for these chips on the toshiba e-series family of handhelds. please copy me on reply! - To unsubscribe from this

Re: [patch] 0/4 Support for Toshiba TMIO multifunction devices

2007-11-20 Thread ian
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 01:04 +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > Just to note, that there is an alternative implementation for at least > the tc6393 chip devices. Most current version of those patches can be > found in the OpenEmbedded monotone. Yes, this is true. The core code in both cases

Re: [patch] 0/4 Support for Toshiba TMIO multifunction devices

2007-11-20 Thread ian
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 10:23 +0800, eric miao wrote: > Roughly went through the patch, looks good, here comes the remind, though :-) > > 1. is it possible to use some name other than "soc_core", maybe > "tmio_core" so that other multifunction chips sharing a core base > will live easier. It's

[UPDATED PATCH] Support for Toshiba TMIO multifunction devices

2007-11-21 Thread ian
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 12:05 +0800, eric miao wrote: > On Nov 21, 2007 11:54 AM, ian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 10:23 +0800, eric miao wrote: > > > Roughly went through the patch, looks good, here comes the remind, though > > > :-) >

Re: [UPDATED PATCH] Support for Toshiba TMIO multifunction devices

2007-11-22 Thread ian
On Thu, 2007-11-22 at 00:52 +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 12:34:09AM +0000, ian wrote: > Unfortunately, this is broken as designed (in fact this whole file is.) Fix attached below. > (Not looked at the rest because you really really need to get thi

Re: [PATCH 4/6] regulator: regulator core.

2008-02-23 Thread ian
On Sat, 2008-02-23 at 10:18 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Renaming is not an option - "current" is an electronic term for > which > > there is no alternative. > > amps, milliamps, Are units of current, not current itself. > amperage (the latter of which I've always disliked) Ugh. -- To

Re: [PATCH 4/6] regulator: regulator core.

2008-02-24 Thread ian
On Sun, 2008-02-24 at 09:51 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > And what? You can't measure anything but current in amps, so ambiguity > is not a problem. It not is the credible validation of the language English. Thanking you kindly. -Ian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "

RE: Opportunity.

2015-10-19 Thread Ian
. Best Regards, Ian. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Hang when booting 2.4.0/2.4.1-pre8 on Compaq 1850R with SMART 3200

2001-01-18 Thread Ian Macdonald
ida/c0d0: blksz=512 nr_blks=17764320 Partition check: ida/c0d0:_ The partition check never starts. I get the same results when booting 2.4.1-pre8. The system works fine with the 2.2.x kernel series, but I need some of the functionality in the newer 2.4.x series. Any ideas? Ian -- Ian Macdonald

Re: pppoe in 2.4.0

2001-01-18 Thread Ian Macdonald
module: alias ppp ppp_async However, I couldn't get PPP to work when I compiled it directly into the kernel. Ian -- Ian Macdonald | "Language shapes the way we think, and Senior System Administrator | determines what we can think about." -- B. Linuxcare, Inc.

Re: [PATCH] Single user linux

2001-04-26 Thread Ian Stirling
On Thursday, April 26, 2001, at 07:03 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: he owns the computer, he may do anything he wants. snip Any OS worth its weight in silicon will make a distinction between blessed and unblessed users. It can be phrased in different ways -- root vs. non-root, admin

Loopback crypt.

2001-05-28 Thread Ian Stirling
Is there any way to delete the key of an existing loopback encrypted device, and have it block, until a key is reloaded? Of course any cached pages would need deleted, and dirty ones flushed first. To enable things like deleting keys from memory, before suspend-to-disk, or forcing users of

Re: A patch to loop.c for better cryption support

2000-10-12 Thread Ian Stirling
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 04:19:49AM +, Ingo Rohloff wrote: snip 2.4 has already broken backwards compatibility to 2.2 (IV changed from disk absolute to relative). When you change it now (before 2.4.0) it is relatively painless. I think the change is a good idea. I've been away from

Re: Device Driver

2000-10-17 Thread Ian Stirling
I take it then that you never use a hard drive in any of your systems on the grounds that it contains non-open source firmware which may affect the security of your system? ;) Tell me, what do you use to store all those Linux applications on? Your ATA drive can't tell you kernel

Re: [BUG REPORT] Conflict between Tulip driver w/ LinkSys 100LNE and EEPro

2000-10-19 Thread Ian Stirling
The problem: I can't have the Tulip and EEPro drivers loaded at the same time. If I have the Tulip driver loaded, and I load the EEPro driver, the self check fails with 0x and complains that I don't have the card in a bus master slot. If I have the EEPro driver loaded and the ether

Re: EXT2-fs error

2001-02-23 Thread Ian Wehrman
. i'm not using any unusual hardware, and haven't had any other recent issues like this. let me know if i can provide further information, or test patches. thanks, ian wehrman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL

2.4.2ac7 success story, one question

2001-03-06 Thread Ian Soboroff
swapped? i'm not sure how to see exactly how much of that swap is really being used or how often things move in and out of swap, though. ian -- Ian Soboroff [EMAIL PROTECTED] University of MD Baltimore County http://www.cs.umbc.edu/~ian

Re: Microsoft begining to open source Windows 2000?

2001-03-08 Thread Ian Stirling
snip "microsoft may be going open source" Not a chance. First your company must have at least 1500 licences and you can't modify any code... which implies that you can't rebuild either... You can modify your compiler, so that it accepts patches (with no context) and completely rewrite

Broken Tulip Driver

2001-03-12 Thread Ian Zink
at all. The light on the back of the card blinks green. ifconfig shows lots of carrier errors. I will attach below all the relevant information I can think of. Any help will be greatly appreciated. Please CC me on any responses, as I'm not on the kernel mailing list. Thanks, Ian Zink zforce:/home

Re: Broken Tulip Driver

2001-03-12 Thread Ian Zink
I will try tonight and let you know. Thanks, Ian Jeff Garzik wrote: Can you try out the updated Tulip driver in 2.4.2-ac19 and let me know if it works? ftp://ftp.us.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/ -- Jeff Garzik | May you have warm words on a cold evening, Building

Dumping memory of a running process?

2001-03-13 Thread Ian Stirling
Is there a way to dump the memory of any process without stopping, or modifying it? Obviously normally stopping it would be the right thing to do, but is it possible, and if so, is there a handy tool? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a

devfs vs. devpts

2001-03-16 Thread Ian Soboroff
creating entries in /dev/pts? ian -- Ian Soboroff [EMAIL PROTECTED] University of MD Baltimore County http://www.cs.umbc.edu/~ian - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTE

User based routing?

2000-12-18 Thread Ian Stirling
Are there any patches floating around? Basically to allow for example a server to dial out to ISP's on behalf of users, and give them full control over that interface. I know about UML, and it's not quite suited. I've not found anything searching archives, but maybe it's out there. Thanks. - To

Re: User based routing?

2000-12-19 Thread Ian Stirling
On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 07:46:51PM +, Ian Stirling wrote: Are there any patches floating around? Basically to allow for example a server to dial out to ISP's on behalf of users, and give them full control over that interface. I know about UML, and it's not quite suited. I've

Oop in 2.4.0-test12

2000-12-21 Thread Ian Hastie
: 83 7c 24 18 00cmpl $0x0,0x18(%esp,1) Code; c012cf75 page_launder+1e5/800 12: 75 4e jne62 _EIP+0x62 c012cfc5 page_launder+235/800 -- Ian. I don't have a sig either! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" i

Re: About Celeron processor memory barrier problem

2000-12-25 Thread Ian Stirling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tim Wright) wrote on 24.12.00 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 11:36:00AM +0200, Kai Henningsen wrote: There was a similar thread to this recently. The issue is that if you choose the wrong processor type, you may not even be able to complain. Hmm

Re: Abysmal RAID 0 performance on 2.4.0-test10 for IDE?

2000-12-26 Thread Ian Stirling
On Tue, 26 Dec 2000, Felix von Leitner wrote: Thus spake Rik van Riel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): One more detail: top says the CPU is 50% system when reading from either one of the disk or raid devices. That seems awfully high considering that the Promise controller claims to do UDMA.

linux 2.2.18pre17 + VM-global -7 = `Negative d_count' oops

2000-10-26 Thread Ian Jackson
connection attempts succeed, but there is no evidence of any user-mode executing. After the lockup the system apparently just resumes where it left off. Sometimes afterwards there is a message like `VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for emacs...' but more often there isn't. Thanks for your attenti

Re: linux 2.2.18pre17 + VM-global -7 = `Negative d_count' oops

2000-10-27 Thread Ian Jackson
Andrea Arcangeli writes ("Re: linux 2.2.18pre17 + VM-global -7 = `Negative d_count' oops"): On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 06:37:37PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: Negative d_count (-805538369) for [binary garbage]/NULL followed by an oops. Kernel logfile extract below, uuencoded.

PCMCIA-USB (non-cardbus). Any support pending?

2000-10-31 Thread Ian Stirling
Along with many others, I have an older laptop. I also notice the large number of USB things released, some of which I'd like to connect to it. Is there hardware around? Is anyone working on drivers? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a

RAID modules and CONFIG_AUTODETECT_RAID

2000-11-14 Thread Ian Grant
presume there is a good reason for this and that it's not just a mistake. Are there any plans to re-enable this feature? It would be nice to be able to have a single kernel for all our machines without having to have RAID in the kernel when it isn't needed. -- Ian Grant, Computer Lab., New

Re: RAID modules and CONFIG_AUTODETECT_RAID

2000-11-15 Thread Ian Grant
[Ian Grant] In 2.2.x we were able to build a kernel with RAID modules and have it autodetect RAID partitions at boot time - so we could use raid root partitions. Really? Funny, because IIRC RAID autodetection does not even exist in 2.2.x kernels. Perhaps you are referring to vendor

Re: Idea: Encryption plugin architecture for file-systems

2001-04-21 Thread Ian Stirling
Hello, ftp://www.kerneli.org/pub/linux/kerneli/ For idea encryption, you just use losetup -e idea /dev/loop0 /filesystem Password: whatever mke2fs /dev/loop0 mount /dev/loop0 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL

Lid support.

2001-04-25 Thread Ian Stirling
I assume there is no generic APM support for lid-close? My BIOS (P100 DEC CTS5100 Hinote VP) has no way to do anything other than beep, when the lid is closed, so I'm using a hack that polls the ct65548 video chips registers to find when the BIOS turns the LCD off, so I can do whatever. Or is

Re: [PATCH] Single user linux

2001-04-26 Thread Ian Stirling
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Ian Stirling wrote: Also, there is another reason. If you'r logged in as root, then any exploitable bug in large programs, be it netscape, realplayer, wine, vmware, ... means that the cracker owns your machine. snip Heh. You receive all your email on your root

ReiserFS oops/panic/uninterruptable sleeps in -ac

2001-04-27 Thread Ian Gulliver
any processes stick, even under load. This seems to be a bug somewhere in the ac patch, possibly related to SMP. If anyone could figure it out, it'd really be nice to fix this before the bug makes it way into the stock kernels. Ian Gulliver Penguin Hosting http://www.penguinhosting.net

continued ext2fs corruption

2001-04-29 Thread Ian Wehrman
information. thanks, ian wehrman 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 440BX/ZX - 82443BX/ZX Host bridge (rev 03) Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B- Status: Cap+ 66Mhz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=medium TAbort- TAbort

Re: Lid support.

2001-04-29 Thread Ian Stirling
Hi! I assume there is no generic APM support for lid-close? My BIOS (P100 DEC CTS5100 Hinote VP) has no way to do anything other than beep, when the lid is closed, so I'm using a hack that polls the ct65548 video chips registers to find when the BIOS turns the LCD off, so I can do

Re: continued ext2fs corruption

2001-04-30 Thread Ian Wehrman
. does anyone here have any thoughts? thanks, ian - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

2.2.19 rpc_execute panic (OK with 2.2.17)

2001-06-09 Thread Ian Lynagh
suggest a fix? If you need more information to diagnose the problem please just ask. I would appreciate it if you were to CC me responses as I am not on the list. Thanks in advance Ian --- linux-2.2.19-spiffy-simple/.config Fri Jun 8 22:22:54 2001 +++ linux-2.2.17-spiffy-simple/.config

Re: 2.2.19 rpc_execute panic (OK with 2.2.17)

2001-06-09 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 02:06:45PM +0200, Trond Myklebust wrote: == Ian Lynagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: When trying to mount something over NFS with a 2.2.19 kernel we get: Unsupported unaligned load/store trap for kernel at 004d260c Kernel panic

Where is check for superuser in TCP port bind.

2001-06-24 Thread Ian Stirling
Obviously (to me) this check is in tcp_v4_get_port(). But, I can't find it, or perhaps it's better hidden than I thought. Or maybe I'm just very confused. Any help would be most welcome. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL

Re: Where is check for superuser in TCP port bind.

2001-06-25 Thread Ian Stirling
Obviously (to me) this check is in tcp_v4_get_port(). But, I can't find it, or perhaps it's better hidden than I thought. Or maybe I'm just very confused. Any help would be most welcome. The above poster was of course deeply stupid, and could have done with more sleep :) It's in

2.4.5-ac19 appletalk unresolved symbols

2001-06-27 Thread Ian Wehrman
/appletalk.o: unresolved symbol register_snap_client_R3addf9f1 /lib/modules/2.4.5-ac19/kernel/net/appletalk/appletalk.o: insmod /lib/modules/2.4.5-ac19/kernel/net/appletalk/appletalk.o failed /lib/modules/2.4.5-ac19/kernel/net/appletalk/appletalk.o: insmod appletalk failed thanks, ian wehrman -- Labfire

Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch.

2001-06-28 Thread Ian Stirling
Linus Torvalds wrote: Things like version strings etc sound useful, but the fact is that the only _real_ problem it has ever solved for anybody is when somebody thinks they install a new kernel, and forgets to run lilo or something. But even that information you really get from a

Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch.

2001-07-01 Thread Ian Stirling
Is this (printing out versions. etc) really a big deal so we should add stuff like /proc/xxx, KERN_ to make things more complicated? It sounds to me like to make the kernel smaller we'd actually end up with adding more code and complexity to it. And quite frankly, if people don't

Ethernet locks up with 2.4.5 on SE440BX-2

2001-07-03 Thread Ian Grant
anything obvious that might be the cause of the problem. Any insight/suggestions of things to try would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in anticipation. Ian Grant # # Automatically generated make config: don't edit # CONFIG_X86=y CONFIG_ISA=y # CONFIG_SBUS is not set CONFIG_UID16=y # # Code maturity

Re: loop device corruption in 2.4.6

2001-07-05 Thread Ian Stirling
Mark Swanson wrote: I get repeatable errors with 2.4.6 patched with the international encryption patch patch-int-2.4.3.1.bz2 when building loop device filesystems on top of Reiserfs. snip And the block size thing is not the only thing wrong with international crypto patch. The whole

ide hotplug and 2.4.1

2001-02-01 Thread Ian Soboroff
; modprobe ide-probe' which had a pretty good success rate. i'm hoping maybe the 2.4.x hotplug features have made this obsolete. (plugging up the floppy drive always works, because PC floppy controllers are too dumb to care if they actually have a drive attached). ian -- Ian Soboroff

Re: PS/2 Mouse/Keyboard conflict and lockup

2001-02-08 Thread Ian Stirling
I'm not sure whether this is related to the ominous ps/2 mouse bug you have been chasing, but this problem is 100% reproducible and very annoying. snip I'm also seeing a ps/2 mouse bug, with 2.4.0-pre5 (I think) on a CS433 (486/33 laptop) Freezes after some time in X, killing keyboard.

2.2.19pre10 panic: skput: over: cD158117:3872 put:3872 dev:10

2001-02-14 Thread Ian Jackson
4290 symbols from /boot/System.map. Feb 13 14:38:30 chiark kernel: Symbols match kernel version 2.2.19. Feb 13 14:38:30 chiark kernel: No module symbols loaded - kernel modules not enabled. Feb 13 14:38:30 chiark kernel: Linux version 2.2.19pre10 (ian@chiark) (gcc version 2.7.2.3) #1 Tue Feb 13

[PATCH] Very small fix for 2.4.3-pre8 unresolved symbols

2001-03-26 Thread Ian Hastie
-objs := 8390.o arlan.o aironet4500_core.o aironet4500_card.o ppp_async.o \ - ppp_generic.o slhc.o pppox.o auto_irq.o + ppp_generic.o slhc.o pppox.o auto_irq.o net_init.o ifeq ($(CONFIG_TULIP),y) obj-y += tulip/tulip.o -- Ian. I don't have

/proc/config idea

2001-04-02 Thread Ian Soboroff
in /boot, like System.map) and also know if they were the right ones. the one problem that comes to mind right now is modules, which needn't correspond to a full kernel .config. anyway, my $0.02. ian -- Ian Soboroff [EMAIL PROTECTED] University of MD

loop problems continue in 2.4.3

2001-04-07 Thread Ian Eure
ksize" 100% reproducable. has anyone else seen this? i did compile with gcc 2.92.3, and i have hedrick's ide patches applied. anyone else see this? p.s. please cc: me in any replies, i'm not on the list. -- ___ | Ian Eure - [EMAIL PROTECTED] | &quo

Re: loop problems continue in 2.4.3

2001-04-11 Thread Ian Eure
i get this message when it panics: -- snip -- loop: setting 534781920 bs for 07:86 Kernel panic: Invalid blocksize passed to set_blocksize -- snip -- Jens Axboe writes: On Sat, Apr 07 2001, Ian Eure wrote: i'm still having loopback problems with linux 2.4.3, even though they were

IDE DMA under 2.4?

2001-04-12 Thread Ian Soboroff
t DMA (under 2.4), and about 17MB/s with (under 2.2). tia, and sorry if it's a faq i couldn't dig up, ian -- ---- Ian Soboroff [EMAIL PROTECTED] University of MD Baltimore County http://www.cs.umbc.edu/~ian - To unsubscribe from this list: send the

Re: loop problems continue in 2.4.3

2001-04-16 Thread Ian Eure
Jens Axboe writes: On Wed, Apr 11 2001, Ian Eure wrote: i get this message when it panics: -- snip -- loop: setting 534781920 bs for 07:86 Kernel panic: Invalid blocksize passed to set_blocksize -- snip -- Ahm, how are you setting your loop device up? The above

Re: IP Acounting Idea for 2.5

2001-04-16 Thread Ian Stirling
Manfred Bartz responded to Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED] who writes: snip You just illustrated my point. While there is a reset capability people will use it and accounting/logging programs will get wrong data. Resetable counters might be a minor convenience when debugging but the

BUG/CRASH help - 2.6.20 (fc5) - spinlock bad magic on CPU#0, kswapd

2007-04-22 Thread Ian Kirk
duplicating any questions asked, I Googled for the error messages but found quite different stack traces and contextx (e.g. resiferfs vs ext3 - i'm only running ext3) Regards, Ian (normally posting from [EMAIL PROTECTED] but can't get to that as the server is crashed!) - To unsubscribe from this list: send

Re: Null pointer in autofs4 (_spin_lock) in 2.6.21-rc2

2007-03-11 Thread Ian Kent
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007, Thomas Renninger wrote: On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 19:39 +0900, Ian Kent wrote: On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 11:12 +0100, Thomas Renninger wrote: On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 01:28 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 09:57:56 +0100 Thomas Renninger [EMAIL PROTECTED

Slab corruption - file_free_rcu ?

2007-03-12 Thread Ian McDonald
stability on that is much better. My config is attached. Please cc me on any queries as I'm not subscribed to lkml. Regards, Ian -- Web: http://wand.net.nz/~iam4 Blog: http://iansblog.jandi.co.nz WAND Network Research Group config.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data

[PATCH 1/1] Allow i386 crash kernels to handle x86_64 dumps

2007-03-14 Thread Ian Campbell
no reason to disallow it. Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- pristine-linux-2.6.18/include/asm-i386/elf.h2006-09-20 04:42:06.0 +0100 +++ linux-2.6.18-xen/include/asm-i386/elf.h 2007-03-14 16:42:30.0 + @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ * This is used to ensure we

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Allow i386 crash kernels to handle x86_64 dumps

2007-03-15 Thread Ian Campbell
invoke vmcore_elf_allowed_cross_arch() to find out what cross arch are allowed for vmcore. Something like this? Ian. --- Allow i386 crash kernels to handle x86_64 dumps. The specific case I am encountering is kdump under Xen with a 64 bit hypervisor and 32 bit kernel/userspace. The dump created

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Allow i386 crash kernels to handle x86_64 dumps

2007-03-15 Thread Ian Campbell
to or shall I resend CCing apkm? (I'll add an Acked-by if that's ok). Ian. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >