Re: [GIT pull] x86 updates for 3.11

2013-07-15 Thread Kees Cook
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Sat, 13 Jul 2013, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > >> Fail on me. I got rushed and sloppy. I really need to automate looking >> for warnings pre-commit and not rely on Fengguang's robot. > > /me too. I took it for granted that this was tested

Re: [GIT pull] x86 updates for 3.11

2013-07-15 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Sat, 13 Jul 2013, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Fail on me. I got rushed and sloppy. I really need to automate looking > for warnings pre-commit and not rely on Fengguang's robot. /me too. I took it for granted that this was tested by Ingos machinery w/o noticing that it went in just when Ingo

Re: [GIT pull] x86 updates for 3.11

2013-07-15 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Sat, 13 Jul 2013, H. Peter Anvin wrote: Fail on me. I got rushed and sloppy. I really need to automate looking for warnings pre-commit and not rely on Fengguang's robot. /me too. I took it for granted that this was tested by Ingos machinery w/o noticing that it went in just when Ingo left

Re: [GIT pull] x86 updates for 3.11

2013-07-15 Thread Kees Cook
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de wrote: On Sat, 13 Jul 2013, H. Peter Anvin wrote: Fail on me. I got rushed and sloppy. I really need to automate looking for warnings pre-commit and not rely on Fengguang's robot. /me too. I took it for granted that this

Re: [GIT pull] x86 updates for 3.11

2013-07-13 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Fail on me. I got rushed and sloppy. I really need to automate looking for warnings pre-commit and not rely on Fengguang's robot. -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at

Re: [GIT pull] x86 updates for 3.11

2013-07-13 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 4:21 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > >* Guarantee IDT page alignment What the F*CK, guys? This piece-of-shit commit is marked for stable, but you clearly never even test-compiled it, did you? Because on x86-64 (the which is the only place where the patch matters), I

[GIT pull] x86 updates for 3.11

2013-07-13 Thread Thomas Gleixner
Linus, please pull the latest x86-urgent-for-linus git tree from: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git x86-urgent-for-linus * Guarantee IDT page alignment * Revert an UEFI patch which caused a regression * Add a missing check for EFI runtime services * Fix

[GIT pull] x86 updates for 3.11

2013-07-13 Thread Thomas Gleixner
Linus, please pull the latest x86-urgent-for-linus git tree from: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git x86-urgent-for-linus * Guarantee IDT page alignment * Revert an UEFI patch which caused a regression * Add a missing check for EFI runtime services * Fix

Re: [GIT pull] x86 updates for 3.11

2013-07-13 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 4:21 AM, Thomas Gleixner t...@linutronix.de wrote: * Guarantee IDT page alignment What the F*CK, guys? This piece-of-shit commit is marked for stable, but you clearly never even test-compiled it, did you? Because on x86-64 (the which is the only place where the

Re: [GIT pull] x86 updates for 3.11

2013-07-13 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Fail on me. I got rushed and sloppy. I really need to automate looking for warnings pre-commit and not rely on Fengguang's robot. -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at