On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 4:36 PM, jianchao.wang
wrote:
> Hi ming
>
> Thanks for your kindly response.
>
> On 05/30/2018 04:22 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
you could keep the software queues as-is but add our own version of
flush_busy_ctxs() that only removes requests of the domain that we want.
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 4:36 PM, jianchao.wang
wrote:
> Hi ming
>
> Thanks for your kindly response.
>
> On 05/30/2018 04:22 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
you could keep the software queues as-is but add our own version of
flush_busy_ctxs() that only removes requests of the domain that we want.
Hi Jens and Holger
Thank for your kindly response.
That's really appreciated.
I will post next version based on Jens' patch.
Thanks
Jianchao
On 05/23/2018 02:32 AM, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
This looks great but prevents kyber from being built as module,
which is AFAIK supposed to
Hi Jens and Holger
Thank for your kindly response.
That's really appreciated.
I will post next version based on Jens' patch.
Thanks
Jianchao
On 05/23/2018 02:32 AM, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
This looks great but prevents kyber from being built as module,
which is AFAIK supposed to
Hi Omar
Thanks for your kindly response.
On 05/23/2018 04:02 AM, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:48:29PM +0800, Jianchao Wang wrote:
>> Currently, kyber is very unfriendly with merging. kyber depends
>> on ctx rq_list to do merging, however, most of time, it will not
>> leave
Hi Omar
Thanks for your kindly response.
On 05/23/2018 04:02 AM, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:48:29PM +0800, Jianchao Wang wrote:
>> Currently, kyber is very unfriendly with merging. kyber depends
>> on ctx rq_list to do merging, however, most of time, it will not
>> leave
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:48:29PM +0800, Jianchao Wang wrote:
> Currently, kyber is very unfriendly with merging. kyber depends
> on ctx rq_list to do merging, however, most of time, it will not
> leave any requests in ctx rq_list. This is because even if tokens
> of one domain is used up, kyber
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 10:48:29PM +0800, Jianchao Wang wrote:
> Currently, kyber is very unfriendly with merging. kyber depends
> on ctx rq_list to do merging, however, most of time, it will not
> leave any requests in ctx rq_list. This is because even if tokens
> of one domain is used up, kyber
On 05/22/18 19:46, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 5/22/18 10:20 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 5/22/18 10:17 AM, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
>>> On 05/22/18 16:48, Jianchao Wang wrote:
Currently, kyber is very unfriendly with merging. kyber depends
on ctx rq_list to do merging, however, most of time,
On 05/22/18 19:46, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 5/22/18 10:20 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 5/22/18 10:17 AM, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
>>> On 05/22/18 16:48, Jianchao Wang wrote:
Currently, kyber is very unfriendly with merging. kyber depends
on ctx rq_list to do merging, however, most of time,
On 5/22/18 10:20 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 5/22/18 10:17 AM, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
>> On 05/22/18 16:48, Jianchao Wang wrote:
>>> Currently, kyber is very unfriendly with merging. kyber depends
>>> on ctx rq_list to do merging, however, most of time, it will not
>>> leave any requests in ctx
On 5/22/18 10:20 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 5/22/18 10:17 AM, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
>> On 05/22/18 16:48, Jianchao Wang wrote:
>>> Currently, kyber is very unfriendly with merging. kyber depends
>>> on ctx rq_list to do merging, however, most of time, it will not
>>> leave any requests in ctx
On 05/22/18 16:48, Jianchao Wang wrote:
> Currently, kyber is very unfriendly with merging. kyber depends
> on ctx rq_list to do merging, however, most of time, it will not
> leave any requests in ctx rq_list. This is because even if tokens
> of one domain is used up, kyber will try to dispatch
On 05/22/18 16:48, Jianchao Wang wrote:
> Currently, kyber is very unfriendly with merging. kyber depends
> on ctx rq_list to do merging, however, most of time, it will not
> leave any requests in ctx rq_list. This is because even if tokens
> of one domain is used up, kyber will try to dispatch
On 5/22/18 10:17 AM, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> On 05/22/18 16:48, Jianchao Wang wrote:
>> Currently, kyber is very unfriendly with merging. kyber depends
>> on ctx rq_list to do merging, however, most of time, it will not
>> leave any requests in ctx rq_list. This is because even if tokens
>> of
On 5/22/18 10:17 AM, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> On 05/22/18 16:48, Jianchao Wang wrote:
>> Currently, kyber is very unfriendly with merging. kyber depends
>> on ctx rq_list to do merging, however, most of time, it will not
>> leave any requests in ctx rq_list. This is because even if tokens
>> of
Currently, kyber is very unfriendly with merging. kyber depends
on ctx rq_list to do merging, however, most of time, it will not
leave any requests in ctx rq_list. This is because even if tokens
of one domain is used up, kyber will try to dispatch requests
from other domain and flush the rq_list
Currently, kyber is very unfriendly with merging. kyber depends
on ctx rq_list to do merging, however, most of time, it will not
leave any requests in ctx rq_list. This is because even if tokens
of one domain is used up, kyber will try to dispatch requests
from other domain and flush the rq_list
18 matches
Mail list logo
