On Mon 09-04-18 22:31:19, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> dquot_init() is never called in atomic context.
> This function is only set as a parameter of fs_initcall().
>
> Despite never getting called from atomic context,
> dquot_init() calls __get_free_pages() with GFP_ATOMIC,
> which waits busily for
On Mon 09-04-18 22:31:19, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> dquot_init() is never called in atomic context.
> This function is only set as a parameter of fs_initcall().
>
> Despite never getting called from atomic context,
> dquot_init() calls __get_free_pages() with GFP_ATOMIC,
> which waits busily for
dquot_init() is never called in atomic context.
This function is only set as a parameter of fs_initcall().
Despite never getting called from atomic context,
dquot_init() calls __get_free_pages() with GFP_ATOMIC,
which waits busily for allocation.
GFP_ATOMIC is not necessary and can be replaced
dquot_init() is never called in atomic context.
This function is only set as a parameter of fs_initcall().
Despite never getting called from atomic context,
dquot_init() calls __get_free_pages() with GFP_ATOMIC,
which waits busily for allocation.
GFP_ATOMIC is not necessary and can be replaced
4 matches
Mail list logo