Re: [PATCH] ipmi: kcs_bmc: mark expected switch fall-through in kcs_bmc_handle_data

2018-02-16 Thread Wang, Haiyue
On 2018-02-15 05:46, Corey Minyard wrote: On 02/14/2018 11:30 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Thanks, queued for next release. -corey Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1465255 ("Missing break

Re: [PATCH] ipmi: kcs_bmc: mark expected switch fall-through in kcs_bmc_handle_data

2018-02-14 Thread Gustavo A. R. Silva
On 02/14/2018 03:46 PM, Corey Minyard wrote: On 02/14/2018 11:30 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Thanks, queued for next release. Thanks, Corey. -- Gustavo

Re: [PATCH] ipmi: kcs_bmc: mark expected switch fall-through in kcs_bmc_handle_data

2018-02-14 Thread Corey Minyard
On 02/14/2018 11:30 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Thanks, queued for next release. -corey Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1465255 ("Missing break in switch") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silv

[PATCH] ipmi: kcs_bmc: mark expected switch fall-through in kcs_bmc_handle_data

2018-02-14 Thread Gustavo A. R. Silva
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1465255 ("Missing break in switch") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva --- This code was compiled with GCC 7.3.0 drivers/char/ipmi/kcs_bmc.c | 1 + 1 file changed,