Re: [PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc: update kernel-doc comments for dw_mci

2018-02-27 Thread Jaehoon Chung
On 02/27/2018 08:36 PM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> On 02/27/2018 08:28 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 23 February 2018 at 07:30, Jaehoon Chung  wrote:
>>> On 02/23/2018 10:40 AM, Shawn Lin wrote:
 Hi Alexey,

 On 2018/2/23 3:45, Alexey Roslyakov wrote:
> cur_slot and num_slots has been removed from struct dw_mci in 
> 42f989c002f2.
> Unfortunately, inline documentation was not updated so far.
>
> Fix @lock field documentation in Locking section.
> Move @mrq field of struct dw_mci_slot mention closer to it
> description, so no one could miss this slightest detail.
>
> Couple of code style fixes as a bonus.
>

 Thanks for updating these.

 Reviewed-by: Shawn Lin 
>>>
>>> Thanks! Will apply this with Shawn's Reveiwed-by tag.
>>
>> Dear Jaehoon, I picked this up for next and by adding your ack. Tell
>> me if you have objections!
> 
> Sure! No problem!
> 
> Acekd-by: Jaehoon Chung 

Typo..

Acked-by: Jaehoon Chung 

> 
> Best Regards,
> Jaehoon Chung
> 
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> Thanks and kind regards
>> Uffe
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
>> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>>
>>
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> 
> 



Re: [PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc: update kernel-doc comments for dw_mci

2018-02-27 Thread Jaehoon Chung
On 02/27/2018 08:28 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 23 February 2018 at 07:30, Jaehoon Chung  wrote:
>> On 02/23/2018 10:40 AM, Shawn Lin wrote:
>>> Hi Alexey,
>>>
>>> On 2018/2/23 3:45, Alexey Roslyakov wrote:
 cur_slot and num_slots has been removed from struct dw_mci in 42f989c002f2.
 Unfortunately, inline documentation was not updated so far.

 Fix @lock field documentation in Locking section.
 Move @mrq field of struct dw_mci_slot mention closer to it
 description, so no one could miss this slightest detail.

 Couple of code style fixes as a bonus.

>>>
>>> Thanks for updating these.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Shawn Lin 
>>
>> Thanks! Will apply this with Shawn's Reveiwed-by tag.
> 
> Dear Jaehoon, I picked this up for next and by adding your ack. Tell
> me if you have objections!

Sure! No problem!

Acekd-by: Jaehoon Chung 

Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung

> 
> [...]
> 
> Thanks and kind regards
> Uffe
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> 
> 



Re: [PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc: update kernel-doc comments for dw_mci

2018-02-27 Thread Ulf Hansson
On 23 February 2018 at 07:30, Jaehoon Chung  wrote:
> On 02/23/2018 10:40 AM, Shawn Lin wrote:
>> Hi Alexey,
>>
>> On 2018/2/23 3:45, Alexey Roslyakov wrote:
>>> cur_slot and num_slots has been removed from struct dw_mci in 42f989c002f2.
>>> Unfortunately, inline documentation was not updated so far.
>>>
>>> Fix @lock field documentation in Locking section.
>>> Move @mrq field of struct dw_mci_slot mention closer to it
>>> description, so no one could miss this slightest detail.
>>>
>>> Couple of code style fixes as a bonus.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for updating these.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Shawn Lin 
>
> Thanks! Will apply this with Shawn's Reveiwed-by tag.

Dear Jaehoon, I picked this up for next and by adding your ack. Tell
me if you have objections!

[...]

Thanks and kind regards
Uffe


Re: [PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc: update kernel-doc comments for dw_mci

2018-02-22 Thread Shawn Lin

Hi Alexey,

On 2018/2/23 3:45, Alexey Roslyakov wrote:

cur_slot and num_slots has been removed from struct dw_mci in 42f989c002f2.
Unfortunately, inline documentation was not updated so far.

Fix @lock field documentation in Locking section.
Move @mrq field of struct dw_mci_slot mention closer to it
description, so no one could miss this slightest detail.

Couple of code style fixes as a bonus.



Thanks for updating these.

Reviewed-by: Shawn Lin 


Signed-off-by: Alexey Roslyakov 
---
  drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h | 19 +--
  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h
index e3124f06a47e..451bc0862493 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h
@@ -65,8 +65,7 @@ struct dw_mci_dma_slave {
   * @fifo_reg: Pointer to MMIO registers for data FIFO
   * @sg: Scatterlist entry currently being processed by PIO code, if any.
   * @sg_miter: PIO mapping scatterlist iterator.
- * @cur_slot: The slot which is currently using the controller.
- * @mrq: The request currently being processed on @cur_slot,
+ * @mrq: The request currently being processed on @slot,
   *or NULL if the controller is idle.
   * @cmd: The command currently being sent to the card, or NULL.
   * @data: The data currently being transferred, or NULL if no data
@@ -102,7 +101,6 @@ struct dw_mci_dma_slave {
   * @bus_hz: The rate of @mck in Hz. This forms the basis for MMC bus
   *rate and timeout calculations.
   * @current_speed: Configured rate of the controller.
- * @num_slots: Number of slots available.
   * @fifoth_val: The value of FIFOTH register.
   * @verid: Denote Version ID.
   * @dev: Device associated with the MMC controller.
@@ -134,17 +132,17 @@ struct dw_mci_dma_slave {
   * ===
   *
   * @lock is a softirq-safe spinlock protecting @queue as well as
+ * @slot, @mrq and @state. These must always be updated
   * at the same time while holding @lock.
+ * The @mrq field of struct dw_mci_slot is also protected by @lock,
+ * and must always be written at the same time as the slot is added to
+ * @queue.
   *
   * @irq_lock is an irq-safe spinlock protecting the INTMASK register
   * to allow the interrupt handler to modify it directly.  Held for only long
   * enough to read-modify-write INTMASK and no other locks are grabbed when
   * holding this one.
   *
- * The @mrq field of struct dw_mci_slot is also protected by @lock,
- * and must always be written at the same time as the slot is added to
- * @queue.
- *
   * @pending_events and @completed_events are accessed using atomic bit
   * operations, so they don't need any locking.
   *
@@ -321,8 +319,8 @@ struct dw_mci_board {
  #define SDMMC_ENABLE_SHIFT0x110
  #define SDMMC_DATA(x) (x)
  /*
-* Registers to support idmac 64-bit address mode
-*/
+ * Registers to support idmac 64-bit address mode
+ */
  #define SDMMC_DBADDRL 0x088
  #define SDMMC_DBADDRU 0x08c
  #define SDMMC_IDSTS64 0x090
@@ -449,7 +447,8 @@ struct dw_mci_board {
(SDMMC_CTRL_RESET | SDMMC_CTRL_FIFO_RESET | SDMMC_CTRL_DMA_RESET)
  
  /* FIFO register access macros. These should not change the data endian-ness

- * as they are written to memory to be dealt with by the upper layers */
+ * as they are written to memory to be dealt with by the upper layers
+ */
  #define mci_fifo_readw(__reg) __raw_readw(__reg)
  #define mci_fifo_readl(__reg) __raw_readl(__reg)
  #define mci_fifo_readq(__reg) __raw_readq(__reg)





[PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc: update kernel-doc comments for dw_mci

2018-02-22 Thread Alexey Roslyakov
cur_slot and num_slots has been removed from struct dw_mci in 42f989c002f2.
Unfortunately, inline documentation was not updated so far.

Fix @lock field documentation in Locking section.
Move @mrq field of struct dw_mci_slot mention closer to it
description, so no one could miss this slightest detail.

Couple of code style fixes as a bonus.

Signed-off-by: Alexey Roslyakov 
---
 drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h | 19 +--
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h
index e3124f06a47e..451bc0862493 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h
@@ -65,8 +65,7 @@ struct dw_mci_dma_slave {
  * @fifo_reg: Pointer to MMIO registers for data FIFO
  * @sg: Scatterlist entry currently being processed by PIO code, if any.
  * @sg_miter: PIO mapping scatterlist iterator.
- * @cur_slot: The slot which is currently using the controller.
- * @mrq: The request currently being processed on @cur_slot,
+ * @mrq: The request currently being processed on @slot,
  * or NULL if the controller is idle.
  * @cmd: The command currently being sent to the card, or NULL.
  * @data: The data currently being transferred, or NULL if no data
@@ -102,7 +101,6 @@ struct dw_mci_dma_slave {
  * @bus_hz: The rate of @mck in Hz. This forms the basis for MMC bus
  * rate and timeout calculations.
  * @current_speed: Configured rate of the controller.
- * @num_slots: Number of slots available.
  * @fifoth_val: The value of FIFOTH register.
  * @verid: Denote Version ID.
  * @dev: Device associated with the MMC controller.
@@ -134,17 +132,17 @@ struct dw_mci_dma_slave {
  * ===
  *
  * @lock is a softirq-safe spinlock protecting @queue as well as
+ * @slot, @mrq and @state. These must always be updated
  * at the same time while holding @lock.
+ * The @mrq field of struct dw_mci_slot is also protected by @lock,
+ * and must always be written at the same time as the slot is added to
+ * @queue.
  *
  * @irq_lock is an irq-safe spinlock protecting the INTMASK register
  * to allow the interrupt handler to modify it directly.  Held for only long
  * enough to read-modify-write INTMASK and no other locks are grabbed when
  * holding this one.
  *
- * The @mrq field of struct dw_mci_slot is also protected by @lock,
- * and must always be written at the same time as the slot is added to
- * @queue.
- *
  * @pending_events and @completed_events are accessed using atomic bit
  * operations, so they don't need any locking.
  *
@@ -321,8 +319,8 @@ struct dw_mci_board {
 #define SDMMC_ENABLE_SHIFT 0x110
 #define SDMMC_DATA(x)  (x)
 /*
-* Registers to support idmac 64-bit address mode
-*/
+ * Registers to support idmac 64-bit address mode
+ */
 #define SDMMC_DBADDRL  0x088
 #define SDMMC_DBADDRU  0x08c
 #define SDMMC_IDSTS64  0x090
@@ -449,7 +447,8 @@ struct dw_mci_board {
(SDMMC_CTRL_RESET | SDMMC_CTRL_FIFO_RESET | SDMMC_CTRL_DMA_RESET)
 
 /* FIFO register access macros. These should not change the data endian-ness
- * as they are written to memory to be dealt with by the upper layers */
+ * as they are written to memory to be dealt with by the upper layers
+ */
 #define mci_fifo_readw(__reg)  __raw_readw(__reg)
 #define mci_fifo_readl(__reg)  __raw_readl(__reg)
 #define mci_fifo_readq(__reg)  __raw_readq(__reg)
-- 
2.16.1