Ping?
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
wrote:
> Hi
>
>>>
>>> Unsinged long is more than enough for s3an. I think v7 is ok.
>>
>> Then, why did you change the spi_nor_s3an_addr_convert() prototype?
>>
>
> Because it is used in spi_nor_read and
Ping?
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
wrote:
> Hi
>
>>>
>>> Unsinged long is more than enough for s3an. I think v7 is ok.
>>
>> Then, why did you change the spi_nor_s3an_addr_convert() prototype?
>>
>
> Because it is used in spi_nor_read and spi_nor_write, which use
Hi
>>
>> Unsinged long is more than enough for s3an. I think v7 is ok.
>
> Then, why did you change the spi_nor_s3an_addr_convert() prototype?
>
Because it is used in spi_nor_read and spi_nor_write, which use loff_t.
I think it is more clean to have only one comment explaining the max
size of
Hi
>>
>> Unsinged long is more than enough for s3an. I think v7 is ok.
>
> Then, why did you change the spi_nor_s3an_addr_convert() prototype?
>
Because it is used in spi_nor_read and spi_nor_write, which use loff_t.
I think it is more clean to have only one comment explaining the max
size of
On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 10:19:10 +0200
Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
> Hi Boris
>
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Boris Brezillon
> wrote:
> > Wait. If you really want to manipulate an loff_t variable, you can do
> >
> >
On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 10:19:10 +0200
Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
> Hi Boris
>
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Boris Brezillon
> wrote:
> > Wait. If you really want to manipulate an loff_t variable, you can do
> >
> > offset = do_div(addr, nor->page_size);
> >
> >
> >
> that
On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 10:14:20 +0200
Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 09:57:23 +0200
> Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
>
> > Hi Boris
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Boris Brezillon
> >
On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 10:14:20 +0200
Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 09:57:23 +0200
> Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
>
> > Hi Boris
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Boris Brezillon
> > wrote:
> > > Hi Ricardo,
> > >
> > > Please try to pass the version in your subject
Hi Boris
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Boris Brezillon
wrote:
> Wait. If you really want to manipulate an loff_t variable, you can do
>
> offset = do_div(addr, nor->page_size);
>
>
>
that leads to:
CC drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.o
Hi Boris
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Boris Brezillon
wrote:
> Wait. If you really want to manipulate an loff_t variable, you can do
>
> offset = do_div(addr, nor->page_size);
>
>
>
that leads to:
CC drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.o
drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c: In function
On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 09:57:23 +0200
Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
> Hi Boris
>
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Boris Brezillon
> wrote:
> > Hi Ricardo,
> >
> > Please try to pass the version in your subject prefix (pass
> >
On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 09:57:23 +0200
Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
> Hi Boris
>
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Boris Brezillon
> wrote:
> > Hi Ricardo,
> >
> > Please try to pass the version in your subject prefix (pass
> > --subject-prefix="PATCH vX" to git format-patch).
> >
>
> Sorry
Hi Boris
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Boris Brezillon
wrote:
> Hi Ricardo,
>
> Please try to pass the version in your subject prefix (pass
> --subject-prefix="PATCH vX" to git format-patch).
>
Sorry about that.
> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 17:45:51 +0200
>
Hi Boris
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Boris Brezillon
wrote:
> Hi Ricardo,
>
> Please try to pass the version in your subject prefix (pass
> --subject-prefix="PATCH vX" to git format-patch).
>
Sorry about that.
> On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 17:45:51 +0200
> Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
>> /*
Hi Ricardo,
Please try to pass the version in your subject prefix (pass
--subject-prefix="PATCH vX" to git format-patch).
On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 17:45:51 +0200
Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
> Xilinx Spartan-3AN FPGAs contain an In-System Flash where they keep
> their
Hi Ricardo,
Please try to pass the version in your subject prefix (pass
--subject-prefix="PATCH vX" to git format-patch).
On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 17:45:51 +0200
Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
> Xilinx Spartan-3AN FPGAs contain an In-System Flash where they keep
> their configuration data and
Xilinx Spartan-3AN FPGAs contain an In-System Flash where they keep
their configuration data and (optionally) some user data.
The protocol of this flash follows most of the spi-nor standard. With
the following differences:
- Page size might not be a power of two.
- The address calculation
Xilinx Spartan-3AN FPGAs contain an In-System Flash where they keep
their configuration data and (optionally) some user data.
The protocol of this flash follows most of the spi-nor standard. With
the following differences:
- Page size might not be a power of two.
- The address calculation
Hello
It has been almost two months :)... Any feedback about the patch
before I port it to the next version and resend?
Regards!
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
wrote:
> ping?
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
>
Hello
It has been almost two months :)... Any feedback about the patch
before I port it to the next version and resend?
Regards!
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
wrote:
> ping?
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
> wrote:
>> Xilinx
ping?
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
wrote:
> Xilinx Spartan-3AN contain an embedded spi device where they keep their
> configuration data and optionally some user data.
>
> The protocol of this flash follows most of the spi-nor standard. With
> the following
ping?
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado
wrote:
> Xilinx Spartan-3AN contain an embedded spi device where they keep their
> configuration data and optionally some user data.
>
> The protocol of this flash follows most of the spi-nor standard.
22 matches
Mail list logo